Mini 1504 - Antihero Mafia REBOOT [GAME OVER]
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Why are you surprised over this dissonance? This is not the first time this is brought up, and this was way before Thor got here:In post 1033, AngryPidgeon wrote:Implying hydra dissonance on the Thor matter right when the interaction of these slots is looking terrible.
I refer to post620-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
@Thor: Yes I have played a game with AP before.
We have discussed it shortly here:
GGIn post 954, The Grim Reaper wrote:
It's difficult to say, you were mostly a mystery to me during that game because I didn't know you at all. Half of my impression of you obtained during that game was skewed by my own expectations of who you might be and how you might operate. I have the feeling I got to know you a bit better after reading that game's scum QT. But that was after the game.In post 953, AngryPidgeon wrote:do you think my play is comparable to Hidden Temple at all?
During it I remember considering you mostly town, but I did fear you might be scum because of a certain sense of the inconsistent tone you took with me. Back then I decided to ascribe that to your read on me changing, and sadly let you slide for most of the game.
I'd say that's comparable to what you're doing here in a way, yes. Partially. There's stuff I noticed you do here that I consider scummy, that I don't remember you doing in Hidden Temples, but that might be because I forgot or because I didn't notice at the time.
But I don't generally use a lot of meta, even less so when inited to do so by the person I'm considering scum, so your question is largely lost on me. My read on you is based on what you have been doing in this game, and will continue to be thusly.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Thank you for that waffle. Are you not sure how to feel about it like you state in sentence 1, or do you think it's town as stated in sentence number 2? I guuess it's option number 3: You know it to be scummy since he's your buddy but have decided to stop bussing him, thinking you've got some kind of case going over "dissonance" and laziness.In post 1036, AngryPidgeon wrote:
994 is distinctly lacking a claim which Im not sure how I feel about. Town are more likely to freak out and drop a claim if they are getting turbo wagoned.
I don't necessarily mind you "borrowing" our arguments that we used against you in post 980, but the least you could have done before copying them, is addressing them.
You. I'm not letting you buy any townpoints whatsoever from a Pasch flip.In post 1005, The Grim Reaper wrote:If pasch flips scum who is your next favourite for a lynch Thor?
Yes, buddy up to the unwtting inactive-fest tha tis Belisarius, that should get you a far way.
This is still probably town for involving himself in the discussion when he could be coasting.In post 1007, Belisarius wrote:EBWOP: Oh, and Brothers Grim: What the fuck happened to your scumread on me?
1. Sheeping someone else before voting.
This is a good post and while not reading the thread is null for Thor, nothing he has done is towny, least of all putting Pasch At L - 1 which is certainly not what I'd expect from town Thor.In post 1025, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Thor, am I correct in my understanding that you have no intention of actually reading the thread, ISOing anyone, or making any cases? I'm not convinced by your cocky attitude and my suspicion has not changed just because you make a lot of (empty) posts.
VOTE: Thor
2. Voting someone for being on a wagon that AP was on himself before moving vote to Thor (hypocrite).
3. MAking a fuss about an L-1 wagon on a player who did not get further than an AtE in his ultimate defense.
1+2+3 = AP is scum.
You got that right!P-edit holy crap
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Please address 1022 in more detail. This blanket statement does not entertain me in the slightest and my cheese fatigue has subsided so I need some entertainment.In post 1104, AngryPidgeon wrote:lmao, you are just blatantly assigning scum motivation to everything I say.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
In post 1106, AngryPidgeon wrote:And also re 2: I'm not voting Thor for voting Pasch. You are blatantly misrepping everything I've done and assigning scum motive to it.
Before your vote on Thor you said this:
This is a good post and while not reading the thread is null for Thor, nothing he has done is towny,least of all putting Pasch At L - 1which is certainly not what I'd expect from town Thor.
Please explain my blatant misrep.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Post number fixed.In post 1107, The Grim Reaper wrote:
Please address 1102 in more detail. This blanket statement does not entertain me in the slightest and my cheese fatigue has subsided so I need some entertainment.In post 1104, AngryPidgeon wrote:lmao, you are just blatantly assigning scum motivation to everything I say.
GG
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
In post 1101, AngryPidgeon wrote: It felt scummy to me that Guyett was having pointless (my perspective) wars with Thor and more sitrring the pot instead of trying to actually accomplish anything (once again, my perspective).
