You bastard! replaced battle mage my main reasoning for signing up!
He left because he was obvious scum and I knew it.
hewitt wrote:Huh. That's kind of interesting find there actually Kise. That slipped right by me but that is worded pretty oddly on BloodCovenent's part.Kise wrote:Umm... not that I'm softclaiming to be scum, but how did you come to figure that I am town here? {I smell a slip}BloodCovenent wrote:He tends to act really scummy when he is a town role
Recover? 3 pages, a lot of quotes one can easily skim…the rvs…10 minutes to long to catchup?Vamparific wrote:i dont always replace out, i wanted to play this game, but my computer crashed so i missed the start, and now have exams >< if i hadn't missed the start or if there weren't so many start pages i might be able to recover.
Meh, whats lynching Zwet than? Policy, grudge, lurker, smart…Kise wrote:If you don't like someone's style, that's not so much a policy lynch as it is a personal lynch, or grudge lynch as someone said.
It should be evident in the quote, and my intentions should be clear in my statement.magichands wrote: Question for BenMage:
What is your reasoning behind your vote on BloodCovenent?
Is the reasoning you have somewhere in the quote?
If so, what is the reasoning?
^^^Referencing magic hands post, Post 44. And I disagree. I think magic posted a bunch of fluff to try and look good, and asked some pretty useless questions (like the one to me). All in all I think it was an attempt to appear town, and I get a scum vibe from magic.tubby216 wrote:^ good posting
methinks i is gonna like this kid
How active do you want everyone to be… The game seems to be moving fine. I guess there’s just some people who haven’t contributed at all that need to.X wrote:Happiness with Posting Level:Disappointed
He’s not in the game …TylerJ wrote: I also did some stuff on BattleMage, just doing everything in order of first post. He hasn't provided much.
HuhDitto wrote:Tyler, I am not surprised thatBattle Magehas not provided much in a way of answers. That is all.
Oh…so I haven’t provided much. The game is 5 pages in, and I was V/LA. You yourself only just started contributing. More will come clearly as the game progresses. There are others who haven’t commented at all.TylerJ wrote:Sorry, Benmage.
Mmmm...you might want to think about being replaced. People are abrasive, rude, insulting and ignorant. Hell I know I am. So if you can't handle it, I'd suggest getting out now.magichands wrote:A bit off topic but, if you actually read all of my post you would have seen why I had said that.ConfidAnon wrote: Post 44 -
Thank you captain obvious.magichands wrote:What im saying is is that the town should generally lynch people who they find most suspicious and because its so early in the game we cant really tell who is the most suspicious.
I said it because I was giving an explanation of why BloodCovenants post was suspicious.
I really didnt come to this site to get disparaged by my fellow players. What you said right there was unprovoked and really had nothing to do with the game which leads me to beleive it was just an attempt to troll me.
I believe respect is a rule people have to follow. Being respectful and commenting just on the other persons game without any personal attacks is what a mafia game is about.
Yeah there are some scenarios in which you could not be scum and know kise's alignment...like being masons or something. But it looks like you're backpedaling.BloodCovenent wrote:Are you not going to comment on the above post? Because I'm presuming one of the reasons why you are voting me is because if the "proposed claim" that others think I did.Benmage wrote:unvote vote bloodcovenent
He hasn't redeemed himself, and no one seems interested in magic.
Hmm how do you define it as shameless. I listed why I voted him. I actually was the first to vote him, and so still and always felt him scummy. I switched to Magichands for a moment who I also feel to be scummy...but seeing as that is an unrealistic lynch why not return to the realistic lynch on a person I do feel has acted scummy.ConfidAnon wrote:I don't like how BloodCovenant has crumbled when pressured . . . but I also don't like how quickly a wagon formed on him.
There have been a ton of shameless bandwagon votes on him, which leads me to believe that he is town.
Also,unvote, vote: benmagefor his shameless bandwagon vote. I am still suspicious of TylerJ, but right now benmage is more deserving of my vote.
I've been consistent. I was one of the original to question him/find him scummy. If you read my iso or look back you'll see this. Hence I didn't feel the need to fluff it up. I stated he hasn't changed my opinion of him, and remains scummy. You failing to notice is null for me.ConfidAnon wrote:In post 137, you piled on a vote for very little reasoning. That is scummy.
QFThewitt wrote: It is not scummy to be confident. It is scummy to declare that you're 100% sure someone is town or scum. See above definition of steamrolling and then you might get why it's scummy.
I agree.BloodCovenent wrote:The most convenient claim for scum is VT, why were you surprised that I claimed? Did you expect me to try and hold out for a while before I claimed VT? For scum, VT is the easiest role to claim.qwints wrote:Among other things, I didn't expect a VT claim from scum so early in the day. (Site-wide meta, not you personally). The other things are less concrete, but give me a feeling that you're not the obv-scum you'd need to be to justify a lynch at this time.BloodCovenent wrote:what did you expect me to do?qwints wrote:BC, your actions didn't match how I think you would play as scum in that situation. That's why I unvoted.Youasked me to claim, I just find it surprised that you backed off due tomyclaim.
