In post 1294, theslimer3 wrote:Yeah you can wait.
seriously though, it involves me re reading a lot more of the game, so it's not going to be super quick.
In post 1294, theslimer3 wrote:Yeah you can wait.
i'm talking about other stuff as well, not just specifically peng ISOIn post 1411, Wisdom wrote:It's not like she has posted much...
he seemed sincereIn post 1413, Wisdom wrote:Yeah and then you believed that he derped and forgot who he protected
hm..In post 1417, Wisdom wrote:Desperado and havingfitz weren't possible PRs?In post 1415, Mantisdreamz wrote:maybe lynching VT over possible special was what he was thinking.
you've got to be kidding me.In post 1453, Desperado wrote: My point was that her derp-level was null because, as you admitted, you've never seen mantis be this derpy at all, whereas the example mollie provided from TR is pretty clearly reflective of mantis' play here.
why does serra seem townier than Tat and/or Nat?In post 1453, Desperado wrote: You are confbiasing all over the place on serra and need to stop, seriously. I'm still confident in one scum in {serra, Nat, Tater} and of the three, I think serra is the one most likely to flip town by a fair margin.
YESIn post 1465, Wisdom wrote: Desp and penguin are scum and this serra defense is troubling me.
i was just gonna say...... but you might flip out... that i could actually potentially see a scum slimer. trying to take on the appearance of just being lazy town.In post 1486, Wisdom wrote:Mantis, if serra is town, who is the third scum?
is it cause i voted Desp earlier than unvoted him, and am now back to scum him?In post 1487, serrapaladin wrote:You're hilarious, you know that?In post 1485, Mantisdreamz wrote:think Desp is scum and was whiteknighting thenewearth
yes... so you may be right on himIn post 1492, serrapaladin wrote:<3In post 1489, Mantisdreamz wrote:i was just gonna say...... but you might flip out... that i could actually potentially see a scum slimer. trying to take on the appearance of just being lazy town.
i was laughing at your gif, you doofusIn post 1526, Bert wrote:In post 1525, Mantisdreamz wrote:lol
ohey
got anything to comment on
?
or...
lol "capable"In post 1539, macmollie wrote:it might be. I don't have a hard grasp on her game in general.In post 1532, Mantisdreamz wrote:if mac thinks she's buddying you.... do you agree that that might actually be the case?
the weirdest thing was to desp, "mollie likes me better than you"
and somehow I feel a weird sense of deja vu and it did not turn out well.
your posts today look better. tell me more.
at this point you are capable of fleshing out your reads, so plz do so
seems ok i think.
In post 2010, Natirasha wrote:He's a shrewd guy. He's provided a contrarian view consistently throughout the game. Both of those are good things to have in your town.In post 2005, Wisdom wrote:Also, how is Desp useful? He has done nothing useful in 81 pages sDeal r.
I have a decent amount of respect for Desp's skill. Don't misunderstand me, though, I think he can be scum here--you wouldn't have to take much to convince me to put the hammer down on him.
i think fg is townIn post 1877, Wisdom wrote:Meaning?
the bold - why?In post 2036, Wisdom wrote:@Mantis
Because of that and becauseI can see serra instead of Desp in the scumteam with penguin and Huntress, but not Desp with serra.
because i like his posts. and as you said, i don't think if he were scum, he'd be pointing out what he thinks to be fake breadcrumbs on nats part. that is, unnecessarily drawing attention to himself.In post 2038, Wisdom wrote:Why?
what about this thoughIn post 2047, macmollie wrote:looking at the progression of those crumbs....hell no.In post 2041, Mantisdreamz wrote:because i like his posts. and as you said, i don't think if he were scum, he'd be pointing out what he thinks to be fake breadcrumbs on nats part. that is, unnecessarily drawing attention to himself.In post 2038, Wisdom wrote:Why?
and.. i'm considering that he might have a point with nats.
In post 2026, macmollie wrote: the only thing that is bugging me is that after we posted our list where we put nats and tater as our top town reads nats started dropping them even more,
you twisted thatIn post 2055, Wisdom wrote:Oh really? And I thought it was because you had no time and because you were setting up your micro - but now you're admitting that you have actually avoided doing anything on purpose and jumping on an excuse to justify it.serrapaladin wrote:Yup, how very devious of me to consider huntress' posts more townie than anything slimer had posted. You know, you pulling shit like this is the reason I really haven't felt the motivation to do anything this day.In post 2049, Wisdom wrote:And this does not help either. He's apparently trying to change the read that he was pushing all game to a townread now.In post 2034, serrapaladin wrote:Does anyone here know huntress? I sort of like her thoughts so far, but slimer was pretty horrible after his little spurt of defense D1 and I've only seen him replace out of scumgames.
i meant mollie cannot read meIn post 2068, Bert wrote:In post 2065, Desperado wrote:I am now. Nats' claim is probably legit which means her and Tayter are town which means Serra is scum.