All I know is that I remember your slot being uninterested in Varsoon and I apparently forgot that Guyett was interested in him at all. I certainly never got the feeling that anyone other than me was interested in Varsoon (other than Mollie and she was taking his side anyways)
First of all I was only slightly interested in Varsoon being scum on D1 and his D2 play does reek of frustrated town.
second of all I was not having a pointless war with Thor... I am uncomfortable with people sheeping me while giving little original reasoning for their vote. I was pushing Thor for some actual reasons for why Pasch is scum.
~G-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
He's willing to look at LC? Wow. What has he got to show for that willingness? Have you seen a case on LYing Cat from Paschendale? Have you seen any arguments?In post 1101, AngryPidgeon wrote:
Mmm, could see this as either alignment. I want to know why his read on you is what it is since Darthe and Thor got sent indiscriminately to the scumheap. I like that he is willing to look at LC when there has been no support there at all (why do it as scum then?).In post 1026, Paschendale wrote:Thor and Darthe and definitely scum. Lying Cat might be. Grim has been so full of confirmation bias the whole game and just has it out for me. Majiffy is ???.
Yes, I remember a certain AtE in Hidden Temples, it was quite an elaborate one about someone going to some pizza place right after work, where things were stressy for some reason or other. Yeah... a very convincing argument... I'm sure you genuinely believe it yourself
AtE is not a scumtell. I make appeals like this all the time when I'm frustrated town.In post 1026, Paschendale wrote:Please, players who are not scum or retarded, speak out against this godawful wagon.Try to figure out why anything I've done actually looks like it's scum-motivated. Notice how the people on it besides Grim have not even bothered to delve into why they are voting for me.
Ooh, a point of criticism. I hope you don't expect this to make your buddying less obvious?
Still the main thing bothering me here is why you are assuredly town and just biased.In post 1026, Paschendale wrote:This wagon is obviously helped by scum and obviously a mislynch. I would happily be refuting whatever reasons the players besides Grim have given for targeting me... except there are none. The closest anyone came is Thor listening to Grim bitch about me and then nodding his head as he looks at his scum role PM and hops on Grim's idiot wagon.
Underlined is a valid point if not really applicable to Thor (but I wouldnt expect Pasch to know that). Varsoon's replace out was scummy as shit and Pasch bringing that upIn post 1026, Paschendale wrote:Don't be stupid. Kill obvscum Thor right now.He is refusing to catch up on the thread, so missing out on a lot of information.This way he can not have to own up for Varsoon's scummy acts, and distance himself from our reads on Varsoon, which were becoming unilaterally scumleans. Varsoon was caught scum and fled. That slot is still caught, even though it's Thor now and not Varsoon. Don't let Thor make you forget.protown if he is town.LOL
Actually, I want to keep you around for another day AP. I'm having way too much fun with you
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
No, I already said I was wrong about you voting Paschendale before. I guess I had yu mixed up with someone else.In post 1112, AngryPidgeon wrote:
You said I voted Pasch? Or am I misunderstanding you.In post 1108, The Grim Reaper wrote:In post 1106, AngryPidgeon wrote:And also re 2: I'm not voting Thor for voting Pasch. You are blatantly misrepping everything I've done and assigning scum motive to it.
Before your vote on Thor you said this:
This is a good post and while not reading the thread is null for Thor, nothing he has done is towny,least of all putting Pasch At L - 1which is certainly not what I'd expect from town Thor.
Please explain my blatant misrep.
GG
You say that you didn't vote Thor for voting Paschendale and that I was misrepping you by saying that you did.
I found a quote where you said the exact opposite. It can be found in italics. The crucial part is bolded for your convenience.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
It started off okay, during D1 you at least left some room for doubt.In post 1116, AngryPidgeon wrote:
There is nothing I can say to this. But Im glad you think my scumplay is subpar.In post 1102, The Grim Reaper wrote:Yes, buddy up to the unwtting inactive-fest tha tis Belisarius, that should get you a far way.
D2 is terrible though. Have you got a busy schedule next week? Can't see any other reason why you seem so intent on getting lynched.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
You are scum regardless of Paschendale's flip. The arguments we've had have revolved around much more than just Paschendale.In post 1118, AngryPidgeon wrote:If I had to sum up your push on me in a word it would be : convenient. You are tying me to Paschendale and very vocally encouraging us to be lynched back 2 back.
Would Pasch flipping town change your opinion on me or have you even considered that possibility?
