Mini 732: Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Mafia (Game Over!)


User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #75 (ISO) » Fri Jan 23, 2009 7:16 pm

Post by hasdgfas »

unvote, vote Danchofran
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
Porochaz
Porochaz
Oh, Prozac
User avatar
User avatar
Porochaz
Oh, Prozac
Oh, Prozac
Posts: 9317
Joined: September 6, 2007

Post Post #76 (ISO) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:03 am

Post by Porochaz »

agreed
unvote vote danch
Mostly retired. Unless you ask or it's something interesting.
User avatar
fuzzylightning
fuzzylightning
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
fuzzylightning
Goon
Goon
Posts: 787
Joined: July 7, 2008
Location: Michigan/New York (depends on the time of year)

Post Post #77 (ISO) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 7:47 am

Post by fuzzylightning »

I can confirm that Danch did not target Rishi last night, because I watched Rishi to see if anyone would do anything with him.
2-1 as Town (including the 39 minute final day)
0-1 as Mafia
User avatar
Plum
Plum
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Plum
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4519
Joined: August 20, 2008

Post Post #78 (ISO) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:31 pm

Post by Plum »

fuzzylightning wrote:I can confirm that Danch did not target Rishi last night, because I watched Rishi to see if anyone would do anything with him.
With this DCF is newb-town, after the Rishi protect (with the exception-case here being that DCF and FL are scumbuddies and are both lying). FL watching Rishi was a pretty clever move, in my opinion. Who's up next?
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #79 (ISO) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 1:43 pm

Post by Gorrad »

I concur, good move. Clears him too, if I do say so myself.

I obviously targetted no one last night : D.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #80 (ISO) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 2:05 pm

Post by hasdgfas »

unvote, vote megatheory
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
Danchaofan
Danchaofan
Goon
Danchaofan
Goon
Goon
Posts: 219
Joined: December 30, 2008

Post Post #81 (ISO) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:07 pm

Post by Danchaofan »

Sorry, I thought what I said might have been a case of LAL but I wrote "If" to hopefully clear that up.

So does the plan of watching rishi and using rishi as a pseudo-cop work?
User avatar
TonyMontana
TonyMontana
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TonyMontana
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2354
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Norway

Post Post #82 (ISO) » Sat Jan 24, 2009 3:15 pm

Post by TonyMontana »

Christ, people, it's not that hard to understand what danchaofan said.
Upcoming
Mini
Theme: Rainbow Six|Siege Mafia
User avatar
Rishi
Rishi
A Meer townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rishi
A Meer townie
A Meer townie
Posts: 3055
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
Contact:

Post Post #83 (ISO) » Sun Jan 25, 2009 4:34 am

Post by Rishi »

hasdgfas wrote:
unvote, vote megatheory
What exactly are you trying to accomplish with the vote-hopping?
Taking a break from MS. Please send e-mail if you want to get in touch with me.
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #84 (ISO) » Sun Jan 25, 2009 8:09 am

Post by hasdgfas »

Rishi wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
unvote, vote megatheory
What exactly are you trying to accomplish with the vote-hopping?
I was voting Danchofran because I wanted to hear more about the completely idiotic statement that he made saying he might have lied about his night action target, now I'm going back to my first vote.
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
Rishi
Rishi
A Meer townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rishi
A Meer townie
A Meer townie
Posts: 3055
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
Contact:

Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:02 pm

Post by Rishi »

hasdgfas wrote:
Rishi wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
unvote, vote megatheory
What exactly are you trying to accomplish with the vote-hopping?
I was voting Danchofran because I wanted to hear more about the completely idiotic statement that he made saying he might have lied about his night action target, now I'm going back to my first vote.
Okay. But why Megatheory? I know you said your vote wasn't random and you gave a reason when you first voted (which, to be honest, sounded like a joke), but what has Megatheory done since then to get your attention?
Taking a break from MS. Please send e-mail if you want to get in touch with me.
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:04 pm

Post by hasdgfas »

Rishi wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
Rishi wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
unvote, vote megatheory
What exactly are you trying to accomplish with the vote-hopping?
I was voting Danchofran because I wanted to hear more about the completely idiotic statement that he made saying he might have lied about his night action target, now I'm going back to my first vote.
Okay. But why Megatheory? I know you said your vote wasn't random and you gave a reason when you first voted (which, to be honest, sounded like a joke), but what has Megatheory done since then to get your attention?
no-killed N1
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
Megatheory
Megatheory
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Megatheory
Goon
Goon
Posts: 237
Joined: July 23, 2008

Post Post #87 (ISO) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:03 pm

Post by Megatheory »

I'm not entirely sure what I think about the dan/Rishi situation. FL's choice seems to confirm dan, but that's assuming that Rishi and FL are telling the truth. (It's also making me think that I'm going to hate smalltown games.)
Master Ruck wrote:I didn't commute. I didn't see much point as, really, I'd only be protecting myself from being killed so I took the chance and if I did die, then I'd just be really unlucky.
Is announcing your choice in the thread the best idea? Telling scum when they have the maximum chance of killing you isn't the most protown strategy. (I mean for future nights, of course. I'd rather play WIFOM games with the scum if I had your role.)
hasdgfas wrote: no-killed N1
No killing does limit my liability if I am scum, but it also had a 2/3 chance of killing a town player. I'd rather be under suspicion in this scenario.
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #88 (ISO) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:15 pm

