NY 118 - BBM's Large Normal Mafia (Game!)
-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Too many people all attacking each other for some reason that probably shouldn't be attacking :<.
You all gave me a headache reading these pages <_<.
I haven't gotten any reads on who could be positive scummy, so my vote can wait.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Wasn't giving myself an excuse, I simply have nothing to add at this point, but when I do I will post, like now.Porochaz wrote:
Hello. No opinion at all after 7 pages of pretty much content. Might not be major to you but you should be mentioning the minor things instead of giving yourself an excuse to hide in the shadows.Bunnylover wrote:Too many people all attacking each other for some reason that probably shouldn't be attacking :<.
You all gave me a headache reading these pages <_<.
I haven't gotten any reads on who could be positive scummy, so my vote can wait.
I have a different way of thinking which could mean that my thought process of this could be totally off, but it seems like you want me to vote for one of the several people that are gaining the attention (Dana, UA, JDodge, etc.) of most of the group, or you want me to find some minor detail that will allow others to exploit which could mean nothing at all. There is no point in me mention minor detail unless someone wants a specific person dead or will is trying to lead some down a wrong path and stray from mafia.
Like I said I have a different way of viewing things, which could mean my entire post is wrong.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
In case people can't read this was in my first post:nhammen wrote:
And yet, you still give no opinion. Are you seriously saying that everyone is still null after all that has happened? And why should we believe you? This could just be an act to hide, as poro has stated. Or it could be newb-scum that doesn't know how to fake scum-hunting. Either way, this looks bad.Bunnylover wrote:
Wasn't giving myself an excuse, I simply have nothing to add at this point, but when I do I will post, like now.Porochaz wrote:
Hello. No opinion at all after 7 pages of pretty much content. Might not be major to you but you should be mentioning the minor things instead of giving yourself an excuse to hide in the shadows.Bunnylover wrote:Too many people all attacking each other for some reason that probably shouldn't be attacking :<.
You all gave me a headache reading these pages <_<.
I haven't gotten any reads on who could be positive scummy, so my vote can wait.
I have a different way of thinking which could mean that my thought process of this could be totally off, but it seems like you want me to vote for one of the several people that are gaining the attention (Dana, UA, JDodge, etc.) of most of the group, or you want me to find some minor detail that will allow others to exploit which could mean nothing at all. There is no point in me mention minor detail unless someone wants a specific person dead or will is trying to lead some down a wrong path and stray from mafia.
Like I said I have a different way of viewing things, which could mean my entire post is wrong.
I would change my vote now, but I still want a response about dana-meta, because I have some follow up questions in mind in either case.
"I haven't gotten any reads on who could bepositive scummy, so my vote can wait."
I don't play like everyone else, I don't go THIS PERSON HAS A SLIGHT SUSPICION OF BEEN SCUM SO MY VOTE GO ON HIM."
When I vote, its because I am more then sure that the person I am voting for is mafia, or someone who is harmful for the townie.
I have given my opinion, but not on what you guys want. I don't think the people who have posted have shown positive scum, some have done some things that are a little suspicious, but to gain anything in game you have to risk yourself, which i did state, and I gave my opinion on Poro action, which I guess you just ignored.
Also my post states that I think differently, so I'm not sure if I am correct, so why question me on rather or not you should believe me. You don't have to believe me, because its my opinion. And if I wanted to hide why would I even answer Poro post if he is the only person out of 24 people who actually noticed that I posted. If I wanted to hide I could have ignored it and just let it die as everyone else try to dominate the topic.
And i don't know how to fake scum hunt. I really don't know what that mean to be honest :<.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
@ Furcolow English, but sometimes I get into a rush and make a lot of errors lol.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
He . And I have commented on their agurment, saying it gave me a headache, because honestly I just found it dumb. But why only focus on those two? There is several people who have commented on other people play style, but it seem everyone who confronts me always ask why I haven't commented on them two :<. Honestly neither of those two people seem scum to me, thats my opinion on them. Now I predict about 7 people are going to attack me because I said that. If I have something to say/comment on/defend/attack or w/e I will post. Out of 24 people, I'm more then sure not all of them have posted, I am confident to say at least 15 people have posted out of 24, but yes lets focus on the guy who is posting, just not anything that is worth wild.Wickedestjr wrote:Fair enough. I like my vote for Bunny Lover though. This isn't the first time I have seen a player say that they have nothing to comment on, but this is page 11, so there's really no excuse. I'm also just shocked that she doesn't have anything to say about Dana or Furcolow.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
@ Wick: I could have sworn I did say that neither seem townie before when I was confronted the first time, but I probably implied it :<. And no, I was just stating that people would start attacking to show how some people player style were which are to pressure and tunnel on the smallest thing. And the last thing, that wasn't what I was trying to say. I was saying that I don't see why I am getting confronted for "lurking" when their are several more people who haven't posted and yet no one has called them out for "lurking".-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
You play your way and I'll play my way .Porochaz wrote:
Whilst I'm drunk and being a bit of a shit, you have fucked about. Its not that you have gone "oh Im going to be wimpy on this issue" its the fact that you are actively not been useful at all. Why only focus on those 2? Hey, here's a question WHY DON'T YOU FOCUS ON SOMEONE ELSE THEM, HMMM? If neither of those 2 people aren't scum, why aren't they? You havent answered that. Who is? You haven't answered that. Are you going to make an effort to even go down a different route considering you dont agree with anything said so far. No your not going to make an effort. So now you wonder when 7 people attack you. Hey, maybe 9 people haven't posted yet, but at least they have the potential to be useful. You are clearly about as useful as a deflated balloon.Bunnylover wrote:
He . And I have commented on their agurment, saying it gave me a headache, because honestly I just found it dumb. But why only focus on those two? There is several people who have commented on other people play style, but it seem everyone who confronts me always ask why I haven't commented on them two :<. Honestly neither of those two people seem scum to me, thats my opinion on them. Now I predict about 7 people are going to attack me because I said that. If I have something to say/comment on/defend/attack or w/e I will post. Out of 24 people, I'm more then sure not all of them have posted, I am confident to say at least 15 people have posted out of 24, but yes lets focus on the guy who is posting, just not anything that is worth wild.Wickedestjr wrote:Fair enough. I like my vote for Bunny Lover though. This isn't the first time I have seen a player say that they have nothing to comment on, but this is page 11, so there's really no excuse. I'm also just shocked that she doesn't have anything to say about Dana or Furcolow.