I have considered Paschendale possibly being town, yes. I think it was somewhere during RVS. I was still a kid. Grandpa used to bring me candy. And somehow the flowers had a sweeter smell to them.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
It's gut. But it's the second occupant in that slot pinging my gut that he's town.In post 1117, AngryPidgeon wrote:Grim, ignoring the fact that Thor is voting your fav scumpick - what is your impression of him so far? Give me some points that you feel about him.
Varsoon due to his disdainful uslesness.
Thor due to his haughty usefulness.
Oh, and the fact that my main three scumreads (you, paschendale and Etl) are trying to push his lynch also helps a lot.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Yes, I MADE A MISTAKE ABOUT YOU HAVING VOTED PASCHENDALE! Give it a rest already. It was just a little mistake. The fact you emphasize this so much is quite telling. There's nothing scummy about t, just a mistake.In post 1123, AngryPidgeon wrote:
No the ones from today - that has been entirely about Paschendale.In post 1121, The Grim Reaper wrote:You are scum regardless of Paschendale's flip. The arguments we've had have revolved around much more than just Paschendale.
And of your 3 excellent points, 1 of them was not factual. 1 of them I explained is about Thor specifically voting to L - 1 and the context behind it. The last one is blatantly ignoring anything that I said about Thor's slot D1.
The rest of your post is just quoting things Ive said that are not interesting and assigning scum motive to them.
This isn't your townplay from Hidden Temple.
The vote was for an L-1 vote yes, but the fact that it was an L-1 vote is completely relevant, because PAschendale deserved that L-1 after that godawful AtE (would like a reply to my comments on your comments on that), so there's nothing wrong with that vote. That little inconsistency you found about "Thor wanting the chance to catch up before the day ends" is clearly a joke, as Thor has stated repeatedly not really being up to that.
And yes, you made arguments against Thor and Varsoon, yet you waited for your vote and hitched it to the argument made by another. Not scummy in itself I guess, but add that to all the other stuff...hmm...
Anyway, I need bed. Need sleep.
I want you to know I enjoyed this. Thank you AP <3
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
I don't think it matters that much, but I see two arguments pointing to it being better to lynch Paschendale first:In post 1231, Majiffy wrote:Therefereestown block-ees are going to call a quicktime-outwagon break to review theplay on the fieldposts in the thread, we will be back shortly to inform you if we are going to continue with afirst downlynch on Pasch or reverse theplayand starton the 32nd yard linewith a lynch on AP
1. Practically, it's easier. He's already at L-1.
2. Angry Pidgeon really isn't playing very well. I've seen him play much better, and when looking at mastin calling Angry Pidgeon the most dangerous scumplayer, tt seems he WANTS to get lynched over Paschendale.
@mastin: What does MVP stand for and why are we not it?
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
That was me saying that not Grim.In post 1257, mastin2 wrote:
Irony, considering we're now in synch.In post 975, The Grim Reaper wrote:I also thought Mastin was good before playing with him and he was a bit of a disappointment.
~G-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Today is a good day Guyett. Don't worry your head over technicalities like that, at this point there's far too many arguments pointing to the obvious.In post 1283, The Grim Reaper wrote:I'm slightly uncomfortable with the current votecount. Like all of the town voting for two of the scum with not one bit of bussing?
EtL: Calm down. mastin is still catching up and obviously not reading what's going on in the latest pages yet. I did find something scummy YOU did. LEt me fetch it.
I'm fine with lynching AP as well, but Majiffy: what about my arguments for lynching Paschendale first?
But it really doesn't make much of a difference.
@mastin: hydra: we'll talk!
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
An uncalled for AtE. I can see where the frustration comes from though. Right now, it feels like you're just going to have to wait for the town-axe to fall on your head in what? Two gameDays? Can't be fun.In post 1293, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:It doesn't matter because what I see happening is "Oh he's my friend. He's town. That guy's my friend too, so he is also town." What I see happening is, "Look, ETL is inexperienced. She doesn't know how to defend herself. She'd be easy to lynch." That's what I see.
I'm fucking sick of it. I'm fucking goddamn sick of it.
But there's no consensus on your slot yet. My other head still thinks you're town apparently. So you still have a fighting chance.
Let's talk! You can defend yourself and see where that gets us. And don't go all weepy on me!
Let's talk about the start of Day 2. Remember that covnersation, with Paschendale bringing up the argument "Varsoon staying on the JKLM wagon despite his reservations"? You promptly defended this argument. Yet Guyett showed it was invalid.
Then you made a mistake, which think was a scummy one: you stood by that argument, and went into a semantic argument about wat "wagons" are.
Can you link me to a completed game where you refer to a "wagon" in the way you did in this game?