Mollie is not what? MACMOLLIE, OK so it's Mac who has experience with you, not mollieIn post 2066, Mantisdreamz wrote:bert - mollie is not.
same thing, you know what I meant
and look at thisIn post 2113, Wisdom wrote:Seriously fucking look at this.In post 2107, Desperado wrote:Says the guy who's been basing all of his reads off of who makes the most sense as a scumteam together. You are the king of erroneous assumptions.In post 2094, Wisdom wrote:That's not doing anything. You're still following your erroneous assumption that one of those three is scum.In post 2086, Desperado wrote:I am doing something--getting serra lynched. You'll get my reads on fakegod and huntress when I give them to you.
I cannot fucking let this guy lynch serra.
In post 2043, Huntress wrote:I'm not sure what I think about penguin yet, I'm still mulling that over. I don't like some of her posts but the fact that Wisdom is pushing her lynch is making me hesitate. At the moment I wouldn't be averse to her lynch. As for Desp, he hasn't commented on Nat since all this came out into the open so I'll wait to see what he has to say about it to see if that changes my view of him.In post 2016, macmollie wrote:well it looks like penny and desp "missed" them I mean penny voted nats and desp has been tossing suspicion nats way all day.
what do you think of that
I also don't like how you are going after bert who is probably telling the truth.
please. do not stray from this.In post 2143, Wisdom wrote:penguin/Desp/Huntress. Period.
waste of time!In post 2115, macmollie wrote: funny cos in gchat mac and I are trying to figure out which 1 is your buddy!
oh boyIn post 2136, Desperado wrote:Wisdom you weren't clearly doing anything and continuing to lash out at everyone and anyone is one of the major reasons you're scum.
i'm getting at the fact that you said, "considering wisdom's position".. as if it really makes a difference.. or makes it any better, that you want to roll with the idea that wisdom was hardcore bussing his partner.In post 2170, Desperado wrote:What are you even getting at? Yes, I believe that.In post 2165, Mantisdreamz wrote:nevermind his current position. you are saying that you really believe that wisdom was screaming and trying to get everyone to vote for his scumbuddy serra.... for town credit?
i've never seen scum bus a partner that hard. in any game i've played.In post 2171, macmollie wrote:and what I mean by putting this out there is that you are scumreading desp cos he think this when wis has said he would do exactly this. so your line of questioning is flawed.In post 2167, macmollie wrote:I think wis is solid town but I want to put this out there. wis has said he would hard bus a scummate in a heartbeat.In post 2165, Mantisdreamz wrote:nevermind his current position. you are saying that you really believe that wisdom was screaming and trying to get everyone to vote for his scumbuddy serra.... for town credit?
i think it's silly that you are even trying to push wisdom.In post 2177, Desperado wrote:So let me get this straight.In post 2174, Mantisdreamz wrote:i'm getting at the fact that you said, "considering wisdom's position".. as if it really makes a difference.. or makes it any better, that you want to roll with the idea that wisdom was hardcore bussing his partner.In post 2170, Desperado wrote:What are you even getting at? Yes, I believe that.In post 2165, Mantisdreamz wrote:nevermind his current position. you are saying that you really believe that wisdom was screaming and trying to get everyone to vote for his scumbuddy serra.... for town credit?
Wisdom comes out of the gate guns blazing on Nat. When that doesn't work out, he shifts seamlessly to Serra and champions Serra's lynch for several pages.
Now he refuses to vote serra under any circumstances because it's the lynch I want.
And you don't think they could be on the same team? Because Wisdom pushed for his buddy lynched really hard for a few pages?
That's pretty narrow-minded, and beside the point to boot.
because if he was scum fake-claiming, it'd be interesting to see what claim he would come up with.In post 2179, Desperado wrote:Looks to me like you're still leaving the door open for Nats' claim to be bunk. Why else were you suggesting that the breadcrumbs were a bit too obvious and then asking her to claim her role name?In post 2175, Mantisdreamz wrote:i missed that he claimed.
hedging? no, i'm explaining why i was considering it.