that's some powerfulPerhaps there are townies?
![Question :?:](./images/smilies/icon_question.gif)
He can't answer it. Battle MAge specifically forbade it. It ranks with quoting your PM and could mean a modkill. This is not a defense of xyzzy though. Failing someone else claiming scum I am sticking with him today.now a ranger wrote:I'm not removing my vote unless xyzzy answers this.The Fonz wrote:
Xyzzy, if your win condition is the same as mine, it will be in a sentence of its own. How many words are in that sentence, and of those what number word is the word 'town?'
I don't think there is much to add as to why I am on xyzy. The entire there might not be a town thing was a huge slip in my view, and his subsequent explanations have been more than a little contrived. I believe he is the best possibility for scum which is why I have been on him all day.The Fonz wrote:WhoMe- please explainwhyyou might switch to Albert. Your posts so far appear to have been very light on content.
Your case on Xyzzy:
that's some powerful ? right there.xyzzy - your explanation doesn't hold water. I think you have slipped up big timeThen you list who you think the 'people of interest are,' then a bit about how Xyzzy can't answer the PM question, then the 'interesting to see him jump on a wagon' question.whatever he is, he's caused us to get off at a run.
I still believe he is scum, his rebuttal of his 1st post was just as suspicious IMO. I'm leaving my vote on him.
Now, you state that you're 'still on' one of the two main wagons, but you're 'amenable' to switching to the other one. It seems like you're very much going along with the crowd, and you'll support any wagon that gets a few other people on it right now.
This is the 1st of Albert's posts i didn't like. I thought it reasonable to assume a str8 good vs evil as I had done so myself, so Albert jumping on the Fonz for this was suspicious to meAlbert B. Rampage wrote:Sounds like someone is sure of the setup. Could he be mafia ?The Fonz wrote:Vote: JDodge
Oh, and BZ, disagree on the cult, what is there apart from good and evil? Could be Druids i suppose.
Unvote, vote: The Fonzfor exactly the same thing N9V and Spambot saw in xyzzy.
didn't like this either. It is obvious that a hammer gives more info, because you get the damn role spelled out by the mod. -1 gives good info to mine the enxt day etc, but a hammer gives facts. that is all N9V was saying yet From now on Albert continues to say that N9V was pushing for hammer.Albert B. Rampage wrote:So you want us to -1 and hammer him immediately after ? Isn't that pushing for a quicklynch ?~N9V~ wrote:Not neccesarily. It doesn't always lead to a claim. I didn't say we should hammer him, I just pointed it out that it can give more info than a -1 can.
we continue. He has already had posts i haven't liked, so him claiming to be whiter than white also tickled me the wrong way. a vote against ABR HAS to be baseless? wtf?Albert B. Rampage wrote:Yes, exactly.The Fonz wrote:Ah, now I see what Spambot's getting at here. You shouldn't assume there's a town, you ought to know. In fact, didn't Xyzzy state earlier that he didxyzzy wrote:I based my assumption that there is a town on the fact that I was going entirely off of logic.know(not assume) there were townies? And now he says he assumed there was a town based off logical deduction?
As for your reason for voting me, its either baseless or OMGUS.
Let me explain: When someone hammers, there's the risk of lynching a town.
When someone -1, the only risk is that someone hammers(I suppose this is what you meant)
But hammering would be an anti-town move that would surely only lead to a lynch for the hammerer if the person at -1 doesn't have a suitable time frame to respond to any arguments. So there, -1 is literally risk-free (I was saying it in the context in which N9V said that its best to hammer than to leave it at -1 to gain information) Err do I make myself clear ?
didn't get this at all. How can it be anti-town to do soemthing the toan has all agreed on?Albert B. Rampage wrote:Seeing as how everybody is so active, I doubt there could be any excuses if we explicitly say it because it would clearly be anti-town to hammer if the town unanimously agrees.Spambot wrote:
You seem to be implying that townies won't do something stupid like hammering somebody. Doing so is scummy, but it's not entirely unrealistic to expect somebody to make a mistake. Whether it's miscounting how many votes away they are or just not reading the thread, it's not that clearcut.
first I myself believed that was Albert had said, so his denying it is odd. Also misrepresentation. All that N9V had meant, to my mind was that a hammer gives facts, L-1 discussions just give data - which is only useful later for mining, he never pushed for the hammer. more suspicionAlbert B. Rampage wrote:Why are you distorting the truth ? First of all, I never said that.The Fonz wrote:He's not pushing the argument that a lynch is better than L-1. He's saying thatthe argument Albert put forward, that a lynch would not yield more info than an L-1 vote, is crap, which it is.