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
I'm not sure. I think it looks a bit like frustrated town...In post 1311, mastin2 wrote: But you're acting like caught scum.
~G-
-
The Grim Reaper
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Shouldn't you have thought of that before? Like while you were making your first 200 posts inhere?In post 1338, AngryPidgeon wrote:You couldn't let me prove my townieness for one Day?
Why wasn't your townieness proven through all the material you've already brought forward?
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
And no, this doesn't make sense. Let me fetch the quotes.In post 1306, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
I don't think I was understanding what was being argued, grim, and I admitted that when we talked about it then, as well as when Thor explained the thing with the scum list, not to mention at the time I was under the impression that Varsoon HAD voted for JKLM. I stood by the argument that I understood at the time. Does that make sense?In post 1303, The Grim Reaper wrote:Let's talk about the start of Day 2. Remember that covnersation, with Paschendale bringing up the argument "Varsoon staying on the JKLM wagon despite his reservations"? You promptly defended this argument. Yet Guyett showed it was invalid.
Then you made a mistake, which think was a scummy one: you stood by that argument, and went into a semantic argument about wat "wagons" are.
Can you link me to a completed game where you refer to a "wagon" in the way you did in this game?
GG
p-edit: looks like I missed that. Apologies.-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
The above was your reply to my questions. You say two things:In post 1306, EspeciallyTheLies wrote: I don't think I was understanding what was being argued, grim, and I admitted that when we talked about it then, as well as when Thor explained the thing with the scum list, not to mention at the time I was under the impression that Varsoon HAD voted for JKLM. I stood by the argument that I understood at the time. Does that make sense?
You didn't understand what was being argued (response 1)
You were under the impression Varsoon had voted JKLM (response 2)
There is no indication at all here that you thought Varsoon voted JKLM. This was never part of your case. (I snipped it to only the relevant part, but you can check, nothing about Varsoon being on a JKLM-wagon). This goes directly againstIn post 842, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
However, the biggest reason I believe Varsoon is scum is the way he acted towards the end of JKLM's lynch.
Spoiler: Varsoon calls JKLM townscumtownscumtownscumtownresponse 2.
Here Paschendale comes in. He entirely misreads your case (because he probably didn't read it) but does add his vote based on reasons you supposedly give.In post 843, Paschendale wrote:I'm actually slightly relieved to know about FnL. I had gut problems with him. All sorts of conflicting reads.
I like EtL's points on Varsoon very much. Especially that, despite his objections to the JKLM wagon, he stayed on it.
VOTE: Varsoon
At this point Guyett expresses disbelief through posting a .gif
But now comes the really surprising part:
In post 845, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Grim I find it hard to believe you don't understand what pasch just said....
Instead of believing your own words, your own case, your instinct tells you to vouch for Paschendale.In post 848, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I suppose it is only fitting you did not read my post, since I didn't read your fairy tale.
You say that Guyett didn't read your wall, implying somewhere in that wall you talk about Varsoon staying on a JKLM-wagon despite his reservations. Yet you didn't.
This is where your sudden "belief Varsoon was voting JKLM" was coming from. You slipped, in an effort to grant Paschendale towncred. You assumed Paschendale knew what he was talking about, and Paschendale misread you.
This is just an extremely awkward way of trying to get out of this slip. You turn to semantics, and try to explain that simply "calling someone scum" is the same as being on a wagon. It is clearly not. But this part of the discussion also goes directly against yourIn post 850, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Maybe, you and I have different definitions for "on the wagon". Because voting for someone and saying they are scum is pretty much it.response 1, because it's obvious that you knew what was being argued. Whether or not Varsoon was on a JKLM-wagon, and whether or not you said it.
Here Guyett further clarifies it for you, further going against your
response 1.
After this you decide to steer clear of the discussion.
I see two scum having slipped over this. PAschendale later feels forced to remove his vote off of Varsoon over this mistake, in an effort to avoid people from noticing the concurrence of your mistake and his mistake. He later puts it back again when this discussion is gone and forgotten.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
The point is that you didn't make the mistake while making your case. You made the mistake after Paschendale agreed with an argument that wasn't present in your case, by telling Guyett he should have read your case.
The slip is the following, in one sentence:
You agreed with Paschendale's mistake on your own case.
And the way you tried to withdraw from that mistake, was an awkward discussion about the semantics of the word "wagon".