Also, if Dana isn't lieing about his claim it seems my way was more right, seeing as I did not believe he was scum.
Also I don't "focus" on people because that stupid to me, it gives a chance of mafia to join in on a lynch.
Also if I said who is scum, would they not go on the defensive? Would that not allow them to protect themselves, telling them they are playing a little to risky?
Like I said in my very very first post in the game, I don't go around voting on people who are slightly scum, I vote on people who I know are scum.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Actually no. I'm more then sure in this large game number their will be a mafia roleblocker, who could possible stop him from invistgating. I would suggest if we have a tracker to track him to see if he visits anyone, or if he is visit by someone, I think it works both way right?Mysterio wrote:None of that exposition was necessary, nor does it even help your case. The fact is we have to unvote simply because we can't know either way. Thing is, if you're not a cop, you'll be outed soon enough. So, no harm in letting you live for now.
Unvote-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
The doctor doesn't have to protect, that his/her choice. Reason been is because the mafia would assume that the doctor would protect the cop, which would mean they wouldn't try and kill him/her, they would just roleblock the doctor, making us kill him since he didn't get to invisitgate anyone, and them getting the ability to still night lynch. Which means the mafia now has a 50/50 chance of hitting the cop, it all depends if they want to risk thinking that the doctor didn't protect him.Xite91 wrote:
I think this is a good idea, only problem is that it outs at least 2 PRsBunnylover wrote:
Actually no. I'm more then sure in this large game number their will be a mafia roleblocker, who could possible stop him from invistgating. I would suggest if we have a tracker to track him to see if he visits anyone, or if he is visit by someone, I think it works both way right?Mysterio wrote:None of that exposition was necessary, nor does it even help your case. The fact is we have to unvote simply because we can't know either way. Thing is, if you're not a cop, you'll be outed soon enough. So, no harm in letting you live for now.
Unvote
Also, a doc will probably try to protect a cop, so the tracker says he targeted some (if he's IS a cop), and was targeted by XXXX and XXXX (a blocker and a doc or a goon and a doc or etc etc) or even more than that.
With this there are two outed PR's for sure (cop and tracker), then out a doc OR get a doc lynched all in exchange for 1 out of probably between 5 and 7 scum depending on how they're set up.
Also you have to keep in mind that most of the time trackers get who they visited and watchers get who visited them, but there are cases with trackers doing both
Also, I probably doubt their is only one cop role in this game, since its 24 people probably their more invisitgating people-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Yeah I even read it and I was confused lol.Xite91 wrote:
Please re-explain this, I think that you mixed up some words.Bunnylover wrote:The doctor doesn't have to protect, that his/her choice. Reason been is because the mafia would assume that the doctor would protect the cop, which would mean they wouldn't try and kill him/her, they would just roleblock the doctor, making us kill him since he didn't get to invisitgate anyone, and them getting the ability to still night lynch. Which means the mafia now has a 50/50 chance of hitting the cop, it all depends if they want to risk thinking that the doctor didn't protect him.
Also, I probably doubt their is only one cop role in this game, since its 24 people probably their more invisitgating people
Mafia will most likely roleblock the cop, but won't kill him because people were saying if he doesn't find anything, we shall lynch him.
So mafia can use their night kill on someone else, have us kill the cop, then have them night kill another person.
This is something I would do if I were mafia, but now that we mentioned the doctor role, the mafia might be afraid of hitting someone the doctor might be protecting, so they go after the person that would make the most sense, the cop (some complicated thinking involved, mainly the doctor won't protect the cop because its too obvious of a kill).-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Guess I got ahead of myself, but more then likely the cop would get lynch after claiming, then coming up empty handed, right?Xite91 wrote:"people were saying if he doesn't find anything, we shall lynch him."
Who said that?
