Mini 1798: Greatest Idea (Game Over)

House · Post Post #9 (isolation #0) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 11:19 am

VOTE: Fate

While discarding compulsive child killer looks really town, he could have used that card for his alignment if he wanted to be town.

His choice to discard it makes me feel like he wanted the town cred for not wanting to be forced to kill an innocent child.

tl;dr> It's an excellent scum discard.

House · Post Post #14 (isolation #1) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 12:01 pm

In post 13, 123456789 wrote:HURT: RadiantMoonlight

HEAL: Ranger

What is this and why are you doing it?

House · Post Post #56 (isolation #2) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 4:15 pm

In post 55, DoctorPepper wrote:
In post 9, House wrote:VOTE: Fate

While discarding compulsive child killer looks really town, he could have used that card for his alignment if he wanted to be town.

His choice to discard it makes me feel like he wanted the town cred for not wanting to be forced to kill an innocent child.

tl;dr> It's an excellent scum discard.
Wait what? Using the card as an alignment assumes that Fate would have to have other scum cards and has to use Compulsive Child Killer. In a set up like this, it's likely that he could have gotten 2 Townie cards, used one for the alignment and the non townie for the ability. This kind of speculation is unfounded and kind of a weird way to vaguely call someone scum.

VOTE: House

You're reachy as fuck.

1) My vote is the second post in the thread, in rvs.
2) Compulsive Child Killer is a great discard for scum. period.
3) Reachy shit like this is far scummier than any discard. Pull your head out of your ass and develop reads based on motive instead of throwing unfounded accusations in the hopes that people will buy it.

House · Post Post #61 (isolation #3) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 5:40 pm

In post 58, DoctorPepper wrote:
In post 56, House wrote:
In post 55, DoctorPepper wrote:
In post 9, House wrote:VOTE: Fate

While discarding compulsive child killer looks really town, he could have used that card for his alignment if he wanted to be town.

His choice to discard it makes me feel like he wanted the town cred for not wanting to be forced to kill an innocent child.

tl;dr> It's an excellent scum discard.
Wait what? Using the card as an alignment assumes that Fate would have to have other scum cards and has to use Compulsive Child Killer. In a set up like this, it's likely that he could have gotten 2 Townie cards, used one for the alignment and the non townie for the ability. This kind of speculation is unfounded and kind of a weird way to vaguely call someone scum.

VOTE: House
You're reachy as fuck.

1) My vote is the second post in the thread, in rvs.
2) Compulsive Child Killer is a great discard for scum. period.
3) Reachy shit like this is far scummier than any discard. Pull your head out of your ass and develop reads based on motive instead of throwing unfounded accusations in the hopes that people will buy it.
You claim its RVS yet somehow youre also saying its a legitimate reason to vote. Your motive is weird and thats what I'm saying, your read on me is based on an "unfounded accusation" which is ironic considering your unfounded accusation.
Sure Compulsive Child Killer is a great discard, assuming you have better cards to work off.

Even then, if you look at it this way, wouldn't Conpulsive Child Killer be good for scum as a role? Take the scum alignment and take the role to kill the IC for less town? I don't even see how it would be a great discard for scum, unless they had better scum to choose from.

Youee non committal, you claim I'm being scummy but I don't see a switch on me, despite saying your vote was the second vote in RVS.

You expected an actual, legitimate reason for a vote in the second post of the game. Get the fuck out of here with that nonsense.

House · Post Post #63 (isolation #4) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:14 pm

In post 62, DoctorPepper wrote:Youre claiming its RVS and nonsense while simultaneously claiming that it's a legitimately good move that scum could do. :>

It's the best reason I can think of for a vote when there's literally zero content, but do you really think I expect a lynch from a DISCARD?

How ridiculous is that?

House · Post Post #67 (isolation #5) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:22 pm

In post 64, DoctorPepper wrote:You're claiming its a scummy move and we should be wary of it, yet you're also saying "Wait gaiz, I wasn't serious, it's only game why you heff to be mad"

You're the one who's reaching here, buddy

Shitty case built on an rvs vote, which you're staying glued to regardless of the fact I explained how redonkulous you're being, and now a slimy misrep.

Here, you can accuse me of OMGUS too.

VOTE: DoctorPepper

House · Post Post #72 (isolation #6) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:30 pm

In post 70, Ranger wrote:
Yo, House.

Ranger wrote:Everyone, and I mean everyone, if they didn't do so already, MUST list what their cards were the first draw. In the case of the replacement, ask for your predecessor's cards.
They must also list what they chose, and the resulting discard.
This is a VERY important part of the setup.
I don't care where someone is on my list, I WILL strongarm a lynch on any player that refuses to do this.

Stop shitting up the game with irrelevant setup spec that has absolutely nothing to do with the game that we DID roll with.

House · Post Post #75 (isolation #7) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:47 pm

This...

[quote="In post 64, you're also saying "Wait gaiz, I wasn't serious, it's only game why you heff to be mad" [/quote]

Is slimy misrep.

Your entire case is built on post number 2, which is voting based on a DISCARD.

Idc how many paragraphs you wall us with, it's not scum hunting, it's pinning an accusation and attempting to sell.

House · Post Post #76 (isolation #8) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:50 pm

In post 75, House wrote:This...

, you're also saying "Wait gaiz, I wasn't serious, it's only game why you heff to be mad"
Is slimy misrep.

Your entire case is built on post number 2, which is voting based on a DISCARD.

Idc how many paragraphs you wall us with, it's not scum hunting, it's pinning an accusation and attempting to sell.

Ebwop

House · Post Post #79 (isolation #9) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:53 pm

Nope.

I'd rather you show town just how much you want to shit up d1 with irrelevant garbage.

House · Post Post #81 (isolation #10) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 6:58 pm

Just because you have some theory about cards that have absolutely nothing to do with the game we are actually playing doesn't mean I'm going to promote the waste of this time catering to your personal non-game game.

I don't give a rat's ass if I'm wagoned, because if town is willing to lynch me for not participating in this kind of idiocy, I'm just as well rid of the time commitment.

House · Post Post #82 (isolation #11) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:00 pm

Also, persisting in this direction will only result in a mislynch and you still won't get your precious info, which will make d1a total wash.

Is that a town or scum thing to do?

House · Post Post #83 (isolation #12) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:07 pm

In post 77, Ranger wrote:
House wrote:Stop shitting up the game with irrelevant setup spec that has absolutely nothing to do with the game that we DID roll with.
No.
I have won.
Actually, directly, WON.
This game before.
By forcing every player to answer this when we had a failed reroll.

Link this game, please.

While you're at it, explain how you know scum simply won't lie to obfuscate whatever deductions you're drawing.

House · Post Post #86 (isolation #13) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:20 pm

Still not linking the game, eh?

Why did you ignore that simple request?

House · Post Post #89 (isolation #14) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 7:58 pm

In post 88, Ranger wrote:
House wrote:Why did you ignore that simple request?
Simple: because you're asking me something that will be answered anyway.

