Mini 1607 - Night in the Asylum (GAME OVER)
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
I disagree that VCA is completely useless here. Ika's lynch is similar to lynching town in that mafia know that he was not of their faction and would probably have been happy to fuel a quicklynch on him.
Then again, his proposed role clam really did suck.
Current thoughts
---
In post 42, Klazam wrote:
@vezok- the first question is fine, but why would you care if mafia can be culted? both cult and mafia-if theres mafia in the game- are both scum. why would it matter to draw distinctions between mafia and a third party?
vote Vezok
LikingKlazamfor this. (The sentiment + Vezokscum interactions)
---
Ika's mass claim idea happened in post 54.
Afterwards,Baezuposted:
In post 67, Baezu wrote:In post 26, Klazam wrote:what is making him sheep zzzz in the absence of posts? why no RVS vote? meh
This post sucks
VOTE: klazam
In post 68, Baezu wrote:In post 65, Knight of Cydonia wrote:
No, this is removing responsibilty from yourself:
In post 5, gameplay506 wrote:Um ye ZZZX I will sheep you just place a vote
The RVS is a stupid compromise for the inability to read people like you would in face-to-face Mafia and should be as short as possible wherever possible so we can actually play the game. Like we're doing now.
So knight, do you still believe we're in RVS?
Completely ignoring that ika situation which had just happened in order to make fairly non-substantial comments. Leaning scum.
VOTE: Baezu
---
I am definitely wary of the way Flames (81 ) and Lynx ( 89 ) jumped onto the ika wagon. Nullish for now as I am often paranoid of people who blatantly sheep but will be watching what else they do in the future.
---
I am conflicted onGameplay.
On one hand, I kinda liked posts such as (below) as gameplay did seem to be genuinely trying to suss out ika's alignment.
In post 80, gameplay506 wrote:
You are either town retarded or scum retarded. Both ways you are retarded. Now why do you think outing every single role in the game on day one would benefit town more compared to scum?
If it's some genius plan that scum will cc you are wrong. They can just claim VT and be over with it.
At the same time, it was odd how gameplay defended ika as a VI but then followed up with posts like this 97 which felt like he was trying to passively encourage a hammer regardless.
And also:
@Gameplay, why is Lynx town?
----
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
Sorry for your loss Mr Ree.
UNVOTE:
In post 138, gameplay506 wrote:
In post 132, insanity018 wrote:Completely ignoring that ika situation which had just happened in order to make fairly non-substantial comments. Leaning scum.
Ika was cult alone. Thus ignoring the ika situation doesn't make him scum. And also he kinda soft claimed a few posts ago you can go, read his post and unvote him.
The point is that if something unusual happens, it would be more of a scum/mafia thing to avoid commenting about it. So that they don't say anything contentious which might make them look scummy.
In post 149, Flames682 wrote:
In post 132, insanity018 wrote:I am definitely wary of the way Flames (81 ) and Lynx ( 89 ) jumped onto the ika wagon. Nullish for now as I am often paranoid of people who blatantly sheep but will be watching what else they do in the future.
You could say it's a sheep, but not really. I voted him because I thought massclaim was a bad idea as well. Everyone else had already pointed that out so there was no need to explain why it was a bad idea like everyone else had.
Did you have any concerns about how fast the wagon had built up?-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
Knight of Cydonia, do you think that those posts make gameplay scum?
In post 182, Flames682 wrote: Anyway, to be more serious, I know I haven't contributed much to this game. I'm not that into it right now. As for the vote on ika, how was it super opportunistic? I have tried before (as town) just reiterating what others have said when voting someone but that always comes on as being scummy, so I didn't just say what others said before me.
It's the way you hopped onto the biggest (and very fast growing) wagon without adding any original thoughts at all.
In post 200, Baezu wrote:Ok.ok. So flames and knight are both mafia. Gg
^ I'm starting to lean towards this too.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
Phone posting.
So what I didn't like about knights was how he was constantly talking about gameplay being bad but never calling him out as scum.
