Mini 1583 - Austin Powers (Concluded)
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
FFS SHADED WAS TOWN GAWD WHY THE FUCK WAS HE LYNCHED AT ALL
*sigh*
well wither way, Naz is your other scumread rite? so come here and hammer her and let's deal with me tomorrow eh?...well psyche unvoted but still, get that back to L-1.
pedit: *sigh* there is SO FUCKING MUCH resistance to lynching Naz. SO MUCH.
Now scarab dear why the fuck did you unvote naz?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Kthx, what do you think about the fact that Naz gave like a thousand reasons for her hammer after it's been done?
pedit: no jake, you are the only one who thinks my case is wrong, so far.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Basically, both Kthx's, naz's, and your case on me is 'he did not participate in the D1 mislynch'.
go to my casepost on Naz, that's how a case is done man.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1394, shos wrote:Case on Nazerene.
disclaimer: Naz is a two-male hydra, but nazerene in hebrew sounds like a female, so I'm referring to it as 'she'.
Exhibit A:
Naz has prepared us quite a bit ahead that she was gonna hammer, despite repeating she wants another wagon]Preparation for the hammer:In post 545, Nazarene wrote:This Head has revised his earlier position on Shadedmelee. This Head would be willing to hammer, but the Heads of the Hydra must conver on that point.
In post 645, Nazarene wrote:This post was a hammer post before I deleted it.
In post 673, Nazarene wrote:My love of hammering is tempered by my intense dislike of some of the wagoners.
The "push" against ProHawk will be detailed later.
Exhibit B:
Spoiler: Naz hammered with a 'LOL' comment as soon as a truly valuable PR claim was given. That is despite the fact that she wasn't actually supporting a shaded-scum thought, and despite the fact that earlier she supported letting Shaded prove her claim. Now, when proving your claim is much easier, she quickhammered. She also prevented victor from posting more when he JUST started to, when there were over 24 hours to DL, and multiple people willing to hammer near DL, and Shaded specifically requested to not hammer before he makes another post.
Exhibit C:
Just read:
So we have three topics to discuss:In post 807, Nazarene wrote:In post 803, Psyche wrote:no way aegor as town commits the humongous blunder of hammering a confirmable town pr and doesn't even act disappointed in himself for it later
Both Heads legitimately tried to push a Prohawk counterwagon. This Head only hammered when it was clear that the outcome was inevitable. shos and others had expressed willingness to hammer at deadline; there was no point in prolonging the inevitable. Given the number of possibly legit claims Shaded made, the notion of "a potentially confirmable PR" is an overstatement.
1. Lynch was inevitable
2. Both heads tried to push a Prohawk counterwagon
3. The loads of claims shaded made(2) makes the potential to confirm the PR begone.
let's do it then;
1.
In post 782, Perpetually Nonsensical wrote:ProHawk[3]- Sharpest-knife-on-tree, Scarab, ShadedMelee
ShadedMelee[7]- VictorDeAngelo, Konowa, ProHawk, Jake from State Farm, Kthxbye, farside22, Nazarene (LYNCH)
If Naz did not hammer, it would have been 6-4; if the Prohawk wagon got to 6, obviously I would hammer IT and not Shaded since I was so opposing it; psyche stated that he would have probably joined the pro wagon as well; inevitable? looks like a tie to me. Not to mention that if the ProHawk wagon was actually being pushed, people might have joined. Which brings us to...
2.
This sums it up pretty well:
In post 685, Kthxbye wrote:If you think that Pro is a better lynch, why are you not interested in convincing me? Hell, even if you can't convince me, why are you not interested in convincing anyone with something other than, 'let's swing a last minute wagon to XXXX just cuz'?
Naz has never posted a case or any reasoning against ProHawk. Open her ISO, search for ProHawk, you'll find these posts:
Spoiler: all of Naz's posts relating to ProHawkw, removed irrelevant stuff
..from which the best attempt to give a single reason to vote ProHawk can be summed up with 'you have no content'. What happened to kthx? to victor? to TN? SKOT? even konowa can count - I'm sure their content is just so existing that it's OBVIOUSLY the best choice to lynch prohawk.
and...
