Ohhh Drixx...
VOTE: Drixx
What you get for picking in my division.
Not really lolIn post 102, dramonic wrote:vote: Mathblade
Honestly I know nothing about footballs, but from what Chess says I chose a good team?
Have you watched football? Points are nighon impossible to predict.In post 108, chesskid3 wrote:So you don't think scum would aim for the best distribution of getting powers?
Well aware. First post says so.In post 111, Persivul wrote:In post 107, MathBlade wrote:What is going to be really helpful is each night we can do the math ourselves and find out who took what.FYI the powers awarded aren't going to be made public.
Nah Patriots are just like everyone else.In post 114, Desperado wrote:umIn post 109, MathBlade wrote:There's an entire wing devoted to gambling on it. The house always makes money because it is unpredictable.
the house makes money because it's extremely difficult to pick winners
not which offenses are going to score the most points
Oh I am not talking planned on thread.In post 128, chesskid3 wrote:Im still talking about your dumbass or scumass comment that breakung people into low power offense losing team and good high power offenses teams is not helpful
I didnt read your postvomit after that but I also disagree with everything being planned in thread
WowIn post 132, chesskid3 wrote:Someone who knows this guy pls update if hes dumb or not.
hes got math in his name so I'd lean not but then a pi avatar is pretty basic so
lol I didn't say anything scum wouldn't know anyway.In post 138, dramonic wrote:One very obvious problem with your "plan" is that it tells scum how to always net PRs.
Which is a really stupid thing to do.
I am not saying it makes me smarter.In post 152, EeveeLution Army wrote:Can i just say that giving us your resume isn't helping in the slightest. Having a degree, especially in math doesn't make you smarter than anyone here. Also poker is ALOT of luck mixed with strategy. So if you're done stroking your ego can we move on.
I thought maybe they didn't learn the information and figured out a way to graduate instead but that takes different smarts.In post 162, Ellibereth wrote:This conversation amuses me. I'll continue it. Your sense of humor is at least on point. (Maybe unintentionally so.)
There's no way you thought that there was noone who graduated with you that wasn't stupid.
I agree not every Mafia game can.In post 164, EeveeLution Army wrote:Did you seriously just give us the complete definition of stupid?
I'm literally just saying that this is mafia not some math problem with a formula to get an answer that is the answer no matter what
Your S key is broken.In post 170, Drixx wrote:So the aints and the vikings want some of this?
Noted sorry.
No one should be taking PGO. That is a scummy role to avoid investigatives.In post 177, Drixx wrote:Nope. My "S" key works just fine. The New Orleans aints are 0-2 and when those aints, go marching in, to BoA Stadium on Sunday, they're gonna get mauled by the Panthers and drop to 0-3. And then it's time to hope to be the first team since the '98 Bills to start 0-3 and make the playoffs. Not my fault you picked the aints.In post 174, MathBlade wrote:Your S key is broken.In post 170, Drixx wrote:So the aints and the vikings want some of this?
You scum with chesskid?
And no I'm not scum, but I'm pretty sure you are.
Your attempt to force people to play a certain way with the claim that it breaks the game ... that smells a bit. The thing is: the scum WILL be able to figure out who is taking a role, but not WHAT those people take. You are arguing that we should just fully inform scum for no cost to them. That doesn't really seem smart to me. Especially with PGO on the list, for example. There's absolutely no reason to tell scum what they have to play around and when.
It's simple. Through the game we should never need more than 15 powers unless something goes really really weird. We just make a list of the 15 powers people are allowed to choose from and outside of that is a scum claim.In post 178, Thor665 wrote:What about the investigative effects?In post 177, Drixx wrote:Your attempt to force people to play a certain way with the claim that it breaks the game ... that smells a bit. The thing is: the scum WILL be able to figure out who is taking a role, but not WHAT those people take. You are arguing that we should just fully inform scum for no cost to them. That doesn't really seem smart to me. Especially with PGO on the list, for example. There's absolutely no reason to tell scum what they have to play around and when.
His plan is generally pure pro-town there, and the only adjustment you would need is people claiming 'nothing to report' the next Day after their power being awarded to cover useful abilities that require scum action.
Also, with PGO, and the proliferation of targeting powers town could get, there probably is an honest discussion to be had that it would be pro-town to reveal that role if gained. I'm not sure I agree with it, but I'd hardly say it's cut and dry either.
Why is it all so clear to you that it is not only a bad plan, but a scummy one?
In post 179, Drixx wrote:Mafia is ultimately a game about information. Scum are already the informed minority to begin with. Giving them additional info for free is silly, and mathblade is a better player than that. They dressed it up real nice and made it seem like a "game break", but when you think about it ... it's not actually a game break at all, and I can think of more situations where following it is bad than good.
If it were some other player I might not feel that it's scummy, but I just have higher expectations of mathblade.
Assume worse case scenario scum lie about an investigative.In post 193, EeveeLution Army wrote:Uh scum can just lie about what they picked
Titus always the rules lawyer ....In post 201, Persivul wrote:Rules were revised to address NFL game ties, and ties in our rankings. Thanks to Titus for pointing out the omission.![]()
If you're in point where Town needs to lie then you're in a bad point already.In post 219, EeveeLution Army wrote:If someone didn't claim what they picked instantly it isn't lying its a strategy. Not saying it isn't the same as lying. But there are times where town might need to lie. For example hypo(which i absolutely despise when its done poorly). But that doesn't really have much to do with this. There are probably better examples but i was trying to be concise
In post 226, dramonic wrote:In post 223, MathBlade wrote:I agree. It's rare. It's so rare it shouldn't be accounted for.