Could I have sworn at least two people had stated it :<
@Opps, I meant mafia at that time in your first quote instead of townie, sorry. Some people like to pressure and attack other for the smallest detail was what I was saying in the second. Well of course I would find anyone who is suspicious and accusing me of stuff suspicious.
So your going to ignore what just happened with Dana and with me giving my opinion. Ok, thats your way of playing.Porochaz wrote:
No, it's not.
You don't vote for people on minor tells. Thats fine. You don't give your opinion... at all! Thats my problem. You are not helpful.unvote vote bunnylurker
@xRec Why did you revote for Dana?-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Wouldn't it be better if we let the mafia lynch him?Furcolow wrote:he has no chance of using his role whatsoever
if he doesnt die, and there's no protection, he's scum
if he actually is a cop, they will stack their kills on him
therefore, if he is a cop, he won't ever be able to investigate at all, as he's going to die
by lynching him, we are protecting our other power roles from being lynched
and yes, i can lynch a claimed cop day 1 if he is lying
i believe he is lying
i can lynch danakillsu on day 1
I mean at least we won't waste our town vote on him, and the mafia would have to use their night kill on him.
Isn't that better for us, to make the mafia lynch someone who we are iffy about?
Also by lynching him, we give the chance for mafia to kill another of our power role.
How can you say we are protecting them?-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
idk, I don't get why Wraith is pushing us to vig Frank so much, makes Frank look scummy and makes Wraith looks scum even after flipping Frank.
I'm going to post my opinion (OMG I'M POSTING SOMETHING?!)
I believe Wraith is scum by his current action. He knows that no one will follow his plan to lynch himself, so he going to try and stop Frank lynch, which he knows he can't, so when Frank is flip and shows townie (assuming that he is townie), everyone will lean that Wraith is townie. This would only work if Wraith is mafia because he knows who is townie and who is his scumbuddy.
I'm more then sure I was thinking more, but it seem that I can't remember is, but thats the jest of it.
Like I said in my first post, I will only post if I am more then sure the person is scum, and this is what I believe in.
Vote Wraith-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
What does WIFOM mean :<.
AlsoUnvote, vote Furcolow
Your desperate.
Your starting to use defense like if I die the town loses, I am so townie, Xite is so mafia.
With your lynch Furcolow, if you flip townie, those on your wagon or those who pushed your wagon may have something to worry about.
But by your play style, I highly doubt that.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Most of your opinions are voided when you flip scum .Furcolow wrote:unvote:
vote: bunnylover
you are bandwagonning scum-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
I doubt the mafia would kill either of the two. No one believes DP, and they will most likely role block Dana instead of killing him.Wraith wrote:To conclude the above: I urge the doctor, whoever he is, to protect dana instead.
Doctor its up to you if you want to protect Dana, but I would advise against it, I think it would be a waste of your action.
Also I don't believe DP claim as a cop. He just comes into the game, and like 3 post in he role claims. Way too early for that kind of move, and honestly if he is telling the truth it puts the townie at a disadvantage because we will probably lose a PR role now.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
So your stating that you lied about been a vanilla townie, and are now saying your the doctor role.Furcolow wrote:Would it help if I admitted I breadcrumbed doctor?
I don't buy it.
I bet next your going to claim your a vigilant :<.
Either way what does it matter if your a doctor? Your going to constantly have to protect yourself now, which makes you useless during the night kill, and the way your playing your just going to be a distraction to the townies.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
nhammen died who was a mafia goon.
Didn't know he was a suspect, but glad that he died, one less mafia to worry about.
Dana what was your result of your night action-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Im conflicted.
Dana posted that he actually read someone, who just so happened to die, and got innocent.
I just don't believe it x_x.
I can somewhat understand the no role block.
I can not believe that you would search the one person mafia targeted to kill, especially since you just posted that Wraith should be lynch and you would lynch him any day of the week. Why didn't you invisitigate Wraith if you wanted him to die? Why DavidParker when their were more people who were suspicious?
Confused and conflicted is what I am.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
I don't want to mislynch, nor did I want to re-read 29 pages to find out if someone told Dana to invistigate that person, or maybe their was a post I missed that just seemed scummy, or something.flinter wrote:
while the post is decent, it lacks a vote, and sadly bunny seems to be very hesitating on this subject. While in his arguments, everything points to Dana being scum. Now I wonder, what would cause this hesitation.Bunnylover wrote:Im conflicted.
Dana posted that he actually read someone, who just so happened to die, and got innocent.
I just don't believe it x_x.
I can somewhat understand the no role block.
I can not believe that you would search the one person mafia targeted to kill, especially since you just posted that Wraith should be lynch and you would lynch him any day of the week. Why didn't you invisitigate Wraith if you wanted him to die? Why DavidParker when their were more people who were suspicious?
Confused and conflicted is what I am.
This could be because Bunny doesn't really know if he should bus. This could be because bunny doesn't know if it is wise to try to mislynch a cop, but I can't really see this post coming from a townie. I could certainly see a Dana-Bunny scumpair (ironically Dana is likely scum for the reasons Bunny gives.