Second, he has time and time again said that its better to hammer than -1.
check out my Albert analysis post and get back to meremussaidow wrote:sorry for the DP, I didn't mean to submit that.
Whome? and Bluezebra are currently high on my suspect list, because after reading through this entire game (took me like, 2 hours too), I've seen incredibly little from either one of them except for a few smile and nod, one liner posts.
also trying to control the doc? Very scummy.WhoMe? wrote:claim or don't. None of this tantalising hints rubbish~N9V~ wrote:Hmm JDodge, do you want me to claim? I've defended myself, and yet you still beleive I'm scum. I will claim if you ask me to, and then I hope the doc will protect me, cuz I'll probably be dead by day three if not.
Because as you say it's a questionable claim. We have 2 scenariosArkest wrote:N9V, a soft-claim like that is fairly damaging to the town. What you just said amounts to "I have a power-role, but I am not going to give any information to the town about it, scum go ahead and kill me."
I do question why people are voting for someone who just soft-claimed though. Putting the issue of whether it was a good idea to claim like that aside, why do we want to lynch a potential power-role?
it's a rubbish claim. If the doc doesnt protect him tongiht and he dies and he turns out cop, without having told us his night one results then the town gains nothing. We need a full claim out of him now and any info he might have before nighttime. It's that simple. He's already of interest to the scum (if he isn't one of them) so a full claim would not put him in any worse position and may help the town.remussaidow wrote:He outed himself as a power role, why are you people still voting for him? Why did you START voting N9V.
Also, go Whome? for misrepresenting him, saying he was trying to control the doc. That right there, coupled with my earlier suspicions of you nets you a nice, tidy littlevote: whome?
confirmed my ass. You have claimed, that is not the same as confirmed.~N9V~ wrote:Yes, I just made up the role name of Perplexed Preist. Fine don't protect me, I just said that because I'm now a confirmed townie, and will be killed tonight. it's a fact. And JDodge wanting to kill a claimed townie, that is awfully scummy.
This was the breadcrumb post I put in today to indicate Spambot was innocent if I turned up dead.WhoMe? wrote:JDodge isn't high on my list. I still firmly believe xyzzy to be scum, who the other 1 (or 2) scum are is still open.
After N9V partailly claimed, hinting at a power role and saying he would need doc protection, I was really hoping that was going to be a cop claim, as that would have meant a scum find. That was why I was pushing for a full claim from him.WhoMe? wrote:Yes spambot,
what is the case on me? I'd be interested in hearing it as it seems to me you are pro town and I cannot for the life of me understand why you are after me.
I haven't investigated xyzzy just because i have such a certainty on his scumminess. I can't remember exactly why I investigated JDodge, but I investigated you because just after I had found out JDodge was innocent, you were linking him and me together as scum, so i thought you were worth looking up.Spambot wrote:My only problem with your claim is that you didn't investigate xyzzy and that you did investigate me. Not saying it was a poor choice, but I'm curious as to why you did so. Barring a counterclaim (and if there is a real cop reading this, you NEED to counterclaim) I believe you.
This interested me. He decided I was misrepresenting N9V as trying to control the docremussaidow wrote:He outed himself as a power role, why are you people still voting for him? Why did you START voting N9V.
Also, go Whome? for misrepresenting him, saying he was trying to control the doc. That right there, coupled with my earlier suspicions of you nets you a nice, tidy littlevote: whome?
which is basically saying he doesn't trust him for trying to control the doc. Which is it?remussaidow wrote:see Jdodge, I told you people think it looks scummy. But seriously, it is just playstyle, and thus is better left ignored guys.
As for N9V, he asks for the docs protection, and then claims vanilla... I don't know if I trust that.
that's why. I am so sure you are scum i have been looking for the other one. I may be wrong of course, but that was my reasoning. As to believing my claim, there is really no other option. A counter claim would give us a guaranteed scum lynch, either today or tomorrow, and we would have confirmed townies and maybe another investigation too. I really have no reason to false claim. And if i have then the real cop could unmask me easily. No one has refuted me yet though have they?WhoMe? wrote:
I haven't investigated xyzzy just because i have such a certainty on his scumminess. I can't remember exactly why I investigated JDodge, but I investigated you because just after I had found out JDodge was innocent, you were linking him and me together as scum, so i thought you were worth looking up.
