In post 1851, ProHawk wrote:Do explain Mastin. What about our discussion makes me the scum buddy?
Your interactions with Squirrel Girl today SCREAM scumbuddy-talking-to-scumbuddy, just waiting for the town players to vote a town player. The banter doesn't look like town-talking-to-town, or even town-talking-to-scum. It looks, very strongly, like scum talking to other scum as part of a formality, essentially to look good while they wait and lurk, essentially, to town voting town. (I'm guessing MC, here. Scienceshrimp has shown interest, and if Nero also thought that appealing...bam. Mislynch.)
In post 1852, Squirrel Girl wrote:Also, your case on me here seems to be 'I disagree with her take on my meta, even though I am arguing that it's possible to look at my meta and conclude anything as my defense'. It doesn't parse out.
Not quite. I'm saying that someone can say literally anything about my meta...and doing so like you did is a damn-strong scumtell. I'm also saying that it's possible to analyze my meta and come to some accurate conclusions about my play. Your shallow meta did no such thing. Additionally, while your craptastic 'case' against me would be reason enough for me to scumread you (given as how said craptastic case is literally the only thing you say makes me scum), there's more. Your role is possible, but not plausible, in the setup. Your play has been highly manipulative and just plain wrong. You are not town. I am sure of it.
So am I, but my Squirrel Girl scumread is much stronger.
That would be because he's my mason buddy, and obviously, I'm inclined to protect him from harm.
Also, I'm a she. Not a he.
In post 1886, Squirrel Girl wrote:I mean, if my case on her was bad, so was...whichever of your heads made the meta town case on her, and she felt no need to disabuse you of that notion apparently.
Though the meta case by scienceshrimp was mostly wrong, it was not entirely wrong--more than that? I could actually understand where it came from, even though I knew it was not even close to entirely correct. Yours? Yours, on the other hand, if the idea had any merit,
is rats-ass backwards from what it should be
. It's not the act, nor the conclusion, even. It's how it's done.
To follow up that thought, let's even say she's convinced my case is the derpiest derp to have ever derped.
Except you don't derp. Not as town. That you're saying you derped is itself a scumtell. Because while I might not know who your main is (I don't bother putting effort into finding an alt's main, even though I'd be fairly good at it), I know that you're a dang-competent town player. Your scumread on me for absolutely crap reasoning then, itself, becomes a scumtell, and trying to say that it's a derp-case from you only amplifies that.
I also think town Mastin would have reasoning.
Also rats-ass backwards. Providing reasoning* was, is, and always will be, a classical scumtell of Mastin. There's a
reason
I 'joked' for the longest time, "If Mastin makes sense, she's scum", or the like, in which I pointed out logic being a scumtell. (A very strong instance of this being Mindreader Mafia, where I used QT manipulation to its absolute maximum. It's among my top-five performances as scum of all time for basically being the epitome of scuMastin.)
*Rather, I always give reasoning. Contrary to Squirrel Girl's claims, I've already done so for her, too. The difference between a scum me and a town me is that a scum me can give
extensive
reasoning, whereas a town me just has a general idea and struggles to verbalize it.