Mini 1795: Science [GAME OVER]
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
thats a vacuum surely :/In post 27, KuroiXHF wrote:VOTE: SirCakez
I already know his character. He's gravity.
How do I know that?
He suuuuuucccckkkks! <3
i mean technically a black holeIn post 31, KuroiXHF wrote:
UNVOTE:In post 27, KuroiXHF wrote:VOTE: SirCakez
I already know his character. He's gravity.
How do I know that?
He suuuuuucccckkkks! <3
Apparently I'm too stupid to be in Science Mafia. I was thinking of a black hole.iscaused by gravity so if that is what you were going for you werent that far off!
its my shtick deal with it cakeyIn post 32, SirCakez wrote:VOTE: mr meeseeks
no caps drives me insane
Do you care to share those assorted reads Salesman?I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
trust me if pascals principle is applicable to your sex life then you are doing something wrongIn post 44, KuroiXHF wrote:(BTW, I tried to make a joke about the wedding night so I googled laws of physics. I came up with this:
Pascal's Principle
Pressure applied to an enclosed incompressible static fluid is transmitted undiminished to all parts of the fluid.
This seems like it could be used for a sexual pun. Go for it, because I'm not good enough to make a joke about it.)I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
A black hole is a region of spacetime exhibiting such strong gravitational effects that nothing—including particles and electromagnetic radiation such as light—can escape from inside it.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
black holes are literally caused by gravity
extremely large star runs out of hydrogen and helium for fusion at the end of its life cycle and it becomes a red supergiant, shrinks a little and then explodes (goes supernova) releasing energy dust and gas, the remaining core becomes a neutron star usually but very large stars will have a core with such mass it becomes a black hole because its mass is so great its gravitational pull is inescapableI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
its less time, its more energy and effort required
in the way im feeling right now im just gonna skim through, take nothing in, and generally not accomplish anything but waste time
if i wait a while then i can do one of my notorious wallposts and actually get the informationn from the whole thing into my brain
understand what i mean?I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
remove my vote from shos? say hello to ploti? turn into a ferret?In post 123, Travelling Salesman wrote:I am, indeed, voting you for something you haven't done. Do you know what that something is?
I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
its a fucking meta read christ on a fucking bicycle
uhh... no? my aim is to keep this alt as secret as possible. sure i fucked that the hell up in my first game, but im not just gonna wander around outing myself willy nilly, id like to keep this as a separate accountIn post 127, Travelling Salesman wrote:I thought that if I were wrong, you might out yourself to me assuming that once I knew your identity, I would correctly townread you,
also i amincrediblytempted to vote you because holy shit youre metaing an alt, i dont care if i did it "on this account" but the last time someone tried this they were scum so dont mind me if i get immediately suspicious
VOTE: travelling salesman
ive nothing else to go on, so this is plenty good thanks you very muchI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
but that would be a lie because i figured it was a 90% chance it was a meta read because of the "something you havent done" term which you use in regards to my meta so i was just getting you to confirm that so i could facepalmIn post 129, Travelling Salesman wrote:"if you knew who my main was, you would be townreading me"
and my "other alt" (presuming youre referring to the one i think you are)... does that even count? because i wasnt even trying to hide who i was there or play differently - this alt is a concious attempt to play in a different style, y'know?
im not saying you should entirely disregard the meta - whatever it is - just take it with a pinch of salt
i mean its sorta secret but not really secret so i dont care that much tbh so idk
anyway im gonna catch up once ive finished my food now yay woohoo broccoliI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
shit i didnt know you were married to deathrowkittyIn post 44, KuroiXHF wrote:she'd choose frogs as her role...
oh yay claims already :/ i mean i understand but ehh, double voter is something i prefer people to keep secret, but you can go as a townlean for now i guessIn post 55, Javajoe24 wrote:Ok, so you guys know, I am a double voter. I hinted at it earlier and that's the reason I unvoted after my first vote.
eh? i dont see whats alignment indicative about them doing that...In post 68, Javajoe24 wrote:I don't like the fact that Sheldon and shos voted magna right after I did simply to prove my double vote. After the next vote count my vote is going on one of you twowut
oh look misrepresenting someone who happens to be voting you what a coincidenceIn post 84, MagnaofIllusion wrote:“Hey look – I’ll try to both peddle that MoI is somehow both doubting the claim and putting too much faith in it at the same time.”
woahwoahwoah so you feel that sheldon made a contradiction in voting you and stuff etc but you instead voted cabd for... some reason? calling someone scummy and then not voting someone while voting someone with little reason is a pretty nice tell, thanks for that!In post 84, MagnaofIllusion wrote:VOTE: Cabd
VOTE: magnaofillusion
yeah i like this for scum - he had already given plenty of reason to vote sheldon cooper, but he "had" to come up with this extra logical leap to fully justify voting, and something about this feels unnaturalIn post 98, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Scum. Scum desperately trying to justify a scum read on me for the exact same conclusion I drew.In post 97, SheldonCooper wrote:Javajoe is most likely likely town as well for their approach to the claim, as well as to an extent their role being likely town.
Everyone else is null at this point except for MoI who I am scumreading because their approach to the Java claim didn't feel at all like actual scumhunting
Here is the initial reasoning on why I am scum. The bolded is the important part.In post 69, SheldonCooper wrote:I voted MoI following 56because I was super sketched about about his willingness to consider a proven doublevote confirmed townas well as his inclination to not believe an extremely easily disprovable claim.
1. 56 never says anything about Java being “Confirmed Town”. It simply says I could sort him as Town for his role. So a misrep.
2. He comes to that same analysis on Java as quoted above. He's now couching his read on "it doesn't feel like real scum-hunting" which is means ... he can't actually justify his stance and has to throw empty words.
That and he ignores the whole back and forth I had with Travelling that explains exactly my thought process.
VOTE: Sheldon
Or Shotty.
has everyone this game forgotten how reasons workIn post 107, chilledtea wrote:Haven't completed reading yet but we have got our scum.
VOTE : SirCakez
first one, shit dude, you complain about a useless post in post number seven??? while not even commenting on all of the arguably more useless science discussion that extended to the third page? sheesh. second one, uhh, "we need a wagon", he wants a wagon to form so he can analyse it, so theres a clear reason so you cant say "because ???", second scum with magna that would be coolIn post 108, SirCakez wrote:In post 7, Fire Assassin wrote:So my first topic discussion I want us all to discuss what were your choices that Antihero didn't pick?
I didn't like these two posts. First one is a bizarre question that accomplishes nothing and the second is pushing an unexplained RVS wagon because ???In post 77, Fire Assassin wrote:I am still in support of my RVS vote, and we need a wagon.
So I suggest everyone condense onto my vote.
Please and thank you from your friendly neighborhood assassin.
whoIn post 111, Cabd wrote:mr. image formatI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
do tell me why you made a big catchup and focused on several players who werent me and then voted me anyway?
