Fakehammers are a mostly useless tool. It's like the fake dayvig, in that respect. Perhaps a tad better, but still super easy to manipulate. Chances of catching scum are lower than dismissing scum for their 'obviously town'-reaction. No good scum will be caught. You won't learn shit.
Some people are smart. Everyone else is a genuis. My god I'm stupid I don't deserve to live. This is the logic you just used. Sure good scumplayers will not be caught, this can be said for almost any gambit you cam think of, and agreed it's a low % play, this does not mean it's useless when used on Kthxbye when he is going to get lynched anyway, the fact we misred his reaction and went ahead with the lynch is our mistake.
In post 1756, toolenduso wrote:Also, Nacho and F16, did you get that revive thing as a mod-provided fake claim or did you come up with that on your own?
They came up with it themselves and requested a fake claim, pretty good idea.
In post 1757, copper223 wrote:Some people are smart. Everyone else is a genuis. My god I'm stupid I don't deserve to live. This is the logic you just used. Sure good scumplayers will not be caught, this can be said for almost any gambit you cam think of, and agreed it's a low % play, this does not mean it's useless when used on Kthxbye when he is going to get lynched anyway, the fact we misred his reaction and went ahead with the lynch is our mistake.
No, this is not true. You can definitely catch good scum with a good gambit, fakehammering just isn't one. It's nothing against you, but it's just something that does little good (likelier to do harm). If someone is going to get lynched anyway, why does the gambit matter?
In post 1709, copper223 wrote:I also saw CoA log into their account during the night phase while I was online, and the text is coning from TTH, so once again unless Reck can somehow intercept and change messages you are confirmed scum. Combined with your play I don't see a universe where we don't lynch you.
I really enjoyed this game even after I met with an "accident" and had to be replaced.
I think the fakeclaim was a gutsy move and I don't think I'd have had the nerve to do it as scum. I can't even say I wouldn't be fooled by it again because it was so unexpected. I know I'll remember this game for a long while.
I'm very glad town figured it out in the end, though. <3
Thank you, Ffery!
"Oh, you can't help that," said the Cat: "we're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad."
"How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
"You must be," said the Cat, "or you wouldn't have come here."
In post 1765, TellTaleHeart wrote:I would gloat but Anti did a lot more in that game than me so I really don't have anything to gloat about. :S
On the contrary I was scumreading him every few pages before you came in and muddied my read with good information presented with the usual TTH townflair.
@Tier
I can't see it being harmful, I would not try it on a scumplayer whom I believe has the ability to turn it around and fake it convincingly enough, which as we just saw is incredibly hard, so that play only has positive equity from my perspective, admittedly it's likely going to be useless as you said but I don't see why not take the odd chance when someone is already compromised and Kthx gave as good a reaction as possible fmpov so zi should hsve followed my gut.
I've taken up design of my first MS large theme game again. It's based on Tarot card meanings. Won't be a uPick. As always, hydrae welcome. If you'd like a pre-in, let me know.
I designed and modded a Tarot-based uPick micro a few months ago, if you're curious what the theme might entail.
Amid the pressure of great events, a general principle gives no help.