Post by hasdgfas »

Megatheory wrote:
hasdgfas wrote: no-killed N1
No killing does limit my liability if I am scum, but it also had a 2/3 chance of killing a town player. I'd rather be under suspicion in this scenario.
sure, but that's almost the exact same argument as used for No Lynching in Newbie games. Why shouldn't we maximize the amount of town-aligned kills if we have the chance?
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
Glork
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
User avatar
User avatar
Glork
Burdened by Proficiency
Burdened by Proficiency
Posts: 14106
Joined: July 13, 2005
Location: Dance into the fire

Post Post #89 (ISO) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:15 pm

Post by Glork »

Vote Count:

Danchaofan 3 (TonyMontana, Porochaz x2)
Megatheory 2 (Gorrad, hasdgfas)
hasdgfas 1 (Rishi)

Not Voting: 6 (Danchaofan, Plum, fuzzylightning, Master Ruck, Malyss)

With 11 alive, it takes six to lynch.
Last edited by Glork on Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Green Shirt Thursdays


Get to know a Glork!
User avatar
Plum
Plum
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Plum
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4519
Joined: August 20, 2008

Post Post #90 (ISO) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:09 pm

Post by Plum »

hasdgfas wrote:
Megatheory wrote:
hasdgfas wrote: no-killed N1
No killing does limit my liability if I am scum, but it also had a 2/3 chance of killing a town player. I'd rather be under suspicion in this scenario.
sure, but that's almost the exact same argument as used for No Lynching in Newbie games. Why shouldn't we maximize the amount of town-aligned kills if we have the chance?
Then again, Day 1 lynches grant info as well as a chance to hit scum. Night 0 kills do not. I see the benefits to N0 kills, but I don't think deciding not to is a scumtell. It's more related to theory disagreement, and I'd say rather bash it out in MD instead.
User avatar
hasdgfas
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
hasdgfas
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 5628
Joined: October 2, 2007
Location: Madison, WI

Post Post #91 (ISO) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:19 pm

Post by hasdgfas »

Plum wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
Megatheory wrote:
hasdgfas wrote: no-killed N1
No killing does limit my liability if I am scum, but it also had a 2/3 chance of killing a town player. I'd rather be under suspicion in this scenario.
sure, but that's almost the exact same argument as used for No Lynching in Newbie games. Why shouldn't we maximize the amount of town-aligned kills if we have the chance?
Then again, Day 1 lynches grant info as well as a chance to hit scum. Night 0 kills do not. I see the benefits to N0 kills, but I don't think deciding not to is a scumtell. It's more related to theory disagreement, and I'd say rather bash it out in MD instead.
should we be directing the vig's kills?


Quote tag fixed.
jdodge1019: hasjghsalghsakljghs is from vermont
jdodge1019: vermont is made of liberal freaks and cows
jdodge1019: he's not a liberal
jdodge1019: thus he is a cow
User avatar
Megatheory
Megatheory
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Megatheory
Goon
Goon
Posts: 237
Joined: July 23, 2008

Post Post #92 (ISO) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:25 pm

Post by Megatheory »

hasdgfas wrote:
Megatheory wrote:
hasdgfas wrote: no-killed N1
No killing does limit my liability if I am scum, but it also had a 2/3 chance of killing a town player. I'd rather be under suspicion in this scenario.
sure, but that's almost the exact same argument as used for No Lynching in Newbie games. Why shouldn't we maximize the amount of town-aligned kills if we have the chance?
There is a massive difference between a lynch and a nightkill. For scum to lynch a townie, they have to either build a case against a player or vote for someone that is already suspected by the town. In either case, the scum have to put themselves at risk to get the lynch they want. The town benefits from having a lynch every day (barring some scenarios where no-lynching improves the odds for town) because you can analyze the players who voted for the lynchee. You might lose a townie, but you gain a useful benefit in return. No such benefit can be gained from a night one vig kill.
User avatar
Megatheory
Megatheory
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Megatheory
Goon
Goon
Posts: 237
Joined: July 23, 2008

Post Post #93 (ISO) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:26 pm

Post by Megatheory »

hasdgfas wrote: should we be directing the vig's kills?
Yes, you should. When we get closer to the end of the day, I'll start taking a straw poll on who the town wants me to kill.
User avatar
Master Ruck
Master Ruck
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Master Ruck
Goon
Goon
Posts: 313
Joined: January 3, 2009
Location: England

Post Post #94 (ISO) » Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:53 pm

Post by Master Ruck »