I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
for... the reaction? you voted for something i hadnt done yet? i didnt realise you could warp the fabric of spacetime, golly goshIn post 144, shos wrote:
for this reaction, of course, which justifies the voteIn post 142, Mr Meeseeks wrote:do tell me why you made a big catchup and focused on several players who werent me and then voted me anyway?
"a big catchup", lol, that's 2 posts.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
a) at the time i hadnt caught up so there wasnt much else to go on, and my previous vote at the time was still rvsIn post 149, SirCakez wrote:How is metaing on an alt voteworthy?
b) scum did it in the last game i was in so it struck a nerveI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
oh sure why dont i fucking let everyone know who this is an alt of
whats the fucking point, holy shit like why do i even need to prove this like seriously
is the best quote i could find without giving away entirely who i amIn post 1957, RadiantCowbells wrote:You wanted to avoid being read for meta and you did things that would make you virtually confscum on your main
and you expect me to townread and/or ignore it? please.
now back the fuck off and stop doubting me, why the piss would i lie about something so disprovable?I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
go on thenIn post 157, shos wrote:
I can see the future, yeah.In post 147, Mr Meeseeks wrote:*naked vote* "why did you do that" "so youd react to it lol obvscum"
rather than the vague "for that reaction lol" bullshit, how about you explain why the reaction was scummy
because the point im making is that the case so far is weak as fuckI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
oh no a fuss from a single naked vote??????? obviously only scum do that, after all town justIn post 159, shos wrote:See, the point is that you make such a fuss from a single, naked vote. I said absolutely nothing, at all, and look how you react. "the case so far" is weak? what case? you getting uberdefensive is alarming. And hence, the vote stays.lovebeing voted for and lynched without an explanation
DEFENSIVENESS ISNOTA SCUMTELL like where did this ridiculous idea even come from it makes no damn sense
also, by "case" i mean your reason for voting me, its weak as shit and your pathetic explanation didnt make it any better.
Also
uberdefensive my arse, i call bullshit on you keeping voting me for thisIn post 142, Mr Meeseeks wrote:do tell me why you made a big catchup and focused on several players who werent me and then voted me anyway?
VOTE: shos
scumteam if you made me choose right now id go shos, moi and cakes, in order of confidenceI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
i dont see how "reacting so much to a naked vote" (which is an exaggeration in and of itself if you ask me) is a big deal - you say it like i should react less to a naked vote, but all i had done at the time was ask for more details about your reasoning and make a couple of snarky comments - hardly unreasonable behaviour
of course im going to react to a naked vote - you vote me with no reason just after a post where youd given reason to vote someone else (something which i already called moi out on) is a dodgy thing to do so you painting me being suspicious of it as bad is utterly stupid. at least if you give a reason i can argue that it was stupid, like ypur current reasons which are misled, exaggerated, and almost circular.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
at least your case hasIn post 163, Travelling Salesman wrote:I mean, from the perspective of hypothetical town you, I'm the one faking a guilty on you right now. But you're right that your chance of lynching any of them is greater than your chance of lynching me.somesubstance though - it is a meta case which, while i am unaware of the exact content, i know exists and i know it existed prior to this game so at least you havent made it up on the spot, and while im kinda peeved that youre still pushing it when im an alt intended to play differently at least it came from somewhere and that is probably the main reason for me not doing the thing what makes me town, although i am worried by the fact that your most recent post is the first one in a while that didnt entirely focus on me
shos has his godawful case which makes no sense, magnaofillusion did some weird shit in regards to sheldon, and cakes is just worrying me. what reason do i have to be suspicious of you beside a mysterious meta case? its a better reason than a naked vote followed by "well your reaction was... overreacting to a naked vote despite not really doing that much"
idgaf that youre voting me, im not gonna push you when you havent done anything that scummyI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
i guess but by playing like this i imagine i am making various unconscious changes to my play (while im not consciously changing a particular aspect, the playstyle is definitely different i think) - all im saying is that your meta read has a 12% chance of being inaccurate at the best of times, nevermind when im intentionally playing differently as an alt (plus with exams on im gonna be playing different)
as for cakez
this one speaks for itselfIn post 133, Mr Meeseeks wrote:
first one, shit dude, you complain about a useless post in post number seven??? while not even commenting on all of the arguably more useless science discussion that extended to the third page? sheesh. second one, uhh, "we need a wagon", he wants a wagon to form so he can analyse it, so theres a clear reason so you cant say "because ???", second scum with magna that would be coolIn post 108, SirCakez wrote:In post 7, Fire Assassin wrote:So my first topic discussion I want us all to discuss what were your choices that Antihero didn't pick?
I didn't like these two posts. First one is a bizarre question that accomplishes nothing and the second is pushing an unexplained RVS wagon because ???In post 77, Fire Assassin wrote:I am still in support of my RVS vote, and we need a wagon.
So I suggest everyone condense onto my vote.
Please and thank you from your friendly neighborhood assassin.
here he was asking a weird and utterly pointless question which seems bizarre and wasteful, like hes trying to look useful when not really doing, you know, that muchIn post 153, Mr Meeseeks wrote:oh sure why dont i fucking let everyone know who this is an alt of
whats the fucking point, holy shit like why do i even need to prove this like seriously
is the best quote i could find without giving away entirely who i amIn post 1957, RadiantCowbells wrote:You wanted to avoid being read for meta and you did things that would make you virtually confscum on your main
and you expect me to townread and/or ignore it? please.
now back the fuck off and stop doubting me, why the piss would i lie about something so disprovable?
not much but theres a reason hes the weaker of my three scumreadsI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
oh wow, technicalities. he was clearly complaining about someone "accomplishing nothing". those are the exact words. so why he was complaining about that and not the other tons of fluff at the start is beyond me!In post 172, Travelling Salesman wrote:1) Cakes didn't complain that Fire Assassin's 7 was useless. He complained that it was a bizarre question which accomplishes nothing. RQS is worse than RVS because scum can datamine it more effectively than town can, but the question didn't bother me terribly much because we sent in science things that we liked rather than trying for any specific role, but I think that even if someone sent in, I dunno *wanders off to wikipedia*, projectile motion, ballistics, vaporific effect, that antihero wouldn't necessarily make them a vig. So, I ignored it rather than pushed on him for it. It was a bizarre question that accomplished nothing, but it could've led to outguessing the mod or at least outguessing what kind of roles everybody was trying for, whether they got it or not.
irrelevant. it was fluff, and for that to be ignored over complaining aboyt a question is silly2) The science discussion that you took part in. There's nothing wrong with some banter and enjoying the flavour at the start of a game.
becaues... he disagrees with the shos wagon? not that hard to figure out, when he "wants a wagon" obviously he wasnt it on someone he doesnt think is town... im not defending fire, im criticising cakez for clearly not thinking about what he says before painting someone as bad for doing it3) Why does Fire Assassin cling to his 1-vote RVS wagon on GIF instead of joining the 2-vote wagon on shos? If his reasoning is that we need a wagon, why is a 1-vote vanity wagon better than a larger wagon? If he wants an RVS wagon, why doesn't he join a larger one since nobody cares about his RVS vote on GIF? Why are you defending Fire Assassin from Cakes here?
