Mini 1926: Game Of Thrones S1E3 (Game over-Mafia WINS!!)

shaddowez · Post Post #6 (isolation #0) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 5:30 am

Hey everyone!

May as well get this out of the way, we all know Wisdom's scum

VOTE: Wisdom

shaddowez · Post Post #20 (isolation #1) » Wed Jul 12, 2017 8:47 am

In post 18, Assemblerotws wrote:I hereby VOTE: Vecna for lying about the vote status of Wisdom.

How do you know he isn't a quadruple voter, hmmm?

shaddowez · Post Post #58 (isolation #2) » Thu Jul 13, 2017 10:49 am

Gratiae

- Considering the votes revolving around me and molla right now, what purpose does it serve to post 53 and make no actual gamestate comments?

gerry's vote was weird, and I'm not opposed to voting there. I don't understand the reason to make a comment in 47 without actually voting, and then voting an hour and a half later with no other interaction.
VOTE: gerryoat

BBT

- Why Wisdom? Do you still consider the game to be in RVS?

shaddowez · Post Post #86 (isolation #3) » Fri Jul 14, 2017 2:31 pm

Vedith

, what's your reasoning against voting Gerry?

Is Vecna usually this random as either alignment?

@Mod

- I'll be V/LA on weekends in general, back on Monday.

shaddowez · Post Post #129 (isolation #4) » Mon Jul 17, 2017 5:46 am

BBT

- Are you actually scum reading gerry, or just pushing for a claim? Because while you may think there are several pro-town reasons to force an early claim, there is also plenty of scum motivation to do so.

I don't like the Assember/Vecna interaction. Assembler is being way too defensive over nothing, and hasn't commented on anything in the game other than the mason talk.

VOTE: Assembler

We really need more people actually participating - Wisdom, Gratiae, random, where are youuuuu?

shaddowez · Post Post #168 (isolation #5) » Tue Jul 18, 2017 10:57 am

In post 143, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 58, shaddowez wrote: gerry's vote was weird, and I'm not opposed to voting there. I don't understand the reason to make a comment in 47 without actually voting, and then voting an hour and a half later with no other interaction.
VOTE: gerryoat
Weird = scum? Because if not (and it doesn't) I don't get your vote?

Weird as in forced, and I couldn't find any town motivation in it. At the time he seemed the scummiest to me based on his interactions.

In post 144, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 129, shaddowez wrote:
BBT
- Are you actually scum reading gerry, or just pushing for a claim?
I was pushing for a claim.

So early on D1 you're pushing for a claim on a

not

scum read, with no good reason? You seem to be looking for people to explain things to you instead of trying to figure things out, and the way you're going about things doesn't read like town!BBT to me.

VOTE: BBT

That's L-1

shaddowez · Post Post #260 (isolation #6) » Sun Jul 23, 2017 1:18 pm

I should be around tomorrow. So far I agree with Gerry about BBT, and have concerns about fuzzy. More detail to come when I actually have time

shaddowez · Post Post #314 (isolation #7) » Wed Jul 26, 2017 2:04 am

I'm willing to see where this goes.

VOTE: gerryoat

His play and fuzzy's are pretty similar IMO - Neither of them are making hard stances on any reads and a lot of their posts are fluff. The biggest difference is that gerry has actually voted for people. I liked 253 when I first read it, but going through again it seems to lack any conviction. Add to that the fact his initial reason for voting BBT was terrible, and I'd rather vote this than fuzzy right now.

shaddowez · Post Post #319 (isolation #8) » Wed Jul 26, 2017 4:01 am

L-3 is not "lynch range" in any universe, unless you know that there are multiple scum are still off the wagon.

shaddowez · Post Post #320 (isolation #9) » Wed Jul 26, 2017 4:02 am

One too many "are"s there

shaddowez · Post Post #352 (isolation #10) » Thu Jul 27, 2017 5:47 am

Will respond later when not hung over... Point of note, Black Hat should be renamed Booze Hat

shaddowez · Post Post #366 (isolation #11) » Fri Jul 28, 2017 3:36 am

In post 323, gerryoat wrote: oh yeah, i'm sure it started to lack conviction once you thought you could get a wagon on me going? If not, explain what makes it lack conviction now than it did before. also explain what made a vote on me better than fuzzy if we are similar, also what makes us similar?

In post 325, gerryoat wrote:
you also say that you agree with me on BBT, bu tyou are the one who put him on L1 yesterday. what is your original reasons for voting him? If your only reason for voting me is cause you think i lacked conviction, but you SR him as well as fuzzy. what made the vote on me better than BBT or Fuzzy if you seem to had questions about the other 2 more than me? Cause from my point of view, it looks like a wagon is forming and you just decided to join it

I agreed with you about BBT in regards to still being suspicious of him, insomuch as I don't believe that the governing conftowns him as a lot of people seem to be doing now. I was actually considering voting him again, but came back to your 206 and 253. They both seem very lackadaisical, and don't seem to actually be trying to get BBT lynched, but make it look like you're trying to do something. Additionally, you throw shade on Assembler in 206, and then wave it off in 253.

While yes, I did "jump on a wagon", when I read multiple people as scummy I'm going to vote for the one that's more likely to be lynched. It doesn't make sense for me to put my vote somewhere else if I think there's a better than good chance that person will flip scum. Also, I did vote you D1, so I'm not exactly just scum reading you out of the blue.

shaddowez · Post Post #395 (isolation #12) » Mon Jul 31, 2017 1:53 am

@gerry

- I absolutely think it's possible you and BBT are scum together.

I'm flying home today so won't be around, but I'll be back tomorrow

shaddowez · Post Post #506 (isolation #13) » Thu Aug 03, 2017 6:59 am

Crap, had a bunch of stuff going on when I got home and forgot about this. Reading now, will post shortly

shaddowez · Post Post #510 (isolation #14) » Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:17 am

In post 376, gerryoat wrote: Okay, so i you actually were suspicious of him. Why didnt you give your own reasons for voting him. Why just post that you agree with me at the time?

BBT's responses to my 129 caused me to vote him in 168 where I gave a reason at the time. He hadn't really done much more between then and the beginning of D2, and I was agreeing that the governing didn't auto-town him. There was no reason for me to just repeat the same things, either my own or yours.

In post 396, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Explain why I'm scum again?

Because your voting pattern is based around weak premises, and you're tunneling with no good reason. You're main (and only, really) reason for thinking Random is scum is because he's not voting on a wagon he claimed to thing scum was on. There's more than one scum, and you don't seem interested in looking for them, just trying to get somebody lynched.

In post 397, gerryoat wrote: why?

Because while you're claiming to think BBT is scum, you're not doing much to try and convince anyone else. You switched your vote to me, then unvoted to wait for our interaction, but just left your vote clear instead of revoting BBT (or anywhere else, for that matter). On the other side, BBT voted you but then changes votes and is basically ignoring you, with the exception of 324.

shaddowez · Post Post #511 (isolation #15) » Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:18 am

In post 502, Vedith wrote:Happy to flash wagon Gratiae if needed.
We have 1 day left.

Why them?

shaddowez · Post Post #512 (isolation #16) » Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:23 am

I can't put a finger on it, but for some reason I'm not feeling Random!scum. There are definitely scummy posts, but there's something about it that seems like he'd be doing more to plant seeds if he was scum. Not to mention that BBT is driving the wagon hard, and I've got a much stronger scum read there.