In post 213, LynxKuroneko wrote:Feels like we're not getting anywhere.
Vote: Flames682
Pressuring is fun!
That distancing from the wagon. Makes me uncomfortable.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
Who, I've had similar concerns about gameplay earlier and he responded with this:
In post 138, gameplay506 wrote:
I don't hide that I encouraged the wagon. Such a fast and early developed wagon out of RVS is guaranteed to have scum on it.
It felt town to me.
In post 239, ZZZX wrote:I am back
let me2moro since I am a little busy todaycheck this gamecome up with a massive post filled with thoughts and reads
ftfy
Bins post is okay, but very little original thoughts.
Yo, 4 days until deadline everyone!-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 264, LynxKuroneko wrote:I promise a full analysis very soon.
At this stage, I don't even want a full analysis. Just a list of who you think is scum/town (that isn't 'We're not getting anywhere so wagon!' would be great. --> This goes for Flames and ZZZX too!
In post 266, gameplay506 wrote:It isnt just that he lurks. When he posts he basically doesnt contribute at all
I can kind of understand how missing practically all of Day 1 could make someone have a slow start into reading this game. So, I'm reluctant to lynch ZZZX until we see some effort to post something meaningful, low hanging fruit and all.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 270, LynxKuroneko wrote:gameplay506 - Seems inconsistent early on, and his desire to claim being vanillized puts him in the spotlight (which is good if we trust him or bad if we don't). Starts off anti-town, and in my eyes seems to be trying to appease the crowd.
So, what do you think of gameplay now?-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 298, Flames682 wrote:Oh yeah ZZZX is also on the scum list and is also the person who I'm scumreading most right now.
VOTE: ZZZX
I don't believe you at all. The person you are scumreading most is the person you forgot to include on your reads list? Who also conveniently happens to be the only person, other than yourself who is starting to get traction for a wagon? Yeah...just no.
p-edit: I think the first part is what Lynx is getting at too.
I'm against lynching ZZZX today. That would just be policy and we can do so much better (like voting Flames)-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
Flames posts his reads.
Responds to a ZZZX post in the meantime.
In post 296, Flames682 wrote:In post 294, ZZZX wrote:anyway I cant really post my notes atm since I am too sleepy to post meaningful stuff etc.
so yea preper 4 2moro
This is pretty much your last 3 posts worded differently.
Doesn't remember that ZZZX is his 'top scumread' until right after Lynx puts a vote on him.
In post 298, Flames682 wrote:Oh yeah ZZZX is also on the scum list and is also the person who I'm scumreading most right now.
VOTE: ZZZX
In post 310, Flames682 wrote:
insanity you've been wanting to lynch me since page 1 and something is definitely off about that
Try harder to discredit me please?
Why is Klazam a scum read? How did you progress from constantly agreeing with gameplay to reading gameplay as scum?-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 335, Flames682 wrote:Baezu is just sheeping this game
*cough* pot, meet kettle*cough*
In [url=http://www.maafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=6220639#p6220639]post 340[/url], gameplay506 wrote:
Effort or just being plain lazy isnt scum indicative. BB
Why does this apply only to you and not to ZZZX?-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 374, Ankamius wrote:
gameplay506's #97 is scumtastic.
gameplay506's #101 and #105 together along with the above is awful. The fact that he wasn't even on the wagon only makes this worse.
I did agree that this was odd.
What do you think of gameplay's explanation?
In post 138, gameplay506 wrote:
I don't hide that I encouraged the wagon. Such a fast and early developed wagon out of RVS is guaranteed to have scum on it.
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
There are several things I want to draw attention to. Lynx's behaviour around the Flames wagon was definitely scummy.
Firstly, posts 299, 304, 322 all help to encourage the Flames wagon. Where is he voting though? A 'pressure' vote on ZZZX.
Most importantly, Lynx does switch to Flames briefly but this is the post where Lynx unvotes.
In post 348, LynxKuroneko wrote:Well, gotta say you're both putting in effort; and at this point I'm okay with that.
Next in line!!!