VOTE: Bunnylover
Dana must have a reason to why he search the person he did, and I want to hear it from him before I make a decision.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
1)We had two cop claim? I missed that, I thought we had a Vanillia townie claim who then switch to Doc. claim.@.@ wrote:
This post is decent? This post REEKS.flinter wrote:
while the post is decent, it lacks a vote, and sadly bunny seems to be very hesitating on this subject. While in his arguments, everything points to Dana being scum. Now I wonder, what would cause this hesitation.Bunnylover wrote:Im conflicted.
Dana posted that he actually read someone, who just so happened to die, and got innocent.
I just don't believe it x_x.
I can somewhat understand the no role block.
I can not believe that you would search the one person mafia targeted to kill, especially since you just posted that Wraith should be lynch and you would lynch him any day of the week. Why didn't you invisitigate Wraith if you wanted him to die? Why DavidParker when their were more people who were suspicious?
Confused and conflicted is what I am.
This could be because Bunny doesn't really know if he should bus. This could be because bunny doesn't know if it is wise to try to mislynch a cop, but I can't really see this post coming from a townie. I could certainly see a Dana-Bunny scumpair (ironically Dana is likely scum for the reasons Bunny gives.
VOTE: Bunnylover
1) It doesn't take into account game scenario. I don't know if a situation exists where I get counterclaimed in a large normal as a cop and I DON'T investigate the person who counter-claimed me. Can you think of one? Secondly, we had two cop claims d1, and we just had one proved to be BS. Does it really make a whole heck of a lot of sense that they were BOTH fake? It doesn't to me. This post reads as disingenuous to me, because it really feels as if bunny is looking for a CONCEIVABLE reason to pile on dana, but nt a likely one, or a good one. He's not thinking in depth in his arguments, and suspicions, as I would expect a town player to do. It seems like he's short cut arguing. "Well, here's an argument the town might run with." without putting in the leg work to see if it makes complete sense given the state of the game. "Hmmmm isn't THAT convenient" instead of "I wonder what a town player and a scum player would do given this scenario."
2) I agree with flinter that the tone of this post is off. If Bunny really does not believe that a town cop would do what dana did, then he should absolutely be voting dana. The post seems like he's throwing dirt out there, and hoping it will stick. This has three possible scenarios in my mind. First, he is scum hoping to get the town cop lynched and then be able to say that he wasnt on the wagon, or he is scum trying to bus, and is leaving his options open based on which direction the town goes this post could easily be seen as the basis for a vote if a couple others jumped on to the logic "I was against dana all along" or he can backpeddle and vote for someone else if it doesn't seem to be gaining momentum "I was dazed and confused etc."
I like myVote: BluebunnyFor now.
Also, hi everyone.
Never said Dana claim was fake, I was just question Dana because I was confused as to what he did.
If you look back on Day 1, you will notice I never voted for Dana nor do I want to since he claimed cop. I don't think Dana is scum, but I'm not the best scumhunter so.....
o.o You also missed the fact that I was the one who posted what I believed the mafia would do knowing that Dana had claimed cop, I think of both scenario, but sometimes to trap scum you must leave out details, although that doesn't work if others point out the details you leave out.
2) Don't want to lynch a cop without asking their opinion on what they did. Or it could be the 4th option, I want to know why he did what he did as I stated before.
I lol'd at bluebunny lol.
Anyways I want to know his opinion, I believe its in this game that I said I don't vote unless I am positive the person I am voting for is scum, or someone has brought a case up that I can't see to be wrong. You all can believe what you want, but it seems like your just looking at my post from a scum view and not a townie view. But w/e, its ya'll votes .-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
@_@ why are you trying so hard to look townie? Why would you ask someone "What do you think of me"? I found that stupid.
1)Never said I wasn't good at mafia, said I wasn't good at scum hunting.
2)I was questioning him. Wanting to know the answer, question him, waiting for the answer. I am also giving my opinion on the situation too, I'm sorry i did that I guess?
3)Thats not what I was discussion. I do not believe Dana is a scum cop, I have never seen a scum cop, and why would scum need a cop they already know who the townies are don't they? That whole post makes no sense to me, re-explain it to me please.
4)I want Dana to explain, it is suspicious that the same person he invistigated died too. That why I made the comment "Why DavidParker when their were more people who were suspicious?" I didn't know people had suspicion of him, it was a shock to me.
5)You play your way, and I'll play my way. I believe I also posted this statement in this topic too.
I don't get what you mean by committing to my post. I want him to answer/respond to my post, I am going to keep bring that post back up if he ignores it, their is no reason you should say I'm not committed to it. And where did this "not voting" thing come from? I said I don't vote unless im positive about someone or someone has brought up their case, I never said I never vote (Double negatives :<).
Also I don't understand what it matter if my post is questioning or attacking. I want answer for them, you can think of it as however you want, but since I posted question in my post I'm going to say its a questioning post.
I"m done auguring with you. You really aren't listening to me and no matter what I say your going to believe what you want to believe, and so be it.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Yeah, I guess I didn't pay attention, unless I'm just having a brain fart and thinking so someone else.UltimaAvalon wrote:Bunnylover wrote:1)We had two cop claim? I missed that, I thought we had a Vanillia townie claim who then switch to Doc. claim.