BS:orangepenguin wrote:Pomegranate wrote:Huh? What's a VT?BloodCovenent wrote:Btw, I'm VT, I guess I am considered a threat to the town. Damn role Pm's.Just some quick observations - neither pom nor ca knew what VT meant. This is probably due to the fact that they are new, but you'd think if they were both vanilla townies themselves, they'd be able to figure it out? So I think that neither of them are VT and are either a town powerrole or scum. This is just for future reference, if one of them attempts to claim VT, because VT obviously = Vanilla town and if you were one, even if you were knew, you'd know what it would stand for.ConfidAnon wrote:Wait, sorry for the double post, but I missed his claim earlier.
What is a VT?
Posted: Thu Aug 13, 2009 6:56 pm Newbie 818:Pomegranate wrote:Huh? What's a VT?BloodCovenent wrote:Btw, I'm VT, I guess I am considered a threat to the town. Damn role Pm's.
X:Pomegranate wrote:You're all going to hate me for it, but my claim is townie. I'm a vanilla, and I have no extra information.
Haha, i read that and was like ohhh crap. I pm'd X to say anything between you and me is jest since I'm the better mage.Battle Mage wrote:*Modkill*Benmage wrote:This dude has no thoughts.hewitt wrote:If you wish, Battle Mage what are your thoughts?
Reading now.
BM
Apologize who apologizes in mafia....Battle Mage wrote: I notice you havent attempted to apologise, or even acknowledge your mistake. Why is that?
And why undermine the case on you, when you havent acknowledging humiliating yourself?
3 seems like a lot. How would an SK imaginable win in a game of this size? Be NK immune? Sounds damn near impossible. Its more than likely a vig/2teams.orangepenguin wrote:Three seems rather unlikely and unbalanced, so I am thinking the latter.three Mafia factions or two and a vigilante/serial killer.
I lol’d.tubby216 wrote:@Hewitt
ok here is my case.
why did you shoot ditto last nite?
I didn’t see the vase on him. The bleak connections he made between you and ditto…is that why your arguing with him? His case was weak no joke, but yours aint great either.Battle Mage wrote:Rather than throw out random (haha punny) insults, would you care to explain your views atall? The protown motivation for Hewitt would be good. I dont see any protown reason not to suspect him at this point.dramonic wrote:I think I'm going to vote Hewitt too!
Wait, nope, the case on him is as crappy as his case on BM.
I'll reread and give my own opinion on this situation, but three votes on Hewitt with such a weak case is scumpoints for Lunatic and Tubby (none for BM because he started the wagon and its his own dillusional case)
FoS: Dramonic
BM
word.Black Jinx wrote:yes this is something I find quite funny. Why don't you just say that you didn't shoot Ditto. Atleast you've said it then.randomlunatic wrote:The case has more got a reaction out of you, which is in itself a case. If you didn't shoot Ditto surely you'd have said you didn't.
Hrmm Let's here more flavor.hewitt wrote: I am the vigilante and I shot Ditto last night. I picked Ditto because I've played extensively with Zazier and I based my kill only on her and not Haylen (whom I've never played with before). Zazier frustrates me with her fluffy posting style but in this game she only posted like once or twice meanwhile in my other current games with her she still posted frequently. I thought it was out of character for her and so I decided to kill her over Konowa (who was my second choice). That and the fact that I don't like her = voila my target. I was right which is great and so then I TRIED to find connections between her and her scum buddies but oh no God forbid I try to do that.
What!?!? A watcher claims to see a killing. We got a vig claim, and no commentary but a vote for DN. Anything you’d like to add?Kise wrote:Ditto/ZazieR was scum for not nitpicking BC like he usually does. I figured a link to BC was there, but he was obviously just trying to look good after a mislynch.
Vote: DeathNote
No reason not to .
It would've gone a long way in confirming you're town. Are you suggesting tubby shouldn't of claimed his information...he saw you kill ditto.hewitt wrote:Hey, listen tubby, that was a stupid move on your part forcing us both to claim is my point.tubby216 wrote:see this quote?hewitt wrote:I didn't think they were the scummiest in the game either. But the fact is, they flipped scum. So now we have to try and use any information we can from them to find out leads to their partners.
this is where you should have listed possible reasons for shooting ditto.I held it out as long as possible until you forced me to claim and now we're both fucked over because of your obnoxiousness.So no that was not where I should've listed possible reasons for shootingDitto because I didn't want it known that I shot Ditto yet!