3.
????
Shaded has posted two claims in total. The first one was a N3 compulsive vig, which he later admitted in this post which has the real claim that it was only to avoid being NKed. This is a very good PR play, IMO, and when Shaded asked just to be allowed to post once more Naz took that away with the lolhammer. So, if being a N3vig, which means we have to keep him alive to D4, not lose, and hope he shoots someone who isn't the scum nightkill, IS A BALLER PLAN AND WE'RE ALL WELCOME, then why waiting just one night and receiving results in the next morning....bad.?
~~~
Exhibit D:(<<<lol so cool)SpLiT PeRsoNaLiTY:
Naz uses her being a Hydra as an excuse for the hammer:
In post 828, Nazarene wrote:
You quotedTierShift. I am Aegor. I hammered. We do not normally coordinate posts.
Notes:
1. It can be seen quite enough in her ISO that one head says something but takes a step back because it 'needs to consult with other head'. So the 'do not normally coodrinate posts' part is..well..crap. I've wasted too much time here, don't wanna go ISO for quotes *again*.
2. It can be very, VERY easily manipulated. In post 778, "-Tier" is signed. 7 minutes later, "-A" is signed, with hammer. Oh so...if you are both online...and you can see that, since other head *just* posted...you do not coordinate. Ok. Yeah.
Contradiction to this point:
In post 890, Nazarene wrote:I'm failing to see the problem here.
We before didn't feel the need for a shaded wagon or lynch. Then after the flailing, we did. So we hammered. I don't know what makes the hammer scummy.
<snip>
Another thing people seem to find scummy was our switch off prohawk and onto shaded. It was because shaded looked like he was scumflailing. I hammer scumflails, no matter what. I had and have another suspect, but that does not deter me from hammering scumflails.
Anything else? Because most of the people are whining at the hammer or the shaded move an sich.
-Tier
notes on this quote:
1. Aegor wa signed on the hammer.
2. Tier says 'we hammered'.
3. Tier says "I hammer scumflails, no matter what." and right there "because shaded looked like he was scumflailing".
scumslip maybe.? This is probably the 5th reason she makes up for the hammer? dunno?
when in the next post I prodded him about how earlier he gave a different reason, he just adds 'oh yaeh that too' style comment. look at it.
~~~~
Currently amusing myslef with post 1010 and alike
This should do I think I wasted 1.5 hours on this post omfg.
this is literally the fifth case that I am building on Naz just this game.
Just reminding.
Tell me, thoroughly, what is not correct in this case. part by part. I'll read it in the morning. nighty.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Im onphone so ill answer briefly.
1. I had no real scumread on you. That wagon was not pushed in the slightest, I honestly didnot even think about it at the time
But I was so opposed to shaded that it would not be a huge jump to assume ill jump on the counterwagon at need.
I cant point out to where psych said that but he did. Either let psych link yiu to that or iso him to search for it.
2. The 'case' was never presentes, it was only promised. Quoting two votes of yours and callink you lurjeracum is NOT A PUSH. it is so easy. Especially wheb you had kthx, victor, tn, skot maybe, that all fit with preciselt the same case. Whe. Im home ill make you some 4 'cases',tgat are the same as the 'prohawk case' presented by naz.
She explicitlynsaid lynch lurkers d1 iirc, so i dont understand what case you are talking about if not this.
3.closed setup. Killing the pr is much inferior to have the town lynch it. Naz did not let shaded sayanything, even final reads, explanatiins, etc.