waste of my time, to have to go into a game and try and find a relevant post which didnt contain my mains nick because, shock horror, a discussion involving metaing my main contained my mains username a lot surprisingly enough4) Cakes' question about whether you could provide citations for having been pushed by scum for meta was wasteful? What, was he going to run out of questions?
but it was pointless, it was hardly like i was going to lie about it ffs5) The question he asked you was one you could answer without outing yourself because it was from the other game you played on this account. If you say something in a game of mafia, people are going to ask you to provide citations. This isn't scummy.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
ahahahaha me looking forwards to a scumgame? do you honestly think this think this, because i do *NOT* look forwards to playing as scumIn post 173, Travelling Salesman wrote:I believe that he is genuinely upset that he was altguessed and genuinely disappointed that a scumgame he was looking forward to has turned out like this already. Scum have feelings too, and I care about his.
piss off, i often call out naked votes. ive seen them before, and 90% of the time they are backed up by shitty reasons when called out (seeI am pretty sure he's seen naked votes before in his mafia career. He's not a newb. So yeah, it was a strange reaction.literally this fucking time!!!!!) because they usually dont give a reason because theyre scared theyll get called out when they do, so its not even close to a strange reaction, dont give me this bull.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
if i am right about one of my three, ill be taking a close look at salesman because theres something odd there. problem is im too used to plotinus' style and it keeps seeming a bit off but then i remember its a hydra so im gonna get alarm bells, because ploti is a much player than bnl so when something is said that seems odd or backwards or something that they should realise is stupid, i have to keep in mind it might just be bnl :/I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
more confident, yes. still wouldnt look forwards to them. i was like "yes im town" in this and im disappointed im being scumread for largely meta reasons despite being an altIn post 177, Travelling Salesman wrote:Re: Cakes/Fire Assassin I'd like to see what either of them think of this.
I think that you were looking forward to this game because yay science. I know that you prefer to play as town, but I had thought that you were growing more comfortable as scum lately and feeling more confident in your abilities, especially after your success in [redacted]. I know that [redacted2] was a frustrating scumgame for you because [etc] but I also thought you did really well in that game in spite of [youknow].In post 175, Mr Meeseeks wrote:ahahahaha me looking forwards to a scumgame? do you honestly think this think this, because i do *NOT* look forwards to playing as scumagain
exactly, i was expecting a magna vote, and ive always disliked naked votes and pried into them. my reaction wasnt even slightly overblown. do you remember my initial reaction?
Naked votes are usually a reaction test of some sort. There don't need to be fantastic reasons on page 7. I assumed his naked vote was because he was sheeping me. Your response to it was overblown. You accused him of talking about other players but voting you instead, but the other players he talked about were "townread, townread, i don't know what i think of magna yet" reads, so voting any of them (except magna maybe) would also have been unexpected.In post 175, Mr Meeseeks wrote:piss off, i often call out naked votes. ive seen them before, and 90% of the time they are backed up by shitty reasons when called out (see literally this fucking time!!!!!) because they usually dont give a reason because theyre scared theyll get called out when they do, so its not even close to a strange reaction, dont give me this bull.
fuck off is that overblown in the slightest, but apparently that was enough to "justify" the vote, can you see why im hella suspiciouss of it?In post 142, Mr Meeseeks wrote:do tell me why you made a big catchup and focused on several players who werent me and then voted me anyway?
man this honesty despite the fact you know itd make me suspicious is kinda townie but also something i know plotinus would do so ehhh
bnl is the one who signs -bnl. He is also V/LA until the 6th so it's just been me for now. He's posted in our hydra PT though.In post 176, Mr Meeseeks wrote:if i am right about one of my three, ill be taking a close look at salesman because theres something odd there. problem is im too used to plotinus' style and it keeps seeming a bit off but then i remember its a hydra so im gonna get alarm bells, because ploti is a much player than bnl so when something is said that seems odd or backwards or something that they should realise is stupid, i have to keep in mind it might just be bnl :/
im null on travleing right now but if one of my scumreads turns up scum theyll be next on my list to scrutiniseI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
im saying thats really shitty reasoning unless you know who theyre an alt of and have a meta read and im 90% sure thats not the case because thats how i would react normally because naked votes are trash. like i said, my reaction was little more than "so what is your reason for voting" which isnt even slightly a weird reaction at all, you can argue about the "tone" of using "do" but honestly thats just unnecessary semantic and pedantic discussionIn post 180, Travelling Salesman wrote:He voted you, probably expecting that you would reactl ike [x] as scum and like [y] as town and you reacted like [x] so he continued voting you? that's usually how these things work? I mean you can argue that he's wrong but doing something to see how someone will react this early in the game isn't scummy?
what? thats something i said to travelling salesman. i give few fucks because theyre not being hugely scummy and their reason is founded in something i know exists. your reason is a naked vote and then a shitty "oh lol reaction test!!!! scummm" when i simply ask why you voted. thats why i give so many fucks. i dont see how you cant tell the difference between what you did and what salesman did and this quote still hugely confuses me as to why you chose it like whatIn post 184, shos wrote:
so...why do you give so many fucks about me voting you? it's not like I had a 'case', right?In post 164, Mr Meeseeks wrote: idgaf that youre voting me, im not gonna push you when you havent done anything that scummy
thats just how my train of thought works, especially with this being an alt, ill switch accounts back to my main and then something will suddenly pop into my head and then i switch back. thats honestly just how my brain works.In post 185, shos wrote:There are two minutes between the first posts. Why? what went through your head for two minutes before you decided it was worthy to post 'seriously though im not scum'?
Also why is there a HALF AN HOUR between that post and 'why I said this'?
ive only played one game on this alt and i couldnt find any posts where ive been nakedvoted there so, uh, no!In post 186, shos wrote:
Any chance you link me to a game of yours where you've been nakedvoted?In post 175, Mr Meeseeks wrote:
piss off, i often call out naked votes. ive seen them before, and 90% of the time they are backed up by shitty reasons when called out (seeI am pretty sure he's seen naked votes before in his mafia career. He's not a newb. So yeah, it was a strange reaction.literally this fucking time!!!!!) because they usually dont give a reason because theyre scared theyll get called out when they do, so its not even close to a strange reaction, dont give me this bull.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
oh good "omgus" as a buzzwordIn post 188, SirCakez wrote:This post pings me a lot. There's OMGUS, overreacting, and his progression of reads is just who's pushed on him and me.
i hate the overuse of omgus - omgus is literally "you voted me so ill vote you", not "i have a good reason for voting you and you are also voting me". overreacting? i havent even gone all caps yet which i did several times in my previous game. your description of my weird "progression of reads" ...i dont get what you mean?
well i explained it plenty well so frankly that isnt my problem at this pointIn post 188, SirCakez wrote:I don't understand the second quote/reason here at all.
learn to read my posts before throwing anything and everything that you can at me and youll see i already answered thatIn post 189, SirCakez wrote:This reminded me, I'm still waiting for an answer to this Meeseeks.
and you disagree that using "generic scumtells" for something with so many varied reactions such as nakedly voting someone isnt a bit dodgy?In post 190, Travelling Salesman wrote:you can still rely on more generic scumtells
the "switched to alt" was litearlly 3 minutes difference, because i logged off, go "wait shit" and then logged back on. you can say its not a town view, but in all honesty i think its just a person-by-person thing, my brain just works like this because it is weird. sometimes ill make a post and half an hour later realised i missed a bit off that i should have said. its better than me just not saying it at all, no?In post 192, shos wrote:
Not necessarily, but for this thing specifically, yes.In post 190, Travelling Salesman wrote: @shos: have you noticed that scum are more likely to do that than town? I thought that thinking of a better thing to say half an hour after the conversation has ended was a fairly universal human experience. I remember going back a month later and telling somebody "zipper" because I'd forgotten the word the last time we interacted but by then they'd forgotten the initial conversation.