Allowing bad play has become a bad thing I want to stop.
What you're suggesting doesnt produce accountability, it gives scum complete control over which roles they can pick AND which role they can deny from town without having to take them by lying.
It's just that basic.
And I'm not voting because we disagree on strategy, I'm voting because either you're scum trying to push a blatantly detrimental play, or are so bad town that I want to cull you immediately to prevent you from sinking the entire town.
...It is 1 shot and scum will know you have a power.In post 241, TwoInAMillion wrote:If we are forced to claim our role usage that will limit our option to keep our power.
If Town is leading huh?In post 244, TwoInAMillion wrote:If town is leading it might be more optimal to use it later if we are not in such a good situation, etc.
It is a direct contrast.In post 244, TwoInAMillion wrote:If town is leading it might be more optimal to use it later if we(scum) are not in such a good situation, etc.
Gerry if scum will be obvious to me later.In post 262, chesskid3 wrote:Unvote
Vote: gerryoat
I'm going to leave this here actually. Still weirded out by the whole "lets lynch one of chesskid or desperado for CK's logic which I added nothing to but wormed my way into" thing.
Day ends in two days can we just lynch chesskid?In post 303, Ellibereth wrote:day ends in two fucking days can we lynch assembly
In post 302, Thor665 wrote:People not addressing plans is an interesting question if you want to apply scum/town vibes o it, but I'm not sure I'm smart enough to read them.In post 254, chesskid3 wrote:I'm torn on what to think of mathblade to be honest. I'm ok lynching within the weak teams, but the fact that nobody has really taken much of a stance on it besides the guy who parroted me and one other person makes me uneasy that it's an all town block and it's a bad road to go down.
Thor make me feel better
Your plan was ignored (which you're taking it as being pro-town as, presumably, it's good enough scum are scared to attack it)
Math's plan was assaulted aggressively and ongoing (on, as far as I can tell since Dram is actually the frontrunner for the logic against it, a basis that scum may lie if forced to claim)
I got nothing brilliant on either take, as I actually am currently vibing both of you, and both plans, as pro-town. I don't think it's a gimmee read though.
If you like you plan, go for it, just because other people don't agree changes very little as a strategy for it on Day 1, since by definition we'll hit in one of the groups![]()
Sure...and?In post 258, dramonic wrote:But again, there is nothing that stops scum from saying they grabbed low accountability roles like jk, doc, watcher and claiming to target irrelevant players, while actually taking something else.
Math's plan does not involve that - so you're arguing against a straw man here.In post 258, dramonic wrote:Claiming to have protected someone both doesn't give any information to the town and it removes the role from the town's perceived list, giving scum both a safety vs doc and a free role (whatever they actually picked) for use later. Same thing for "I copped the dead guy" or "I watched this person nobody visited".
There's no information there AND we (think) the role just went to waste. Because these things can and WILL most likely happen with town players as well. There's a 90% chance (not actual stats) that if anyone in the town grabs doc, he's gonna fail his protection. There's a good chance that someone grabbing watcher won't see anything.
We can't just lynch these players "just in case"
Since, theoretically, town should have more chances at getting roles (and thus missing them) - this seems to benefit scum more than town, yeah?In post 258, dramonic wrote:I would much, MUCH rather keep scum in the dark as to what roles are taken and gamble on the chance they'll lose their pick if their team wins by trying to grab something that's already gone.
Which is a big part of Math's plan that I like, and I still don't get the explosion against it, since he's already advocating some of the best obvious play for a big chunk of the roles.In post 258, dramonic wrote:UNLESS your role has very obvious immediate utility (like a cop result on a living player), I think claiming is dumb, and even in those cases I think it's much better to leave the role open to wifom and just say "I have an inno on X" without specifying the nature of the inno.
Eh, failed tracks are still info.In post 258, dramonic wrote:Of course that only works if your inno is a real inno and not "I tracked that player and they didnt visit". That's not a real inno (haven't check the role list to see what can provide real innos besides cop)
I would dare say that the people who should take the IC role are exactly the sorts of players who should use it immediately.In post 258, dramonic wrote:Also it's obvious but immediate claiming also kills roles like IC <_<
Looking at your rebuttal I see;
"Scum might lie"
"Straw Man"
"Some mild agreement"
At that stage, I can get you generally disagreeing with the plan.
But what do you think about people somehow translating it into "scum plan!"
Because it's really not, and even if you don't like the plan it's still generally a pro-town basic mindset and shows some goals to game solve and help town more than to aid scum machinations.
I find the assault on the plan overwrought and would happily wager scum were in on that pool.
What do you think?
Considering how sore my body is that might just be a thing.In post 298, chesskid3 wrote:Math "my body is a vessel for my superbrain" Blade
In post 312, EeveeLution Army wrote:Btw i was mostly against maths plan because he's like "if you pick a role benefiting scum or passive I'll take it as a scum claim" and that to me is bs
Why? I think differently. I kinda expect to get votes and told my thinking is silly. I just don't want the personal attacks.In post 314, Drixx wrote:Like ... at this point I kind of want to lynch among the pool of people taking snarky swings at Mathblade. Just on policy.
And if assemblerotws is scum so is dramonic.In post 308, Assemblerotws wrote:I am capable of acknowledging antitown when it is shoved in my face.
VOTE: Dramonic
Example.In post 132, chesskid3 wrote:Someone who knows this guy pls update if hes dumb or not.
hes got math in his name so I'd lean not but then a pi avatar is pretty basic so