Megatheory wrote:
Master Ruck wrote:I didn't commute. I didn't see much point as, really, I'd only be protecting myself from being killed so I took the chance and if I did die, then I'd just be really unlucky.
Is announcing your choice in the thread the best idea? Telling scum when they have the maximum chance of killing you isn't the most protown strategy. (I mean for future nights, of course. I'd rather play WIFOM games with the scum if I had your role.)
So what should I have said? "Maybe I did, but maybe I didn't"? I don't see how I've given scum any better chance at killing me than before this day started.
With the dawning of each new day, my evil machinations inch me closer to world domination. And also breakfast.
User avatar
Rishi
Rishi
A Meer townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rishi
A Meer townie
A Meer townie
Posts: 3055
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
Contact:

Post Post #95 (ISO) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 2:18 am

Post by Rishi »

I don't think that not submitting a kill N0 is a scumtell, but if Megatheory was on the scum team, he's a very likely person to not submit a choice (since the person who kills doesn't get their normal choice).

I would say that Megatheory is extremely unlikely to be the SK. What SK would pass up the opportunity to make two kills on N0?

I don't think we should direct vig kills either.
Taking a break from MS. Please send e-mail if you want to get in touch with me.
User avatar
Gorrad
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
Gorrad
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 4578
Joined: April 30, 2007
Location: Land of Dungeons and Stairs

Post Post #96 (ISO) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 4:52 am

Post by Gorrad »

Rishi wrote:I would say that Megatheory is extremely unlikely to be the SK. What SK would pass up the opportunity to make two kills on N0?
One that did not want to very quickly be lynched.
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
I will not assume everyone with blue eyes has Mako poisoning
User avatar
TonyMontana
TonyMontana
Mafia Scum
User avatar
User avatar
TonyMontana
Mafia Scum
Mafia Scum
Posts: 2354
Joined: May 30, 2005
Location: Norway

Post Post #97 (ISO) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:07 am

Post by TonyMontana »

Gorrad wrote:
Rishi wrote:I would say that Megatheory is extremely unlikely to be the SK. What SK would pass up the opportunity to make two kills on N0?
One that did not want to very quickly be lynched.
This.
Rishi wrote:I don't think we should direct vig kills either.
And this.
Upcoming
Mini
Theme: Rainbow Six|Siege Mafia
User avatar
Malyss
Malyss
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Malyss
Goon
Goon
Posts: 218
Joined: May 3, 2007
Location: South Jersey

Post Post #98 (ISO) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 7:01 am

Post by Malyss »

I've been trying to gather up my thoughts on what has happened thus far.

If everyone has been truthful about their night actions:

Megatheory claims to have refrained from using his vigilante action on N0, which makes sense since the vigilante role is usually on the town’s side from what I read in the wiki (though in this game, he could be scum) and if he is town, it makes more sense to use his action on a player who has developed some suspicion.

Danchaofan was protected by Rishi - I can agree with the idea that the jailkeep is a role worth keeping around as if they are town, they could be useful.

Rishi was watched by fuzzylightning - It does seem rather smart to have watched Rishi, the doctor as they could have been a good target.

Malyss protected herself against Megatheory - Given that my action can be used each night, I saw no harm in employing it on N0. Megatheory was the only person that I could think of to use the action on at least until I develop some suspicion of who the scum are.

Tony Montana was jailkeeped by Danchaofan - I can see jailkeeping Tony Montana as being a reasonable move as by doing so, Danchaofan would not interfere with the role related actions that we most of us have. It kind of makes me wonder if Tony Montana could potentially be scum, though. If he was the scum player who was in charge of handing in the kill order on N0, then that role action would have been blocked by Danchaofan’s jailkeeping of him.

Porochaz was bodyguarded by Hasdgfas - Given that Hasdgfas survived N0 while bodyguarding Porochaz, Porochaz must not have been as prime a target as Hasdgfas thought or I’d assume that it would be possible that if Porochaz was scum, then he was not in great danger.


It seems doubtful that the scum would have chosen not to make a nightkill, so either Tony was the one calling in the order and got roleblocked or the scum tried to target me (if the scum making the action was Megatheory), or Tony Montana was targeted while being jailkeeped (or is it jailkept?) by Danchaofan. If Hasdgfas did indeed bodyguard Porochaz, then either Porochaz wasn’t a target since Hasdgfas survived or Porochaz could possibly be scum.
User avatar
Rishi
Rishi
A Meer townie
User avatar
User avatar
Rishi
A Meer townie
A Meer townie
Posts: 3055
Joined: June 17, 2007
Location: Arlington, VA
Contact:

Post Post #99 (ISO) » Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:05 am

Post by Rishi »

Malyss wrote: It seems doubtful that the scum would have chosen not to make a nightkill, so either Tony was the one calling in the order and got roleblocked or the scum tried to target me (if the scum making the action was Megatheory), or Tony Montana was targeted while being jailkeeped (or is it jailkept?) by Danchaofan. If Hasdgfas did indeed bodyguard Porochaz, then either Porochaz wasn’t a target since Hasdgfas survived or Porochaz could possibly be scum.
Or they could have targeted Danchaofan. He was also protected.
Taking a break from MS. Please send e-mail if you want to get in touch with me.
Locked

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”