Town don't go take a shower and come back "oh I said this because ehehehehe".
I'm not sure I'm buying this entire "switched to alt" thingie.
whyIn post 205, Aneninen wrote:I know I said the opposite before, but now I don't think Meeseeks would be a good lynch.
uhh... what? cakez isnt voting me? that makes... little sense. just look at his iso, hes spent wayyyyy more time focusing on me than fire assassin, his current vote. like, hes had one or two sentences about him, ive had entire posts dedicated to me. hm.In post 207, Antihero wrote:Mr Meeseeks - 2 (Travelling Salesman, shos)I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
In post 128, Mr Meeseeks wrote:this altIn post 130, Mr Meeseeks wrote:this altIn post 153, Mr Meeseeks wrote:this is an altIn post 164, Mr Meeseeks wrote:im an altIn post 168, Mr Meeseeks wrote:im intentionally playing differently as an altIn post 178, Mr Meeseeks wrote:being an altIn post 187, Mr Meeseeks wrote:this being an alt
i mean idk man i wonderIn post 187, Mr Meeseeks wrote:this altI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
but the fact that you have missed that (a) i am just an alt and (b) traveling salesman is a hydra with plotinus in is a brand new level of incompetence that i find stunning, and tells me you have barely even been reading the game. like, at all.In post 221, shos wrote:I mostly skimmed the walls, it's uninteresting.
thats not omgus, like i said, omgus is "omg u voted me voteeeee", ive given plenty of genuine reasons so nah, its not my fault that most players who have voted me have given shitty reasons. also, wheres my scumread of salesman? ive basically put them as nulltown ffsIn post 222, SirCakez wrote:How your reads all just seem to be based on who's pushing you.
ahahaha what? nullscum? after all youve said about me, im fuckingIn post 222, SirCakez wrote:Meeseeks nullscumnullscum? that just seems... wrong.
...but him supporting a rivaling wagon is a pretty clear indication that he disagrees with it though. subtext, reading between the lines, as irritating as i find it when people dont state reads its pretty obviously implied when he does something like that. come on.In post 223, SirCakez wrote:He didn't say anything about disagreeing with shos wagon tho.
i made like 325 posts in that game so it was hardly an easy searchIn post 223, SirCakez wrote:Considering you remembered it so well, it shouldn't have been hard to find.
im 90% sure i already explained this, but its asking questions to appear like youre doing something or thinking critically while actually acheieving very little.In post 223, SirCakez wrote:How is this scummy?
show me where, because i havent just gone "wahwah youre voting me when im town" (which id agree is scummy), ive made it pretty clear that im critical of their reasons and intentions and ive given reasons. also, give my iso in my last game a quick skim - especially where i was being challengeed by rc. thats honestly just how im being.In post 225, KuroiXHF wrote:Defensiveness is a town attribute. However, over-defensiveness is a scum attribute. You've been given an inch of rope and your kicking and screaming travels over a mile.
oh fuck you, ive got three scumspects and another which is slightly below which im fairly confident of, ive done the most fucking scumhunting this whole game!In post 225, KuroiXHF wrote:You're so vindictive and angry that I see someone upset that they're being voted and not that they're trying to find scum.
ugh, im sorry travelling but i hate this kind of reasonining because 9/10 times its more just feeling around in the dark and saying things which support your view rather than being logical. someone could easily argue that if i were scum id have more votes on me as my partners would be bussing me if they feel im not doing very well (and you could argue "power role" but this is an antihero upick, everyone has a damn power role).In post 237, Travelling Salesman wrote:If he were town, there'd be more votes on him.
uh... what? is me vs you a thing? as far as i can tell its just you having a mislead scumread and me disagreeing (and being a bit cautious due to your interactions with others). i dont see why scum would pile on me right now - hell, it would look opportunistic as fuck for a start.In post 241, Travelling Salesman wrote:me vs meeseeks
first of all, are they? second of all, so why arent you questioning them rather than just using it to confbias your read on me? cakez is the only offender i notice yet you havent talked to him about it at all, and considering your pov you probably should, since he completely ignored my attempt to confront him about it.In post 241, Travelling Salesman wrote:a few people are noncommitally scumreading him.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
actually, uhh, nope, chilledtea has saidIn post 246, Travelling Salesman wrote:
We are questioning Cakes and I want to read some more of his games.In post 244, Mr Meeseeks wrote:first of all, are they? second of all, so why arent you questioning them rather than just using it to confbias your read on me? cakez is the only offender i notice yet you havent talked to him about it at all, and considering your pov you probably should, since he completely ignored my attempt to confront him about it.
The other was chilledtea, which I called him out for. Anen was scumreading you but then he stopped. I'm not sure why he stopped. Fire Assassin is townreading you. Kuroi and shos are voting you. Sheldon doesn't want to lynch you because you're frustrated.
so your actual accurate sample size for people who are scumreading me but not voting me is... one. one single player.In post 179, chilledtea wrote:So he is null.
i know that confbiasing is hard to get out of - especially when you have a meta read which you view as "accurate" - but you need to really think more carefully
so youre implying that in the way hes acting cakez should be my scumpartner - and yet he is the weakest of your scumreads, and even in the case of chilledtea people often just dont feel confident enugh in a scumread to vote on it - hardly an unexpected or unreasonable reaction for someone you have as null, no?
also, uhh
...We are questioning cakes
no youre not
youve asked him one question
about hiskuroiread
get your shit together, get it all together and put it in a back pack, all your shit, so its together, and if you gotta take it somewhere, take it somewhere, you know, take it to the shit store and sell it, or put it in the shit museum, i dont care what you do, you just gotta get it together.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
In post 179, chilledtea wrote:Meseeks is definitely not a town read, and his genuineness in some things he has said makes me doubtful of the small scum read on him.
