In post 134, Apricity wrote:
I'm pretty much of the same opinion that you just stated. I had a mild townlean on him based on gut feels, but when I looked at his iso, 80-90% of it was related to game mechanics, and that's a behavior I usually think is anti-town. What I'm interested in seeing is how aptil's thoughts about jjh will develop from here once jjh responds. To me, since I understood the reasoning jjh was coming from, aptil's vote appeared a little contrived. If it was genuine confusion I guess that's different...I can't really tell currently.
Wait, I thought you agreed with aptil that we should flip the scummiest person instead of a null slot.
Speaking of which, Infinity, you never addressed aptil when he asked you about your Varsoon vote; you just kinda dropped the vote later. Out of curiosity, was it a pressure vote or a vote for color flip?
Right, I sort of talked about that in
107 (and in the posts where I voted him, though it may not have been worded well). At the time I thought it would be a good idea to flip someone active and town-leader-like who's hard to read, and varsoon fit that bill. In
98 max said he could read varsoon and brought up the threat of a NK which I hadn't really thought of before, which made me change my mind. So to answer your question, it was a vote to flip.
This feels really off to me, it's like since I pointed out you didn't follow up on something you did the same to me. Though it's possible that just occured to you as town or that you're scrutinizing me more since I'm scrutinizing you.