That sounds like an evil name anyway!
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Well yeah. "Oman's actions are so crazy, he couldnt possibly be scum. Scum wouldnt be this goofy", seems to the image your going for.Oman wrote:Yeahm cause all of those are clear signs of innocenceNorth wrote: Someone who is trying to be silly, voting for self, encouraging others to vote for him, might be trying hard to look innocent.
Well, didnt you ask for it?Oman wrote:And you're voting me.North wrote:, but I wouldnt think scum would act so wacky
I bolded the area that is false. It is kind of interesting that you either misunderstood or chose to misinterpret what I did as a playful vote on Oman.destructor wrote:Vote: Northjayhawk
Not really random. I don't like the way he made a semi-serious vote,called it a playful random voteand now he's unvoted it and gone back to Crub. Why?
and a self-vote.Oman wrote:I'm in!
Self vote!
No, Dice Roll!
No, DICE SELF VOTE!
Original Roll String: 1d1(STATIC) 1 1-Sided Dice: (1) = 1
I make my vote, noting that you are acting really bizarre, but your reaction to that has been anything BUT playful and bored. I'm not particularly concerned at all about votes placed on me at this point because it is too early to matter, but suddenly this all seems very serious to you, and you begin to become defensive.Oman wrote:BANDWAGON TO VICTORY!
When you vote for yourself and ask others to vote for you, we learn very little about you or the people voting for you, other than you are a strange goofball. Maybe we might learn about people voting for you if they go nuts and quickly put you at L-2 or something, but compared to simple random-voting to test other people's reactions, a self-bandwagon is completely useless and probably counterproductive for the town.Oman wrote:Umm, how is a self bandwagon any less good than one the vote-ee is not on?
I just dont know what to make of this. You've got to be joking, right?Oman wrote:Ryan...can you post your role pm?
holy hell, how did that happen?Aimee wrote:Veggietastic Vote Count!
ryan -- 5 (thinktank, kravhen, Oman, Crub, destructor)
Crub -- 2 (Northjayhawk, Y)
Y -- 1 (Phate)
Korran -- 1 (WhoMe?)
destructor -- 1 (soupfly)
Not Voting -- Korran, ryan
Now searching for a replacement for Korran.
(I'm assuming that was a joke, still very early) Anyway, that was Kravhen's vote on 42, followed by:kravhen wrote:destructor is onto something
soupfly is clearly scum
unvote, vote: soupfly
on 94. Nice to see Kravhen stepping in to narrowly avoid a quicklynch on ryan by unvoting... soupfly?kravhen wrote:holy shit too many people on ryan for it to be legit
Unvote
ryan, out of the people that stacked on you, who appears most scummy to you and why?
on 122. Unless I missed something, he had no vote on anyone at all.kravhen wrote:Woah woah woah, let him explain himself people.
People are going crazy with the votes now. Short day 1 is BAD FOR TOWN.
Unvotein case i somehow got a vote on him, i lose track. Anyway, I just want him to explain, I don't find it scummy to anticipate the mod to not count a vote because of bad synthax, therefore putting down a "ghost vote" to try to lure a hammer or analyse reactions while keeping the votee NOT actually at L-1 or something. Something like that can even seem clever and useful to some extent, perhaps. Clever use of modding rules. Anyway. Explanation first, lynching later.
That is a fair question. My vote on Oman was only barely non-random with not a lot of solid reasoning behind it at that time, but I thought his bizarre early behavior merited some pressure. I then got some feedback that a real bandwagon before everyone even checked in would be bad. That made sense to me since you basically would let the late people off the hook from possibly making a very suspicious first couple posts and just fly under the radar.WhoMe? wrote:I could be interested in a NorthJayHawk wagon. Could you answer me this question, why would you return to a random vote? You had made a serious vote, so why go back to random?
I believe I've explained this a few times already. (Aside from you typing "barely random" which doesnt make sense, it was "barely non-random")destructor wrote:@ Northjayhawk - In Post 48 you flesh out, in some detail, your issues with Oman. You say that you had a 'barely-random' vote on him, which doesn't ring true in light of this post. This becomes stranger when you take into account the fact that you returned a random vote to Crub. How randomwasyour vote on Oman, really?
soupfly wrote:unvote: destructor --> not saying he's not scum but the original vote was pressure more than suspicion. may decide to revote him but only when i have some firm reasons because we're way past the random stage.
so far nobody has really jumped out at me. i understand why oman, ryan and destructor are drawing heat but i can't say there's anything obvious at the moment.
i'm going to do a reread when i get a chance and hopefully i'll see something that i've missed so far.
Got an update? I dont remember seeing an original arguement for why <insert name here> is scum yet. At 8-9 pages there should hopefully be something suspicious that no one else has noticed or brought up yet.soupfly wrote:the initial vote and this were not based on anything thing i'd seen in your play:destructor wrote:@ soupfly - Are you telling us that your 'original' vote, back in Post 41 was a pressure vote? Why pressuremethen?i wanted to give the impression that there was some substance to my vote when in fact there wasn't. was curious to see how others react. curious to see how you would react.soupfly wrote:In any case I still think destructor is scum...anybody else see it too?
confirm vote: destructor
honestly i haven't read the thread closely enough to really form any firm suspicions, but i will. once i get into the flow of the game i will be quite active but for now i need to find the time to do a proper read through.
as far as why you? i'd answer that with the question "why not you"?
sorry for my being not so active but i will make it up.