So far, what I've gathered is:
Ranger: Town Roleblocker
Fate: Town Cop Lover
Doctor Pepper: Town 2x BP

Ideally we get all 10 extra, but I can make this work with less. More's better.

I'm asking you to link to the game you won by gathering this information you're asking for now.

It's a perfectly reasonable request.

Why won't you provide the link?

House · Post Post #90 (isolation #15) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 8:04 pm

Okay Ranger,

Since you're going to stomp your feet, pitch a tantrum and vote me until I give you what you want, I can do that too.

VOTE: Ranger

Link the game you won using this method.

House · Post Post #105 (isolation #16) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:30 pm

Alignment: Roleblocker
Ability: One-Shot Paranoid Gun Owner
Discard: Hirsute Townie

I was a Town One-Shot Paranoid Gun Owner

Never been PGO, sounded fun.

And I also think Yume's reveal is full of shit.

UNVOTE:

House · Post Post #106 (isolation #17) » Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:34 pm

(and yes, all cards were green)

House · Post Post #112 (isolation #18) » Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:24 am

In post 111, Fate wrote: House is being a stubborn ass but at least I get the sense that he is competent

I don't exist to cater to others.

House · Post Post #113 (isolation #19) » Thu Jun 09, 2016 1:30 am

In post 111, Fate wrote:
Youre still not in the clear from RC's game

What exactly is this about?

House · Post Post #152 (isolation #20) » Thu Jun 09, 2016 6:25 am

In post 133, Radical Rat wrote:
In post 129, Alchemist21 wrote:I agree that House's inconsistency makes him look scummy, but I'm also remembering what Titus used to always say about House being the opposite alignment of how he looked.
I personally dislike using meta for reads, since it seems to me as soon as you're aware of your meta( such as when someone points it out for a defense/case ), it can be manipulated.

It's not really meta as it is philosophy.

I generally dislike town roles, so I'm going to do what I need to do with no regard for playing the crowd.

Idiots see me being a nonconformist and consider it scummy, because obviously scum paint a huge fucking target on their own heads, especially experienced scum.

Enjoy the delicious sarcasm.

Yes, I felt the need to point it out, because people that think abrasive play is scummy obviously aren't all that bright.

House · Post Post #153 (isolation #21) » Thu Jun 09, 2016 6:26 am

Playing = pleasing

Fu autocorrect

House · Post Post #154 (isolation #22) » Thu Jun 09, 2016 6:52 am

In post 128, Alchemist21 wrote:I don't see the harm in what Ranger's doing.

I don't either, now that I've seen something productive come of it.

I'm just not going to do something simply because some self-righteous player demands it and threatens me.

It's easy to chime in after the fact.

House · Post Post #177 (isolation #23) » Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:18 pm

In post 176, Katsuki wrote:I'm quite annoyed setup got re-rolled.

I drew Werewolf, Werewolf Cop and Werewolf Watcher.
Forget which alignment I chose, but I chose Watcher for power.

You'd have been werewolf regardless of what cards you put where, which I find rather odd.

House · Post Post #182 (isolation #24) » Thu Jun 09, 2016 4:59 pm

In post 181, iraonavp wrote:I wasn't there the first time the setup was rolled so I don't know what cards the person I replaced received. I think Fate is lying about being a miller because that would mean his third card was a town role worse than both miller and compulsive child killer.

VOTE: Fate

Is it possible that could be the case? Hell, I didn't even know compulsive child killer was a thing before this game.

House · Post Post #217 (isolation #25) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:42 am

In post 186, iraonavp wrote:I voted House instead of you because I realized that if you were telling the truth, you would have to be either a Night-kill immune miller vigilante or a Bulletproof miller serial killer, and because I think that House is scum-aligned.

Could you stop typing like that? I have dyslexia and it's difficult for me to read.

So you considered Fate might be telling the truth after I raised the possibility, and scumread me for it?

Yeah, that totally makes sense.

VOTE: iraonavp

House · Post Post #218 (isolation #26) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:44 am

In post 187, iraonavp wrote:Oh, wait... I thought the setup was made from the Mafia Discussion thread but it's actually not.

So you could have one of the other worse negative utilities, but I doubt that to be honest.

Did you vote me because you thought I read that thread?

Unless I posted in it (I haven't), that's a pretty stupid assumption to base a vote.

House · Post Post #219 (isolation #27) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:46 am

In post 195, SirCakez wrote:You guys suck
I'm a Mason Lover
Being confirmed town in Song of Ice and Fire was probably the most fun I've ever had as town, so I would pick confirmable town over much anything else

And you can't be a Mafia Mason obviousl
y

That's bullshit.

I almost choose to be a werewolf mason for shiggles.

House · Post Post #221 (isolation #28) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:28 am

In post 220, Radical Rat wrote:
In post 219, House wrote:
In post 195, SirCakez wrote:You guys suck
I'm a Mason Lover
Being confirmed town in Song of Ice and Fire was probably the most fun I've ever had as town, so I would pick confirmable town over much anything else

And you can't be a Mafia Mason obviousl
y
That's bullshit.

I almost choose to be a werewolf mason for shiggles.
Mason, by definition, is Town. And on the Greatest Idea wiki page, Mafia Mason is explicitly not allowed.

Why would werewolf mason be allowed, then?

Damn, I should have totally gone with my first choice...

Speaking of which, how do know HE isn't a werewolf mason?

House · Post Post #224 (isolation #29) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:35 am

In post 222, Radical Rat wrote:Werewolf Mason literally cannot exist though.

To be a Mason is to be Town.

Incorrect!

Alternatively, moderators may introduce Werewolves into Masonries (and likewise Mafia members into Monasteries) without bastardry, as the definition of a Mason or Monk is that they are not confirmed to be a member of a specific non-Town faction.

House · Post Post #225 (isolation #30) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:37 am

And I'm telling you, the mood allowed me to choose a werewolf mason setup.

I changed it in the last hour because I decided I wanted another role more.

House · Post Post #226 (isolation #31) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:37 am

The mod*

House · Post Post #227 (isolation #32) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:38 am

Mains are confirmed not to be mafia.

Mains are NOT confirmed not to be werewolves.

House · Post Post #228 (isolation #33) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:38 am

Masons*

House · Post Post #230 (isolation #34) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:43 am

Apparently, IC is the only mod-confirmed town in games that have werewolves.

House · Post Post #231 (isolation #35) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:44 am

In post 229, Radical Rat wrote:Oh!

Now that certainly is interesting...

Still, I'm inclined to believe Cakez is Town, because as scum, claiming to be the only Mason makes little sense. Rather, I'd expect the entire scumteam to fake being the masonry.

Did you miss where I opted out of it in the last hour of the setup?

House · Post Post #232 (isolation #36) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:47 am

Either way, I don't think we should lynch a lover today. That's doing scums job for them if they ARE all town.