She explicitly lolhammered (lots of eifom in why would scum--- btw), land later as i said in the case in the parts whixh you failed to comment on, gave a thousand different reasons for that hammer.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Hey I just thought of something
Dr. Evil(sahded) is town
Unibrau is town
my role is someone from the bad guys and is town
Scumteam comprised of Austin & chicas? lolIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
You guys should shut up and bury yourselves just out of shame, wasting your time in life trying to actually discuss replaceouts. seriously. I mean wtf. -__-In post 1569, Jake from State Farm wrote:Ok my bad , anyway this should have never even been brought up. Shame on psyche if he's town. Just causing another fucking distraction with useless crap
~~~
In post 1570, ProHawk wrote:In post 1547, shos wrote:Hey I just thought of something
Dr. Evil(sahded) is town
Unibrau is town
my role is someone from the bad guys and is town
Scumteam comprised of Austin & chicas? lol
This is something I have been kicking around in the back of my head as well...
Yeah but with the comment I received on this I guess that means that flavor is completely irrelevant. I mean, I can see why Dr. Evil is a PR and Unibrau is a VT, and my role fits the pattern too, but still..probably irrelevant..
In post 1573, VictorDeAngelo wrote:I find it really odd that the wagon on Naz has seemingly dissolved now he's claimed vt.
Pysche unvoting in particular seems really odd.
is true.
Psyche and I have been fighting for this lynch for hundreds of posts today I think. the amount of resistance to this lynch is horrifying. this just can't not-be a scum lynch.
and considering the fact that psyche himself is the one who unvoted, I'm kinda questioning my superomgobvtown read there. might have started as bussing and jumped off when it was comfy.
pedit: oh there's an entire new page here lolIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
mass town points for Victor, that's an awweeesome start.
In post 1578, Jake from State Farm wrote:@farside - Victor has JUST NOW finished reading day 1 and we have 2 days left of day 2, you still think his method is helping town?
Look at the votecount, mod will delay DL for the replacement. you do have a point though about how one can make a vote without reading D2 >_>;
but shit, it supports the naz lynch, who cares
~~~
lol this is precisely what I'm talking aboutfarside22 wrote:In post 1578, Jake from State Farm wrote:@farside - Victor has JUST NOW finished reading day 1 and we have 2 days left of day 2, you still think his method is helping town?
If he voted for shos would you care?
*claps slowly after reading farside posts*
@1588: when I catch up this is precisely what I do, comment on every single thing I think is noticeable, and only then get involved in current discussions. I definitely don't come up with this as a reason to shout at vic; the fact he has voted is meh but it's the right vote so all well.
~
you honestly can't go through D2 cases without reading D1, jake. my case involves lots from D1 and D2, naz' case goes there as well iirc..you can't just play half a game. you HAVE to read up. "His excuse for not doing that is also horseshit" - what excuse?I don't recall he's ever said why he's catching up slowly?
~
AND PLEASE FOR FUCKS SAKE JAKE you have no legitimation to speak about lies. everyone else can, you, can't. -___=;
will continue from 1590 soonIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1592, Jake from State Farm wrote:fine, I get what you are saying but I am just going to chalk it up as being confused, I have done that before and the hammer was a pro-town move
OH YOUVE GOTTA BE KIDDING ME
CONF BIAS
AT ITS BEST
Here's a spoiler for you
Spoiler: I'm outta hereIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1598, Nazarene wrote:In post 1597, farside22 wrote:And another lie by naz. Basically this statement ignores 2 cases I provided (one I'm wanting for replacement to post at this point and is pointless to presue a read on a player that replaced out) and the other no one agreed so I moved on.
Shaded I was part of the questions and prodding, all that ignored by naz.
The fact that you posted cases does not mean that you were not following wagons.
-A
and another case of 'naz avoids the true points against her'.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
(for the record: scum is the only thing I was NOT in that game. I started out third-party that wins with town, then turned to town, then lost as town.)In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1602, Jake from State Farm wrote:
AND PLEASE FOR FUCKS SAKE JAKE you have no legitimation to speak about lies. everyone else can, you, can't. -___=;
Seeing as I've never lied and you have, multiple times. You have no right to say who can and can't speak about lying.