Seriously?Bunnylover wrote:4)I want Dana to explain, it is suspicious that the same person he invistigated died too. That why I made the comment "Why DavidParker when their were more people who were suspicious?" I didn't know people had suspicion of him, it was a shock to me.
But if DavidParker did actually have suspicion on him (no one has told me yes yet), why would mafia target him (assuming they did and someone else didn't), I would have assumed that mafia would allow him to live just so we would day lynch him due to his suspicion.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
omg i feel like a total idiot now x_x.UltimaAvalon wrote:Bunnylover wrote:1)We had two cop claim? I missed that, I thought we had a Vanillia townie claim who then switch to Doc. claim.
I'm just going to quote these two again, and hope you actually connect the dots this time, or actually go and read the last two or three pages of Day 1.Bunnylover wrote:4)I want Dana to explain, it is suspicious that the same person he invistigated died too. That why I made the comment "Why DavidParker when their were more people who were suspicious?" I didn't know people had suspicion of him, it was a shock to me.
I don't know why DavidParker name didn't make a click in my head.
I feel so stupid right about now. The only reason I can think of that I ignored him was because someone said that he usually fake claim.
That answer my first post then.
Last time I'm going to respond to you @.@
1) I honestly say it as you were trying to draw attention to yourself like, "Hey look at me, I'm been productive!" That how I saw it.
2)Your second question confused me.
3)That wasn't what I was doing, I was just saying I could be wrong. Nothing more, nothing less, if I'm wrong I still have to take responsibility and everything.
4)You said scum cop lol, I got confused by that too.
5)I didn't remember that DP claimed Cop, so I can't argue their.
6)The proof is in this thread, read it, I'm too lazy go find it.
The rest of your post:
Stop assuming things. I have not posted he is scum, or that I am getting a scummy vibe for him, or a townie vibe from him, I haven't said anything. I asked him something because I forgot DP claimed cop, which makes perfect sense to invistigate the person who claimed on him who was lieing. I just simple forgot which is my fault. You say town has no reason to set up the kind of arguement you said, thats true. I'm not setting that up, because I never thought of it, because I don't need to think of it because I'm town.
I said I'm done arguing with you because your going to believe what you wish to believe. You honestly think I am a mastermind scum who is trying to set up an elaborate plan so I can go back to it later when I'm in trouble. It's irritating me that you don't simply say, "Oh, that could be right, you could just be trying to do this. But I believe you are trying to do this." What you are doing is, "STFU. I know this is what you are doing, why don't you just admit it and get it over with." That is how I am seeing you address me and frankly I won't be able to get through to that.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Anyone who was cop would have targeted DavidPaker who claimed he was the cop to in a try to lynch Dana.
We have to believe in Dana claim, which is most likely true since I don't see anyone else countering it.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
No it was Furclow who said he breadcrumbed Doc.Robbnva wrote:
if I was a cop, and it was any other player, yeah I would probably investigate the person claiming my roleBunnylover wrote:Anyone who was cop would have targeted DavidPaker who claimed he was the cop to in a try to lynch Dana.
We have to believe in Dana claim, which is most likely true since I don't see anyone else countering it.
BUT right before DP claimed it was posted he fake claims often even when he is town, plus later he changed to say he breadcrummed Doc
it is that point that clearly he isn't mafia and he is VI instead
now Dana not realizing that makes him either a stupid cop or not a cop at all. Cause what easier way to keep your cop story alive than to claim you investigated the dead guy.
Now I'm not ready to lynch Dana just yet cause he could just be a stupid cop.
Its a troubling situation, but I believe Dana needs to survive for now.
@Benmage: I don't understand your vote. Your voting for me for fence sitting, when I was seeking for answer so I can make an educated vote.
I know it was Furclow who claimed VT then Doc, I stated that in the post your quoted, what I had forgotten was that DP claimed Cop even though he was a VT. I was thinking that I wanted Dana to explain so I can say ok this guy is scum his explanation doesn't help his case or ok that makes perfect sense to why you invistigated him, but he doesn't have to because DP claimed cop which was a lie so Dana was obviously going to investigate him since he knew he was lying. If I had remember that DP claimed cop, I wouldn't have asked. Don't understand what your "wtf" at. I forgot DP claimed, I've said that like 14 times already.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Bah. I have a strategy for that game and the reason why I acted how I did in Day 3. The other days their has been reason for my votes, day 1 lynched the person who was positive scum, day 2 Beloved Princess really had no choice.Robbnva wrote:
going back over reading some things and this stood out at me, than I went and looked at some of bunny's other games, and she/he sure does vote alot in the Super Smash Brothers games, and the reasons given for those votes don't match with this statement. And reading some her other posts it seems like she is trying to buddy up to the town a little bitBunnylover wrote: I don't play like everyone else, I don't go THIS PERSON HAS A SLIGHT SUSPICION OF BEEN SCUM SO MY VOTE GO ON HIM."
When I vote, its because I am more then sure that the person I am voting for is mafia, or someone who is harmful for the townie.