House · Post Post #235 (isolation #37) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:50 am

In post 233, Yume wrote:And what if they aren't all town?

If they aren't all town, they'll be left alone at night.

How long do you think a 3 for 1 nk going untouched will be acceptable to town?

House · Post Post #236 (isolation #38) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:50 am

In post 234, Radical Rat wrote:
In post 231, House wrote:
In post 229, Radical Rat wrote:Oh!

Now that certainly is interesting...

Still, I'm inclined to believe Cakez is Town, because as scum, claiming to be the only Mason makes little sense. Rather, I'd expect the entire scumteam to fake being the masonry.
Did you miss where I opted out of it in the last hour of the setup?
No, but his scumbuddies would know he was a Mason, and as soon as he reports being the the only one, they could have their own fake masonry set up and used as a defense.

Unless he's a lone wolf.

House · Post Post #239 (isolation #39) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 6:59 am

In post 237, Radical Rat wrote:Fair enough I suppose.

I'd still prefer to stay off the Lovers for now though.

Post 232 would like a word with you.

House · Post Post #240 (isolation #40) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:01 am

My goal was not to sell the 3 for 1 lynch, it was too dispel the "Masons are always town" myth.

House · Post Post #243 (isolation #41) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:05 am

How poetic would it be if the lovers were comprised of town/mafia/werewolf?

House · Post Post #244 (isolation #42) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:07 am

In post 242, Yume wrote:
In post 235, House wrote:
In post 233, Yume wrote:And what if they aren't all town?
If they aren't all town, they'll be left alone at night.

How long do you think a 3 for 1 nk going untouched will be acceptable to town?
Well, based on what SC said, he'll let scum live and win if it means he isn't getting lynched.

Yeah, that totally sounds like a pro-town mindset!

House · Post Post #245 (isolation #43) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:18 am

In post 91, Yume wrote:My choices were as such

Vengeful Townie
Werewolf One-Shot Paranoid Gun Owner
Seer

Well, I am a Vengeful Seer.

This is a scumclaim.

Vengeful is a role.
Seer is a role.

Only one card is used to determine role.

Yume is claiming the mod gave her the role of two seperate cards.

VOTE: Yume

House · Post Post #247 (isolation #44) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:33 am

In post 246, Yume wrote:Yeah, me having two roles is a scumclaim yet SC being both Mason and Lover isn't? Like, WTF?

Sure isn't.

House · Post Post #248 (isolation #45) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:35 am

In post 246, Yume wrote:Yeah, me having two roles is a scumclaim yet SC being both Mason and Lover isn't? Like, WTF?

The Lover role is often used in conjunction with other powerful roles to kill them off faster.

I have no doubt Mason and Lover were on the same card, so his claim is 100% more believable than yours.

House · Post Post #250 (isolation #46) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:42 am

In post 249, Yume wrote:Yeah, that's bs. If you are gonna croak about two roles being unbelievable, then attack him as well.

No need.

He's a lover, so he'll die when one of his lovers do anyway.

If you were really a seer, you'd have pointed out how we needed to keep you around to clear him.

Too late though, you missed your chance.

House · Post Post #252 (isolation #47) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:53 am

Why would a seer be so gung ho about wanting a mason lynched in a game where werewolves are a thing, especially when that mason is a lover?

If I was a seer, I'd simply check him n1 without raising a stink about his claim d1.

What does a seer accomplish by getting their #1 target lynched instead of possibly clearing the slot?

And all this is besides the fact that vengeful seer is literally an impossible claim.

House · Post Post #254 (isolation #48) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:02 am

Mason lover is absolutely possible, because both roles can be on the same card.

Just like cop lover is also possible for the same reason.

Read the goddamned wiki, noob.

And you need to reread my answer to your question about how long the three lovers should be allowed to live.

They have a short life expectancy by virtue of the fact they're lovers alone.

Again, read the goddamned wiki.

House · Post Post #256 (isolation #49) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:06 am

In post 255, Yume wrote:Yeah no. SC was yapping about he 'doesn't want to be lynched' even if it means letting the scum coast.

That's SC, and he's a slot for another day.

Today, YOU swing.

House · Post Post #258 (isolation #50) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:08 am

In post 257, Yume wrote:Who is townier to you, someone who is willing to die if it means getting rid of scum or someone who doesn't want to die despite this?

Someone who doesn't tell a confirmable lie about their claim.

House · Post Post #260 (isolation #51) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:10 am

In post 259, Yume wrote:So you don't mind me shooting SC upon my lynch?

P-edit: Oh, so you're an all-knowing entity who knows everything? What if SC is the liar and I am not?

I don't care if you shoot ME upon your lynch.

House · Post Post #261 (isolation #52) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:12 am

I don't believe your claim because if it's true the game is bastard.

Read the damned wiki.

House · Post Post #262 (isolation #53) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:13 am

Hell, read the op, for that matter.

Face it, you're caught.

House · Post Post #264 (isolation #54) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:17 am

In post 2, Micc wrote:
SETUP-SPECIFIC RULES

This is a Greatest Idea Mafia game, which has 13 total players.

Once the go-ahead is given, the cards numbered 1-146 (as listed on the 28th of March, 2016 revision of the Greater Idea Mafia page) are shuffled, and three are given to each player. Each card represents an alignment and role.

You will receive a PM informing you of the three cards you have been dealt.

Once the PM's go out, you will have 48 hours to decide one card to represent your alignment, and a second, different card to represent your role. The third card, if the game's setup is valid, will be publicly discarded.

House · Post Post #265 (isolation #55) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:19 am

Role #40 - Mason Lover

House · Post Post #266 (isolation #56) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:20 am

Tell me... where is Vengeful Seer in the list of roles???

House · Post Post #268 (isolation #57) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:26 am

In post 263, Yume wrote:Well, fine. I'll bang-bang you. Bang-bang. Lol.

However, you're so notoriously stubborn that someone should shoot you at first possible opportunity.

Do continue giving your buddies advice.

House · Post Post #269 (isolation #58) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:28 am

In post 267, Yume wrote:That's not the problem. The problem is that you and him are insistent on allowing a possible mafia lover to live because you don't want to risk it at all!!!!!! Are you two idiots dammit? You calling me a noob yet you essentially are willing to allow possible mafia lover to live because you don't want to risk it. We'll see who is noob when mafia lover coasts to victory because of it.

Wrong, I want you to swing today because you claimed a role that literally cannot exist in the game.

Anything to do with the mason can be cleared with investigative roles. For you, we don't even NEED to investigate.

House · Post Post #272 (isolation #59) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:33 am

In post 266, House wrote:Tell me... where is Vengeful Seer in the list of roles???

House · Post Post #276 (isolation #60) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:36 am

In post 273, SirCakez wrote:Oh wait Yume scumslipped with the Vengeful Seer ROFL

I'm aware I could still be a Werewolf or Alien or those, a Mason is still a better level of town at the least

Yes, she did.

Who are you voting, and if it's not Yume, why not?

