VOTE: Vexen
I believe both Xigbar and Zexion to be loyal.
In post 168, XII Larxene wrote:Demyx: The thing where you state reads and then leave doesn't work if you're not charming about it! I know being lazy is your thing but c'mon, being lovable is also your thing. Being a goof is like, your only talent or something.
I Xemnas wrote:Demyx has merely been useless, which is about all I normally expect from him, anyway.
IIn post 51, X Luxord wrote:VOTE: 6 Zex
As someone who has no flavor knowledge, all of the names are frustratingly similar.
I actually really like this for the honesty in the post so there's that.In post 54, X Luxord wrote:There's not too much to explain. I'm not coming in with any real scumreads so I'm just poking and prodding at people I consider voteable. Crux of it is really that I just don't agree with your reads. If ever I earnestly push you, I'd explain it.
As for 13 Roxas, the less conviction you actually have in your scumread, the more favorably I see you. I don't actually think there's any real urgency in sorting him nor is there any real reason to scumread him. With the claim, I'm unwilling to consider 13 as a D1 lynch. (Of course, if he doesn't produce results that are unambiguously favorable we look more critically.)
Awww did I really ping you for that many people so far? <3 Thanks, boo.In post 204, VI Zexion wrote:Okay half my altguesses just went out the window with Demyx's entry and now I'm confused on that front lmao. Had something else to say but now it's gone.
Let's have a heart to heart here.In post 57, VI Zexion wrote:I think his entrance lacked thought.
So you only had two guesses for alts in the game? You said half your alt guesses got thrown out.In post 207, VI Zexion wrote:Just one, actually.
Was there anything in particular you wanted to talk about at this stage?In post 59, VI Zexion wrote:Nothing else you want to talk about?
In post 65, XI Marluxia wrote:I'm pretty skeptical in general about people who ask to be cop cleared via role and typically find that there's some misguided thought leading there. Not really interested in spending an investigation on Roxas.
In post 66, XI Marluxia wrote:Roles might have flavor justification but that doesn't mean that it will be good flavor justification and it doesn't mean that there will be a correlation between how town someone looks and how powerful their role is.In post 53, V Lexaeus wrote:As for Roxas... He's a special case. In flavor, he's the key (literally) to the Organization's entire scheme until the Oblivion Squad screws it up vying for power, and he runs away.
Don't especially love this sequence but it's probably town?In post 67, XI Marluxia wrote:Luxord, if you didn't have anything that you wanted to say yet, why didn't you just say you didn't have anything to say?
Not necessarily because scum wouldn't do that. I'm arguing that scum like to posture moar.In post 215, VI Zexion wrote:Re 208 if you're saying that scum wouldn't do that because it's too obvious I disagree; I think the entrance was bad precisely because having those reads was unreasonable. I don't think it's particularly strong or intricate reasoning but I don't think it's bad reasoning; giving hard reads with no basis isn't something I'm ever going to townread and is something I'm going to scumread more often than not.
59 I just wanted conversation.
Actually when I first thought about this game I was thinking about how to make up reads to lynch Roxas because he was a traitor to the Organization in the end in KH2. Don't know the other source material aside from that.In post 218, VI Zexion wrote:Frankly, it feels as though you've come into the game determined to townread Roxas and make them look town and I really don't like it.
For what it's worth; this is all noise.In post 218, VI Zexion wrote:I don't think the way that you're townreading their entrance is good at all; I think that it's a scummy entrance and I think that it's pretty exaggerated and wrong to townread that in the way that you are townreading it - I could find a nullread there believeable with the kind of logic you're espousing but a townread is just ridiculous. I don't think that the inability to articulate the Luxord scumread is town at all; I think that inarticulacy is something that would be trivial to fake for Roxas and it absolutely bothers me that you're finding elaborate ways to townread the slot off pretty much nothing.
In post 234, XIII Roxas wrote:As someone with great experience with the scummer whose style you are imitating, I can point to these areas of your post where you went wrong. You had the right idea, but these ones utterly shattered the illusion. Some constructive criticism: keep the "town town? scum? scum" in order and separate from all other content, which would come in a separate post. Furthermore, the scummer you mimicked will collapse content in the manner I have done so: combining separate paragraphs, shortening spaces between quotes, and cutting out older quotes. That scummer also would not have used a spoiler tag so freely.In post 200, IX Demyx wrote:Likely not partners with Vexen.SAME. Although I figure I'll be obvious enough to anyone that knows me anyway. Sadly, this post says nothing about your alignment.In post 18, X Luxord wrote:VOTE: Xigbar
Also, I really should have found out whether or not the game would reveal all alts at the end. Oh well.Really doubt this push as a whole comes from scum.In post 24, V Lexaeus wrote:Sorry, my bad. They are full fledged scum, I just meant traitor as in the flavor. Should have said treacherous or just scum like I did the first time.
