Mini 1435 - Jimmy Neutron Mafia
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mathdino
He's already trying to tell the cop who to investigate on page 1 and he is trying to pigeon hole KBW as someone who shouldn't be taken seriously because he "skimmed a few games". That's just plain mean. Give the guy a chance.
There is scum motivation here in both scenarios with Math being scum.
1. Math and KBW are scum. Math thinks he is useless and is bussing him to get towncred.
2. Math is scum and KBW is town. Math is pushing an easy lynch and getting a cop to investigate KBW.
P-edit:
That was a bad post Amethyst. Try again.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Directing a cop inspection is not townie no matter what you say. You should eat rope for that alone.
You're being passive aggressive with lynching KBW here by saying "he's consistently anti-town and the cop should check him. But don't lynch him. No policy lynches." You're giving people reasons to lynch him while not actively doing it yourself so you don't get the blame.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 112, Amethyst Actor wrote:do what you just did. if you're going to post, at least make some kind of content
Mom Agree's. Elyse looks fishy, she's the one that we are both fully on the same page on.
the first thing that set me off was the non-chalance Elyse had to my putting pressure on her. she tried to defelct it casually but didn't do it very well, In other words, the non-chalance looks forced. she also seems very keen on twisting Dino's words to use it against him.
I didn't deflect anything. If you're referring to "You're Marangal and your post is still bad", that's not deflection. I was acknowledging who you were and letting you know that I still thought your post was bad. How is that forced nonchalance?
In post 113, gangsta_duck41 wrote:I don't see how you all (cough cough Mathdino) found Salamence the towniest. Can you give me any evidence? He has too few posts to show that he's town, I think. And as I recall, didn't he support KBW's policy lynch from the beginning?
I would strongly suggest against Salamence getting the invention. If anything, he's the scummiest.
Edit:Now that I think about it, Elyse is also scummy.
The bolded is absolute bullshit. You didn't think I was scummy enough to mention it in your post, but when someone else says it, all of a sudden I'm scum?
In post 116, gangsta_duck41 wrote:I suppose you do have a point... After looking over his posts, I take back what I said about him being scummy.
Also, KBW, if you have any hope of staying in this game, as Amethyst pointed out, I would suggestnotmaking useless posts. A lot of people would agree to lynching you if you continue.
Backtracking and then fluff.
In post 134, Mathdino wrote:Mod, can we get a vote count?
Elyse: Seems to have a case of tunnel vision and enjoys twisting words around. Her case seems more null-scum to me.
It's the second day the game is open. I'm sorry if I've been focusing on one person for one day.
And I haven't twisted any words around.
Mathdino's passive aggressive nature was a good thing to push us out of RVS. While I still think he is scummy, especially concerning the cop inspection, I can see where he is coming from after rereading.
UNVOTE: Mathdino
VOTE: gangsta_duck41
Sheeping reads, faking reads, going with whomever, hypocrisy, etc.
I'm getting a townread on Amethyst, fuzzy, mozamis, and Grandi for now, in strength order. My top scumreads are gansta_duck, and Mathdino.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 163, Amethyst Actor wrote:why can't you? momma will try to explain
Pedit: Yeah, I realize that it was a bad post, but calling it out as such wasn't necessary, and it was an over-reaction.... /doesn'twanttogodownthatroadagain
Well, I always call things as they are, so if someone makes a bad post, I'll be the one to call them out on it.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 209, gangsta_duck41 wrote:@ Elyse:
Elyse wrote:The bolded is absolute bullshit. You didn't think I was scummy enough to mention it in your post, but when someone else says it, all of a sudden I'm scum?
I didn't mention it in my post because Amethyst had already posted it. It would be kind of stupid if I responded to "Hey, I think Elyse might be scummy!" with "Hey, I think Elyse is scummy!". (my inner Grammar Nazi is yelling at me...) Also, I never said you werescum, I said you werescummy. I understand them to be different things. I realize now that that part of my post was completely unnecessary, and shouldn't have been included. At the time, I was setting myself up to analyze your posts. But this game is going by really fast, and I haven't had the time (until my next post).
You're flat out lying. You only mentioned it in your preview edit because you saw AA mention it. Going by the logic you just used, youshouldn'thave mentioned my apparent scumminess, because AA did. But, the only reason you mentioned it wasbecauseAA mentioned it, negating your logic.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 216, Mathdino wrote:
However, on the topic of Elyse, it's entirely possible that she's scum capitalising on a townie's slip-ups. I honestly don't think GD's behaviour prior to her original case was that scummy. So if we do lynch either of them, and they flip town, we lynch the other.