House · Post Post #278 (isolation #61) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:37 am

In post 277, SirCakez wrote:I am voting Yume already pls

Good man.

House · Post Post #281 (isolation #62) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:40 am

In post 280, SirCakez wrote:I am positive both Ranger and Katsuki will vote you given your role claim is literally impossible.

Especially considering Ranger is responsible for Yume's scumclaim.

House · Post Post #282 (isolation #63) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 8:42 am

Bringing up Ranger's name was the worst thing Yume could have done, lol.

Seriously, you weren't ready for this kind of game and got caught out on basic mechanics.

House · Post Post #294 (isolation #64) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:06 am

After Yume swings, other lynch candidates for me include:

iraonavp
Fate
Radical Rat

House · Post Post #295 (isolation #65) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:06 am

In post 293, Yume wrote:Well, in that case, I might as well come clean: I am Town 1-shot Unlynchable. So ya. What are you gonna do now, folks?

Test your new fakeclaime, of course.

House · Post Post #296 (isolation #66) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:07 am

In post 288, Yume wrote:And there you have it. SirCakez is a liar after all. Anyone not voting me is a scumclaim, you say? Prove it.

Flail more, votes were reset after the modkill.

House · Post Post #298 (isolation #67) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:09 am

In post 285, Yume wrote:Also, I am not a newb, bang-bang. I am a seasoned veteran. Just ask Radiant Moonlight, bang-bang.

Then you have even less credibility for claiming an impossible role because you simply should have known better.

Keep on digging that hole.

House · Post Post #299 (isolation #68) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:09 am

In post 297, Yume wrote:
In post 294, House wrote:
After Yume swings
, other lynch candidates for me include:

iraonavp
Fate
Radical Rat
NOPE, DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY. YOU SAID ANYONE WHO DIDN'T VOTE ME SCUMSLIPPED. SC DIDN'T VOTE ME, SO HE SCUMSLIPPED. HOW CONVENIENT FOR YOU TO DISREGARD THAT.

HOW CONVENIENT FOR YOU TO DISREGARD THAT

House · Post Post #301 (isolation #69) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:12 am

In post 300, Yume wrote:You're the one digging yours.

1. You claim anyone who doesn't vote me in their next post is a scumclaim
2. When mod posts the latest votecount, it is shown that SC isn't voting me
3. You conveniently ignore this fact.

Quote me saying that.

House · Post Post #303 (isolation #70) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:15 am

In post 301, House wrote:
In post 300, Yume wrote:You're the one digging yours.

1. You claim anyone who doesn't vote me in their next post is a scumclaim
2. When mod posts the latest votecount, it is shown that SC isn't voting me
3. You conveniently ignore this fact.
Quote me saying that.

House · Post Post #305 (isolation #71) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:18 am

In post 300, Yume wrote:You're the one digging yours.

1. You claim anyone who doesn't vote me in their next post is a scumclaim
2. When mod posts the latest votecount, it is shown that SC isn't voting me
3. You conveniently ignore this fact.

Tell me, what post are you responding to here?

House · Post Post #307 (isolation #72) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:21 am

In post 136, SirCakez wrote:
In post 114, Yume wrote:
In post 111, Fate wrote:what abilities?
you claimed fucking town vengeful

Unvote:
Vote: Yume

House is being a stubborn ass but at least I get the sense that he is competent

Youre still not in the clear from RC's game
Like, I can shoot scum if I am lynched, so it wouldn't be advisable to lynch me on a whim.
Yeah ok
VOTE: yume

In post 159, Micc wrote:
123456789 has been modkilled for claiming scum with another player.

They were a

Lyncher One-Shot Dayvig
, and have been turned into a
Neutral Survivor
.

Day 1 will continue with the votecount reset.

So yes, SirCakez was voting you prior to the reset and you making all this noise about him not voting you is now shown for the desperation tactic that it is.

House · Post Post #309 (isolation #73) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:24 am

In post 308, Yume wrote:
In post 274, SirCakez wrote:Anyone who doesn't vote Yume in their next post is scumclaiming
This one and all of yours sharing the same mindset, cos that's what this basically is. Also, I do know better. This feels like you two are scum trying to exploit a perceived 'fault' aka what they call 'a low hanging fruit'.

I guess we'll see about that once you don't die after getting enough votes to lynch.

One terrible fakeclaim after another...

House · Post Post #311 (isolation #74) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:29 am

In post 277, SirCakez wrote:I am voting Yume already pls

Which he was.

It's quite simple to believe that he didn't realize the votes were reset.

Keep flailing, this is highly entertaining.

House · Post Post #313 (isolation #75) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:31 am

In post 310, Yume wrote:So you are saying he'll vote me immediately after he comes on? He won't. He should have voted me on last page prior to the latest votecount. He didn't. You're going to say 'but he wants to trap you further, scum'. Well, let me tell you, it's meaningless if he doesn't follow it through on a vote. And even if he does vote me, it's still meaningless unless majority of players join my wagon. And even then it would be meaningless unless RM votes me too, cos they know me and my playstyle best.

If you're unlynchable, why all the resistance and desperation?

If expect contempt and scoffing at an unlynchable being wagoned, but you're squirming awfully hard over two people calling you scum.

House · Post Post #314 (isolation #76) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:33 am

A true unlynchable would be TELLING people to vote them once wagoned, because it confirms their claim.

House · Post Post #317 (isolation #77) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:38 am

In post 315, Yume wrote:I am not resistant to that, I am resistant to you two being unable to consider that one of the lowers could be scum. You'd realize this if you iso me instead of finding bs to scumread me for. This whole argument started because you refuse to believe the existance of scum lover. Scum lover and 1-shot unlynchable are both roles listed in possible roles. Are you blind?!

Hey dumb fuck...

In post 235, House wrote:
In post 233, Yume wrote:And what if they aren't all town?
If they aren't all town, they'll be left alone at night.

How long do you think a 3 for 1 nk going untouched will be acceptable to town?

In post 243, House wrote:How poetic would it be if the lovers were comprised of town/mafia/werewolf?

Enough of your shitty lies about me, you suck at it.

Do you really think people are going to take anything you say at face value after that blatant fakeclaim?

House · Post Post #319 (isolation #78) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:42 am

In post 318, Yume wrote:Quit ignoring me

In post 312, Yume wrote:Orly? You expect me to believe that he didn't notice given that he posted RIGHT AFTER the mod said votes were reset? Keep feeding me bs, it's highly entertaining, as are your double standards.

You notice he hasn't been posting, yes?

Take up your beef with him. I'll analyze your wagon d2, it's a waste of time right now.

House · Post Post #322 (isolation #79) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:58 am

In post 321, Yume wrote:He posted right after the modkill and the votecount following it. Also, he posted multiple times since then. Try again.

You can stop flailing, now.

Cakes not replacing his vote on you is not indicative of anything except inattention.

If anything, scum would be more attentive, not less.