Wasn't planning on arguing, just figured you might need the constructive criticism.In post 224, VI Zexion wrote:Trying to discredit my take on your content thus far as just noise doesn't invalidate the reasoning that I've stated; you're welcome to state my reasoning as noise but I think it pretty apparently is not. I don't find the reasons for your townread on Roxas to be genuine; I find the manner in which you are engaging me here to be furthermore scummy; I think that your attitude insinuates that you "know better" about "how the game is played" and that's a position from which you inherently have the advantage, it's a position from which you're poised to start an argument and win it in order to prove a point, not to scumhunt; I think if you were interested in scumhunting you wouldn't discount my critique of your read as just noise, the lack of receptivity from you when you've just started your catchup is scummy because the strength of your read as you're defending it right now doesn't match with where it should be if you were town just at this point in your understanding of the game and your development of your reads.
I'm talking to you because my concerns are with you; just because I think you're scummy doesn't mean I'm dead-set that you're scum end of story and never talk to you again; even if I were sure you were scum I would still talk to you because I treat my scumreads like they're town and that's playstyle.
The motivation for you townread Roxas depends on his alignment - if he's town then you're trying to pocket him because he's an easy pocket when he's town and all you need to do is agree with his reads and you're town to him; if he's scum then you're scum with him and you're trying to improve the position your team is in because your scumbuds are being scumread and you don't want to have to endgame town without Roxas. Roxas' motivation for not articulating the Luxord scumread is so obvious I'm baffled that you're asking me - if Roxas is scum then he doesn't have to provide reasoning that he'll have to justify and be held accountable for.
If you're struggling do it Ranger style. That's pretty common these days so I don't think it gives anything away.In post 230, XIII Roxas wrote:I'm sorry but I'm not going to fake content on slots that I don't actually have stances on. I would like to make a readslist but I'm trying to figure out formatting which would preserve my anonymity because I'm afraid no matter what style of readslist I use I will immediately out my identity once I have done so.In post 157, VI Zexion wrote:@Roxas if you're town here I definitely would like to see more from you that isn't just pushing back on other slots because I feel like that's pretty much the extent of what I've seen from you so far; don't think it's helpful at all to limit your content to reactions to other slots if you're town, think your reasoning on Lexaeus town is pretty poor and I don't find your stance there reasonable at all.
While it may be obvious enough, I still wish to preserve some semblance of anonymity even though I have to admit, I am indeed facing a conflict. I feel outing my identity would be the most valuable thing for my wincon, yet doing so would be counter to the spirit of the game and I did sign up for this game specifically for the anonymity-alt nature of it.
A readslist would help me explain why I am struggling and give you an idea of where I'm at, but I'm still figuring out how to make one that will not be traceable to my style.
Oh yeah that much is obvious but what I'm thinking about is the way your reads were thrown out. Think as scum you'd put more thought into that side of things.In post 240, XIII Roxas wrote:What if I told you that I put extensive thought into my opening post?In post 216, IX Demyx wrote:Think that if Roxas were scum there would be more thought put into the opening post/sequence and there just wasn't. It doesn't come across as stiff, either.
Rather, more specifically, I thought about my role and tried to figure out how to maximize its utility a great deal and my first post was the ultimate conclusion I reached.
I'd be very surprised if anyone with knowledge of either of you mistook you for that person, let alone Zexion of all people.I know which scummer you are talking about and while I don't know if I am allowed to state directly I am not them I can safely abuse a loophole to let you know I am not them by stating this:
I am not from California.
If you assume I am a scummer from there.
You have my identity wrong.
In post 246, VI Zexion wrote:@Demyx last paragraph is shallow reasoning because your question was shallow - not sure what else you expect there. Wasn't implying that you should be scumhunting me, was implying that you should be scumhunting generally; instead you're coming up withoverelaborate reasons why Roxas is town as if you're already sold on your read there,feels a lot like TMI if Roxas is town hereand I haven't seen you develop your reads at all sinceso I'm pretty skeptical of what you're doing here overall.Don't see you getting reads; don't see you legitimately attempting to solve the game;don't like how you're talking to me as if you know I'm town.Don't have an altguess on you.
In post 71, X Luxord wrote:I don't actually recall what exactly made me switch to Xigbar in 18, but it was likely because I thought it was okay to let Lexaeus stay busy with prodding at Larxene's claim, and vote someone who didn't seem as engaged. Yes, I didn't have any particular reason for voting Xigbar. I am generally more of a passive player. I don't think this is a bad thing when the game is moving fine on its own. I think it's fine for me to move and act at my own pace in this environment.
This is silly on all levels.In post 72, IV Vexen wrote:Dude Im begging you, please stop doing this. Just use the name, its going to make it easier on everyone involved.In post 64, X Luxord wrote:You're right, my ISO has been basically all ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.
