Fate (2): Chesskid, VasudeVa
Vollkan (1): CupcakePanda
Chesskid (5): Parama, Vollkan, tclawren, smargaret, UshiromiyaAnge,
tclawren (1): Stephoscope
Not Voting:
Deadline is May 19th, 10pm PST
tclawren wrote:Wow. That was a terrible gambit. IfIthought was a gambit, then IknowCK thought was a gambit. This doesn't prove anything.
Kise wrote:Basically chess, you either claim to sort this out, or explain how Parama is a lying scumbag.
vollkan wrote:Parama wrote:vote: chesskid3
ANYTHING ELSE HAPPENS AND THERE WILL BE CONSEQUENCES. I'VE ALREADY USED AN ABILITY ON HIM, AND GOOD THINGS WILL HAPPEN IF HE'S LYNCHED TODAY. BUT ONLY TODAY.
Unvote, Vote: chesskid3
But if this is you lying to push a policy lynch, I will be pissed.
smargaret wrote:I love (baking) cupcakes.
I'm behind a chesskid policy lynch.vote: chesskid
Parama wrote:Grey.
Why aren't smarg and vollkan the epitome of obvious scumminess? Panda is at an absolute null - if you can convince me why he's scummy, MAYBE I'll think about it, but...
CupcakePanda wrote:Good Miller claim. I usually hate Miller claims cuz they are nothing but WIFOM the way some people do them (and I actually am of the school of thought that you just act pro-town and not claim Miller at all because early claims only help the mafia). I legitly feel like the way LLD did it makes her look better with the way she provided additional information though. Plus she used Red Truth as an Ushiromiya.
@vollkan: I uh... don't really know what qualifies as a pastry and what doesn't.