You're the lynch today. Accept it. You painted yourself into a corner that is impossible to come out of.

House · Post Post #326 (isolation #80) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 10:12 am

Moonlogic

Come on, 1-shot unlynchable. Why aren't you excited to confirm your claim?

House · Post Post #335 (isolation #81) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:02 am

In post 334, Yume wrote:
In post 330, Radical Rat wrote:On the contrary, why would someone TRUST scum? You'd want the Lovers dead if there were no scum there, so of course you'd say there are.
Then prove to me that there aren't.

Just ask for spoilers once you hit the dead zone.

House · Post Post #337 (isolation #82) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:05 am

In post 336, Yume wrote:I am not dyin' today. I am an unlynchable, remember? Why waste your votes or that?

To confirm your claim, of course.

House · Post Post #339 (isolation #83) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:22 am

Doesn't matter, we can still go on to our next scumspect if you don't die.

Which you will die, so it's irrelevant.

Squirm more.

House · Post Post #342 (isolation #84) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:39 am

House · Post Post #344 (isolation #85) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:42 am

In post 340, Yume wrote:Uh-huh. You are liars. I am the one telling the truth.

Is that so, vengeful seer?

House · Post Post #345 (isolation #86) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:44 am

In post 343, Yume wrote:Because the votes will be wasted. If you're gonna lynch, lynch someone who is actually scum. You'd waste votes on me today and not be any closer to the solution than you are right now. To tell you the truth, I actually relish being voted, but I am trying to put my personal feelings aside. However, SC and House are getting in the way of it.

Hey, look at the bright side... if you live through today, I'll believe you!

House · Post Post #346 (isolation #87) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:56 am

Reminder, lest it be missed...

In post 245, House wrote:
In post 91, Yume wrote:My choices were as such

Vengeful Townie
Werewolf One-Shot Paranoid Gun Owner
Seer

Well, I am a Vengeful Seer.
This is a scumclaim.

Vengeful is a role.
Seer is a role.

Only one card is used to determine role.

Yume is claiming the mod gave her the role of two seperate cards.

VOTE: Yume

Yume then claimed 1-shot unlynchable Townie after being called out on her impossible fakeclaim, which does not motivate me to change my vote because her claim is now confirmable by...

lynching her

.

House · Post Post #349 (isolation #88) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:31 pm

House · Post Post #350 (isolation #89) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:31 pm

Top!

L-2

House · Post Post #351 (isolation #90) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:51 pm

Teaser:

I have a lovely case for d2 already written up, based on the flip.

Yume has done a lot of damage to her team.

Scum...

House · Post Post #353 (isolation #91) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:21 pm

In post 352, SirCakez wrote:My top two scum after Yume hangs are Radiant Moonlight and massive

I'll change your mind.

House · Post Post #359 (isolation #92) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 2:28 pm

I will say that it would be a difficult sell to make me believe that our lovers are scum.

This isn't a typical game where roles are randomized and players are stuck with what they're given.

We CHOSE these roles, and I find it highly unlikely that scum would choose to tether their survival to others.

If they're all town, which we must absolutely consider as a possibility, if not a likelihood, we'll cripple ourselves by killing three power roles that are so important they required a Lover modifier to equalize.

House · Post Post #360 (isolation #93) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 2:29 pm

In post 358, SirCakez wrote:True
Really depends if she flips Mafia or something less likely to have a lot of buddies like Alien

Unless she flips solo scum (or town, as if... lol), my d2 case will apply.

House · Post Post #362 (isolation #94) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 2:35 pm

In post 361, Ranger wrote:
House wrote:This is a scumclaim.

You're a bit late to the party, House.

I realized that the moment Yume claimed./quote]

No I'm not. I suggest you read my ISO.

House · Post Post #363 (isolation #95) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 2:36 pm

In post 362, House wrote:
In post 361, Ranger wrote:
House wrote:This is a scumclaim.
You're a bit late to the party, House.

I realized that the moment Yume claimed.

No I'm not. I suggest you read my ISO.[/quote]

EBWOP

House · Post Post #365 (isolation #96) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 2:37 pm

In post 361, Ranger wrote:
House wrote:This is a scumclaim.
You're a bit late to the party, House.

I realized that the moment Yume claimed.

No I'm not. I suggest you reread my ISO.

Fixed...

House · Post Post #366 (isolation #97) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 2:39 pm

In post 105, House wrote:Alignment: Roleblocker
Ability: One-Shot Paranoid Gun Owner
Discard: Hirsute Townie

I was a Town One-Shot Paranoid Gun Owner

Never been PGO, sounded fun.

And I also think Yume's reveal is full of shit.

UNVOTE:

I realized you caught scum, which is why I changed my mind and revealed my cards.

House · Post Post #367 (isolation #98) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:05 pm

In post 364, Ranger wrote:{iraonavp, massive, DoctorPepper, House}
{Alchemist21}
{Fate}
{Katsuki}
{Radical Rat}
{Yume}
^I realize SirCakez and Radiant Moonlight are absent.
I'm not sure where to place them at the moment.

Fate needs to be way lower.

Like, below Katsuki lower.

House · Post Post #370 (isolation #99) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:18 pm

Town

Ranger
SirCakez, Katsuki
Alchemist21

To Be Sorted

(in no particular order)
massive
iraonavp
DoctorPepper
RadiantMoonlight

Scum

Yume, Radical Rat, Fate

House · Post Post #371 (isolation #100) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:35 pm

Cop should check RM
Seer should check Cake
CT should check Katsuki

House · Post Post #373 (isolation #101) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:46 pm

In post 372, Ranger wrote:
SirCakez wrote:Why massive top tier O.o
Partially, his picks, but this time and last time, partially, his play not looking scummy.

But does it look townie?

House · Post Post #380 (isolation #102) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:56 pm

Something for folks to chew on tonight...

In post 149, Radical Rat wrote:I won't be voting for Massive.

I don't want to help someone who breaks the rules hoping for a cheap win.

In post 156, Yume wrote:
In post 151, 123456789 wrote:1) I'm not breaking any rules
So this
In post 1, Micc wrote:
Game Rules

Claiming scum by yourself is fine. Claiming scum with another player is an instant modkill. Don't do it.
doesn't count as a rule?

Yume is queued in on Radical Rat's posts, and supported his statement in the quote above. Not damning in itself, but then when she claimed 1-Shot Unlynchable.... who else claimed that?

In post 123, Radical Rat wrote:As for my cards, I had

Werewolf Supersaint
Town One Shot Unlynchable
Alien Psychotrooper

I chose Werewolf as my alignment, and One Shot Unlynchable as my ability.

Upon being called out on her impossible claim, Yume leaned on her scum buddy's role. Before you say scum wouldn't be so transparently obvious about being scum, remember that this is the scum that fakeclaimed vengeful seer.

I know what you're thinking because I thought it too... Yume might have been faking an association. However, I have come to believe that is not the case, based on Radical Rat's own actions.