So I rather take my time with reading him. So he is null.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
By the way, it shows over-defensive when you're getting to the point of appealing to more emotion. You're swearing a lot[/quote]fuck off is that a scumtell. i just went into the iso of my other game, used ctrl+f, and in the two pages there were 125 matches for "fuck". so, uhh swearing being a scumtell? forget it.In post 256, KuroiXHF wrote:
oh fuck you, ive got three scumspects and another which is slightly below which im fairly confident of, ive done the most fucking scumhunting this whole game!In post 225, KuroiXHF wrote:You're so vindictive and angry that I see someone upset that they're being voted and not that they're trying to find scum.
can i help someone with a chronic problem of apparently being unable to see whats right in front of them?, and evidently, only to me. Tell me, who are you scum hunting?
i mean shit look at all the scumhunting iIn post 133, Mr Meeseeks wrote:
shit i didnt know you were married to deathrowkittyIn post 44, KuroiXHF wrote:she'd choose frogs as her role...
oh yay claims already :/ i mean i understand but ehh, double voter is something i prefer people to keep secret, but you can go as a townlean for now i guessIn post 55, Javajoe24 wrote:Ok, so you guys know, I am a double voter. I hinted at it earlier and that's the reason I unvoted after my first vote.
eh? i dont see whats alignment indicative about them doing that...In post 68, Javajoe24 wrote:I don't like the fact that Sheldon and shos voted magna right after I did simply to prove my double vote. After the next vote count my vote is going on one of you twowut
oh look misrepresenting someone who happens to be voting you what a coincidenceIn post 84, MagnaofIllusion wrote:“Hey look – I’ll try to both peddle that MoI is somehow both doubting the claim and putting too much faith in it at the same time.”
woahwoahwoah so you feel that sheldon made a contradiction in voting you and stuff etc but you instead voted cabd for... some reason? calling someone scummy and then not voting someone while voting someone with little reason is a pretty nice tell, thanks for that!In post 84, MagnaofIllusion wrote:VOTE: Cabd
VOTE: magnaofillusion
yeah i like this for scum - he had already given plenty of reason to vote sheldon cooper, but he "had" to come up with this extra logical leap to fully justify voting, and something about this feels unnaturalIn post 98, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Scum. Scum desperately trying to justify a scum read on me for the exact same conclusion I drew.In post 97, SheldonCooper wrote:Javajoe is most likely likely town as well for their approach to the claim, as well as to an extent their role being likely town.
Everyone else is null at this point except for MoI who I am scumreading because their approach to the Java claim didn't feel at all like actual scumhunting
Here is the initial reasoning on why I am scum. The bolded is the important part.In post 69, SheldonCooper wrote:I voted MoI following 56because I was super sketched about about his willingness to consider a proven doublevote confirmed townas well as his inclination to not believe an extremely easily disprovable claim.
1. 56 never says anything about Java being “Confirmed Town”. It simply says I could sort him as Town for his role. So a misrep.
2. He comes to that same analysis on Java as quoted above. He's now couching his read on "it doesn't feel like real scum-hunting" which is means ... he can't actually justify his stance and has to throw empty words.
That and he ignores the whole back and forth I had with Travelling that explains exactly my thought process.
VOTE: Sheldon
Or Shotty.
has everyone this game forgotten how reasons workIn post 107, chilledtea wrote:Haven't completed reading yet but we have got our scum.
VOTE : SirCakez
first one, shit dude, you complain about a useless post in post number seven??? while not even commenting on all of the arguably more useless science discussion that extended to the third page? sheesh. second one, uhh, "we need a wagon", he wants a wagon to form so he can analyse it, so theres a clear reason so you cant say "because ???", second scum with magna that would be coolIn post 108, SirCakez wrote:In post 7, Fire Assassin wrote:So my first topic discussion I want us all to discuss what were your choices that Antihero didn't pick?
I didn't like these two posts. First one is a bizarre question that accomplishes nothing and the second is pushing an unexplained RVS wagon because ???In post 77, Fire Assassin wrote:I am still in support of my RVS vote, and we need a wagon.
So I suggest everyone condense onto my vote.
Please and thank you from your friendly neighborhood assassin.
whoIn post 111, Cabd wrote:mr. image formatdidnt fucking do
sure im doing a lot of reacting at stuff directed at me and answering questions but would you rather i just ignored it? i cant help it if im at the centre of far too much attention right nowI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
yeah i get its your opinion but if you looked at my last game youd see this isnt really alignment-indicative at allIn post 256, KuroiXHF wrote:it's my opinion
is this strong scum relatively speaking or just in general?In post 261, KuroiXHF wrote:Strong Scum: Meeseeks
please read my posts and make your mind up on your own. i would like to hear the opinion of someone in your hydra who doesnt have the confbias of a meta read from the start and maybe you can help convince ploti of the truthIn post 264, Travelling Salesman wrote:I'm trusting Plot on Meeseeks being our strongest scumread
youre dodging my question here. i asked you why im nullscum despite what youve said about me, and youve said about fire. idgaf about fire. ansewr the damn questionIn post 270, SirCakez wrote:
I don't have any really strong scumreads at this point. Fire Assasin has kind of drifted back to nullscum.In post 244, Mr Meeseeks wrote:
ahahaha what? nullscum? after all youve said about me, im fuckingIn post 222, SirCakez wrote:Meeseeks nullscumnullscum? that just seems... wrong.
...then why is it weird that he supported a counter wagon without disagreeing with the other? youve just said you regularly do something that you scumread fire for, which seems counterintuitive at best
Not really....
...but him supporting a rivaling wagon is a pretty clear indication that he disagrees with it though. subtext, reading between the lines, as irritating as i find it when people dont state reads its pretty obviously implied when he does something like that. come on.In post 223, SirCakez wrote:He didn't say anything about disagreeing with shos wagon tho.
I've supported counter wagons without disagreeing with the other before
the question was about whether or not something in another game actually happened or not, and you pretty much entirely knew im not lying because i would have to be a completely incompetent buffoon to lie about something so disprovable. ergo, asking about it is an attempt to look like youre doing something when in reality you achieve very little
And how do you know I'm not achieving anything?
im 90% sure i already explained this, but its asking questions to appear like youre doing something or thinking critically while actually acheieving very little.In post 223, SirCakez wrote:How is this scummy?
and you areAnd I am scumreading Meeseeks.still not voting melike what the holy balls youve made it abundantly clear im your strongest scumread yet your vote is still placed on your fire assassin vanity wagon while completely ignoring the building wagon on me. this isnt town, this is scum trying to avoid looking opportunistic by not joining a growing wagon
VOTE: sircakez
well punIn post 283, GuyInFreezer wrote:-notscience
why?In post 304, Aneninen wrote:
I strongly think Meeseeks is a planned mislynch by some scums.In post 270, SirCakez wrote:And I am scumreading Meeseeks. This is really awful reasoning for a scumread. Like my townread on you just sank like a rock, that's how fake I think this is.
yeah i play reactionary regardless, especially rn when i have various other important things on its easier just to focus on what is important relative to me, and thus largely peoples feelings about meIn post 308, Travelling Salesman wrote:
Friend Meeseeks, I agree with you that voting somebody who voted for you isn't that great a scumtell and that there can be situations for example if most people are scumreading player A then anybody that player A attacks can counter with "omgus" when instead the problem is that 12 people are scumreading player A and 3 of them must also be scum because math.In post 208, Mr Meeseeks wrote:oh good "omgus" as a buzzword
i hate the overuse of omgus - omgus is literally "you voted me so ill vote you", not "i have a good reason for voting you and you are also voting me". overreacting? i havent even gone all caps yet which i did several times in my previous game. your description of my weird "progression of reads" ...i dont get what you mean?