No jake, I did not LIE, I will repeat this just once for you: if I think that 'lets lynch pro' 'lynch pro' 'pro is scum' is not a PUSH against someone, then no, they haven't pushed it. it's a subjective statement, and you can't call this a lie.
and about you, well, you didn't lie, but you have absolutely no idea what a lie actually is, as said by me, farside, and even your dearest PR buddy, Naz.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
to this I shall give you:In post 1607, Jake from State Farm wrote:You obviously have no idea what a push is because saying "let's lynch pro" multiple times IS a push.
yeah, let's lynch naz!!In post 1608, farside22 wrote:In post 1607, Jake from State Farm wrote:You obviously have no idea what a push is because saying "let's lynch pro" multiple times IS a push.
Let's lynch naz!!
..
do these two posts help the naz wagon? at all? answer me truthfully; farside may have been sarcastic(lol surely..) but this time I really, truly ask you seriously. DO YOU THINK THESE TWO POSTS HELP A NAZ LYNCH? I define a 'push against someone' like this - "doing anything in order to make the wagon grow". please define 'push' yourself, and answer question above.
meh, I've never bussed so hard anyone. I always plan to do that in my next scum game, but I keep getting town; my last scum game was months agoIn post 1609, Jake from State Farm wrote:Then again you were the one who hopped off the naz wagon when it was growing popularity to push a person who called you a liar. I guess I could be wrong about naz and it's actually naz/ shos scum pair.
Shos lynch will be very informative
what info will you get from my lynch? if I flip town? and scum?
inb4u say that it depends on the wagon: give me one case, just one. for example: "if X1,2,3,4,5,6 voted you and you flipped town, I will ___".
In post 1611, Psyche wrote:In post 1569, Jake from State Farm wrote:Ok my bad , anyway this should have never even been brought up. Shame on psyche if he's town. Just causing another fucking distraction with useless crap
you are literally the worst
Psyche, your vote is no longer on Naz. Just reminding you. get back.
pedit:
no, you, jake.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1394, shos wrote:
<snip>
Exhibit D:(<<<lol so cool)SpLiT PeRsoNaLiTY:
<snip>
2. It can be very, VERY easily manipulated. In post 778, "-Tier" is signed. 7 minutes later, "-A" is signed, with hammer. Oh so...if you are both online...and you can see that, since other head *just* posted...you do not coordinate. Ok. Yeah.
Contradiction to this point:
In post 890, Nazarene wrote:I'm failing to see the problem here.
We before didn't feel the need for a shaded wagon or lynch. Then after the flailing, we did. So we hammered. I don't know what makes the hammer scummy.
<snip>
Another thing people seem to find scummy was our switch off prohawk and onto shaded. It was because shaded looked like he was scumflailing.I hammer scumflails, no matter what.I had and have another suspect, but that does not deter me from hammering scumflails.
Anything else? Because most of the people are whining at the hammer or the shaded move an sich.
-Tier
notes on this quote:
1. Aegor wa signed on the hammer.
2. Tier then says 'we hammered'.
3. Tier says "I hammer scumflails, no matter what." and right there "because shaded looked like he was scumflailing".
<snip>
I'll also add that somewhen in the game Tier distanced the hammer because it was Aegor who hammered. I'll look that up for you in a short whileIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
(I know this has relevance to the hammer but the point is the use of hydraing as a way to distance yourself from stuff you do, and avoiding questions. [do I need to give examples for Naz avoiding what she wants? there's like 100 examples I think])In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 881, Nazarene wrote:I did not coordinate the hammer with Aegor.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1640, Jake from State Farm wrote:Willing to hammer isn't the same as coordinating a hammer. C'mon farside
how bout the post where Tier said that 'he always hammers scumflails and shaded was flailing'In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Psyche
You requested a reason to come back to the wagon. so. requoting for page head:
In post 1635, shos wrote:In post 1394, shos wrote:
<snip>
Exhibit D:(<<<lol so cool)SpLiT PeRsoNaLiTY:
<snip>
2. It can be very, VERY easily manipulated. In post 778, "-Tier" is signed. 7 minutes later, "-A" is signed, with hammer. Oh so...if you are both online...and you can see that, since other head *just* posted...you do not coordinate. Ok. Yeah.