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Let me break it down for you:
1. EtL makes a case.
2. Paschendale agrees with an argument that isn't there. (JKLM stayed on a wagon)
3. Guyett notices the oddity of step 2.
4. EtL claims there is no oddity in step 2, and states the non-existing argument is there.
5. EtL explains this by stating that she interprets "wagon" broadly.
6. Guyett shows surprise at this interpretation of "wagon", EtL steers away from further discussion.
7. PAschendale, despite EtL saying Paschendale was not being odd in 2, admits to his mistake himself and removes his vote.
(aftermath: Paschendale replaces his vote.)
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
In post 1391, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:I never argued the semantics about the word "wagon"... wtf? I never once argued about that. I honest to god thought Varsoon had voted for JKLM. Is it completely impossible to look at that case and the conversation following it from the point of view of someone who thought that?
GGIn post 850, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Maybe, you and I have different definitions for "on the wagon". Because voting for someone and saying they are scum is pretty much it.-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
+
After which you didn't reply anymore. The difference between Guyett's definition of wagon and yours, is your inclusion of "calling someone scummy", which Guyett read as that being in itself enough for constituting a wagon. You didn't react against this implication. This is the semantic element, the tiny way out of your tight spot.In post 852, The Grim Reaper wrote:my definition of being on the wagon would be actually voting .
I do find it suspicious that he both pushed and distanced himself from the wagon at numerous times.
If you had argued that wagons are actual votes, the mistakes made by you and Paschendale would be unexplainable.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
In post 1397, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Are you trying to make a case against me for that? When you know what I'm like?
How am I supposed to know how you're like? I've been in a game with you once, and I think you replaced out of it pretty early on in the game. (it was HF's Greater Idea, I do remember that)
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Hmm, given that in between you responded to other things, I guess I missed it.
Doesn't change much, but I'll update it for you:
1. EtL makes a case.
2. Paschendale agrees with an argument that isn't there. (JKLM stayed on a wagon)
3. Guyett notices the oddity of step 2.
4. EtL claims there is no oddity in step 2, and states the non-existing argument is there.
5. EtL explains this by stating that she interprets "wagon" broadly.
6. Guyett shows surprise at this interpretation of "wagon", EtL steers away from further discussion and admits to her mistake.
7. PAschendale admits to his mistake himself and removes his vote.
(aftermath: Paschendale replaces his vote.)
Let me emphasize what is so odd:
Paschendale reads something that isn't there. EtL claims it is there. EtL sees it isn't there. EtL doesn't find it odd that PAschendale saw something that isn't there. Paschendale admits to seeing something that wasn't there.
You BOTH saw something that wasn't there, and you let each other get away with it.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
I need to go to bed. 3 in the night here.
I think it points to you wanting to vouch for Paschendale before anything, as an initial reaction. This concurrence of mistakes and the way you tried to talk both of you out of them feels like there's some scum-coordination gone wrong there.
GG
p-edit: it's not about the vote. It's about the argument "Varsoon stayed on the wagon..."
But yes, in general I don't count the people having pushed for a Varsoon-lynch among my strong townreads.-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Paschendale won't flip town.
And before any of that happens, Angry Pidgeon will have flipped scum as well.
I see how my argument is not completely watertight (but it does require a severe lack of knowledge of your own case, which is scummy in itself, and a severe lack of Paschendale actually reading other people's cases, which is also scummy if he's agreeing with them). I still find it hard to believe you thought Varsoon was on JKLM's wagon when you mentioned nothing about Varsoon voting during your case. Nothing. How could you have? He hadn't voted.
I have to admit that despite my remarks about that conversation, I'm kind of somehow liking your responses in the here and now. We'll be talking further.
But not now.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Agreed on Darthe. He's definitely one of the options for dessert.
Need to talk to Guyett about what his problem with Belisarius was again, because all I can see coming from that slot recently is town.
Angry Pideon's behavior is still as scummy. The only difference between yesterday and the day before it, is that he suddenly did give the impression he wanted to live. He said he'd claim at L-1, I don't see any reason why we shouldn't call his bluff and put him at L-1. We can still decide afterwards. There's no way Angry Pidgeon will not be facing an L-1 at some point during this game, we might as well get that over with.
Paschendale will definitely get lynched this game. Whether it be today, tomorrow, or in LyLo, he's getting lynched and that thought makes me happy.
EtL, well, her reactions yesterday have put growing doubts in my mind. Her reads-list isn't terrible at first glance, but will scrutinize it more carefully today.
Thor should be part of the townblock Lying Cat.