But I also can think of examples where you, as scum, found it difficult to push back on anybody but the few people who were scumreading you, and that your read on them was primarily a response to their read on you, so that does kind of ping me. idk it's a nuanced kind of thing. I'm pretty sure I've seen you omgus as town, too, though.
yeah but the particularly "general scumtell" of shos' (that is, reacting to a naked vote) is one of those that is very much changeable per person for the vast majority of users, which is why i find it weird
You're playing on an alt, so generic scumtells are what most people have to go on. If you want people to take into account how you in particular tend to react to certain things, you play on your main. If you want to escape from all of the meta stuff, you play on an alt. I think I'm going to try alting a bit after this; I'm really tired of being Plotinus. I need an alt for real life, too. >.>In post 208, Mr Meeseeks wrote:and you disagree that using "generic scumtells" for something with so many varied reactions such as nakedly voting someone isnt a bit dodgy?
yeah but im still hoping to convince the dingus to do so through calling him out. it was more of a genearl "are you fucking kidding me" than finding it scummy, i just found it incompeteny
This is, unfortunately, not alignment indicative for shos. I played with townshos once and scumshos once and I didn't see much of a difference between the two.In post 218, Mr Meeseeks wrote:shos, have you even been reading this game? seriously?
in all honesty im not 100percent sure what i meant by that and what alternative was in my brain sorry about thatUm, it turned out that the only things i have to say right now in response to your posts are chatty things. why. but you requoted 133 but i think there was something in there i wanted to ask about.
How would he keep it a secret if he can't turn it off? Eventually people would notice that he's never voting...In post 133, Mr Meeseeks wrote:oh yay claims already :/ i mean i understand but ehh, double voter is something i prefer people to keep secret, but you can go as a townlean for now i guessI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
shit did not realise i was this close so prodge-sorta post (ie ill post general ideas but no catchup until tomorrow
d/l getting a tad close, and ive seen a lot of support for cakez, so i dont see why we shouldnt get a bigger wagon on him, considering particularly that five of our seven wagons consist of a single vote
i would welcome a shos wagon too but that seems notably less popular so id rather push for cakeyboy
i dissuade any wagons on kuroi or anenineninenineninen until further noticeI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
but it is a perfectly valid argument - its inaccurate to call me scummy for being overdefensive when that fits with my town meta. sure, you cant call me town for it either, obviously but with the meta knowledge you should take it with a pinch of saltIn post 314, KuroiXHF wrote:I get meta. I really do, but if you use it as your only line of defense, you're not defending yourself well. It comes off as an excuse, and that's how I take it.
what i meant was like "am i strong scum just because im your strongest you have or are you really pretty certain im scum" if that makes senseIn post 314, KuroiXHF wrote:Scummier than Mr. Burns. Less scummy than Hitler.
I'm not sure what you're asking from me.
there is a place between "uber super xd strong scumreads" and "nullscum". i was expressing distaste that, despite all that youve said about me being scum (and believe me its a lot), im still only nullscum. that seems like a cognitive dissonance and it is part of the large reason while im scumreading you; it looks like youre trying to emphasise that im scum without showing yourself scumreading me much so you can have an excuse not to vote me for whatever reasonIn post 316, SirCakez wrote:Yes you're nullscum. There's only 13 pages, I don't have any uber super xD strong scumreads
you complained that he started a counter wagon without disagreeing with the other, saying that its scummy. you then said "ive supported counterwagons without disagreeing with the other before". you literally said you regularly did something you find scummy about him. more votes on this guy please???
What?
...then why is it weird that he supported a counter wagon without disagreeing with the other? youve just said you regularly do something that you scumread fire for, which seems counterintuitive at best
Not really....
...but him supporting a rivaling wagon is a pretty clear indication that he disagrees with it though. subtext, reading between the lines, as irritating as i find it when people dont state reads its pretty obviously implied when he does something like that. come on.In post 223, SirCakez wrote:He didn't say anything about disagreeing with shos wagon tho.
I've supported counter wagons without disagreeing with the other before
great, im not talking about in general achieving nothing, stop misrepresenting what ive said. in fact i didnt even say achieve nothing i said achieve very little so youre literally lying about what i said. but regardless, the point is you asked that question which was ultimately pointelss as it achieved nothing. youve misrepresented my intentions in this reply as well as literally misquoting me
I have some pretty solid reads so I haven't "achieved nothing".
the question was about whether or not something in another game actually happened or not, and you pretty much entirely knew im not lying because i would have to be a completely incompetent buffoon to lie about something so disprovable. ergo, asking about it is an attempt to look like youre doing something when in reality you achieve very little
And how do you know I'm not achieving anything?
im 90% sure i already explained this, but its asking questions to appear like youre doing something or thinking critically while actually acheieving very little.In post 223, SirCakez wrote:How is this scummy?
[/quote]fuckin finally
Huh good point
and you areAnd I am scumreading Meeseeks.still not voting melike what the holy balls youve made it abundantly clear im your strongest scumread yet your vote is still placed on your fire assassin vanity wagon while completely ignoring the building wagon on me. this isnt town, this is scum trying to avoid looking opportunistic by not joining a growing wagon
VOTE: sircakez
VOTE: Meeseeks
if i knew the answer i wouldnt have asked why, would i? answer the question i asked pleaseIn post 323, Aneninen wrote:Not answering this but you should know the answer.
why? i think its scummy regardless of context, why does behaving like that to someone who is town suddenly stop it being scummy in any way?In post 341, Travelling Salesman wrote:if I'm wrong about Meeseeks then never mind.
look, the vast majority of my posts are walls. how can you declare yourself to be able to read me well enough to put me as top scum when you clearly havent read them?In post 348, shos wrote:Im way too tired to got hrough all the walls on p13.
i dont get what youre saying - why would "putting out" a large wall stop a meta read getting traction? also tbh it was basically timing coincidence that it happened around the time but heyIn post 359, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Meer – This may or may not be a play-style issue. I do however find feel his case on me feels very much like “Oh, I’m getting a meta-read from Traveller I better find something to put a large wall out there so it doesn’t get traction”.
are you fucking kidding? i really hope you are kiddingIn post 360, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Link this please.