I was wondering about your vote for death too, for “no reason not to”.Kise wrote:@Benmage - Nope. Nothing to add. Both have claimed pro-town roles, so why lynch when they're likely to be NK-food?
ThisKise wrote:Unvote; Vote: qwints
Almost forgot about his opportunism D1, coupled with a lack of good reasoning, b.k.a. scum-motive.
This is a baloney retarded claim imo.Battle Mage wrote: Claiming at this point is pretty null, given i feel im likely to get vigged, and regardless of affiliation, i dont wanna get killed tonight. If you can't see my reasoning for this, you should trust me for now.
This doesn't seem smart. If there is a (scum)roleblocker and they block battle mage we have one townie(vig) killing another townie(watcher) seems so idiotic.Battle Mage wrote:Yep, ill protect you tonight. Tubby, there is no point you watching yourself. I'd suggest keeping the WIFOM down to just 2 players- me and Hewitt. Or alternatively, just say you're going to watch Hewitt. I think me dying might be a best case scenario here, given some people see me as a definite potential mislynch.tubby216 wrote:here is how this works,
BM must protect me tonite,
we must decide on a target for hewitt,,
if i die bm is either scum or roleblocked,
if hewitt fails to kill he is either role blocked or scum
but i will not announce who i am watching, just know tthat it may be either
myself, bm or hewitt
and i will leave it at that.
How could Hewitt fail to kill? lol
I dont see any reason to suspect a mafia RB. If there is one, they will probably target you tonight, and kill Hewitt.
BM
yeah myb. lets direct kill to check his claim, got it.tubby216 wrote:so you think hewitt scum?? or did you miss the part where we direct his kill toniteBenmage wrote:This doesn't seem smart. If there is a (scum)roleblocker and they block battle mage we have one townie(vig) killing another townie(watcher) seems so idiotic.Battle Mage wrote:Yep, ill protect you tonight. Tubby, there is no point you watching yourself. I'd suggest keeping the WIFOM down to just 2 players- me and Hewitt. Or alternatively, just say you're going to watch Hewitt. I think me dying might be a best case scenario here, given some people see me as a definite potential mislynch.tubby216 wrote:here is how this works,
BM must protect me tonite,
we must decide on a target for hewitt,,
if i die bm is either scum or roleblocked,
if hewitt fails to kill he is either role blocked or scum
but i will not announce who i am watching, just know tthat it may be either
myself, bm or hewitt
and i will leave it at that.
How could Hewitt fail to kill? lol
I dont see any reason to suspect a mafia RB. If there is one, they will probably target you tonight, and kill Hewitt.
BM
The sheer fact that bm is for this makes me think hes even scummier.
I'll give him another day or so, its been a few days since his last post.Slicey wrote:Vote: OPHis actions, or lack thereof, are similar to what he did in Twilight Mafia IMHO. He has barely contributed at all and his few points contain little or no substance. Who do you think is scum?
DeathNote wrote: Your right, I am not following the game at all.
I don't like qwints or Battle Mage(claim). But there's so many who really haven't contributed its hard to do anything. The game feels a bit stalling? no?Slicey wrote:dramonic, Benmage, who do you think is scum?
But if you both are who you say you are, you'll be killed tonight and he'll be killed the ngiht after. We don't really need a counter claim because the real vig would just vig him. All your doing is risking revealing a real vig for the sake of confirming who you want to protect, which again is null because you are going to be the target of the night. Especially since we just lost our watcher!!Battle Mage wrote:No, because ill be protecting Hewitt, if there is no counterclaim (and assuming i dont get lynched)Benmage wrote:This vig/not vig thing is ehhh. I guess here we are confirming Hewitts legitimacy, so i suppose i'm down. A vig should claim, because 1 scum for 1 town is good. However wouldn't he just vig the hewitt tonight and save all our problems??
Yeah giving you the benefit of the doubt for now, hence voting qwints. I don't see why you can't just protect someone else. Scum are going to kill you tonight, hewitt tomorrow, this is obvious. A real vig could atleast not have to out himself and could of silenced hewitt himself. Hopefully the real vig just said he wasn't the vig, and will do this after you die.Battle Mage wrote:How often do aspiring town leaders turn out to be scum?DeathNote wrote:Not Vig
I am not liking how BM is basically controlling this game, or at least trying to. Every other post is him and it is all very wordy and occasionally insulting. Although sometimes he makes good points, I can't help but think that if you throw enough accusations out there.... that something has bound to be right.
I've got another cycle max, to live. After that, you guys are on your own. So how about you do us all a favour, and give me the benefit of the doubt for now?
I dont think it was ever written in stone that theres 2 factions + 1 of either vig/sk. I think either of what you're suggesting is plausible.dramonic wrote:Also, if I may bring something new to the table:
Has the possibility of a SK, a vig and a single mafia faction been explored, or do we have a serious reason to believe its 2 scum factions + 1 vig/SK?