Mafiascum.net

But I'm pretty sure Frank popcorned to Az (who then in turn popcorned to KainTepes) so that's more the agreed order, right?

Forgive me if I seem stubborn, but I'm not jumping at the opportunity to claim in the order decided by Snarky "all-but-confscum" Snowman

You're being pretty stubborn, I thought this was a popcorn, I was popcorned to and then I got to choose. Plus the supposed cop unvoted me, so maybe there's more to the story than me being confscum, hmmm?

I don't think you were popcorned to properly, no?

If you follow the chain, you're actually not involved - you're a separate claim due to the guilty on you.

So what actually happened is you jump into the massclaim path and try and divert it to me

Now can you once again see why I'm reluctant to follow you here? We have a devised system which you seem pretty determined to interrupt, and that puts me on edge.

Also making a note here of a zefiend/snarky scumteam possibility with a sacrifice of Snarky (who word almost certainly be lynched soon regardless) to give zefiend towncred

It's a long shot and I'm not going to pursue zefiend for it right now as it is barely past gut feeling (although the unvote of Snarky despite claiming to get a guilty and Snarky's defence bring weaksauce put me on edge) but I want to note down that it's a feeling I had around now

So my role claim is real, but the guilty on Snarky was a reaction test.

I feel like he's probably a Lyncher with some extra powers.

Alisae and Desperado had good reactions. Azrael and Davsto not so much.

Discuss.

I dislike that claim so very very much

That is, unless you have an actual guilty.

Your reaction test was terrible.
VOTE: zefiend

In post 829, ɀefiend wrote:So my role claim is real, but the guilty on Snarky was a reaction test.

I feel like he's probably a Lyncher with some extra powers.

Alisae and Desperado had good reactions. Azrael and Davsto not so much.

Discuss.

Jfc.

I really wish I was a day vig

Lol what if AZ and liar cop are in cahoots

And snarky why did u have to have bad math. Now idk wtf to think about u

Yea i also dont like Liar cop trying to stop the mass claim.
Keep em coming.

KT its ur turn

Fuck it

VOTE: zefiend

In post 839, FrankJaeger wrote:Fuck it

VOTE: zefiend

ewww
did I ever mention how I don't believe your doc claim?

In post 840, Alisae wrote:

In post 839, FrankJaeger wrote:Fuck it

VOTE: zefiend

ewww
did I ever mention how I don't believe your doc claim?

No, go ahead.

zefiend your gambits are shit and so is your ability to read reactions, if town.

You allowed Snarky to be at L-1 for hours without retracting.

We didn't even get a clear read on him out of this. Awful.

In post 839, FrankJaeger wrote:Fuck it

VOTE: zefiend

Just let me shoot him tonight, much easier.

I never tried to stop mass claim. In fact I think that's a good idea.

Real target was Drealmerz. "No Result." Apparently Drealmerz answered that he would prefer a non-normal game, or something else affected my action.

Hahahahaha

Haha

I kinda liked the gambit. I don't know about vigging him before he gets another chance to clear.

MFW Snarky's claim is the most believable so far

zefriend, how often to you gambit? I did not take you for that kind of player.

Why snarky?

Be more specific about the reads you gathered from your reaction test. I know you're more than capable of it so the lack of depth here is a huge red flag.