Contradiction to this point:
In post 890, Nazarene wrote:I'm failing to see the problem here.
We before didn't feel the need for a shaded wagon or lynch. Then after the flailing, we did. So we hammered. I don't know what makes the hammer scummy.
<snip>
Another thing people seem to find scummy was our switch off prohawk and onto shaded. It was because shaded looked like he was scumflailing.I hammer scumflails, no matter what.I had and have another suspect, but that does not deter me from hammering scumflails.
Anything else? Because most of the people are whining at the hammer or the shaded move an sich.
-Tier
notes on this quote:
1. Aegor wa signed on the hammer.
2. Tier then says 'we hammered'.
3. Tier says "I hammer scumflails, no matter what." and right there "because shaded looked like he was scumflailing".
<snip>
I'll also add that somewhen in the game Tier distanced the hammer because it was Aegor who hammered. I'll look that up for you in a short while
In post 1637, shos wrote:(I know this has relevance to the hammer but the point is the use of hydraing as a way to distance yourself from stuff you do, and avoiding questions. [do I need to give examples for Naz avoiding what she wants? there's like 100 examples I think])In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Which story? The excuses from the QT? What dobyou think a scum story would say?
And I think that they are not coordinating their posts, lolIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
of course
I voted jake after the persistent, constantly repeating claim by him of 'you lie, it's a lie, lies, liar, you are scum cuz you lie, vote shos, liar, lie lie, lie, lying, liar'. it pissed me off, since his claims (and definition of 'lie') were immature, ignorant to my posts, and it looked like he's just sticking to a story to protect Naz whatever the cost is. this is what made me think that it's either 1. Jakescum WKs naztown or 2. jakescum protects nazscumbuddy. in both cases jake is scum, ergo, vote jake.
However, jake's play is so amazingly poor and I've no idea what the hell is going in his head. this entire day his play is equal to a smurf trying to play RDND while having the role of Cthulhu; it wasmaaaaaybeacceptable on D1 since, well, dunno why but there were 6 people who supported a shaded lynch(+naz who hammered) so there may just be something I keep missing; but today - I mean - I don't recall a single post by jake that I actually agreed with. if there was one, great, but there were like 200 other posts which were bad. soooo buttom line - 'too scummy to be scum' OR regular scum. I dunno, but I don't need to decide now, so I'll decide on another day.
and I've never been scum as a hydra before. I'm guessing that it's like having daytalk with a buddy, but sort of different, dunno. but you can't coordinate every post, it'll come out as wierd and preplanned, and anyway that lie is only based on tier's post. Aegor's only contribution was the hammer itself - while Tier is the one who makes the inconsistency. so all in all I think that's just a Tier- mistake which he's trying to cover up somehow. When we attacked the hammer, Tier answered, but how can he answer if he didn't hammer? that's a mistake, which now comes back to bite him.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1665, Jake from State Farm wrote:I'm sorry if you disagree with the things I've said , much like I've disagreed with the things you and others have said but this is the last time I'm going to ask you to please stop insulting me and my play. I've not done anything terrible. I've just disagreed with you. Even if you are right, and I'm wrong, that still doesn't make my play terrible. It just means I'm wrong. Being wrong happens, and I rarely admit when I'm wrong. That's just being bullheaded and again doesn't mean my play is terrible.