...im sorry i didnt get that fromIn post 360, MagnaofIllusion wrote:My comment about Sheldon’s vote was a jest response
like sure the wolowitz bit was in jest but this bit looks like youre trying to point out a genuine contradiction and while you may have known that it wasnt really obvious, so it feels unfair to call that reading. and while you did point out that cabd did scummy stuff, that was done in posts well before this, it seemed weird to wait to put the vote on until that post (and the exact reason why cabd was scum for that question is totally beyond me tbh)In post 84, MagnaofIllusion wrote:“Hey look – I’ll try to both peddle that MoI is somehow both doubting the claim and putting too much faith in it at the same time.”
uhh how do you know thiss??In post 361, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Since I know who is the main behind Mees
disagreeee, if you know fairly well both heads and they post something which would be a bit dodgy from one head and not dodgy from the other, it surely is sensible to see if you know which head it is fromIn post 361, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Hydras share an alignment. If you see scummy behavior from them regardless of the head you hunt it.
also ploti admitted it was ploti and i didnt scumread them for that so this point is moot
read my interactions with salesman. i have had a mix of scumreading them for some things and townreading them for others which, when balanced, lead me to a nulltown. almost every word cakes has said about me has suggested that he thinks im scum. thats why its okay for me and not okay for him. different circumstancesIn post 363, MagnaofIllusion wrote:So it’s OK for you, who have many many words with Salesman to NullTown him but it isn’t OK for Cakez to Nullscum you?
because i dont think either of you are scum yet both - particularly you - seem to be getting a fair amount of people expressing willingness to vote you. particularly since, except from traveling salesman whose post i find almost as inaccurate as you do, they all said stuff like "read kurois posts we should lynch him", that is to say, giving no reasons, and this was before traveling said anything so they cant have been agreeing with them. but even despite that, i just disagree that youre scum yet your wagon is growing so i thought id point out that youre a bad wagon imoIn post 368, KuroiXHF wrote:Wait, why?I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
right..? then why did i procrastinate putting up a large wall with various excuses rather than straightaway doing it?In post 383, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Well if you don’t know what piece is missing from the claimed Town meta on you putting up a large wall would certainly be a way to hopefully bridge that gap.In post 381, Mr Meeseeks wrote:i dont get what youre saying - why would "putting out" a large wall stop a meta read getting traction? also tbh it was basically timing coincidence that it happened around the time but hey
is it really "clearly tongue in cheek" to imply that someones post is contradictory? especially since several other players didnt pick up the tone. and the other thing is irrelevant
Well this is a you-problem then because the whole thing was clearly tongue in cheek. Whether that problem stems from Town or Scum is yet to be sorted in my mind.In post 381, Mr Meeseeks wrote:like sure the wolowitz bit was in jest but this bit looks like youre trying to point out a genuine contradiction and while you may have known that it wasnt really obvious, so it feels unfair to call that reading. and while you did point out that cabd did scummy stuff, that was done in posts well before this, it seemed weird to wait to put the vote on until that post (and the exact reason why cabd was scum for that question is totally beyond me tbh)
As to why Cadb is scummy (as scummy as you get on page 1 to 3 anyway) look at 26 and tell me if you see game relevant content in there.
because theres only one game my alt was outed in so i just found it quite weird. also it means its less likely for you+travel to be scumpartners because theres a decent chance that they may have outed my alt to their partners which you would totally be more careful about revealing
I read game here on MS that I don’t play in. Seriously what’s the purpose of this question as far as you sorting my alignment context?In post 381, Mr Meeseeks wrote:uhh how do you know thiss??
really? because that is a silly and incompetent analysis. theres a pretty obvious difference between cakes being nullscum on me despite virtually all his many comments on me being "is scum", and me being nulltown on travel after having various town and non-town feeligns about him
I’ve read the whole game. Personally I think at the most charitable analysis of your post that you are trying to split hairs given there is no “book definition” of what nullscum or nulltown means.In post 381, Mr Meeseeks wrote:read my interactions with salesman. i have had a mix of scumreading them for some things and townreading them for others which, when balanced, lead me to a nulltown. almost every word cakes has said about me has suggested that he thinks im scum. thats why its okay for me and not okay for him. different circumstances
if youd read the context you know im not talking about my mains meta but this accounts meta so good job being entirely wrong here. sure, one game is not a meta or whatever bullshit you spout, but surely theres a logical connection between me being overdefensive as fuck in one game where i was town and that not being a scumtell for me?And as to other responses non-Specific to me personally –
I’m frankly finding this sort of response from you scummy as hell.In post 381, Mr Meeseeks wrote:but it is a perfectly valid argument - its inaccurate to call me scummy for being overdefensive when that fits with my town meta. sure, you cant call me town for it either, obviously but with the meta knowledge you should take it with a pinch of salt
You’ve made a big song and dance about this is an alt that you wanted to use so as to not be meta read. And now you are trying to lean on a Town meta in this argument. One other completed game is not a Town meta and I don’t see any evidence Kuroi knows who you are an alt of.
jesus you are thick sometimes arent youIn post 385, shos wrote:
Of COURSE we choose the lynch by popularity and not by who I actually think is scum!! What do you mean?! Scumhunting is for pussiez, I dont need that shitIn post 351, Mr Meeseeks wrote:d/l getting a tad close, and ive seen a lot of support for cakez, so i dont see why we shouldnt get a bigger wagon on him, considering particularly that five of our seven wagons consist of a single vote
i would welcome a shos wagon too but that seems notably less popular so id rather push for cakeyboy
Just see where someone is lynchable and join
Piece of cake
...VOTE: meseeks-
(p sure my vote was already there?)
i scumread BOTH YOU AND CAKEZ. that is OBVIOUS from my posts (of course you dont FUCKING read any of them but thats irrelevant). now, when deadline is approaching, which one am i gonna fucking push? you or cakez, when you have less fucking popularity? also there is a fucking votecount right before that fucking post and who has more votes? kuroi. WHO I FUCKING SAID NOT TO LYNCH
LYNCHING BY POPULARITY MY HAIRY ARSEHOLEI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
that post was at shos by the way
cakezIn post 387, KuroiXHF wrote:Meeseeks, I realize I need to re-read this game, but can you give me a group of two or three that you would most like to lynch?
shos
magnaofillusion
in that orderI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
a theory with a massive hole in it, given that like 80% of my posts have been huge walls with scumhuntingIn post 390, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
Perhaps because you hate the effort being scum requires to make walls like that with fake-scumhunting?In post 386, Mr Meeseeks wrote:right..? then why did i procrastinate putting up a large wall with various excuses rather than straightaway doing it?
but even when confronted he hasnt given a single reason why im "town". also, why are you defending him and speaking for him? and youve definitely changed your initial, point, originally it was "what is the difference", but when i point a difference you instead scramble to cover that he just hadnt stated any reasons for townreading me. oh, and that dig for "insults" is just silly, i said that your analysis is silly and incomptent, not you. anyway, to humour you, if he found anything townie about me, why didnt he bring it up when i expressed distaste at his "nullscum" read and not voting which he justified by "well i just dont have a strong read thats all" and "i forgot to vote". surely that is the time any town player who did have a nullscum read due to townie influences to, you know, bring them up? but hey, ill go with it because i know youll keep hammering away at this, and by the way if the reasons are shitty i wont accept it, im saying this in advance preparing for all likelihood that if he does come up with reasons and their shitty and i say their shitty youll just accuse me of not wanting to hear them from the start, because seriously ive asked him why im nullscum before and hes never give any similar reasoning so if he comes up with any reasoning now i bet you it was come up with on the spot
Not really. I don’t directly point to every post I read as Town in this game. The process of scum-hunting is going to focus on the negative. It is by no means a stretch to suggest that someone could have a Nullscum rating on someone with the majority of their comments to said player being focused on negative aspects of that player’s posting.In post 386, Mr Meeseeks wrote:really? because that is a silly and incompetent analysis. theres a pretty obvious difference between cakes being nullscum on me despite virtually all his many comments on me being "is scum", and me being nulltown on travel after having various town and non-town feeligns about him
But yeah – keep up with the insults. Very helpful for you.
