...If he dies, maybe I can steal his carebear ?
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Grek wrote:I don't know, but her alignment doesn't matter. If she is scum and get's lynched, that's good. If she's scum and isn't, we lose nothing. If she is town and nobody quicklynchs, she is safe. If she is town and gets quicklynched we found some scummy people.
Wow. I'm officially astounded.Grek wrote:The only way she is going to get lynched is if 2 more people voted before anyone can unvote. Which would be realy scummy. I was offering the scum enough rope to hang themselves, both figuratively and literaly. Seeing as they did not take the bait, IUnvote.
How do you know the scum didn't try to lynch me?Grek wrote:I am unvoting because the scum didn't try to lynch Nox. Leaving my vote on her would be useless.
I don't know, it seems alledged townspeople are dumb enough to give them the opportunity to do so. :/Grek wrote:I honestly doubt that there are 2 townies that would be dumb enough to vote for her.
Are we in a sitiation that we can be confirmed that we are in fact losing two scums?Grek wrote:In what situation would losing 2 scum be a bad thing for the town?
Newsflash; That includes you if you're on the bandwagon.Grek wrote: If she is town and gets quicklynched we found some scummy people.
I agree.pug89 wrote:While finding two scum could be more helpful than a lot of discussion day 1 it doesn't seem likely that your plan would result in such. This is why I think you are scum who came up with your plan only after being questioned about your vote to cover your behavior.
Thank you. That just about sums it up.Mirth wrote:Sigh. My point is that quicklynching Nox, regardless of whether or not she is scum or town, is bad, even for scum. The scum have no good reason to quicklynch her even if she is town, because it would give them away. Thus there is no good reason to quicklynch Nox for the scum. The end.
So in your mind Mirth is guilty until proven innocent?benhalkum wrote:Well, with being just a good guy I am only having to go off of suspecions and randomness like you guys.
You think without a shadow of a doubt Mirth is Town, then tell me. I'll go with my fellow good guys
I agree that it has snowballed rather quickly, and that's usually a bad omen. IMHO, I don't think it's overdone as it's simply a matter of elaborating and justifying his vote, which he still hasn't despite the posting.Zindaras wrote:inHim: Which of the people voting ben do you think is most likely scum? Why do you want to keep your vote on Nox?
I'll have to say that I'm not really very excited with this 'wagon either. In a day, he's gotten 4 votes (including my own) and 2 FoSes, which seems a bit overdone for something like this. I'm going toUnvotefor now so we can calm down and let ben respond in more detail.
The both of them seem sketch In my opinion. I find Ben's behavior odd- If it was a random vote, so be it. But saying it was founded, and then denying it saying it was random when pressed for explanation, is just plain scummy to me.Jex wrote:I'm definitely starting to realize why everyone thinks Ben is scum. I still have grek at the top of my list though, with ben in a close second.
"Grek wrote:He said:Mirth wrote:Grek, his answer seemed to be that "it's too early to think anything" unless I'm reading something wrong...and I know I shall be getting more flak for this, but I really don't like how hard Grek is pushing. I agree with Nox about it seeming like Grek is trying to get rid of attention.I think it needs attention now. Knowing who thinks what of who, and why those thoughts changed as the days pass helps the town. It gives us something to work on once we have more solid info.Day 1 won't get much more from me on Day 1 besides who I support or who I suspect - I'll get to the other players when I feel it needs attention
We could wait untill Apo gets back, decide if ben was a jester, scum or nuts and go from there. What are the chances we would have two jesters?As for my read on InHim. I do not know what to think, but he honestly does strike me as less scummy than a few other people. I don't like the wagoning, but two things don't sit well in my mind. Somebody mentioned earlier that the mod likes jester roles, and while speculating about it seems stupid, I keep remembering that phrase. InHim's player age just doesn't want to reconcile with the kind of stupid wagonning for me for some reason. That's all I have to add. (Now I need to go catch up on all I missed in Open. Argh.)
Note that people suspected me on theI agree with you about Grek's pushing. I don't like that he states it is just his playstyle, yet he didn't really choose to push hard against someone until after people began looking at him as a possible suspect. Grek is still high on my list of scum, but I don't know who I want to vote for at this point. For now unvote until I have some time to read through posts again and get a better idea of things.first page. It makes sense that I only started after that, as there wasn't enough info for me to start pushing on for someone onpage one.
Grek wrote:The scum can't exactly go and kill everyone that thinks they are scum, people would notice.Nox wrote:I agree that people's thoughts and opinions concerning others are important to the town; however, they are equally important to Scum.
I brought it up twice in response to ben's ridiculously scummy posts and twice in response to posts talking about jesters.Grek has mentionned it what, three or four times now? It's starting to irk me.
Why do people assume scum are stupid? Of course people would notice. Thing is though, Scum don't need to kill off people who are onto them to win; they need to kill off the Town, period. They tend to deal with the people who are suspicious of them in an upfront manner in order to not look scummy and to cast suspicion on others.Grek wrote:The scum can't exactly go and kill everyone that thinks they are scum, people would notice.