I don't believe I have a meta if that is what your trying to go on to decide if I am townie or scum.
As for the buddying, I am trying to buddy with no one, although I do see some of my post which can be seen that way.
So I'm not truely understanding the case against Wraith. I believe we are voting for him for self voting and wanting to kill himself and that fact that he said Frank was townie yet in the end still voted for him saying nothing could be done to save him. So because he was certain that Frank was townie, which he was, we still need to lynch him? Wraith just doesn't come off scum to me, nor imo does his action speak out scum like I was expecting. It seems like people are trying to push Wraith wagon with a weak case.
Looking at the ISO that Wraith made, I don't like that Xite came to the defense of CA before CA could state something about it. The buddying is a little too obvious for me to call that this is scum buddying, but Wraith ISO on CA seems the most logical votes for today. He attacks a person for parroting, while he is parroting is the main thing that I can not overlook.
Vote: ConfidAnon-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Meow.
@Lowell
637- bunny references "scum roleblocker" [-, how does he know these things?]
This is a large normal game, right? Are you seriously saying you don't expect a roleblocker in this game? I have yet to play one game that has not had a roleblocker.
198- bunny explains his lack of voting as strategy [-]
Wasn't stating anything as a strategy. I simple said I don't vote unless I'm sure about someone been scum, or someone has made a very good case against someone in my eyes. Its not strategy, its just me. Play style I guess.
414- ditto bunnylover [-]
I gave my reason for voting him, he was been an idiot with his defense and using ultimatums such as Townies are going to lose because of a D1 lynch.
I don't like the case you have made against me. I am a defensive player, if someone votes against me you will see my question them, even if its one vote. When I switched my vote to Fur I stated my reason, don't see any guilt your talking about. As for the roleblocker, that is a common scum role and a townie role, so I wouldn't see why not to mention it. Should I have waited till Dana got blocked to mention OH HEY GUYS THEIR MIGHT BE A ROLEBLOCKER?-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Blah, wouldn't it be easier if you point out how you relate Porochaz to GodFather before we make a decision to follow you.Kise wrote:You guys didn't know I'm the Godfather Hunter? Lynch Porochaz, see his flip, then be amazed.
@hiphop: Do you still want me to answer that "question" of yours.... (?_?)
Also, how in the world did you expect people to know you were randomly voting Wraith at the top of the game? You carried a serious tone so there's nothing for anyone else to detect randomness behind it. People have had this argument many a time in MD, but I personally don't believe that every game has a set stage that requires everyone to be random. In your case, I think it was just convenient for you to throw down the excuse that your D1 vote was random so you could lazily avoid explaining that wack bandwagon request.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Usually yes I do, but I would be lieing if I said I read every single masspost that a person makes.Xite91 wrote:
hey bunny, I have a question... do you read massposts?Bunnylover wrote:
Blah, wouldn't it be easier if you point out how you relate Porochaz to GodFather before we make a decision to follow you.Kise wrote:You guys didn't know I'm the Godfather Hunter? Lynch Porochaz, see his flip, then be amazed.
@hiphop: Do you still want me to answer that "question" of yours.... (?_?)
Also, how in the world did you expect people to know you were randomly voting Wraith at the top of the game? You carried a serious tone so there's nothing for anyone else to detect randomness behind it. People have had this argument many a time in MD, but I personally don't believe that every game has a set stage that requires everyone to be random. In your case, I think it was just convenient for you to throw down the excuse that your D1 vote was random so you could lazily avoid explaining that wack bandwagon request.
Probably 70% or 80% i read them.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Lowell are you voting Poro just to start a wagon?Lowell wrote:unvote, vote poroto find a wagon that sticks.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
I just don't think Wraith is scum.ConfidAnon wrote:
No, I am voting him because he voted Frank while saying Frank was Town (a complete inconsistancy), along with other points I have outlined in my case.Bunnylover, 862 wrote:So I'm not truely understanding the case against Wraith. I believe we are voting for him for self voting and wanting to kill himself and that fact that he said Frank was townie yet in the end still voted for him saying nothing could be done to save him. So because he was certain that Frank was townie, which he was, we still need to lynch him? Wraith just doesn't come off scum to me, nor imo does his action speak out scum like I was expecting. It seems like people are trying to push Wraith wagon with a weak case.
Looking at the ISO that Wraith made, I don't like that Xite came to the defense of CA before CA could state something about it. The buddying is a little too obvious for me to call that this is scum buddying, but Wraith ISO on CA seems the most logical votes for today. He attacks a person for parroting, while he is parroting is the main thing that I can not overlook.
Vote: ConfidAnon
The parroting point, in regards to dana, is valid. However, I have to wonder why you are voting for me (when, if I recall correctly, that it the only point against me), whereas there are several points against Wraith?