So please don't insult me or my play again as I consider it a personal assault
I'm not insulting you(not on purpose at least). obviously you can be wrong. obviously I can be wrong. but that argument about the 'lie' just pissed me off sooooo harddddd I could bang my head to the table until it breaks(the table, not the head). I was furious, really, that vote on you was probably out of anger rather than thinking. it has legitimacy, yes, and the argument that supported it still stands, but I was really feeling annoyed at the time.
buttom line - if you're town, don't be offended, if you're scum, then fuck you by all means xD lol jk
In post 1666, Psyche wrote:jake
there are things about your play that are bad and harmful to the town
pointing that out may be important for my win condition
are you implying that your wincon is different that town's?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1670, shos wrote:
In post 1666, Psyche wrote:jake
there are things about your play that are bad and harmful to the town
pointing that out may be important for my win condition
are you implying that your wincon is different that town's?
????In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1666, Psyche wrote:jake
there are things about your play that are bad and harmful to the town
pointing that out may be important for my win condition
so can you elaborate what you mean here?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1683, ProHawk wrote:Psyche, can you get your buddy to do something pro-town please?
....
...
...
What is your opinion on the 1664 argument, in light of the quotes at pagetop?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Spoiler: Naz, don't worry, we read your post. stop repeating this
Also, holy fucking shit. I didn't imagine it would be so many quotes.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1706, Psyche wrote:ive got a mean back-up plan in my back-up pocket
you should post that, since you claimed a PR, so you'll probably die at night ya know :/In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Well.
Darn.
I dunno what to say or do. Genuinely frustrated.
TNs replacement should catch up asap. You guys need yo shut the fuck up fpr a while(me too) and reevaluate and not make quick decisions.
SKOT, dor fucks sake do something.
Victor, kthx, skot, captain - should be the ones talkibg right now. We(farside, jake, pro and me) have proved thus far that pur decision making is subpar. Now is time to read.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Well, after a long weekend, I'm here. hopefully with refreshing set of thoughts.
I'll read up the entire day when I'm back from Kung Fu.
(also, DAMN, I just told you three and myself to shut up and let the others talk, and then BOOM you 'splode for 3 pages within a day)In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
alright, I'm back. I'm a little dazzled though, I'm gonna probably make some lengthy post(no quotes though). In general, I just think we're in a pretty fucked up situation right now.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Alright so.
I've read through.
I think it is pretty clear that we're currently in a clusterfuck level of mess. I mean, there's not even a single leading wagon. nobody is sure of anything(except for Jake, but he was also sure of Shaded and he is very meh anyways), we have 3(?) lurkers and this istearing us apart.
So really, jake's supposed cases (lol) on 'confscum shos' and his confscum partner farside is really ridiculous; I've kinda got nothing on prohawk somehow. so active members - only jake is a possibility today. the fact that he took my first post of today and compared it to how I looked at him - that's impressive. I'd take it the other way if it were the opposite, although I probably am cunning enough as scum to do that. I think that today I'm going to focus harder on the inactive ones. the Jake/farside/psyche/shos(/prohawk?) has just spoken too much. it's too clumsy, each one got his own trench and keeps digging in it today.
so for the while I'm gonna go and VOTE: Victor
Captain, yuo need to read and catch up ASAP. really.
Psyche, is it any bad to claim now?
what do people think about a massclaim? we're probably not in lylo yet but situation looks like shitIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1741, ProHawk wrote:PSYCHE, if you don't claim night actions and give me a reason why you targeted Scarab, I will vote park you this entire day.
In post 1742, Psyche wrote:Get to it, then.
In post 1743, ProHawk wrote:VOTE: Psyche
We ALL need to lynch this lying sack of a player. The "clusterfuck" is your own doing Psyche.
