How do you know she isn't in the Southern Hemisphere, where it is Winter?BloodCovenent wrote:Vote: Snow White
Because it's summer at the moment.
Also, you misspelled Covenant.
QED!Konowa wrote:It has to happen sometime. I still fail to see how a second vote on someone is the equivalent of a bandwagon. Perhaps I just have a different perspective. Also, I did not bring us out of the RVS as both you and Scott are saying. I merely nudged it in that direction.canadian wrote:was a bandwagon that necessary so early? getting out of the random voting stage when you were only the 4th person posting?
I think it is somewhat hypocritical for you to be harping on me about "bandwagoning" but ignoring those who voted Blood up. Why are you not commenting on that?
Exactly! I was a second vote, and there was no discussion about me. The people targeting Konowa look very suspicious. Also, part of the reason it is good to place a second vote on someone during RVS is to see who will join in for the third, soPlatypus_Dude wrote:Thank you DIDO. o_O
What is wrong with a second vote? It takes like 10 to lynch. If it had a random reason, would it cause discussion? Not as much, that's for sure.
Again!?!?CJMiller wrote:Unvote
Vote: BloodCovenent
Agree with Empking, and want to see where Monkey thinks that Blood admits to overreacting. Oh yeah,MonkeyMan576 wrote:Have you actually read his posts? He admits to overreacting.Empking's Alt wrote:Vote: MM
I see no overeaction.
Oh really?MonkeyMan576 wrote:I'm not tunneling, or taking anything out of context.
I asked you to show me where, and your answer wasMonkeyMan576 wrote:Have you actually read his posts? He admits to overreacting.
This is the first time you took a post of his out of context.MonkeyMan576 wrote:On post 31 he admits that he's more interested in "being loved" than being pro-town. To me that's being reactionary.
Show me where he "admits" this please. This is the second time.MonkeyMan576 wrote:Not to mention admitting you don't care about acting pro-town.
It was obviously sarcasm. Your detector must be broken. You should get it looked at. And 29 was AFTER Monkey accused him of overreacting, so how do you agree with Monkey when you say that the post after this accusation is proof of what Monkey was saying?Snow White wrote:FoSCJMiller. Why the rush the bandwagon? We need questions to get reads on people why vote the out so dimissively?
I can see MM's point. BloodCovenent's post 29 was, in my opinion, an over reaction to MM's faux votei considered MM to be joking with you and instead of you joking back you appeared to over react. Even if it was said with sarcasm put "(sarcasm!BloodCovenent wrote: IM NOT OVER REACTING AT ALL!!!!)" beside it to avoid the mess.
Are you working with Monkey? Because Blood never said he was more worried looking like a "loser" than looking like Scum. Monkey put those words in his mouth.Snow White wrote:But i want to know why you were more worried looking like a "loser" than looking like Scum.
People should be more concerned with getting Day lynched than being percieved as a loser.BloodCovenent wrote:And now, to Monkies post, i practically have to defend myself, otherwise i look like a loser.
Because Kise's posts are not very intelligent; just look at him in iso. For example:Snow White wrote:Also, you seem annoyed at Kise, even though his vote is not even on you. Why?
BloodCovenent wrote:Kise.... just stop posting.... please.
How is it hip if only one person has done it yet? Konowa is the one that made it hip.Kise wrote:Oh, you mean you being the 2nd person to vote for Wiirdo?
It's a bandwagon because you just jumped on it. You went with the 'hip' choice and, to boot, didn't say anything other than a vote.
Do you know what innocuous means? Because if you do, this looks like a contradiction.Wiirdo wrote:This all spawned from people voting for me without me even participating. What a crazy RVS!
Anyway, from what I've picked up from my quick read, Bloodcovenant seems the most suspicious. I still think what you've all picked him up on is a little innocuous. I could understand if it wasn't in the RVS.
Ouch! That hurts... But thanks for the good... mixed with the bad... Also, please no more walls of text. I can't deal with that.BloodCovenent wrote:My opinion is dumb town trying to scum hunt. I'll give him some credit, just that he's doing a really bad job at it.nhammen wrote:Monkey is tunneling Blood pretty hard. Especially for page 4. And he's taking quotes out of context really bad. I'm not sure if he is scum or just dumb town, so I still have my FOS on him. CJs wagoning is still the scummiest thing I have seen so far though. I also think Kise is mildly scummy, but its probably nothing.