I really, really don't like this. This is lynchworthy material. Like I almost spazzed out reading this. How am I supposed to know if slip-ups are townie or scum? I'm going to call out slip-ups regardless, because I don't know the person who slipped's alignment. GD had four posts before his scummy post. It's not like he was a gleaming townie and had one bad post. It was his fifth post. Everyone is usually null at post 5. The last sentence is the worst. This is a common scum tactic. You lynch one, they're town, and then use their town flip to lynch the other. Oops. That one comes up town too. Two mislynches in a row. Lining up lynches is never something town does.
Gangsta wrote:
In post 49, Elyse wrote:UNVOTE:
VOTE: Mathdino
He's already trying to tell the cop who to investigate on page 1 and he is trying to pigeon hole KBW as someone who shouldn't be taken seriously because he "skimmed a few games". That's just plain mean. Give the guy a chance.
There is scum motivation here in both scenarios with Math being scum.
1. Math and KBW are scum. Math thinks he is useless and is bussing him to get towncred.
2. Math is scum and KBW is town. Math is pushing an easy lynch and getting a cop to investigate KBW.
Okay. You're overreacting here. He only made a suggestion. He didn't blatantly tell the cop what to do. I understand the rest of your reasoning in the first part of the post, though.
Actually, he did tell the cop what to do.
Gangsta wrote:
However, you overreact again in the second part. I think it's a bit premature to be suggesting alliances during the second page of discussion... It looks to me like you're going for a quick lynch.
I also think it's a bit premature to pigeon hole a player as useless on page two. But that might just be me.
Gangsta wrote:
Also, you have really shitty logic for the second part. You can ALWAYS justify scum motivation by attacking the town or bussing. That means nothing.
That's not true.
Gangsta wrote:
In post 52, Elyse wrote: You're Marangal.
And you post was still bad.
This is fluff/clarification.
No. This is letting Marangal know that her identity does affect my opinion of her post.
Gangsta wrote:
In post 60, Elyse wrote:Directing a cop inspection is not townie no matter what you say. You should eat rope for that alone.
You're being passive aggressive with lynching KBW here by saying "he's consistently anti-town and the cop should check him. But don't lynch him. No policy lynches." You're giving people reasons to lynch him while not actively doing it yourself so you don't get the blame.
Again, I think Mathdino was only giving a warning. I can explain why I think he is innocent in this regard (not in all...) in more detail later, but not in this post. Many of his earlier posts also strongly discourage everyone from voting for a PL.
Even if this post was made before Mathdino kept repeating that he didn't want a PL, you still think that he's scummy.
As for the whole reverse psychology thing you claim he is trying to perform, I don't think enough people took Mathdino's suspicion seriously enough to be like "He says we shouldn't do this, therefore, we should do this!" If this confuses you, tell me (I am really bad at explaining things).
I've already heard all of his from Mathdino. Why are you repeating him? More importantly, why are you answering for him?
Gangsta wrote:
In post 76, Elyse wrote:Mathdino is trying to discredit KBW even though, according to Mathdino, he's usually town anyway.
This is just a clarification. I have already expressed my disagreement with her position.
Are you sure you aren't Mathdino's alt or something? You're answering as if you are him.
Gangsta wrote:
In post 157, Amethyst Actor wrote:Pedit: damn elyse, chill. I'll answer you shortly
I agree with them here. You are fighting too relentlessly. If you are town, you should use this time to find out who is scum, not to endlessly argue that you're right.
I'm proving my point about who I think is scum. Sorry if you don't like my aggression, but that's my playstyle.
Gangsta wrote:
In post 212, Elyse wrote:You're flat out lying. You only mentioned it in your preview edit because you saw AA mention it. Going by the logic you just used, you shouldn't have mentioned my apparent scumminess, because AA did. But, the only reason you mentioned it was because AA mentioned it, negating your logic.
Your logic for negating my logic is bad. Perhaps you misunderstood, or I explained it badly (probably the latter). I was saying that I was stupid to include that in my post. I shouldn't have included it in the first place. At the time, I made a quick (and stupid) decision to include that in my post, thinking that it would set me up for an analysis later. Now, not only do I realize just how stupid it was to include it, but I don't even need that to set up an analysis because you attacked me first. It was only through hindsight that I gave that reasoning.
Mathdino already explained why I'm right and you're wrong. I'll let you respond to him about that.
Gangsta wrote:
In conclusion, Elyse has attacked both me and Mathdino wholeheartedly. To me, this shows that she is only trying for quick lynches. This then leads me to believe that she is scum, or at the very least an unhelpful townie.
This is really bad. Since when does attacking someone mean they are trying to quicklynch them? I do not want a quicklynch, have never wanted one, and never even mentioned one. You are also heavily buddying with Mathdino.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
@Gangsta
By "that's not true", I meant that it didn't apply to the situation.