This exchange is bad. I thin it is pretty obvious, what psyche's role is.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
sorry for delay, took a shower
In post 1745, Psyche wrote:i am never ever ever claiming
you will know my role when i flip and no sooner
also I hope you crumb stuff anywhere so that we know who is conftown when you're deadIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
@prohawk: because claiming will help scum. so far they can only speculate, and they don't know how many shots he has(whether he be cop, weak role, hider, etc) which will result in him staying alive. if, for example, we get to lylo with psyche alive and he claims, say, 2-shot cop, and shows us a crumb from D1 somewhere where it is 100% sure a crumb and nobody could notice it or soemthing - then yes, I'll believe him.
re: scum running the show - there is just no show to run. not today, at least. yesterday I (want to believe that I) lead town to the lynch on Naz. I pushed it reheaaaally hard, gave free tickets to anyone willing to come aboard, built cases - and there was plenty of material to build that on - point is, scum didn't need to do shit. D1 Jake lead town to a shaded lynch which took away one investigative PR from town, D2 I lead town to Naz lynch - scum did not need to work hard. jsut lie under radar and cooperate. so my plan for today(not in weekends..) is to start looking at the votejumps on those wagons. Kthx, for example, I remember jumped on Naz with meh reasons. PRohawk on shaded. I don't realy remember. but we have loads of material to analize - I CAN NOT FUCKING believe both wagons comprised of only townies, and I HIGHLY doubt even one was, so this is my road for today.
I'll keep my per-post replay nowIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1876, ProHawk wrote:In post 1391, Psyche wrote:if naz turns out to be town
i will fullclaim or do something else that is extreme
Hey Jake, look what I found in ISO land...
If you really want to help out, make this follow through with a promise instead of pushing someone to lynch themselves.
oh.
that's interesting.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
see bold.
In post 1748, ProHawk wrote:
Your push on Naz was warranted, but mis-guided, your hop off was interesting in #1489 and the hammer was bad, like scum usually hammer with an "oh well this in inevitable".Disagree. the hammer was after all discussion was due, naz was not going to respond to anything further as can be seen in my post 1684. also, see 1650 - psyche asked and I provided. can't judge him for that.
You have a sketchy claim as just "IM A PR GUYS!"sometimes that is better than claiming, you should know that mate
You have a sketchy claim as just "Scarab is town because of my PR" - Scum would have this knowledgeirrelevant
Scum decided to NOT kill a "PR" and instead decided to kill Scarab who actually wasn't a PR. - Odd Right? But ofc they did that so we would just lynch you today instead.psyche absolved this with the 'safer kill' post. which makes sense.
You are being indignant and witholding information that would help us narrow down scum (whom we have yet to hit) because you believe your role is too valuable to claim (I can't think of one role that would qualify, but I am not really a wealth of knowledge with regard to roles, perhaps you can teach me something this game)
Best of all, you are going to be dead tonight (if you are really a town PR) anyway, yet you will still never ever ever claim.
Why are you still alive?
if he actually withholds info from town, that's indeed bad, but he might have crumbed it/will, and him being alive is not scummy.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1801, ProHawk wrote:Actually, would you mind stating which decisions you feel are sub-par from that entire group?
In post 1743, ProHawk wrote:VOTE: Psyche
We ALL need to lynch this lying sack of a player. The "clusterfuck" is your own doing Psyche.
In post 1742, Psyche wrote:Get to it, then.
In post 1745, Psyche wrote:i am never ever ever claiming
you will know my role when i flip and no sooner
In post 1748, ProHawk wrote:Here's the deal Psyche, you are just as likely to be scum as the next guy. (About 1000% more likely in my book)
Your push on Naz was warranted, but mis-guided, your hop off was interesting in #1489 and the hammer was bad, like scum usually hammer with an "oh well this in inevitable".
You have a sketchy claim as just "IM A PR GUYS!"
You have a sketchy claim as just "Scarab is town because of my PR" - Scum would have this knowledge
Scum decided to NOT kill a "PR" and instead decided to kill Scarab who actually wasn't a PR. - Odd Right? But ofc they did that so we would just lynch you today instead.
You are being indignant and witholding information that would help us narrow down scum (whom we have yet to hit) because you believe your role is too valuable to claim (I can't think of one role that would qualify, but I am not really a wealth of knowledge with regard to roles, perhaps you can teach me something this game)
Best of all, you are going to be dead tonight (if you are really a town PR) anyway, yet you will still never ever ever claim.