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.ph ... &start=925
Trying to self sacrifice himself, knowing that he would be lynch for that, doesn't add up.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
I can't argue with this. I don't see how.Gorrad wrote:
Wickedest, look at this. This is my response to you, Bunny, and all the others. Wraith here is admitting that the only reason he's been self-sacrificing is so that people WON'T lynch him.Gorrad wrote:
This is you pretty much admitting that the only reason you've wanted to get lynched is for townpoints. Once more, guess who needs townpoints. Hint: Not town.Wraith wrote:Because you should totally just lynch the guy who wants to be lynched. That's smart in any game. Whatever, I've made my cases, lynch me now so I don't have to waste anymore time here.
Vote:Wraith-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
But he made two.Robbnva wrote:
I ignore your WOTs cause I don't care what you have to say about me.Wraith wrote:Wow, amazing. My two WoTs were COMPLETELY ignored. Especially by my primary suspects and wagoneers.
@dana: If Xite was my scumpartner and bussing me then laying off all of a sudden was the stupidest decision, ever. My bus was in the bag, Xite's major town cred was assured...Oh wait. I'm town, Xite's town, and you're being an idiot. Open your eyes, read my damn WoTs, and tell me what you think.
I do have 1 question, what is wrong with a pro-town person thinking that a person is scummy if they try to make a huge case to show everyone that he is scum, when he actually isn't
I know what i am and if somebody tries to convince everyone I am something I am not, of course that person gets top of my FOS list.
One on you and one on Mysterio.
Whats your reasoning for ignoring the post on Mysterio?-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Of course a person will post more the more pressure people put on top of him/her, they would want to prove that they aren't scum and convince us that they are townie.flinter wrote:
typical. Mysterio gets under pressure, Mysterio disappears.Flameaxe wrote:In other news, I'm prodding Bunnylover and mysterio.
Just compare it to Wraith. The more he gets under pressure, the more he posts. If he could just manage to produce a little more interesting things...-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Wraith I know I've been flip floping on your vote, but here my reason:
I believe you were trying to gain townie points by been one of the only people defending Furclow, even saying you would sacrifice yourself to save him, made me iffy on you since unless you were mason together or had some kinda other role that allow you to know which side he was, no one would make that gambit day 1.
I also agreed with a lot of what Gorrad is saying on your post, which I have posted I've agreed with.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
With the deadline tomorrow, I guess I will hammer.
In all honest if this flips scum, we need to take a re-re-look at Wraith.
Unvote, Vote Mysterio-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
@Xite: I think you misunderstood him. I believe he was saying, people are going to constantly be voting against Wraith, which will allow scum to have a bigger chance of lynching someone else they want gone. If we continue to allow Wraith to live, he is going to continue be a thorn in our side, until someone find out his role.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Antihero can you explain your reason on your vote on me.
@At the whole Dana not been blocked thing:
Why exactly would scum block the cop that everyone is doubting and want dead? Everyone obviously would question why he hasn't been roleblocked, why he hasn't died, and etc.
So are you all honestly saying that you want to lynch a claim cop when no one else has claimed they are the real cop, have a chance of him dieing and actually been the cop, then were all fucked because the townie info role just died and now everyone going to go run to look at who was on the wagon and start picking those people off.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
From a scum point of view, yes it is smart to kill the person who has a history of fake-claiming.
Why? Look how things are playing out.
Do I get why Dana is been allowed to invistigate? A little. In my eyes its more suspicious for a claimed cop to be allowed to investigate then to have him obviously roleblocked.
How would his counter claim be called out in D2 if no one believed DP claimed?-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
I'm a master in disguise ;D.
And Yes, I am a guy.
Also I'm surprised its taken this long for someone to bring up the lynch of mysterio.
Imma post later with some actual content with all the new post.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Because I'm busy
Probably the only reason my vote isn't on him.
Still gotta read 3 pages.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
I just lol'd.Robbnva wrote:let's test the cop
Vote Xite
Xite comes up scum than lynch dana
If Dana is scum, claiming cop, then he would know who is town.
If Dana is town, is the cop, then he would know who is town.
Their is no logic in lynching the people he lynch and is saying he is town.
The only way to prove is what he saying is true is by a tracker or you lynch him to see what he flips.
You are trying very desperate to get rid of Xite.
Vote Rob
No I haven't read the rest of the thread yet, I just saw this and was like lol.
@Xite: I don't think Gorrad is going for the typical policy lynch. Gorrad doesn't know how Wraith normally plays, and therefore it wouldn't be a policy lynch (right?), he wants Wraith lynch because he knows scum isn't going to do it as it derails votes.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
24 people, and we think their is going to be only 1 cop?
I would rather kill Hip-hop (or whoever his replacement is)
Most likely watch it flip scum, allow Dana to live, eventually he going to have to out another of his scum buddy to keep alive, and we just keep doing this until Dana is the only one left and then you all can go crazy and lynch him.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
well the reason I'm not pushing for his lynch, is because Kise did not vote him.
Kise would obviously search the person who is claiming to be his role, and since he never put a vote on Dana, that must mean he got an innocent on him.
Kise wouldn't want to reveal himself unless necessary to save Dana, which would cause them both to most likely die in the end.
Kise also had his vote on Porochaz, saying he was godfather. Kise probably searched Porochaz and got innocent on him, but didn't believe it. Its possible for someone to have GF role, but I don't think we should look into it atm.