sircakez why was i only nullscum?
im hardly peddling it as meta though. im not saying "DUDE YOU GOTTA TOWNREAD ME FOR DIS SHIT". im saying "look, i did this loads as town in my last game, maybe consider the fact that for me its not scummy", which isnt even
No I can read in context very well. Your trying to peddle a single game as meta is crap. Hell – meta itself is mostly crap. But you failing back on this sort of argument reads at a gut level as “Caught for the wrong reasons” whining.In post 386, Mr Meeseeks wrote:if youd read the context you know im not talking about my mains meta but this accounts meta so good job being entirely wrong here. sure, one game is not a meta or whatever bullshit you spout, but surely theres a logical connection between me being overdefensive as fuck in one game where i was town and that not being a scumtell for me?slightlyunreasonable to somebody who isnt trying their hardest to paint someone as scum for bad reasons
before, i was getting so-so on magna being scum. im now relatively confident in it, even if it is the weakest of my scum read.I'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
okay slight error, the vote putting kuroi at "most voted" actually occurred in literally the post after the post i madeIn post 386, Mr Meeseeks wrote:i scumread BOTH YOU AND CAKEZ. that is OBVIOUS from my posts (of course you dont FUCKING read any of them but thats irrelevant). now, when deadline is approaching, which one am i gonna fucking push? you or cakez, when you have less fucking popularity? also there is a fucking votecount right before that fucking post and who has more votes? kuroi. WHO I FUCKING SAID NOT TO LYNCH
LYNCHING BY POPULARITY MY HAIRY ARSEHOLE
but way more players, including our double voter, had shown an interest to vote kuroi than had shown an interest to vote cakes, and they had an equal number of votes on them at the time i made that post
point still standsI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
chances are im just being dumb, gimme a hintIn post 395, Aneninen wrote:Wellshyt. Either you're dumb or I was misinterpreting something.
only thing i can think of is that youve read something ive said as me softclaiming or crumbing or in some way hinting at my role and are reading me based on that? in which case i can assure you i have not done so and in that case you did misinterpret somethingI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
i mean naturally i do have a pr because everyone has a pr because its an antihero upick gameIn post 398, Aneninen wrote:
Exactly.In post 396, Mr Meeseeks wrote:
chances are im just being dumb, gimme a hintIn post 395, Aneninen wrote:Wellshyt. Either you're dumb or I was misinterpreting something.
only thing i can think of is that youve read something ive said as me softclaiming or crumbing or in some way hinting at my role and are reading me based on that? in which case i can assure you i have not done so and in that case you did misinterpret something
I thought you were hinting having a PR.
but no, i never hinted at having a particular prI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
there is a place between "uber super xd strong scumreads" and "nullscum". i was expressing distaste that, despite all that youve said about me being scum (and believe me its a lot), im still only nullscum. that seems like a cognitive dissonance and it is part of the large reason while im scumreading you; it looks like youre trying to emphasise that im scum without showing yourself scumreading me much so you can have an excuse not to vote me for whatever reason[/quote]In post 422, SirCakez wrote:quote="In post 316, SirCakez"]Yes you're nullscum. There's only 13 pages, I don't have any uber super xD strong scumreads
You're a full scumread now so looks like your problem isn't an issue anymore![/quote]i mean... it is in and of the fact that you still did the scummy thing. youre the one who asked the question, im just answering it
oh nevermind you clearly cant understand ityou complained that he started a counter wagon without disagreeing with the other, saying that its scummy. you then said "ive supported counterwagons without disagreeing with the other before". you literally said you regularly did something you find scummy about him. more votes on this guy please???
how
It wasn't pointless, it helped my reads. gtfo.great, im not talking about in general achieving nothing, stop misrepresenting what ive said. in fact i didnt even say achieve nothing i said achieve very little so youre literally lying about what i said. but regardless, the point is you asked that question which was ultimately pointelss as it achieved nothing. youve misrepresented my intentions in this reply as well as literally misquoting me
very little? at the time of your first "nullscum", youd made seven posts which contained stuff saying or implying i was scummy, while you had no consideration of me being town. also, hah, take that magna, it wasnt because he townread me, so suck it, it was just as i suspected. shocker, huh?Because there was very little game content to go off of. Even now the game is fairly small.
well yes it is because you said "well maybe it took you a while to make a wall after travels accusations because you hate making walls" when i obviously dont hate making walls because ive made a metric fucktonne of walls so it still is a pretty damn gaping holeIn post 424, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Well given that the time it took you to start posting said walls I don’t think necessarily that is a huge a hole as you are presenting.
well guess what i was right, and yeah they do, when town finds someone scummy in a certain area and has an idea as to why its scummy, its hardly difficult to create a conclusion as to how they will respond to a certain thingIn post 424, MagnaofIllusion wrote:The prediction about how things are going to go doesn’t do you any favors in my eyes – you ‘ve already drawn hard conclusions about events that have yet to pass which isn’t something I’d expect Town to do.
and this point is also rendered moot by cakes not stating any town thingsIn post 424, MagnaofIllusion wrote:As to whether Town players would post every Town thing they see – why do you expect that from everyone when you clearly ascribe to the theory that players play differently and can’t be held to “generic scum tells”? It is the basis of your argument on not suspecting your for over-reacting to pressure. I personally rarely post things I see that I think are Town unless the situation specifically warrants it.
hey dude how about you read the part you quoted and the bit where it says "magna is my weakest scumread" and figure out from that why you arent voting me...In post 424, MagnaofIllusion wrote:Isn’t this the point where you should be voting me? I mean you hammered Cakez for not voting you and here you are saying you are relatively confident I am scum.
how did you go from post 337 and
toIn post 343, Travelling Salesman wrote:are you scum or just unfun: KuroiIn post 428, Travelling Salesman wrote:Kuroi is town as fuckI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
agreed, lets lynch cakes please
tbh im tempted to just claim now because i am aware of a huge risk of the votes just falling on and lynching me because everyone will just go "fuckit we have no other viable lynch"
but ideally we could just lynch cakes. look through my iso, ive said more than enough about it all
id be cool with shos too, but id prefer cakeyI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks
-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
okay i just thought id be a bit cheeky and clever, serious mode now
im yttrium, investigative neighbour
would rather not disclose the exact nature of either my investigative or who my neighbours are because the ones who need to know already know because theyre in the hood thank you very muchI'M MR. MEESEEKS LOOK AT ME!-
-
Mr Meeseeks Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 551
- Joined: March 31, 2016
-