Why are you still alive?
re:1880 - ISOs lack context. read those quotes and read 1650 between. that should settle you.
youg uys fucking clogged the thread iwth your argument back there
...ProHawk wrote:Shos, you were wrong about Naz. Stand up and face the music.
yes.? what music?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1781, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 1778, Jake from State Farm wrote:Farside/ shos are scum , I don't think. I know
would you fucking just claim your results?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1801, ProHawk wrote:Actually, would you mind stating which decisions you feel are sub-par from that entire group?
In post 1743, ProHawk wrote:VOTE: Psyche
We ALL need to lynch this lying sack of a player. The "clusterfuck" is your own doing Psyche.
In post 1742, Psyche wrote:Get to it, then.
In post 1745, Psyche wrote:i am never ever ever claiming
you will know my role when i flip and no sooner
In post 1748, ProHawk wrote:Here's the deal Psyche, you are just as likely to be scum as the next guy. (About 1000% more likely in my book)
Your push on Naz was warranted, but mis-guided, your hop off was interesting in #1489 and the hammer was bad, like scum usually hammer with an "oh well this in inevitable".
You have a sketchy claim as just "IM A PR GUYS!"
You have a sketchy claim as just "Scarab is town because of my PR" - Scum would have this knowledge
Scum decided to NOT kill a "PR" and instead decided to kill Scarab who actually wasn't a PR. - Odd Right? But ofc they did that so we would just lynch you today instead.
You are being indignant and witholding information that would help us narrow down scum (whom we have yet to hit) because you believe your role is too valuable to claim (I can't think of one role that would qualify, but I am not really a wealth of knowledge with regard to roles, perhaps you can teach me something this game)
Best of all, you are going to be dead tonight (if you are really a town PR) anyway, yet you will still never ever ever claim.
Why are you still alive?
In post 1781, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 1778, Jake from State Farm wrote:Farside/ shos are scum , I don't think. I know
OMFG GUYS JUST SHUT UP JUST STFU
oh it really si unbearable reading thsi thread you're all so dramatic OMG I KNOW. OH MY GOD ILL NEVER VOTE ANYONE ELSE. *sigh*
I'll see ya tomorrow.In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1885, ProHawk wrote:Shos, how do you know my choice and vote on Psyche is sub-par?
I don't, but I've no reason to think otherwise yetIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1669, Jake from State Farm wrote:vote: naz
I'm done with all the bullying on me. Go f yourselves.
that's for me to look at tomorrowIn post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
In post 1803, Captain Corporal wrote:Okay, still getting through all this fluff, I'll hopefully be all caught up by tomorrow. What's everyone's view on my slot? Who are the priority lynches for today? And who's everyone's top scumspect?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011
Nazarene[6]- Sharpest-knife-on-tree, shos, farside22, VictorDeAngelo, Jake from State Farm, Psyche (LYNCH)
See, these votes onnaz for thinking she was scum - thry are fine. But Jake's vote is different:
(Context here)
In post 1666, Psyche wrote:jake
there are things about your play that are bad and harmful to the town
pointing that out may be important for my win condition
In post 1667, Psyche wrote:oooh that's a good one shos
In post 1668, Jake from State Farm wrote:In post 1666, Psyche wrote:jake
there are things about your play that are bad and harmful to the town
pointing that out may be important for my win condition
Nothing I've done is bad or harmful. All I've done is given my opinions , said and voted who I think is scum, call out things I perceive to be lies , misinformation, etc, and defended myself when needed to.
All of that is pro- town behavior
In post 1669, Jake from State Farm wrote:vote: naz
I'm done with all the bullying on me. Go f yourselves.
"Bullying"? Hardly. Dat AtE, and ragevote?
I am trying to conpare that tp myself as a townie on D1 with shaded. Frustrated, yes. Vote shaded? Wtf, hell no.
Why would he do that?In post 836, Lucky2u said:
Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.-
-
shos Survivor
-
-
shos Survivor
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 17862
- Joined: November 28, 2011