In post 198, Radical Rat wrote:Aren't Mason and Lover two separate abilities?

Radical Rat obviously knows that roles are determined based off of one card, as he was about to call fowl on the Mason Lover claim on these grounds, evidenced by this post.

But where was his objection to the following?

In post 91, Yume wrote:My choices were as such

Vengeful Townie
Werewolf One-Shot Paranoid Gun Owner
Seer

Well, I am a Vengeful Seer.

Strange, he'll ask if Mason and Lover are two different abilities... but he's not at all curious about Vengeful and Seer being in the same role?

This is all contingent on Yume being a scum flip, ofc.

House · Post Post #381 (isolation #103) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:56 pm

In post 379, iraonavp wrote:Alchemist, why did you quickhammer Yume?

Alchemist didn't hammer, Katsuke did.

House · Post Post #385 (isolation #104) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:08 pm

In post 384, iraonavp wrote: Are you sure?

Yeah, it's not that hard to scroll back to the last vc and count to two.

House · Post Post #386 (isolation #105) » Fri Jun 10, 2016 5:09 pm

In post 384, iraonavp wrote:I didn't notice that Yume's claim was impossible until it was pointed out.

I don't see how Radical Rat being 1-shot unlynchable on the first roll would impact Yume's fakeclaim, I think that's null.

By itself, it doesn't mean much, but when you add it all together, it's pretty damning.

House · Mon Jun 13, 2016 12:58 pm

VOTE: Radical Rat

I'm still happy with the Lovers staying alive today, especially as hard as Yume was working to sell a lynch there.

House · Post Post #397 (isolation #107) » Mon Jun 13, 2016 1:04 pm

In post 396, Ranger wrote:{iraonavp, massive, DoctorPepper, House}
{Alchemist21}
{Fate}
{Katsuki}
{Radical Rat}

Fate: Town Cop Lover (Disc: Compulsive Childkiller)
House: Town 1x PGO (Disc: 1x Gladiator)
Alchemist21: Town dayvig (Disc: Alien Mass Redirector)
SirCakez: Town Vanillaizer (Disc: Mafia Goon)
Ranger: Town Roleblocker (Disc: WW SuperSaint)
Doctor Pepper: Town 2x BP (Disc: Mafia Fruit Vendor)
Yume: Vengeful Seer (claimed) (Disc: WW 1x PGO)

iraonavp: town or SK (Disc: Werewolf)

Radical Rat: Werewolf 1x Unlynchable (Disc: Bodyguard)
Katsuki: WW Watcher (Disc: Innocent Child)
not-me-numbers: Werewolf Conspiracy Theorist

massive: lyncher/mason (Disc: Werewolf)

RadiantMoonlight: ??? (Disc: Mafia Godfather)

Still want that claim from RadiantMoonlight.

I'll be voting Radical Rat after that though.

Seriously bro, swap your Fate and Katsuki positions.

House · Post Post #398 (isolation #108) » Mon Jun 13, 2016 1:05 pm

Err... sis. Lol

House · Post Post #399 (isolation #109) » Mon Jun 13, 2016 1:20 pm

In post 390, Radiant Moonlight wrote:Titus you were wrong. SirCakez was town.

Why do you say that?

House · Post Post #405 (isolation #110) » Mon Jun 13, 2016 2:50 pm

In post 404, Radical Rat wrote:
In post 397, House wrote:
In post 396, Ranger wrote:{iraonavp, massive, DoctorPepper, House}
{Alchemist21}
{Fate}
{Katsuki}
{Radical Rat}

Fate: Town Cop Lover (Disc: Compulsive Childkiller)
House: Town 1x PGO (Disc: 1x Gladiator)
Alchemist21: Town dayvig (Disc: Alien Mass Redirector)
SirCakez: Town Vanillaizer (Disc: Mafia Goon)
Ranger: Town Roleblocker (Disc: WW SuperSaint)
Doctor Pepper: Town 2x BP (Disc: Mafia Fruit Vendor)
Yume: Vengeful Seer (claimed) (Disc: WW 1x PGO)

iraonavp: town or SK (Disc: Werewolf)

Radical Rat: Werewolf 1x Unlynchable (Disc: Bodyguard)
Katsuki: WW Watcher (Disc: Innocent Child)
not-me-numbers: Werewolf Conspiracy Theorist

massive: lyncher/mason (Disc: Werewolf)

RadiantMoonlight: ??? (Disc: Mafia Godfather)

Still want that claim from RadiantMoonlight.

I'll be voting Radical Rat after that though.
Seriously bro, swap your Fate and Katsuki positions.
I'm curious: what's got you so confident in Katsuki? They've barely posted at all.

I'm more certain about Fate being scum than Katsuki being town.

House · Post Post #411 (isolation #111) » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:35 pm

In post 406, Radical Rat wrote:Alright, and what's your logic there?

They threw away compulsive child killer, and claimed Miller.

For them to be town, they have to have received three shitty roles, and the odds favor them being scum and fakeclaiming Miller.

House · Post Post #412 (isolation #112) » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:38 pm

In post 407, SirCakez wrote:How did you even interpret that as a scumslip lmao
I meant they screwed up earlier by trying to push me for a mislynch and are now trying to rectify their mistake

Cakes, RM isn't scum here, just derp town.

I have two solid scumspects that need to swing.

House · Post Post #413 (isolation #113) » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:39 pm

In post 409, SirCakez wrote:They disappeared when Yume was being wagoned
They are both normally incredibly active players but are lurking here

Just these two things alone are fantastic evidence

Titus doesn't shy away from suspicion as scum.

House · Post Post #415 (isolation #114) » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:57 pm

{iraonavp}
{Ranger}
{Alchemist21, DoctorPepper, massive}
{Katsuki}
{RadiantMoonlight}
{Fate}
{Radical Rat}

RR needs to swing.
Then Fate d3.

If the game is still ongoing at that point, I'm open to RM.

House · Post Post #416 (isolation #115) » Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:58 pm

In post 415, House wrote:{iraonavp}
{Ranger}
{Alchemist21, DoctorPepper, massive}
{Katsuki, SirCakez}
{RadiantMoonlight}
{Fate}
{Radical Rat}

RR needs to swing.
Then Fate d3.

If the game is still ongoing at that point, I'm open to RM.

Ebwop

House · Post Post #440 (isolation #116) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:17 am

In post 418, Fate wrote:
In post 411, House wrote:
In post 406, Radical Rat wrote:Alright, and what's your logic there?
They threw away compulsive child killer, and claimed Miller.

For them to be town, they have to have received three shitty roles, and the odds favor them being scum and fakeclaiming Miller.
the fact that I discarded a town role makes me confirmed town, because it means I definitely had the option of being town.

That's a crock of shit, too.

House · Post Post #441 (isolation #117) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:20 am

In post 422, Radiant Moonlight wrote:
In post 399, House wrote:
In post 390, Radiant Moonlight wrote:Titus you were wrong. SirCakez was town.
Why do you say that?
Titus insisted on that phrasing. She's not subtle and wanted to apologize for her very likely incorrect push on SirCakez.