I can copy all of my thoughts on everyone here, but my heart really isn't into anything regarding scumhunting yet. Like, I won't be proactive now but I think it can be assumed that I will be eventually? I really don't think there are any motivations to be found by my lack of productivity.
Here's a direct (reformatted from Excel) copy of my notes, with one omission. (Only noting this so if I want to bring it up later, people know.)
2 Xigbar:Reaction to a relatively calm voteswitch by me in RVS. Weird "if you were scum" Q toin P26. Other than this, gut strongly says town mindset-- but based on not much concrete.12
4 Vexen:Flavor entrance, very standard, empty ISO, voteable.
5 Lexaeus:Pushesfor inv-immune. Probably just in a frivolous/reac-test way. I tend towards townreading. (Okay, nvm. It seemed genuine.) P53 seems pretty town at first glance, feeling strongly as towniest post in the game.12
6 Zexion:Lots of content. Pushesfor noisemaking which at face value makes no real sense but is a believable push for town to make. Votes5for bad reasons. Overall P47 makes me feel just a little bit weird, entertaining possible narrative of scum with strong presence? Unsure how much conviction he actually has (the less the better, honestly). P56 is towny.13
12 Larxene:Claiming inv-immune. Not impressive but claim tends towards town.
13 Roxas:Asks to be checked, says will claim if needed. Opens with scumread me and townread.12
Personally Im not a big fan of telling the investigative roles where to target in the beginning of the game. Not nearly enough knowledge of the game yet to start playing with power roles like that.
Godfather.In post 76, VIII Axel wrote:Sure. What role does that and is scum-aligned? Just doesn't make sense to me.In post 45, VI Zexion wrote:Care to finish that thought?
+1In post 82, XII Larxene wrote:What's the point of even making this distinction? Why am I the towniest here, anyway?In post 39, IV Vexen wrote:Larxene might not be obvi town but she is so far the most town player here. Dont get where the Luxord obvscum is coming fromIn post 37, II Xigbar wrote:VOTE: Roxas
Both posts felt played up. Larxene is definitely not obvtown, Luxord is definitely not obvscum.
This is your only post worth looking at and it doesn't say much.
It is really hard to think about your alignment when my kneejerk reaction to your signing here isIn post 90, XI Marluxia wrote:It will probably be much easier to tell everyone apart later in the game when we all have contributed more than the same 5 useless posts. Alternatively, we could all make up distinctive call signs based on our avatars and names!!In post 85, X Luxord wrote:...I might just have to replace out. Even when reading on my main, the avatars and usernames are just too similar. It's confusing the hell out of me and I don't know why it's just me and it's really frustrating to have to check names and people again and again. I'll give it one more try tonight.
-The Pinkhaired Shitlord
In post 96, VIII Axel wrote:Do you want to expand on that vote? Seems pretty useless.
hmmm did I end up expanding enough for you two? Not sure I even came to the same conclusions so lemme know if you still have questions i guessIn post 97, V Lexaeus wrote:Why, why, and why?In post 94, IX Demyx wrote:Dance, water, dance!
VOTE: Vexen
I believe both Xigbar and Zexion to be loyal.
ftr this feels like a super super lazy read in a way that isn't rly townie in the slightestIn post 98, IV Vexen wrote:because usually scum arent going to come out the gate and say what kind of role they have and draw some major attention on themselves. Have a hard time imagining a scum player doin what you did right out of the gate.
The question was about the scum motivation for wanting to be checked, not for avoiding it.In post 279, III Xaldin wrote:Godfather isn't immune, he comes back as town, scum.godfsther would want to be targeted not discourage it.In post 257, IX Demyx wrote:Godfather
How did you even come to that conclusion.
Ahh, you were responding to Xigbar so I thought you were responding to the vote & comment about both posts of Roxas' being played up.In post 283, VIII Axel wrote:Right but to follow up on this, godfather gets a town result. Larxene's((? might be a different person, I'm not checking) ability implies that if you check her, you get no result.
Uhhh okay I don't know who Zexion is then oops.In post 323, II Xigbar wrote:???
I was the best man at Zexion's wedding. No shit they know who I am. No shit they would try to pocket me since we're super close friends IRL.
Why would it have to be due to notoriety?
In post 381, XIII Roxas wrote:However this is quite perplexing because I thoughtDemyxwas you. (Demyx's flavor knowledge and entrance felt like something which fit for you, so them being you was my best guess.) They aren't who I thought they are and yet I'm still positive I know them all the same. And I can't figure it out on any level. I'm left with less answers than I had before and more questions I can't quite articulate. Ishouldknow them. (That much I am certain of.) Not only who they are but what their alignment is. But frustratingly, I can tell you neither.
spell it out 2 me like im 10 who is providing said resistance in form of baseless townreads? list them plz nd tyIn post 439, VI Zexion wrote:the paranoid part of me right now thinks that if you were actually scumreading Axel then you would be much more concerned with pushing that lynch through given how much actual resistance there is there in the form of baseless townreads.
