GIEFF wrote:Mastin is guilty of the same thing.
Fair enough. Yet, the focus is predominately on camn. Even with a mastin wagon having more steam.
GIEFF wrote:My problem is with your claim that the people who are spewing (which is subjective) is scum. You have no evidence that is NOT based on this.
But you have no problem at all using other evidence to REMOVE people from your list. You somehow don't think that either Battle Mage or Mastin are capable of faking concern for the town. Scum do that all the time. Battle Mage's trap was null, and any town-points Mastin may have gained by trying to kick-start the game were lost (and then some) with how often he tried to call attention to that fact. Mastin is the ONLY person who both spews AND lurks, yet you decide to just write him off. I don't buy it.
I don't, nor have I pretended, to have "evidence" on anyone yet. I have not given a true case on any of my aforementioned list being scum because, get this, now is not the time. I am voting Ceph for a reason. IF need be I'll give a detailed (hint: more words than Ceph has posted) rationale for it but its right there.
As for Battle Mage and Mastin: yea, I think they're town
at this juncture
. Further evidence could change it. I think they are both perfectly capable of faking concern but I do not think they have done so
in this particular instance
.
I AM going to do a review of Mastin as a function of activity on the site in actual games and if he's actively avoiding this one I'll throw my vote that way.
GIEFF wrote:
And you don't include camn or KMD on that list, just because you subjectively claim they don't make your eyes bleed, when they're just as guilty of quote-warring and walling as most (with the exception of alex).
I call BS. If you want to lynch people who you think are purposefully creating spew to confuse the town, that's one thing, although I still think that would be ticky-tack. But you've gone even farther by haphazardly removing people from that list. You aren't even applying your own "formula" objectively.
This is the second time in this post alone you used the word subjectively to explain my thought process. Duh.
Are you saying you've
objectively
found scum? If thats the case then I'd sure as hell throw my vote on you right now because as you so eloquently put it I call BS.
I dont include KMD or Camn in that list because I dont find them scummy. If I need to write a thesis showing the difference in the posting to differentiate them I will but god in heaven why should I need to. I dont think they're doing what I was illustrating.
And, to close a nice paraphrase:
"If you want to lynch people who are purposefully doing something that is scummy in nature I think that's ticky-tack. You've went farther by removing people from the list of more people than could possibly BE SCUM in the hopes of finding the actual SCUM and that's even worse."
Pretty sure that sums it up.
@VP:
<3 (although your post was more than a scroll tsk, tsk).