What made her push very likely incorrect?

House · Post Post #442 (isolation #118) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:25 am

In post 428, massive wrote:If we assume Cakey is telling the truth about his role, then he's not a werewolf, since Werewolf Lover is (for some reason) one of the "impossible" combinations according to the Wiki page.

RC, are you going to give Ranger your round-one cards, or are you going to ignore that request?

We don't have to take Cakes at his word about being a Lover. Ranger outed the members d1.

House · Post Post #443 (isolation #119) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:27 am

In post 433, SirCakez wrote:He's my second-highest scum suspect right now, I don't feel good about it.
No, the Lovers don't have a chat.

Dude, are you high?

Ranger is the reason we got scum d1 and two more members in the crosshairs.

House · Post Post #444 (isolation #120) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:28 am

In post 443, House wrote:
In post 433, SirCakez wrote:He's my second-highest scum suspect right now, I don't feel good about it.
No, the Lovers don't have a chat.

Dude, are you high?

Ranger is the reason we got scum d1 and two more members in the crosshairs
.

Never mind.

House · Post Post #445 (isolation #121) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:29 am

In post 433, SirCakez wrote:He's my second-highest scum suspect right now, I don't feel good about it.
No, the Lovers don't have a chat.

Your second highest is actually scum, and your suspicion on RM over inactivity stinks of week old fish that has been laying in the sun.

House · Post Post #446 (isolation #122) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:30 am

In post 435, Radical Rat wrote:
In post 432, Radiant Moonlight wrote:Yes, we are not claiming at this time. The group is better off if we do not.

Something was wrong. Titus being ill is not a good thing.

How do you feel about Rat suddenly 180ing on his read on you when a wagon on him took off, SirCakez?

Mod: Do lovers have a chat? Is werewolf lover possible?
I did not 180 on my read. More like a 90. I went from a cautious townread to healthy suspicion.
However, since the wiki does say Werewolf Lover is impossible, that's 2/3 scumteams that are impossible for him to be, I'm back to townreading him.

What a safe posture to adopt.

House · Post Post #447 (isolation #123) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:32 am

In post 437, Radiant Moonlight wrote: Also, answering why requires claiming.

Wrong. Revealing the cards from the FIRST setup does not compromise your role from the SECOND setup.

House · Post Post #448 (isolation #124) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:45 am

Cakez, let me explain why I think your push is terribad.

It isn't the product of actual hunting for scum. Can scum lurk? Of course. But so can town. You didn't even try to discern the reason for the lack of activity. You just pinned an accusation and hung a vote on it.

You're assuming facts not in evidence. That's very bad town play, because it looks exactly like what scum would do and can easily get you mislynched in MyLo.

Don't throw around accusations based on your own perspective without getting the player's reasons for their behavior first.

In a typical game, I'd have swung my read on you

so

hard for the way you made this push.

House · Post Post #449 (isolation #125) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 7:54 am

In post 438, Radical Rat wrote:.
I haven't claimed anything except "Not Werewolf Unlynchable" for this roll.

I never said you claimed it this roll. I said Yume fell back on your claim to base her second fakeclaim when her first one flopped because you're buddies.

You know, you really should have bussed the shit out of her when she made an impossible claim, or at the very least, not tried to hunt based off impossible claims when your own buddy made an egregious one that you didn't call out.

House · Post Post #450 (isolation #126) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:02 am

In post 427, SirCakez wrote:
In post 425, DoctorPepper wrote:I'm convinced something is wrong. I'll put pressure on your spot because this isn't the play I'm used to from either of you tbh
^

You're on a wagon with your second highest scumspect.

Considering they lost a member d1, odds of them bussing d2 are rather low, especially when the second is incriminated by their own partner.

Think about this at more than a surface level.

House · Post Post #451 (isolation #127) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:09 am

In post 419, Fate wrote:
In post 415, House wrote:{iraonavp}
{Ranger}
{Alchemist21, DoctorPepper, massive}
{Katsuki}
{RadiantMoonlight}
{Fate}
{Radical Rat}

RR needs to swing.
Then Fate d3.

If the game is still ongoing at that point, I'm open to RM.
I guess I'll just back to back bus buddies and NK you and coast though

iranowap is a safe lynch for me to push once you're dead

This actually sells me on Fate being scum #3 more than their cards did.

Notice how he targets my #1 townread in his post ty push after I'm NK'ed.

Why would iraonavp be my #1 townread when I pushed him yesterday and Ranger caught scum yesterday?

Because I'm the cop and iraonavp came back inno. That's why.

I'm outing my claim and results because Fate made it clear that I'm being targeted tonight anyway (surprised i wasn't last night, actually).

When RR swings, Fate needs to be jailed/blocked and I need to be protected.

House · Post Post #453 (isolation #128) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:12 am

In post 452, Radical Rat wrote:
In post 449, House wrote:
In post 438, Radical Rat wrote:.
I haven't claimed anything except "Not Werewolf Unlynchable" for this roll.
I never said you claimed it this roll. I said Yume fell back on your claim to base her second fakeclaim when her first one flopped because you're buddies.

You know, you really should have bussed the shit out of her when she made an impossible claim, or at the very least, not tried to hunt based off impossible claims when your own buddy made an egregious one that you didn't call out.
You didn't say I did, but RC did.

And I told you, I just missed that claim.

But you were all over a Mason Lover claim.

Right.

House · Post Post #456 (isolation #129) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:17 am

In post 454, Radical Rat wrote:House, would you mind claiming with all three of your cards?

The more known cards we have in play, the fewer scum can use to fakeclaim.

If you want any shot at living to d3, you need to bus Fate.

One of you are swinging today, and I don't care which because we can neutralize the other.

House · Post Post #457 (isolation #130) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:22 am

In post 455, Radical Rat wrote:I would have been all over it if I saw it. But I didn't notice that claim until it was quoted, so sue me.

Not buying it.

You were paying enough attention to feign suspicion of Mason Lover, Vengeful Seer should have screamed at you for rope.

House · Post Post #460 (isolation #131) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:39 am

In post 439, Radiant Moonlight wrote: The counterwagons between our slot and RR feel really weird. Can I get some input on what's happened thus far, especially from Ranger? Thanks.

~Titus

Cakez is tunneling you based on blind assumptions and if this were any other game I'd be scumreading him for it because his actions today smell like Lyncher.

Luckily for him, he gets a reprieve until RR and Fate swing.

House · Post Post #461 (isolation #132) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:40 am

In post 459, Radical Rat wrote:I'm not opposed to lynching Fate, but I'm not done with RM yet.

The day has only just begun, we don't need to worry about who's swinging yet.

Nothing to worry about. It's you or Fate, period. End of story.

