Mini 105 - High School Teacher Mafia-Game Over!

[nard054]

Does the term scum always imply mafia? If not, it could it mean that Curtaindog was the SK. Just stating all possibilies. (I would also suspect that this is the type of game in which a vigilante would be present, as Quailman stated)

Nothing to go on, so no vote yet.

[nard054]

fos: quailman

for starting a random bandwagon. And he made it clear that he didn't have a reason other than to put a second vote on someone other than him.

[nard054]

Well, I'm not voting BlueSin because I think he's mafia. I'm voting him because 1)I don't want him to stay hidden. This allows him to more easily lurk. This could help him considerably if he were mafia, but it wouldn't be that much of an advantage if he were town. 2) I did this to start up some more discussion. I'm testing a theory that mafia will jump on a bandwaggon that forms just because someone makes a small mistake or posts something that doesn't make too much sense. So,

FOS: Coolbot and Quailman

.

So you're saying that it doesn't matter to you whether or not we lynch a lurking townie? What if that person was a cop or a doc and you lynched them just because they didn't post when there was really nobody acting suspicious. I wouldn't blame people for not posting when there's nothing to post about. [/b]

[nard054]

Ok. There are two things that I have found suspicious thus far in the game.

First was Quailman changing his random vote to another random vote just so someone would have two votes. This is not even related to the argument that BadAndie and Quailman are having. I just thought the desire to have a random bandwagon was a little shady.

The second was Yggdrasil's accusation of Bluesin for simply being hidden or whatever. How would that possibly help him in the game if he were scum? It seemed to me that he was looking too hard for 'suspicious' things.

Its a tough vote, but I find Yggdrasil more suspicious right now, so I'll send a

vote yggdrasil

's way.

[nard054]

I think BadAndie has been more unreasonable, and seems a bit scummy. Bandwagons are useful, especially in the beginning of the game, to start discussions. Makes the game more interesting. So, fos nard and BadAndie.

I'm not saying bandwagons aren't useful, I'm saying they should be based on something other than trying to put someone else ahead in the votes. And look how it succeeded. All of the votes for BadAndie came from this completely random "save-myself-when-theres-nothing-really-threatening-me" tactic.

[nard054]

I'll beat her to it. She (BadAndie) and I are masons. Hence I defended her and tried to rally votes for Quailman. He did vote (even if randomly) for both masons. It might be a coincidence, or he might know something.

[nard054]

In my post where I pointed out that Quailman voted for both masons, I even said that it was probably a coincidence, and I still stand by that. My vote for Ygg stays. He seems the most suspicious at this point.

[nard054]

I'm still really suspicious of Ygg. He jumped all over Zoneace when he...um....got a little cranky. It seems to me that he votes a little too quickly and changes his vote often. I personally think that people that do that are most likely to be scum because they play things up for more than they are to direct attention away from themselves.

[nard054]

Agreed. I'd rather have you tell us without anyone giving you options. But if someone feels so inclined to guess, I'm not stoppin' ya.

[nard054]

Yggdrasil wrote:

Also, I would doubt that the kill was due to a vigilante because I don't think a vigilante wouldn't risk killing a townie or a useful role just killing blindly night 1.

Did anyone else catch the double negative? Are you saying you killed last night? Or is it just a (very important) grammatical error?

[nard054]

I'll go with that.

unvote: ygg

so he can prove himself tonight (if we ever get to that point). Seriously, something has to be done. Here is my suggestion:

We all vote for someone who we feel suspicious...then everyone who didn't vote for that person changes their vote to the most suspected person. This is just to get the game moving and it could be helpful in pinpointing mafia.

For me this person (other than ygg because i still don't really believe him) is quailman.

vote: quailman

P.S. - just a suggestion. I don't really care if we go through with it or not.

[nard054]

Um, nardo, isn't that how mafia works? Or do you normally vote for someone you think is a cop or a doc?

Yeah...i guess it is. But this time I think everyone should vote and express an opinion, if for nothing more than to get conversation moving.

[nard054]

Ygg...can you submit a death scene along with your choice to kill? (And if this is violating the rule where you can't quote the PM then you don't have to answer) But this was the case when I was a SK in two earlier games. I'm not sure exactly how Stewie runs his games, but I've come to know this as a standard in games. And the fact that you don't have it/didn't think of it is a little suspicious to me.

[nard054]

Maybe they have them in Canada (Which is where Stewie is from, right?)? Anyone know?

I have nothing else to say.

[nard054]

Well what are the chances that both of them are innocent? Not very good in my opinion. So I say we just choose one of them and, if the chosen is innocent, then we'll lynch the other tomorrow (or, if we have new leads, someone different). But I say we lynch one of them as to not fall victim to the deadline.

unvote: quailman

I'd rather have a vig than a roleblocker. Call me crazy.

vote: coolbot

[nard054]

Excellent. Now we know at least one of them is mafia. The question now is which one. I'm somewhat inclined to believe quailman over sketchwick, but I want to feel Sketchwick out a bit before giving my full opinion.

[nard054]

Thats reason enough for me to vote.

vote: sketchwick

[nard054]

So far we have had two investigative roles die (uraj and bluesin)

How do you know that BlueSin's was an investigative role? All it says is that he had multiple functions. I have no idea what that means, so how would you, an alleged sex-ed teacher know what these functions were?

So

fos: tigris

for that reason and I just don't find your claim as credible as Quailman's.

[nard054]

I read death scenes very closely indeed. The death scene for bluesin
Quote:
Bluesin was spotted in his lab mixing different kinds of potions that would help him to find evil in this game.

Sorry....I didn't see that part in my first read-through.

Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but did Quailman ever actually claim? From what it seems like to me (and I wasn't extremely active in this part of the game), but we all assumed that Quailman was a detective of some sort when he said that he was so sure of Sketchwick being scum. He never actually claimed though. I'd like to hear the entire claim from Quailman.

[nard054]

Whether they met or not, I do not know. I didn't know they were masons when I randomly voted one, then the other. I

speculated

about how BadAndie could have reached her conclusion, but I have no such role.

I did not see anyone together last night, nor did I say that I did

. I thought I believed you, but you're still acting wierd.

That quote was from page 4, when I brought up that Quailman had voted for both masons.

Anyway, there seems to be a little contradiction there. You said you saw ZONEACE "stay put," implying that if he would have met with someone else, you would have seen him with that someone.

I feel that this is enough reason to put the last vote on, but I'll wait for you to defend yourself and for the town to add anything.

[nard054]

The way I see it, we have this game won. Lynch one of them today and if they're not the one, the two remaining members will lynch them tomorrow (Or Ygg can kill them tonight). Anyone object?

[nard054]

Here goes.

vote: Tigris

Let's end this.

Sure, why not? If its not tigris, its (obviously) quailman.

vote: tigris