Vote: ZZZX
Failed to post since the 6th. Come on, now.
The bolded is obviously just a convenient excuse for scum to jump off a wagon and therefore be dissociated from a wagon they know to be on town. In between when Lynx switched his vote onto Flames (330), these are the posts that Flames made:
In post 335, Flames682 wrote:Baezu is just sheeping this game
In post 345, Flames682 wrote:It's funny how I'm the one getting all the attention but Baezu is now doing the same thing that I was doing and agreeing with a bunch of posts. Look at his ISO
Hardly examples of super obvtown effort!
Thus, Lynx was just making up any bullshit reason to justify changing his vote.
I also want to say that Lynx's 'pressure' votes, such as those on ZZZX do little to actually scumhunt or pressure someone. What is the point of a 'pressure' vote if you tell that person it is only made for pressure? Why would you constantly remind everyone else that your votes are purely for 'pressure'? (287) Placing 'pressure' votes allows Lynx to avoid taking responsibility for his votes and avoid pissing off the person he is voting.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
Gameplay, I'm not sure if we should rely so heavily upon flavour to determine SK/vig. Also, why are you so keen for a mass claim?
In post 439, Baezu wrote:I'm on phone now so I can't go find it but will do so once I have a chance
Please do.
Feeling nervous? I understand, it must be so stressful being caught scum.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 445, LynxKuroneko wrote:
In your last paragraph you're saying pressure votes do nothing. Did my vote and criticism on Flames not getting to say something; if anything?
Why are you against me wanting to draw out activity from other players? I can't just say; "X is lurking / therefore scummy", because that'll get us nowhere. Once players see that another is willing to vote them (getting them 1 step closer to lynch), I feel it'll incite some reaction.
Compare the pair.
Person A: Flames is lurking scum. Vote: Flames
Person B: Flames, you should post more. I love pressuring! Vote: Flames
Which one sounds like Lynx?
Spoiler: hint hint
Lynx 445 wrote:Again. I applaud that; it was beautiful. But no. And the fact that you've ignored others who are... *gameplay506*... saddens me.
Says the person whoisn'tvoting gameplay, hasn't expressed any interest in doing so and hasn't even claimed to scumread gameplay today.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 450, Klazam wrote:Yeah not sitting right with me. Why is baezu so eager to clear me? Saying its the result of a crumb, then now its because i was voting a scum that went down? This behavior coming from a claimed vt perplexes me.i dont see scum motivation there though, unless its to tie me with baezu, so when he gets lynched i go down? I dont see that legit happening though.
Regarding lynx, im trying to decide if hes a troll/badplayer or legit scum. Leaning badplayer atm.
To be fair, that post was the reason I found you towny early as well. But going as far to say 'conf-town' was kinda weird. At first, I did think she may have been scum intending to fakeclaim Cop but she didn't?
You should definitely vote Lynx btw.
@Gameplay, what about Klazam's post bothered you?-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 468, LynxKuroneko wrote:Me, badplayer? *Shakes head*. Anyone else buying what insanity is selling?
^Obsession with perception from others-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 490, gameplay506 wrote:
Lynx is probably town. I suggest you unvote. Instead vote one of Baezu, Klazam or Bins.
Also guys I think Baezu is lying. Look at Flames'ses diagnosis and so. He doesn't have one and he is a VT.
I disagree.
So? Ankamius didn't have a diagnosis either and he wasn't a VT.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 517, Baezu wrote:Are you trying to derail the Lynx wagon cuz he's your partner?
Why did you move your vote then?-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
Lynx, you are far from confirmed town. Bins isn't confirmed either. I am not voting you because of your playstyle but because you are scum. And since I'm now apparently the only person who wants to lynch you, why are you so anxious about one vote?
But your attempt to 'conf-town' one of the people who is indecisive about you has been noted.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
So do I!
The way gameplay replaced out makes me feel more confident about that read actually.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 601, SleepyKrew wrote:In post 599, LynxKuroneko wrote:... gameplay claimed vanilla~rized, meaning VT. You claim not VT.