I only have one completed town game and it was my second game onsite. I had never played as town before and we lost horribly. I have ongoing games where you could see this, but of course you can't use it because it's ongoing.
But if your sticking point on me being scum is my aggression, that just proves how weak your case is.
Also, I still think Dino is scum, Salamence, so I agree with you there. What are your thoughts on gangsta and AA?-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
I hate doing reads lists like these, but apparently I'm tunneling so here we go:
_Zaradi_ - Null
Amethyst Actor - Town
BT - Null
fuzzybutternut - Nullscum
gangsta_duck41 - Scum
Grandi - Town
Keybladewielder - Null
Mathdino - Scum
MonkeyMan576 - Nulltown
mozamis - Scum
Salamence20 - Null
Z3r0 - Null
I really don't like mozamis' last few posts. Wouldn't mind his lynch either.
Gangsta, why do you keep asking people why they think me v. you is town v. scum?-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
I don't get why BT is obvtown, can someone explain it to me?
In post 370, Bacde wrote:In post 76, Elyse wrote:Mathdino is trying to discredit KBW even though, according to Mathdino, he's usually town anyway.
P-edit: And he's going to continue to do that if people like you treat him like you're doing now.
not liking this post
Everyone is usually town
But elyse includes the phrase "according to mathdino" to incriminate him
My point was that Mathdino was subtly trying to get KBW lynched while admitting he was probably town. Yes, I know everyone is probably town, but Mathdino said he acted like a troll as town.
In post 371, Bacde wrote:I don't think its a bad idea at all to suggest that an investigative role use their nightaction on a particularly hard player to read (one interpreted as a troll, for instance)
Yes, it is.
Also saying someone is scummy because of tone is dumb and inconclusive. It's hard to convey tone over the Internet anyway.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 378, Bacde wrote:Elyse I'll accept you as town if you vote the invention to go to me
Nah-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 387, Bacde wrote:In post 384, Elyse wrote:In post 378, Bacde wrote:Elyse I'll accept you as town if you vote the invention to go to me
Nah
You should do it
I don't want to have to lynch you over something so trivial
Yeah, I would hate to die over something like that too. Oh well.
In post 395, Amethyst Actor wrote: You've made a rather elaborate case on Elyse
LOL. His case on me is not elaborate at all. Are you actually serious?
Pretty sure that's a joke.
Vote Invention: Grandi-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 408, Amethyst Actor wrote:
@ Elyse, Town points for not falling in line, That's a scummy request no matter how you look at it. (Looks townie at first glance (go for your known confirmed town) but it can be very sinister and perfect for scum (go for a scum member who would seem town.)
What is this in reference too?
@Zaradi
What Monkey said isn't indicative of alignment.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 463, Mathdino wrote:Lemme put it to you this way: if a clone of KBW replaced BT, would it make any sense to keep the vote on him? I'm going to judge the new guy based on how he plays, not on how BT did. Right now AA is the towniest person who's still in the game, so I'm going AA.
I understand that, but you initially said:
In post 457, Mathdino wrote:Because I don't know who's replacing BT yet. May be a total incompetent.If his replacement is way town, I'll probably give it to him instead.
Edit: Oooookay... who are you thinking then?
The bolded is not what you explained.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 527, MonkeyMan576 wrote:If you're playing the Survivor TV series, would you be more likely to vote off the guy that says "I'm the best, keep me in the game. I'm not going to say why, just do it!" or the guy that talks to other people in the game, researches people, and decides on a course of action based on that?
I'd keep the guy who says he's the best because strategic people are too dangerous.
But that's survivor. Not mafia.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
In post 586, gangsta_duck41 wrote:Hello!
Sorry... Personal stuff came up.
Is there any way I can defend myself?
Nah, you should just claim scum.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
You're manner is completely different here. The way you pursued gangsta was not cocky. Confident maybe, but not cocky. Saying that things are sexy and speaking like the way you did with mozamis is cocky.
Playing with you (Marangal) before, I know you are stubborn. I've never seen you act like this though.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
If your first response was that or post 667, then I would've been fine. But your kneejerk response was saying it was in the flavor. THAT is a scumslip.
Also, AA, I don't want to go through your Mozamis case. It's not my job to fight someone's battles for them. If it was a good case I would be all up on Moza, but it's not. I'm not going to pick apart why it's bad. That's Moza's job.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
Here's my point.
A townie who said "Since there are three scum" and is questioned about it would say the truth. Something to the effect of "I just assumed there were three scum. There usually are."
A scum who gets caught like this would try to find somewhere where it says there are three scum, like Mathdino tried (and failed) to do, rather than just say the truth. He even tried to pass it off as nothing when he says "What's the issue here?" Clearly, he knows what I mean.-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013
-
-
Elyse Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6363
- Joined: February 8, 2013