i signed up for this game to stalk Vi
![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_surprised2.gif)
beeeeeeecaaause you're the "paragon of mafia hunters"Vi wrote:Why would you do that?Timeater wrote:boomshakalaka
i signed up for this game to stalk Vi
I joined this game to stalk Unsight
I don't want to say anything relevant until the Day begins (specifically, until scumtalk has probably ended).
Code: Select all
foilist13:2
Leafsnail:1
Lowell:9
Midnight's Sorrow:3
LynchMePls:6
SSBF:4
Vi:7
leaf wrote:This is... pretty much a list of everyone who's posted content so far?
Except Parama and Chronopie. Interesting.
@105 - Give me examples, Parama. And refer to where you said this before.
Also, please tell me what you think of Timeater's list, which is fundamentally the same idea.
Okay.leaf wrote: Oh, I thought by "example" you meant "For example, this is what I think now".
Nevermind.
Uhhhh...wat?vezopiraka wrote:I have somewhat of an inside source and I can tell you that lynchmepls is in the mafia but he's not werewolf. And no I don't know this cause I'm scum.
unvote:vi
Vote:Lynchmepls
Can you please elaborate on how post 121 was scummy?SerialClergyman wrote:Timeater gets a special mention for scummy 121 as well.
What mindgames? Even if you were "scared", how is that a proper reason to vote? Please elaborate.Midnight's Sorrow wrote:Unvote
vote:Vi
Vi's mind games scare me quite a bit.
Its so easy anyone can do it!Vi wrote:[words that don't say anything]
Vi wrote:Not only was the post completely fluffy and useless, it would be the third time I've seen someone try to interject humor into their catch-up posts to make it more interesting for them to type. The first two people I've seen do it were scum (SerialClergyman saw the second time, when xRx did it).
By the way, insulting vezo doesn't count as content.
This coming from Parama is amusing. I can see how me sayingParama wrote: Epic scumslip, Time.
BUT I STILL WANT NHAMMEN LYNCHED.
I dont see what we have to lose with this course of action.monkey with a gun wrote:I roleblocked SGR.
I don't think there is any chance of NK WIFOM, but there is something else I am worried about.
More comments after I catch up on ... 3 pages in the past 12 hours? Which will happen after the movie I'm watching ends...
Disagree, SGR's current status is more about nhammen than it is about himself.foil wrote:Ok, unvote for now. If SGR is getting replaced then there is no reason to be voting him, and there is now enough D2 content for fresh reads on people.
Crackaddict logic.If he's lying about being town, there's a good chance he lied about blocking SGR, yes? And thus your case would crumble to nothing.
Like what?I'm not sure he didn't - just in a closed game with 22 players left alive there are plenty of other ways to stop a kill.
I agree wholeheartedly with this statement.Pondering Anime Girl wrote:I'm wary of how nhammen left the Socrates wagon. That was a little too easy. The wagon was fine for nhammen until SGR is replaced by someone who actually talks back. Next thing we see is nhammen shaking his hand and wandering away.
Can you elaborate further on Parama's character and playstyle?The Master of Foiling wrote:RE: Parama: My experience with him thus far in this game is that he tunnels like no other. He calls people obvscum and stops playing, and insists that his previous cases are the final word on any matter and refuses to refute responses to them. I don't know what experience you've had with him, but mine has been very different.
How is mislynching in a gigantic game a "classic scumtell", sir? Do you assign the same scumtell to all the other people who voted Chronopie? Do you assign that tell to me as well?So-Crates, Dude wrote:Foilist, post 627 is terrible because you spent an entire page calling Parama scummy/stupid and then you avoid voting him and instead vote for the Mislynch Of The Day(tm), a classic scumtell. You have repeatedly waffled between calling Parama scum and calling him dumb and refuse to take a hard stance on him in any way. Even now you decline to meet him head on and instead try to take him out at the knees and discredit him by calling into question his competence while simultaneously suggesting (but not outright saying) that he is scum. You are not interested in Parama's actual alignment, only in making that yapping dog go away.
Why would a scummer claim and go for such a brutal gambit early on in a game this big? Is that really a tactically sound decision? What do you feel nhammen's motivations are?The Leaf Mummy-Guy wrote:If he's lying about being town, there's a good chance he lied about blocking SGR, yes? And thus your case would crumble to nothing.
Heh. Still not answering questions are we? You would rather make predatory accusations like you have been most of the game coupled garbled misinformation? Oh you would? Ok.Leafsnail wrote:Timeater is on the same team as foilist. Note the lack of connection with foilist and the vague "attack" on socrates.
Code: Select all
1. Leafsnail
2. Parama
3. Socrates
Correctomundo.We're all posting our top 3 scumspects. It's not a request, it's an order.
I dont act.foil wrote: Timeater would have been on it, but lately he's been posting more and generally acting more townie then before, a great improvement.
You wont or you wont right now?nacho wrote: No. I haven't read the game, I'm not giving you my top three suspects. Sorry.
leaf wrote:As suspected, Timeater didn't flip the fuck out over foilist failing his test in the same way he did when he failed to see the three suspicions I posted.
leaf wrote:I did post my top 3 suspects... which you'd know if you actually read my posts.
You said something about me in ISO post 10, but you seemed to accept my answer in ISO post 11 (yeah, it was just a misunderstanding on my behalf). You then say nothing about me until post 35, but this doesn't seem particularly aggressive. Perhaps 36 was, but you don't actually accuse me... then you ignore me apart from one question until post 43, where you vote me. So no, I don't accept that you've considered me scummy since page 6.
All that being said, I do agree with this sentiment. What gives, foil? Nhammen is most defintely not a lurker. Typo? Brain fart? I see nothing about lurkers in post #1246.leaf wrote:Bullshit detected: nhammen isn't a lurker. Logically, if "The lurkers" was your third suspicion, then your third suspicion should be the lurker you regard as worst.
Top 3 Suspects
1) Parama
2) Leafsnail
3) The lurkers
1) Parama
2) leafsnail
3) nhammen
Sooo, you just change your mind or something?Between Socrates and nhammen, I would support an nhammen lynch. Socrates predecessor was certainly as scummy as nhammen, but Socrates was less so.
As far as the role claim, we have more information to gain from lynching nhammen than Socrates. If he flips town roleblocker, then that would incriminate socrates. If he flips scum then Socrates is highly unlikely to be on the same scum team, but could still be on the other.
If we lynch Socrates we really get no info on nhammen at all unless he flips mafia, and even that can be disputed.
So in interests of this I will add nhammen as third on my scum list.
What do you claim you didn't write? I'm lost.@Timeater: I didn't write that.
Or they could BOTH be scum.Lowell wrote:So, to summarize, socrates replaces some idiot and we're all like "ooo, poor socrates, let's stop voting him!", then shrine replaces some idiot and we're all like "yeah, let's vote the new guy!", despite the obviousness of socrates being scum. Really? Thank god I skipped the foilist wagon-drama entirely.