Yeah because Vanillad Rolestopper isn't the same as a VT. They're functionally the same, yes, but the claims have very different meanings.
^I agree with this.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
I'd probably be more worried if Sleepyhadclaimed VT, considering Lynx's post just before
In post 578, LynxKuroneko wrote:Thats stupid, Klaz. He'll obviously claim VT like gamelay did...-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
Well, I don't think you caught SK in a lie. Gameplay claimed to be a (vanillerised) rolestopper, not a VT. So I would be more concerned if SK had seen Lynx say 'gameplay claimed VT' and then try to claim VT, because thatwouldbe a lie. And SK definitely saw Lynx's post because he quoted it.
But, trust me, I think your Lynx read is wrong.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 618, ProHawk wrote:I will catch-up though, but my time is spread slightly at the moment. Anyone be so kind as to point out the highlights?
Free town points if you actually read the thread and post something remotely meaningful (unlike your predecessors)
- We quicklynched the cult leader on Day 1
- Gameplay/SK claimed to be a rolestopper who got vanillerised on Night 1
- The Night 1 vezok kill is unaccounted for
- Baezu and who have claimed VT-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
ProHawk seems town for now? Still thinking about some of the things you said.
In post 648, LynxKuroneko wrote:I'm not even going to respond to 646.
Please either understand the context in which that statement was used or don't mention it, please. Thanks.
>_> Responds anyway.
Seems like you're pretending not to care about what people think when in actuality, you do.
In post 651, Bins wrote:
I know the context. Insanity is way more deserving of the leader role than me, I don't know why you were trying to shut her down.
@Everyone, how many scum would you guess are left?-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 677, ProHawk wrote:Look.
I mean, statistically Lynx wouldn't be a BAD lynch if we were solely hunting from this wagon, but my gut tells me no withthe amount of antagonizing he is doing to people pushing him. Which leaves you and Klazam.
In response to this, I thought Lynx was trying to be really placating at first.
In post 445, LynxKuroneko wrote:
While I will admit that you'vedone a great jobof trying to make me look bad and breaking down my actions, you've just shown yourself to be quite...misguided.
Again. I applaud that; it was beautiful. But no. And the fact that you've ignored others who are... *gameplay506*... saddens me.
In post 486, LynxKuroneko wrote:Baezu - How am I not reading?
gameplay - I'm not trying to scumhunt?Surprisingly the only person really doing that is insanity018, even if she's stretching her reasoning as much as possible. You're the one I'm weary of, regardless. You've made hasty claims, change your stance on people repeatedly, and can't even act like an adult. And yet you feel like you can insult me and my plays? You've done the most posting this game, and its a lot of noise, really.
Fmpov, Lynx started getting antagonistic when that wasn't working.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
In post 682, insanity018 wrote:
Fmpov, Lynx started getting antagonistic when that wasn'tworkingchanging my read of him.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
I've found that quite a lot of Who's posts feel townish but his lack of presence throughout the game worries me.
Baezu's last couple of posts make me uncomfortable.
In post 697, Bins wrote:In post 695, ProHawk wrote:In post 692, Bins wrote:I actually think tunneling isn't scummy, it's town.
Could you elaborate here?
In post 693, ProHawk wrote:Who's play makes me feel dirty.
This is literally what I mean.
It's a yuck feeling, and it sucks to be tunnelled when you're town, but it's usually done by town. It's just what I believe, I honestly don't think scum tunnels.
Did you mean to quote ProHawk 693 here? Because that seems to contradict what you're saying.
//sidenote - does your avatar come from somewhere? I keep thinking it looks familiar.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
With that in mind, some stuff that stood out to me -
That is one of the reasons why I thought gameplay's replace out was more likely to be town. Although I could imagine scum distancing themselves by insulting each other, it didn't make sense that they would also try to replace out/get the other to replace out because of it.
I don't really like how Baezu seems to keep fishing to vote elsewhere. 517-518 and recent postings.-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia
-
-
insanity018 Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2256
- Joined: April 9, 2014
- Location: Australia