I agree. I don't think this is fishing... sorry BC, looks like you're the only one.Scott Brosius wrote:I do think BC is stretching a bit as I think SW is just being a careful townie.
I disagree with this though. I have seen games where the scum refused to vote when they could easily have done so and stayed hidden.Sando wrote:On this subject, I'm impressed with Snow Whites refusal to vote despite the pressure to, it would have been very easy for scum to just go with the flow on this one.
Yeah, because L-8 has such a good chance of a quicklynch. Your logic fails sir. Fortunately for you, terrible logic in itself is not a scumtell (I have to keep reminding myself of this fact). But I am keeping my eye on you to see if something else develops.Kise wrote:At the time Konowa voted, Wiirdo, Empking & CJMillar were all hip choices due to someone already having voted them. Why wouldn't Konowa just place his vote against someone with zero votes? It alarms people into thinking Konowa wanted to get someone (who exhibited no scummy behavior) lynched off the bat.xRECKONERx wrote:Question:
Why was Wiirdo the "hip" choice if he only had one vote on him?
Can you show where BC OMGUS'd? I do not see it anywhere.MonkeyMan576 wrote:CJ had an obvious OMGUS on lobster. BC has OMGUS'd, been overreactionary and defensive, and been using poor logic.xRECKONERx wrote:Re: Monkey -
I don't know. I guess I'm still half-expecting him to explain why he suddenly halfway jumped ship from BC to CJM. His response to taking BC's quote out of context doesn't satisfy me, but I'm not closed off to the idea that it could just be two different interpretations of the quote.
@MonkeyMan: Why are you FOSing CJ? What has BC done, specifically, that warrants you keeping your vote on him while you have an FOS out on CJ?
I do not see any OMGUS there...MonkeySudo wrote:Post 64.nhammen wrote:Yeah, because L-8 has such a good chance of a quicklynch. Your logic fails sir. Fortunately for you, terrible logic in itself is not a scumtell (I have to keep reminding myself of this fact). But I am keeping my eye on you to see if something else develops.Kise wrote:At the time Konowa voted, Wiirdo, Empking & CJMillar were all hip choices due to someone already having voted them. Why wouldn't Konowa just place his vote against someone with zero votes? It alarms people into thinking Konowa wanted to get someone (who exhibited no scummy behavior) lynched off the bat.xRECKONERx wrote:Question:
Why was Wiirdo the "hip" choice if he only had one vote on him?
Can you show where BC OMGUS'd? I do not see it anywhere.MonkeyMan576 wrote:CJ had an obvious OMGUS on lobster. BC has OMGUS'd, been overreactionary and defensive, and been using poor logic.xRECKONERx wrote:Re: Monkey -
I don't know. I guess I'm still half-expecting him to explain why he suddenly halfway jumped ship from BC to CJM. His response to taking BC's quote out of context doesn't satisfy me, but I'm not closed off to the idea that it could just be two different interpretations of the quote.
@MonkeyMan: Why are you FOSing CJ? What has BC done, specifically, that warrants you keeping your vote on him while you have an FOS out on CJ?
Please clarify what you mean by "He is clearly the most suspicious from the group for his RVS votes and justification of them," Which votes and justification are you talking about? Be specific.Wiirdo wrote:Not at all. He is clearly the most suspicious from the group for his RVS votes and justification of them, but overall it's not extremely scummy. Because nobody else had done anything very scummy at that point, it stood out like a sore thumb.nhammen wrote:Do you know what innocuous means? Because if you do, this looks like a contradiction.Wiirdo wrote:This all spawned from people voting for me without me even participating. What a crazy RVS!
Anyway, from what I've picked up from my quick read, Bloodcovenant seems the most suspicious. I still think what you've all picked him up on is a little innocuous. I could understand if it wasn't in the RVS.
I do not see the overreaction. That is not OMGUS, as he is just presenting a valid defense. And your third point looks like you are trying to put words in his mouth.MonkeyMan576 wrote:Overreacting:BloodCovenent wrote:i don't think you really mentioned the three scummy things that i did... like, you never actually said them, you only left us to presume what they were.MonkeyMan576 wrote:I've stated several times why I found him scummy. I'm not going to encourage lazyness and do your work for you.