House · Post Post #463 (isolation #133) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 8:56 am

In post 458, massive wrote:We have to take him at his word about being a Mason Lover (the complete package). He's already said he's the only mason.

It's an easy claim to buy, because he just threw it out there with no fear.

If he was scum, he'd have been taking a ginormous risk of an actual Mason cc'ing him.

Cakez is not a person of interest. Let scum kill him.

House · Post Post #470 (isolation #134) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:03 am

In post 464, Radiant Moonlight wrote:
In post 463, House wrote:
In post 458, massive wrote:We have to take him at his word about being a Mason Lover (the complete package). He's already said he's the only mason.
It's an easy claim to buy, because he just threw it out there with no fear.

If he was scum, he'd have been taking a ginormous risk of an actual Mason cc'ing him.

Cakez is not a person of interest. Let scum kill him.
Agreed. Cakez is confirmed town, to both our heads.

I'll grab from the first game. I don't see why anyone would want that but whatever.

Reread d1, it's enlightening.

House · Post Post #471 (isolation #135) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:04 am

In post 469, Radiant Moonlight wrote:
In post 467, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 463, House wrote:Cakez is not a person of interest. Let scum kill him
Well apparantly scum couldn't even do that much. Lol
Who are the lovers? You're assuming they tried to kill him.

Ranger, Katsuki, and Cakez.

I think they targeted Ranger over Cakez because Ranger caught scum d1.

House · Post Post #474 (isolation #136) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:07 am

In post 473, Radiant Moonlight wrote:
In post 471, House wrote:
In post 469, Radiant Moonlight wrote:
In post 467, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 463, House wrote:Cakez is not a person of interest. Let scum kill him
Well apparantly scum couldn't even do that much. Lol
Who are the lovers? You're assuming they tried to kill him.
Ranger, Katsuki, and Cakez.

I think they targeted Ranger over Cakez because Ranger caught scum d1.
I don't think they targeted the lovers at all. No solid evidence there. Just Titus theory I am running with.

If they didn't target Ranger, the only likely target left was me for jumping all over Yume and pushing RR in twilight.

House · Post Post #475 (isolation #137) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:16 am

In post 392, Alchemist21 wrote:It's also possible that scum were in the lovers and tried to kill outside them, but I think that almost always means scum were roleblocked last Night rather than Town got protected. The only alternative would be a BP Townie.

This is a really bad theory.

It's quite possible I was protected after I pushed so hard for Yume's lynch, who flipped scum, and made a case for RR, who is today's leading wagon.

Scum likely targeted me so I wouldn't be able to push my case today.

House · Post Post #479 (isolation #138) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:24 am

In post 476, Radical Rat wrote:
In post 466, Radiant Moonlight wrote:
In post 459, Radical Rat wrote:I'm not opposed to lynching Fate, but I'm not done with RM yet.

The day has only just begun, we don't need to worry about who's swinging yet.
VOTE: Radical Rat

When is the proper time for caring who swings?
Once the discussion of the day has been taken care of.

At any rate, I'm at L-1, so let's get this out of the way.
I am a Mafia One-shot Dayvig. Mafia was taken from Mafia Seer.
Fate is NOT my scumbuddy, but I do suspect that slot is scum.
There is at least one Vengeful on our team, so lynch carefully.

Last, but not least...

Kill: House

So Fate and another group scum.

Interesting.

Lynch Fate next, town.

House · Post Post #480 (isolation #139) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:25 am

If I was alive tonight, I'd target Alchemist.

He's my primary suspect for scum aside from Fate, but Fate needs to go.

House · Post Post #482 (isolation #140) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:29 am

In post 481, Alchemist21 wrote:All the scum were really unlucky if there are multiple scum factions and neither of them managed a kill last Night.

Not if there's a 3P that doesn't kill.

House · Post Post #485 (isolation #141) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:33 am

In post 483, Alchemist21 wrote:That could only be a Cult. I think the other 3p roles without kills lose if the scum with kills all die before they reach theor wincon.

Dangerous assumption to make. There are mods that consider 3P to be a threat to town. For town to win, all threats must be eliminated.

House · Post Post #486 (isolation #142) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:35 am

Lynched is a possibility.

House · Post Post #487 (isolation #143) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:35 am

Lyncher*

House · Post Post #488 (isolation #144) » Tue Jun 14, 2016 9:37 am

In post 480, House wrote:
If I was alive tonight, I'd target Alchemist.

He's my primary suspect for scum aside from Fate, but Fate needs to go.

Don't want this overlooked.

House · Post Post #926 (isolation #145) » Fri Jul 01, 2016 9:00 am

Props to Ranger for breaking the game open.

Gg all.

House · Post Post #928 (isolation #146) » Fri Jul 01, 2016 9:05 am

In post 927, Katsuki wrote:Also House, fuck IC lol. Then again, given how things went probably wouldve been a better idea aha, but I rly do hate that role with a passion.

So instead of IC, you tied your survival as scum to other players that you couldn't know the alignment of?

Sounds legit.

House · Fri Jul 01, 2016 11:47 am

In post 129, Alchemist21 wrote:I agree that House's inconsistency makes him look scummy, but I'm also remembering what Titus used to always say about House being the opposite alignment of how he looked.

Heh heh... so true.

House · Fri Jul 01, 2016 12:03 pm

In post 235, House wrote:
In post 233, Yume wrote:And what if they aren't all town?
If they aren't all town, they'll be left alone at night.

How long do you think a 3 for 1 nk going untouched will be acceptable to town?

HELLO!

House · Post Post #934 (isolation #149) » Fri Jul 01, 2016 1:12 pm

In post 933, Fate wrote:uhhh ty for carry I guess?

lolKatsukiscum

Ranger was the hero.

Just throwing out an itys.

House · Post Post #937 (isolation #150) » Fri Jul 01, 2016 1:22 pm

In post 935, Fate wrote:idk I think RM's play was pretty strong day and night

RM has the benefit of being supercop.

Not hard to nail that.

House · Post Post #944 (isolation #151) » Fri Jul 01, 2016 4:10 pm

In post 943, Titus wrote:
In post 937, House wrote:
In post 935, Fate wrote:idk I think RM's play was pretty strong day and night
RM has the benefit of being supercop.

Not hard to nail that.
Avoiding the person scum will shoot and clearing townies at the same time was hard. Very hard.

Fair enough. Well done, scumfriend.

House · Post Post #954 (isolation #152) » Sat Jul 02, 2016 2:51 pm

In post 953, Ranger wrote:Feelin' good, though I have to admit: the strategy I used to break the game ONLY works if there's been a reroll. If the setup was valid on the first roll, then me asking for any of your cards would be tantamount to demanding a massclaim on D1, which would have obviously not been a good idea. Since it led to an almost-perfect town win (I TOLD you guys not to lynch iraonavp and that he was mod-cleared by the innocent result from House), still fairly proud of my play here, especially since (with the exception of Dr. Pepper) I basically had all the scum in sight on D1.

Great job, Ranger. Mad props.