Vote: Hip-Hp
@Shanba: Although it is a bit of a stretch to have this many roles, I think it still has a chance to make it plausible that we need to take into consideration. I am not saying you are wrong, but even if Dana is scum, he will have to continue to give up his scum buddies to save himself.
Also, who did you investigate Dana? I don't know if you posted it and I just missed it or you haven't posted it yet.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
I'm voting Hiphop, because Dana got a guilty on him.
Doesn't guilty mean scum?
No, I believe Kise knew Dana was the cop.
I don't know if Dana knew Kise was the cop.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
lmao I feel like an idiot.
I honestly don't have anything to say to that.
I wasn't lieing on purpose, it was an honest mistake, but I can understand your suspicion due to that.
The only thing I can think of why I directly said that Dana found Hip-Hop scum, then asked for his investigation is due to the head ache I had, but that really isn't a good excuse.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
@Mod, do we have to vote for Baby Spice or will our vote still count?-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
But Kise never put a vote on Dana.
That what I don't get. Kise would obviously investigate a person who claimed him, since he didn't come out and counter claim, right?
If Kise did investigate Dana and came up scum, then why not put a vote on him?
Their is another possibilty.
That Dana is actually a cop, but is a scum cop.
Is that something that can be done in a game like this?-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Try taking out your lungs. I believe that works :<.
I don't like the fact that everyone here died except for me:
Hiphop [3] (Dana, Lowell, Bunnylover)
Guys what are ya'll opinion on the reason their is two deaths.
Is it because their is a Vig or a SK role?
I am leaning on their been a SK role due to the kills that have been made at night.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
That can wait later can't it?Antihero wrote:
Yeah, I don't like that either. But it can be easily fixed.Bunnylover wrote:I don't like the fact that everyone here died except for me:
Hiphop [3] (Dana, Lowell, Bunnylover)
VOTE: Bunnylover
What is your opinion on Vig or Sk?
Which one do you think their is?-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Day 1, I will be honest, I am totally useless and this was one of the 3 first games I joined. I was trying to see how people play, and posted when I had something to say. So I can understand what you mean by anything tangible, but I did give my opinion on Dana scumminess on post 7 on my ISO. Is it good and a lot? No, but it is my opinion on Dana for a little and I gave just my opinion. As for the Warith to Furclow thing, did you not read my post when I voted them? Furclow was been desperate and stupid. Oh I'm a VT, no wait I'm a doctor now. Your telling me you didn't find that stupid? Wraith I posted that WIFOM situation practically where he was only trying to get people not to vote him and townie cred because he apparently knew Furclow would flip town.
Day 2, I was suspicious of Dana in the beginning because I forgot that DP had faked claimed Cop, and that he actually got an invisitgation off. After I read the last 5 pages of Day 1, I realized my mistake and understood why Dana invistigated that person therefore my suspicion was not on him. I never jumped on Dana, I was questioning him as an other person would have. About the votes I voted for CA because I agreed with Wraith ISO, then Gorrad showed me where Wraith posted that he self voted to protect himself, so I switched over. I don't find anything strange about that switch. I hammered Mysterio. My reason, I honestly don't have a god damn clue what I was doing. I feel like a freaking idiot because 1) We didn't get him to claim and 2) I practically just set my lynch up.
Are you saying that if I claimed Doctor (in no way is that a claim this is just a example) as scum, and no one counter claims, you will still be up for my lynch? If someone comes out and claims a PR that is big, I expect someone to counter claim or otherwise I'm going to believe them. Now I should have expected that they wouldn't CC because it was Day 1 and they didn't want to out themselves.
Btw it was only 5 <_<.
Preview Edit: I raised the question of SK or Vig because I'm 100% sure their is a SK, and no one else has brought it up yet although I am sure everyone suspected it. Their is another reason too, but I rather not post it as it will lose its meaning.-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Not a good idea to claim. We have no doctor, therefore the vig/sk would die this night if they were to come out.Wraith wrote:
This is a good guess, but it is actually advantageous for SK to kill lurkers, because they provide little to no reads back on him. If an SK, for example, killed people who accused him, that would be bad play. Lurkers are a safe kill. So it can still go either way. I need to check the player list. If we had a vigilante today or tomorrow might be a good time to claim, so we aren't blindly looking for a nonexistent SK, based on how many scum might be left.My Milked Eek wrote:
What are you insinuating here? You do know hiphop died and is town, right?Bunnylover wrote:I don't like the fact that everyone here died except for me:
Hiphop [3] (Dana, Lowell, Bunnylover)
The vig/sk is killing off lurkers, nitwits.
- nhammen
- benmage
- kise/ua
- baby spice/lowell
In the case of baby spice, I'm willing to bet he went with dana's first day 4 post. But other than that, he's killing off lurkers, which is not a thing an sk would do.
MME, I am expecting a quick lynch on myself from viewing that alone to happen.
Preview Edit: What was Xite defense on Dana?-
-
Bunnylover Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2454
- Joined: July 19, 2010
Because Hip-Hop was replaced and is already dead?Gorrad wrote:There is no chance whatsoever that Hiphop will be lynched this game.