Uh, no... it's Blue.
I can't confirm a Red Team, but I can confirm a Blue one.
This is probably true as well, to an extent. There is definitely a difference between Faction and Team, and the latter might have some relevance to specific roles, but is very likely not alignment indicative.In post 27, Hinduragi wrote:I don't give a flying fuck who's on what team. All people need to know is if they're town or not. Let's make this very fucking clear: you're either town or you aren't. Teams are just some bullshit thrown in for flavor.
I already heavily implied that I'm on Blue Team.In post 39, RadiantCowbells wrote:Are you on team banned?
In post 106, Frozen Angel wrote:
In post 94, DrDolittle wrote:I am also on the banned team -- still not quite comfortable with how hindu so quickly dismissed RC's banned status as scum signalling?
well actually this feels scummy. I know in the way my role pm is written all banned players are millers. but he never claimed to be one. plus he claims he is in banned in 63 posts later ... after I confirmed what RC was claiming
and yeah I think there is nothing in Aj so
VOTE: DrDolittle
@RCI'm town. you can move on ...
It's been done many times in the past, it's not surprising in the least tbqh. It's fool hardy to make people believe this is an epic fail strategy.In post 118, Aj The Epic wrote:Yeah because the single most effective scum strategy is to bus your partner's ass first post out of confirms.
Hindu votes RC, Dr immediately counter votes Hindu in his first post. That in and of itself shows that though Dr didn't claim Miller in the very first post, that he was aware of the team and believed it which means it's far more likely that he was on the team, and his later claim corroborates it.In post 123, Frozen Angel wrote:explain please. I said he never claimed miller. nor defended RC when he was in banned team as well. why is that town?
In post 166, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm willing to vote Toge just for that, but I feel like the Dwlee wagon is being pushed by scum as a counterwagon to my ABR wagon.
I already said it's a meta read.In post 175, hi im Yakko wrote:You asked for a case for scum abr pandaguy care to provide a case for town abr?
I also have to address that this is entirely not true. I'd be happy to have ABR post more, and I am not condoning him to remain silent just because I think he is town. Wagons need support, I need him to help push Dwlee (especially since he started it).In post 178, RadiantCowbells wrote:You're defending him saying that we shouldn't force him to make more content since you apparently already know he's town.
In post 184, RadiantCowbells wrote:It's that my motivations are pro-town and yours are anti-town, basically.
In post 184, RadiantCowbells wrote:The reality is that there is no good cause for the Dwlee wagon, the post being cited is not a scumtell whatsoever, most of my primordial scumreads are on the Dwlee wagon already, and that Dwlee happened as a reaction to ABR. Even with this, I would not fight it until much later if there wasn't a good reason to, but ABR needs to happen.
In post 188, Dwlee99 wrote:Yo toogeloo are you blind to my posts or something? Just wondering.
In post 196, RadiantCowbells wrote:That's 4 votes on Dwlee and I could see 3 of them as scum easily.
In post 267, dramonic wrote:It is 7 to force someone to solo Baron. Baron spawn is in 12 and 6 hours or something? There's a reason I don't jungle...
God forbid people not actually have solid reads and are fine with wagoning for the sake of wagoning.In post 363, hi im Yakko wrote:Another hop? How many people are scum for you hinduragi?
To antagonize you, but you knew that, I'm sure.In post 372, Dwlee99 wrote:We as a collective term for a group of people. You knew what I meant so what is the point in making that comment?
If you are referring to my Hindu read, I covered that already (assuming you are reading). If you are referring to some other question I may have glossed over, you might need to remind me.In post 377, hi im Yakko wrote:If you would be so kind panda as to answer mine.
In post 393, Klazam wrote:toog's post 369... just read that again. advocating the waste of a day to test a claim, on the basis of oh hey maybe night actions might be good for us.
In post 463, DrDolittle wrote:In post 461, Raskolnikov wrote:a bear
ill have you know im actually the black man in the picture. thanks.
I thought maybe he was just referring to me.In post 476, Hinduragi wrote:Who's bear?
I'd hope to god it's an even less (hopefully non-existent) scum modifier.In post 499, RadiantCowbells wrote:Lynchproof isn't exactly a common town modifier.
In post 746, dramonic wrote:[5:01]Dramonic (Xerath):Ganking bot!
Klazam (4): Toogeloo, Albert B. Rampage, Hinduragi, Raskolnikov
Hiplop (3): RadiantCowbells, Klazam, Frozen Angel
Frozen Angel (2): dwlee99
Hinduragi (2): DrDolittle, Aj The Epic
Raskolnikov (2): Hiplop, hi im Yakko
Aj the Epic (1): The Bulge
Not Voting:
It is 7 to force someone to solo Baron. Baron spawn is in 5 days and 21 hours...
In post 987, Raskolnikov wrote:I'm Jarvan IV, my passive is golden aegis and it prevents my target from dying that night. I can also self target so I was gonna do that all game t_t
In post 1021, Hinduragi wrote:Toog, do you want that question answered?
In post 1034, RadiantCowbells wrote:I appreciate you making me slightly less likely to be night killed.
I'd be fine with this as a dying man's wish.In post 1033, Albert B. Rampage wrote:do we all agree on RC insta lynch tomorrow if rasko flips scum?
...and his overall activity.In post 1045, The Bulge wrote:Caught up btw. Ok with the rask lynch, those fake hammer reactions were laughable.
Hoping to be far more active Day 2 as my life is clearing up a little bit and I tend to usually slip through Day 1 anyway
In post 1077, RadiantCowbells wrote:I don't really feel like arguing with idiots.
My role is confirmable. Lynch me D3 if I haven't confirmed myself by then.
Do you understand what I'm saying? I'm Annie.
Why is it only those two options?In post 1079, RadiantCowbells wrote:Either I and scum targeted ABR together or scum were role blocked.
Yeah, if you are SK, mafia ain't going to touch you until after you've helped them do some heavy lifting since they are already down a member.In post 1079, RadiantCowbells wrote:Concerned that I'm SK? maf will be forced to deal with me. now stop being idiots and unvote.
So you would kill not only the one player who kingpinned a Day 1 lynch of scum, and then threaten to kill a player that is being town read on multiple fronts without disregard, even if they had a innocent on them? And why do people want to hesitate lynching this?In post 1100, RadiantCowbells wrote:You can literally be claiming a cop inno on him and he is still getting shot tonight.
In post 1125, Hinduragi wrote:My role is Ascetizer. I make someone Ascetic for a night.
I'm pretty sure I've stated several times your multi-shot vig role is bullshit.In post 1154, RadiantCowbells wrote:If you believed that I was scum the logical conclusion would be for you to believe that I'm fully making up my vig claim to buy another day.