What about the townreads are baseless tho?In post 469, VI Zexion wrote:@Demyx Roxas, Lexaeus, Xigbar and now apparently you as well (???????????). There were probably other slots as well that I'm not really remembering right now.
Actually given I have become increasingly aware of who Xiggy probs is with the thing with Zex this adds a lot.In post 498, XIII Roxas wrote:(For what little value it adds at this stage Xigbar is in fact a townread but I wouldn't be able to tell you exactly how strong of one. He's moved from being in the ambivalent zone to north of null, but by how far I'd have to spend a little more time on the read to let it mature. I figure this is vaguely important as it removes any interest whatsoever of me voting the slot, but given how improbable it'd be for a wagon there to ever materialize in the first place this is not very relevant to the current happenings.)
In post 504, XIII Roxas wrote:with a strong lean towards Demyx.
Dude you are smoking something really strong here. Agreeing with Roxas is the fastest way to get scumread. Like every time I have I've had a paranoia burst from them so you're just flat wrong here through my experiences alone.In post 506, VI Zexion wrote:Like I just don't get how anyone is townreading Axel in any universe and I'm fairly sure that if Luxord isn't scum after that then Demyx is because there's no way a player who is at least competent the way Demyx seems to be would read that shit as "oh I get your townread there Roxas", like that's just blatant as fuck pocketing and anyone who knows Roxas knows that all you need to do to pocket him forever and beyond is to buy into his reads / narrative. Doesn't matter how much he scumreads you beforehand if you just agree with him you're suddenly a townread.
In post 508, V Lexaeus wrote:Hm.
I still believe that Saix is scum, but Xaldin's also in the pool so I can go there.
VOTE: Xaldin
I think that's L-2
In post 509, VII Saix wrote:Give him time to defend/claim.
I don't love these posts.In post 510, VII Saix wrote:I have nothing more substantial to contribute at this point.
+1In post 518, VIII Axel wrote:It's because you wrote three paragraphs of frustration against me and my play rather than analyzing what I've done.
No self respecting scum would use such a garbo "case", sorry.In post 521, VI Zexion wrote:I actually have zero frustration about Axel and that was looking at their play, I just didn't bother to actually go into "analysis" any more than I did because it should be completely self-evident just by reciting what they've done without the spin of ~deep thought~ going on behind the posts that they're trying to play up. You also completely missed the point; the post was entirely ignored, the resistance to the Axel wagon is so hilariously bad because scum would be jumping all over Axel here if he were town unless all wolf rands are just completely incompetent.
I mean, I was town every time I did it.You're either lying or you did it really really badly.In post 516, IX Demyx wrote:Dude you are smoking something really strong here. Agreeing with Roxas is the fastest way to get scumread. Like every time I have I've had a paranoia burst from them so you're just flat wrong here through my experiences alone.
Dude, I knew who you were from 157. Since you engaged me I locked that in. If you think you're playing any differently to normal - you're not.In post 522, VI Zexion wrote:I also don't think you actually understand my meta or why I'm playing the way I am here, but whatever.
it's not; zex is always wrong on uIn post 528, II Xigbar wrote:Fmpov this is an intentional scumclaim. I feel it would be bad sportsmanship to explain this further. If we want to wagon here instead today I'm okay with that.
yeah you're gonna have to explain what changed.In post 533, VI Zexion wrote:You always lynch Xigbar's buds first here. He's 100% scum but Xaldin needs to die.
oh so you've finally pulled your head out your ass and realized i'm town?In post 535, VI Zexion wrote:No I've never scumread you I just said I would never townread you. You've been null all game until now.
I've seen you call her scum for this kind thing before tho and she's always been town in the instances I saw so it's like ehhhhhnnnn.In post 538, II Xigbar wrote:I don't think Zex has a fantastic track record on reading me but the only person who is better who still plays is Firebringer. And it's not about her scumread on me, it's about the wording.
In post 539, VI Zexion wrote:Nothing? My vote is already on Xaldin.In post 536, IX Demyx wrote:yeah you're gonna have to explain what changed.In post 533, VI Zexion wrote:You always lynch Xigbar's buds first here. He's 100% scum but Xaldin needs to die.
You being you and other people not being you though changes other things about other people.
yeahhh I hate these posts. Don't do that. I don't want to be buddied by you.In post 540, VI Zexion wrote:With the altguess, yes. Roxas' earlier post about not knowing how to deal with you summarized my thoughts really well but with the altguess it's an easy read.In post 537, IX Demyx wrote:oh so you've finally pulled your head out your ass and realized i'm town?