That's scummy. He's saying even if NAR is town we should kill him anyway.xyzzy wrote:Blargh, no matter what alignment nar is, though I believe he's scum, he's too dangerous to keep alive.
again - this doesn't seem right. Surely you keep your vote on someone you think is scum?xyzzy wrote:
In that case,Unvote
You're scummy, but I don't want you to die before we get anything useful out of you.
not sure I like this either.xyzzy wrote:Indeed.
Hate to say it, JDodge, but N9V has, in his death, pretty much proven that you're scum. You're the one who said that one of you is scum.
Interesting that you did that, N9V; were you planning on using that to prove JDodge's scumminess?
It'll probably turn out good for the town...
we're quite late in the game now - why don't you vote, FOS means sweet faxyzzy wrote:My suspicion of JDodge is increasing rapidly...
Giant FoS: JDodge
does anyone really think i have false claimed here? Given that I jave highlighted my bread crumbs, and my role as cop explains why i havent been voting everyone in sight. as this would confuse matters if i got nightkilled before claiming.xyzzy wrote:WhoMe?, if you've been this suspicious of me this whole time, why have you never investigated me?
Until I have a good answer, I have a difficult time believing that you're the cop.
Did you feel it wasn't necessary, or did you think someone else was a better target?
xyzzy wrote:WhoMe?, if you've been this suspicious of me this whole time, why have you never investigated me?
Until I have a good answer, I have a difficult time believing that you're the cop.
Did you feel it wasn't necessary, or did you think someone else was a better target?
Mismatch. Changing story. First you don't believe my claim, then when someone mentions naivity (sp?) all of a sudden you DO believe my claim, but you think I am naive. You are so scum.xyzzy wrote:Essentially, I think he's naive, so while I believe his claim, I don't believe that what he says is necessarily accurate.
JDodge, unlike yourself, I am in a position to know my own alignment for sure. This means I know the play remus is making. If i had been killed last night, then he would have been the logical lynch for today, his only defence would be to claim I was naive so that the ppl I had confirmed innocent weren't actually confirmed.JDodge wrote:Doesn't this seem a bit overly convenient and misleading to anyone else?WhoMe? wrote:Hi guys,
good news, I'm not naive. Remus shows up as scum.
vote remussaidow
of course he is going to claim I am scum and that is why I wasn't killed last night. This is just a ploy, and would mean we had started with no cop. How likely do you think this is?
insulting? It's obvious.remussaidow wrote:I agree with Jdodge, I believe that it is whome?
he's "known" everybody's alignment, but...
they were all town. He "knew" that xyzzy was scum. but claimed to have never investigated him.
He's also starting WIFOM arguments about what I'm going to say. That's just plain insulting.
You see my point then JDodge? If remus is not scum, then he would know for sure that I was, as I would have lied about his alignment. How then does that marry up with unwillingness to lynch in LYLO. He IS scum, I am not lying, and you have it in your power to win the game for the town.JDodge wrote:Truly you can't be serious? You know your own alignment. You know that WhoMe? must be lying. Therefore, WhoMe? cannot be town.remussaidow wrote:or is it unwillingness to be wrong in a lynch or lose situation?
are you insane? i am claiming a guilty result on you in LYLO, the possibility of me being town and lying doesn't exist here.remussaidow wrote: Jdodge, Yes I do know that he's lying, and yes, I do THINK that he is scum, but I want to be awfully damned sure about it when I vote in this situation. This isn't the place where we can say, oops, we lynched the wrong guy. I'm not a proponent of end-game lynch all liars, because occasionally the town does lie.
now a ranger wrote:
1) Whome? did NOT investigate Xyzzy, and still felt sure he was scum.
and it worked out. We lynched him, without me using an investigation on him, so in effect i got an extra investigation
2) He happened to investigate ME for some odd reason when I had already hammered two scum... Why not Qman or Remussaidow first?
granted i was reaching here. I wondered if you were scum who double bus'd to look town
3) It just happens he didn't get a guilty until the end.
thats just the way it went
What seems unlikely:
Jdodge was targeted 3 times on Night 1, by Blue Zebra, Whome?, AND Remus.
What seems likely about Remus that could also mean he is scum:
1) He might have killed the Doctor Blue Zebra on Night 3, so that he could kill the cop next. Perhaps he didn't know that Whome? would inspect me on that night.
2) If I was Whome? and WAS scum who claimed cop, in a VERY unlikely instance, btw this is just an example, I would probably fake a no-kill by not submitting a kill, and pretend that someone (in this case, Blue Zebra) protected me.