Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:05 am**

In post 441, Desperado wrote:I do have reads. Zefriend wants reads that are specifically related to the questionnaire discussion.

At this point any reads would be great.

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:06 am**

In post 443, Azral wrote:I love Narna's posts. He's my strongest townread right now.
Lane and drealmerz are okay, not as strong though.

Kain has done nothing town and I'd be open to lynching him.

zefiend 383 was probably meant to sound super town but it has the opposite effect on me.
Also dislike his push on desperado - not genuine.

VOTE: zefiend

What's not genuine about it?

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:06 am**

Read my ISO then man, I'm not even sure what we're talking about anymore.

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:09 am**

I have read your ISO. Let's try this then. Reads on Davsto, Aristophanes, Narna, KainTepes and me would be great.

(P.S. we all were part of the questionnaire discussion at some point).

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:12 am**

In post 440, SnarkySnowman wrote:How do you not have reads 18 pages in man

Not sure you're in a position to say this. Do you have any reads besides Davsto and Lane?

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:14 am**

If you've read my ISO then you would have seen the reads I've seen fit to divulge. They are reads I feel strongly enough about to give and support if necessary. If I haven't given a read on someone, it's because they don't lean one way or the other yet, or there's conflicting information, or any other of a number of reasons why I wouldn't have given a read on someone yet.

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:24 am**

In post 451, ɀefiend wrote:
In post 443, Azral wrote:I love Narna's posts. He's my strongest townread right now.
Lane and drealmerz are okay, not as strong though.

Kain has done nothing town and I'd be open to lynching him.

zefiend 383 was probably meant to sound super town but it has the opposite effect on me.
Also dislike his push on desperado - not genuine.

VOTE: zefiend
What's not genuine about it?

More or less everything.
You take small, neutral things people do and try to spin a case on them.
People aren't always logic machines, that doesn't make them mafia.

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:30 am**

In post 455, Desperado wrote:If you've read my ISO then you would have seen the reads I've seen fit to divulge. They are reads I feel strongly enough about to give and support if necessary. If I haven't given a read on someone, it's because they don't lean one way or the other yet, or there's conflicting information, or any other of a number of reasons why I wouldn't have given a read on someone yet.

Who are the ones you're most conflicted on and why?

I get the "null for lack of a read" slots not being discussed, but "null due to conflicted info" should definitely be brought up!

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 11:50 am**

Kain - I'd question anyone who has a clear read here

Narna - He's gotten several top town reads; I haven't seen anything either way

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 12:03 pm**

In post 449, Azral wrote:
In post 448, lane0168 wrote:Jeez you guys make compelling cases
The people who make the most compelling cases are often scum in my experience.

then I am the touwnest of touwn

/touwn out

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 1:43 pm**

KAIN TEPES

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 1:49 pm**

are you TOUWN kain tepes

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:03 pm**

you guys are making me feel so old

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:04 pm**

In post 462, Azral wrote:you guys are making me feel so old

Are you??

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:08 pm**

aren't we all

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 2:09 pm**

none are old in relative terms to overall existence!

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 4:50 pm**

"hey," someone says. "I think we need to ask one important question: what is the omnipotent voice in the sky's opinion on the dog/cat debate?"

"it's cats," says the omnipotent voice in the sky. "always cats."

votecount 1.073 players voting for drealmerz7 (Davsto, Aristophanes, lane0168)
3 players voting for lane0168 (Narna, drealmerz7, FrankJaeger)
2 players voting for Davsto (McMenno, SnarkySnowman)
1 player voting for McMenno (Desperado)
1 player voting for Desperado (ɀefiend)
1 player voting for ɀefiend (Azral)
1 player voting for Azral (KainTepes)

1 player not voting (Gamma Emerald)

with 13 players alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch

the day will end in (expired on 2017-01-23 18:00:00)

mod notes: Gamma Emerald is V/LA until January 17 and has been prodded. (note that prods on people who are V/LA come with the caveat of "just try to check in when you can so everyone knows you're still alive", though Gamma Emerald's V/LA should end before that would be strictly relevant anyway.)

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 4:51 pm**

In post 466, xyzzy wrote:"HEY," SOMEONE SAYS. "I THINK WE NEED TO ASK ONE IMPORTANT QUESTION: WHAT IS THE OMNIPOTENT VOICE IN THE SKY'S OPINION ON THE DOG/CAT DEBATE?"

"IT'S CATS," SAYS THE OMNIPOTENT VOICE IN THE SKY. "ALWAYS CATS."hey," someone says. "I think we need to ask one important question: what is the omnipotent voice in the sky's opinion on the dog/cat debate?""it's cats," says the omnipotent voice in the sky. "always cats."

<3

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 4:57 pm**

In post 458, Desperado wrote:Kain - I'd question anyone who has a clear read here

Narna - He's gotten several top town reads; I haven't seen anything either way

Kain can be read, it justtakes a bit of effort. A "clear" read is rare though.

What do you think of Narna's tone and approach to the game? They seem to be narrating more than giving opinions (with a few exceptions) and playing it rather safe in general. In my quick Iso of them, I saw a lot of almost content, but not much that really had anything to it.

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:00 pm**

to me that is often how it goes on D1 though

I often get shit for weak-ass reads on D1 and I'm like "I can't fake having a stronger read when it's not there, it's early in the game, I'll be patient and let them develop"

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:21 pm**

ATTENTION; ALL THREE OF THE CURRENT WAGONS ARE ON TOWN.

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:25 pm**

Let's lynch zefiend!

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 5:26 pm**

In post 468, Aristophanes wrote:What do you think of Narna's tone and approach to the game? They seem to be narrating more than giving opinions (with a few exceptions) and playing it rather safe in general. In my quick Iso of them, I saw a lot of almost content, but not much that really had anything to it.

Aye. That doesn't make them scum, either, but the hard townreads raise eyebrows for sure.

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:19 pm**

In post 456, Azral wrote:
In post 451, ɀefiend wrote:
In post 443, Azral wrote:I love Narna's posts. He's my strongest townread right now.
Lane and drealmerz are okay, not as strong though.

Kain has done nothing town and I'd be open to lynching him.

zefiend 383 was probably meant to sound super town but it has the opposite effect on me.
Also dislike his push on desperado - not genuine.

VOTE: zefiend
What's not genuine about it?
More or less everything.
You take small, neutral things people do and try to spin a case on them.
People aren't always logic machines, that doesn't make them mafia.

Way to be as vague as possible. I only cased one person, and they are doing a decent enough job of responding to my points that we are making progress. Your last statement is out of left field and makes no sense. If that statement was consistent with my mentality, then drealmerz would be my #1 scumread.

Posted: **Sun Jan 15, 2017 8:21 pm**

In post 469, drealmerz7 wrote:to me that is often how it goes on D1 though

I often get shit for weak-ass reads on D1 and I'm like "I can't fake having a stronger read when it's not there, it's early in the game, I'll be patient and let them develop"

You were pretty sure about Kain, then Lane, then Davsto, then back to Lane being scum again. Unless they weren't strong reads, in which case I don't understand why you were being so theatrical.

Mafiascum.net

Mini 1867 -- TBD Mafia [game over]