I'm not going to fabricate more shit to "excuse how I played it" when I'm town
there's simply nothing more to it as much as people want there to
I wanted to urge caution and consideration before blindly sharing information, I apparently did it poorly, that is all
what you're suggesting is really stupid as scum to do, imo, and I'm not stupid scum at all, that's not how I would play it ATALL!!
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:48 am
by drealmerz7
yeah yeah, whoopwhoop
I know
all I can hope is that townies can see the Truth - I really don't know what else to do, pushing back on lane isn't going to serve, I've already said what I think he's doing, me repeating and going on and on about it isn't helpful
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 7:49 am
by drealmerz7
I don't want to do what I did in Strahd, that is for sure
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 8:08 am
by Desperado
Still feeling really good about a McMenno vote
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:53 am
by xyzzy
everyone gathers around to hear what one of the townspeople has to say.
"hey," says the townsperson, "maybe the whole conceit of us selecting and killing members of our community through mob justice is both contrived and highly unethical, you know? like we'll almost certainly end up killing someone who is completely innocent. I don't want that blood on my hands."
the rest of the townspeople promptly slap that person while saying in unison, "don't question the premise!"
"I've decided I'm actually okay with this now," says the townsperson. "please just stop slapping me."
mod notes: Secret Agent Jin has requested replacement.
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:13 pm
by Gamma Emerald
V/LA until tuesday
in other news, why are you voting dreal
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 12:55 pm
by KainTepes
GAMMA what si your answer to the question DO YOU PREFER TO PLAY AS TOWN OR SCUM OR 3P??
Snarky what si your answer to the question DO YOU PREFER TO PLAY AS TOWN OR SCUM OR 3P??
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 2:53 pm
by drealmerz7
yo, fellow townies
scum are satisfied to just sit around now and hope we all get frustrated and Yu all reach for LHF (me!)
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:10 pm
by Desperado
So scum are or are not on you currently?
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 3:23 pm
by drealmerz7
with 3? pretty certain, there's bound to be at least 1, and could even be 2 with the sort of scum attention I tend to draw on D1s
they often feel like they can hide on my wagon pretty easily
I am pretty effective evaluating my own wagon, too, feeling who jumps on trying to push the momentum on me or whatever, but 3 is a little small atm
I don't have much reads on ari or dav, but they ping me for potential opportunism at least, ari kind of silently championing lane perhaps?
lane could be towny-cover for either of them, I don't know, of course
if I had to pick I'd say ari+lane more likely duo and dav just mis-guided towny, but is just possible it's 1 scum who has 2 misguided townies and a 2nd scum will jump on to try and push the moment
of course as I say this it changes it all but, meh
Maybe things would move along quicker if you stopped complaining about the game being stale and started doing things to help move it along other than complain about it being stale and whine about your wagon. Don't just say you're town, show it through your actions and by scumhunting somewhere which isn't conveniently the wagon on you.
snarky came in and makes that comment? useless
That's just how he is, I'm afraid. Most games he's like this.
Posted: Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:16 pm
by McMenno
I suppouse the pouint is in the situatioun where we are right nouw: voute drealmerz our this fake brit? I say we lynch davstou at the stake
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:32 am
by drealmerz7
In post 340, Davsto wrote:Maybe things would move along quicker if you stopped complaining about the game being stale and started doing things to help move it along other than complain about it being stale and whine about your wagon. Don't just say you're town, show it through your actions and by scumhunting somewhere which isn't conveniently the wagon on you.
I've produced SO MUCH FUCKING MORE CONTENT THAN YOU HAVE, scum - you're not actually trying to sell this narrative, are you?
geezus
and then you say this in defense of 0content poster? :
That's just how he is, I'm afraid. Most games he's like this.
yeahhhh, you can die
UNVOTE: lame VOTE: davsto
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:34 am
by drealmerz7
geee it's almost as if scum are happy with the ONLY ISSUE that is on the table pretty much and not allowing focus to find ANYWHERE OR ANYTHING else
"just don't say anything and nothing else will be lynchable"
fuck that
PRODUCE CONTENT OR GET OUT OF THE GAME
snarky, that is unacceptable - participate or die
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:16 am
by Davsto
The Snarky issue will sort itself out. Leave it to a vigilante if one is present, that's their job. Lynching people who never contribute because they're not contributing is a waste of scumhunting time and effort.
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:18 am
by drealmerz7
who is talking about lynching snarky???
you just like to frame the issues however suits you best eh?
davsto lynch is excellent
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:20 am
by Davsto
In post 342, drealmerz7 wrote:I've produced SO MUCH FUCKING MORE CONTENT THAN YOU HAVE, scum - you're not actually trying to sell this narrative, are you?
Never said I did, but nice strawman.
Point is, you're there whining about the gamestate being stale, while doing nothing to stop it being stale. That's scummy as hell. You've found a problem and are pointing it out to look good but not actually fixing it.
You're saying "move on from this thing on me" while providing nothing to move on to (well, other than calling a lurker a lurker and calling for votes on your voters with no real justifying reason but that's hardly what I'd call effort) and instead just repeating weak and generic arguments for defence.
If you're going to complain about something, do something about it, don't just sit there going "wah people think I'm scum and the gamestate is stale" while doing nothing to fix any of those problems.
I mean you don't say "lynch snarky" but it's quite a strong implication
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:22 am
by Davsto
He literally said to Snarky "participate or die" and yet calls me out when I say that he's wasting effort on a Snarky lynch as if I'm hugely misrepping the situation
This is comical
Posted: Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:24 am
by drealmerz7
you call that effort on a snarky lynch???
noooo, again, that is you just framing a narrative how you want to see it