VOTE: mod for voting pedantry
and
for reasons.
In post 49, Voidedmafia wrote:I"m pretty sure asking for setups is just for the sake of asking. Katsuki's attempt to ask for them last game didn't seem to be very fruitful to me.
Still waiting on Sharper.
In post 71, PimHel wrote:Not liking Serra voting 'with reason'.
In post 76, Varsoon wrote:Hey, I'm talkative.
And, besides, it's like...
USERS CURRENTLY BROWSING THIS FORUM: Varsoon
In post 92, shos wrote:!vote Varsoon
Serra brought it to my attention that Varsoon has responded too heavily to the 'accusation' of sorta-lurking.
In post 108, Syryana wrote:Either we can choose to massclaim or not.
In post 114, BBmolla wrote:Post 110 sucked. Hard.
In post 122, Syryana wrote:In post 120, serrapaladin wrote:
Sarcastically calling Syr's post vacuous or disagreeing with a mass lynch?
I think you mean mass claim. And I wouldn't have to make vacuous posts if people wouldn't keep being deliberately obtuse about the phrase "treating this as mountainous."
Pedit, case in fucking point.
In post 124, Varsoon wrote:You've never reaction tested a possible reaction test?
In post 129, PimHel wrote:what are your exact thoughts about Sharper, Varsoon and Syry?
In post 128, PimHel wrote:If you think that one of the active players is scum, you should give us something. Not a possibility, as that's fake.
In post 225, Parama wrote:Well I can 100% guarantee you that BB isn't mafia in this game, or even a harmful third. He's either town or jester, so lynching him is bad.
And I liked you before but your stubborn insistence to not logic is baffling
Para's hammered, your and UT's position are objectively the most worrying, and I find Syr's vote bad in light of his recent voting.In post 327, PimHel wrote:So first you only mention Parama for his vote on Varsoon, then after some time you mention me and UT as bad votes and now Syry?
Seriously?
Are you being serious?In post 354, Parama wrote:where am I defending Molla
he's jester
don't lynch him because in xylbot I'm pretty sure jester lynch ends game (could check but)
the end
Umm, our last Xylbot had two two-man teams...In post 363, shos wrote:as always.
trips me up a bit, as scum can't be normal inventors, and if his role is the normal inventor, he should know that.In post 424, shos wrote:Why would a scum inventor tarfet townies
So I'm scum for my quick change if he's scum and I'm scum for my fake read if he's town? My initial vote on Untrod was mostly because he was being useless, but given we're down to 10, probably with a good 5 non-town role, I thought better of it. Syry and shos have both been objectively more scummy. Best case, Untrod is town who doesn't really care about the game. Worst case, he's the actual jester or something and wants to get himself lynched. Either way, I don't like his lynch at all.In post 453, PimHel wrote:First lynch Untrod.In post 450, Voidedmafia wrote:...Care to give posthumous reasoning, Syr?
If scum, attack Serra for his quick change on Untrod or Rufflig for trying to force-replacing Untrod, while Untrod is now at his peak in activity.
If town, which I doubt, Serra is still a good option for faking reads.
So leave Syry alone.
Yeah, because using policy as an RVS reason is just "transparently bad".In post 478, Syryana wrote:Pushing a policy lynch? Onpage 1? This is pretty transparently bad play. Possible jester? I originally thought so. Now we have two possible jesters, both on page 1. Interesting.
So this guy is third party? I doubt he's scum, but third party sounds about right.In post 494, The Rufflig wrote:Welcome, Tierce.
Damn it, Tierce. I've been trying to tone down my towniness so I could make it further into the games more often. Looks like I'm still a fairly easy alignment read, though. Oh well.
Why would you pick the least specific part of Tierce's case to point out? The lines you quoted are just stating how bad Para is, which doesn't constitute a case, meta or otherwise. (btw Para, you know that 1st, 2nd line etc. depends on your screen resolution and text size, right? For me that was all one line.)In post 510, Voidedmafia wrote:not meta.In post 470, Tierce wrote:Post 149 was the kind of :effort: crap Parama pulls as scum. I was fine with the hammer coming from him, but the following post was really really bad. Post 315 is equally bad. You want to see someone who clearly believes you are scum? /)U^.^U/) (\U^.^U(\
Also, you seem to be funneling her points about how you play as "meta" in general and aren't actually trying to differentiate the points...which is a problem of the strawmanistic kind (screw you all, I just made a new word). Just because the points fall under the "meta" label doesn't absolve you of having to answer them.
P-EDIT: Which is still not a reason to look for them.
In post 642, Oversoul wrote:It seems my gambit did not work as well as I had hoped.
In post 765, Syryana wrote:I'd vote, but I can't.
lolwut?In post 836, Kublai Khan wrote:||| MAFIABOT || serrapaladin - 1 (Syryana) |||