As for flying beauties: they have mostly dissappeared from this game, which is a shame. Want to see them come back here in full force. I remember having a strong townread on them but given they haven't been here for so long, I forgot why.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
I knew you were going to throw a hissyfit over this.
Don't think for a second you can sow suspicion on me for simply saying I'd like you to be as involved with the game as in the beginning. This is not a misrep so put the index finger of suspicion somewhere where I can't see it.
You admitted it yourself so STOP BEING SO DAMN TOUCHY.
It is simply because I miss you <3In post 1428, flying beauties wrote:I haven't talked much to anybody in this day round except majiffy once I got a good read on him.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper
-
-
The Grim Reaper
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Let's talk about Darthe. You said you wouldn't mind lynching him at a time everyone was talking about PAschendale and Angry Pidgeon. what moved you to that statement?
Are you as confident in AP and Paschendale scum as mastin and MAjiffy (and myself) are?
You know Angry Pidgeon as scum pretty well i imagine. The one thing that gives me pause with AP is all this talk (and personal experience) I heared about him being so great as scum. If he's scum,h e wasn't that great here. MAybe he's been careless, but as town. So careless that he made himself look scummy. If AP is so good as everyone says as scum, I wonder then how it can be that he's become a close to universal scumread.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
I'm not moving my vote away from Angry Pidgeon anymore. He needs to be lynched today and we are making eachother unnecessarily paranoid.
Also the longer this is takng, the more time it gives for town to make each other crazy.
Case in point: flying beauties latest remark. I merely asked for further confirmation. Have you even read what's been going on today? HAVE YOU EVEN READ OUR 251 POSTS, MORE THAN HALF OF WHICH PROBABLY MENTION AP AS SCUM? Did you even see pages 37-38-39? That's what you get for not having been here.
I don't want to be in your townpile anymore anyway. Go climb back up in your little treehouse, make a drawing with "GRIMS: KEEP OUT" to put in front of it and have a little chat over tea in it, while further ignoring my contributions.
Good night.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Those still in doubt concerning AP: read again starting from post: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 8#p5404878 .
It's the interactions following that that completely sealed the deal for me on AP being scum, and I should expect it will do so for everyone possessing a brain.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
Put your vote on Angry Pidgeon Thor.
He said he was going to claim at L-1, let him, and see if it adds up in any way with him insisting on "living at least one more day".
You don't seriously expect us to move our votes from this wagon with what your repeated implorations.
Paschendale may be scummier according to you, at this point both AP and Paschendale are so close to confscum their differences in scumminess are arbitrary at best.
The question at this point is not why you are preferring a Paschendale wagon so much, the question beomes: why are you opposing an Angry Pidgeon wagon, considering you obviously find him scummy, and people on his wagon town?
That Paschendale wagon WILL happen. Just not today.
Stop worrying over that and vote Angry Pidgeon. If you won't, someone else will have to because currently you're looking at a block of town sitting on AP's wagon that will not budge.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
The core goal is to get him lynched. I see the bullshit-claim he'll have to come up with as another instrument in the making to expediate his lynch.
The argument has been made numerous times: while Angry Pidgeon is equally scummy, the situation today makes it clear that he's still got some wiggle room, for God knows what reason. More people still seem to be willing to consider him possibly town, so he's got an angle. For me, my personal perception, yes, Angry Pidgeon and Paschendale are equally scummy. For the group, no, while almost everyone now agrees Paschendale is scum, this is not the case for AP.
There is NO way Paschendale does not get lynched in this game. Unless town's got a vigilante doing that inevitable job for us.
Therefor a select few have made it their mission to lynch Angry Pidgeon first, before he gets a firmer grip on those people still not convinced he's scum.
GG-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
-
-
The Grim Reaper Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 418
- Joined: October 2, 2013
I didn't say you had an equal scumread on AP as you do on Paschendale. I quite literally said the opposite. I said you also find him scummy.
Do you find Angry Pidgeon scummy? Yes or no? Yes, you do. So why not vote him? Simply preferring a Paschendale-lynch right now should not be an argument since it has beene stablished that it's coming anyway. It's a GUARANTEE.
Who on the wagon don't you have a townread on?
That second paragraph in 1526 is a pile of I don't know what, but it's irrelevant and uninteresting. Angry Pidgeon IS more dangerous and this situation proves it. He's more dangerous because he still managed, one way or the other, to convince certain people not to vote for him yet. Your own behavior is the proof that he's dangerous. Forget about lynchers and lynchees-theories and look at yourself.
GG
-
-
-