This is just the start, he continues to overreact and be reactionary and use hyperbole...BC wrote:whaha? it should be? And bandwagon much?
OMGUS:Not denying being more interested in being popular and "loved" than being pro-town.BC wrote:I think that CjMiller, and MonkeyMan are both acting scummy.
MM wrote:Personally, I'd be more worried about looking like scum than looking like a loser...BC wrote:hmm.. you don't know me. I like to be loved
Fixed because you can't read.MonkeyMan576 wrote:Calling a2nd3rd vote on someone a bandwagon...usually bandwagons in the scummy sense is when someone is pushing a lynch.
Criticizing the attack that was made on him because he was calling two votes a wagon, when in actuality he was calling three votes a wagon. An attack that you have repeated after it was defused...MonkeyMan576 wrote:Sure...... Way to count...?
Criticizing the vote without actually providing any actual content reason.
He's saying not defending himself will be bad, and the you attack him by agreeing with that statement!?!?MonkeyMan576 wrote:Defending yourself doesn't make you scummy. Defending yourself poorly does. Usually only scum are afraid to defend themselves.BC wrote: And now, to Monkies post, i practically have to defend myself, otherwise i look like a loser.
nhammen wrote:I have a few questions for you:
You mention that he is using hyperbole. In an earlier post, you mentioned that he used bad logic. Can you show me an example of each?
Also, we have heard your case against BC multiple times. Other than that, the only player you have mentioned is CJ. Other than BC and CJ, who do you find most scummy, and who do you find most town?
Snow White wrote:Firstly MM thank you for providing your posts. But like Nhammen i want to hear who else you suspect and why.
MonkeySudo wrote:I'm not going to waste the time to get in a quote war with BC, I'll leave it up to others to decide who has the better arguments.
I would say that no scum would be stupid enough to act this scummy, but "too scummy to be scum" is a logical fallacy. I've let you go far too long.MonkeyMan576 wrote:Don't hold your breath. I've already answered more than I should.
Arrogance is not a scumtell, but when it turns into refusal to answer questions, then it becomes one.Platypus_Dude wrote:Is arrogance a scum tell or is this ad hominem? If arrogance is a scumtell, can you post at least 1 example that proves this?BC wrote:1) Constant signs of arrogance by MM.
Hypocrisy is not a scumtell, but you should not be voting Wiirdo for something that you are doing; especially when you are even worse about it than Wiirdo.Looker wrote:nhammen's Post 217- Hyprocisy=Scumtell...? <--- But that's assuming you have a reason for denoting my actions as hypocritical. Do you?
QFTBekkatha wrote:I don't like the bandwagon that has formed on BC. To be honest, the whole MM and BC argument isn't going anywhere. Old disputes are just continually repeated either directly with the quotes or simply re worded. MM, either get a new argument against BC or drop it because these arguments aren't doing whatever you intended them to. Unless you wanted people to be focused on a false dispute instead of scum hunting... but I'm not sure what your reasoning is.
Wait, what? Earlier you were attacking me for not asking questions enough, and now you are attacking Reckoner for asking too many?Kise wrote:Because you haven't done anything that shows me a pro-town motivation. You're doing nothing other than keeping others busy by asking them questions, so, in a sense, this tactic could be used to take the heat off of you.
This:Kise wrote:Please find a quote of mine (if possible) where I suggest that you need to ask questions, nhammen.
It seems that maybe I misunderstood you, but to me it looks like you are asking me to ask questions of other players.Kise wrote:This is information, instead of analysis. Just stating facts and not critically assessing the situation = a common scumtell. It is always likely that those using IIOA are purposely lying low under the radar; not wanting to warrant any attention or step into the spotlight; indirectly addresses players by talking about them, rather than talking to them; has the "speak-when-spoken-to" mentality... basically, IIOA is something mafia do. That's what I'm getting at.
The only people you've directly spoken to have been Monkey and, somewhat, Konowa.
Engaging in conversation is more beneficial to the scumhunting agenda than your speaking in 3rd-person perspective.
He's been looking for a replacement. Nobody has replied...CJMiller wrote:Mod: Replace or modkill. Your choice.