Purple Orange wrote:Kise wrote:Purple Orange wrote:In terms of lining up lynches, where does your "Reck-Nero-PO-Espy orgy" you've been pushing since the beginning of the game fall?
Well, dear, it's only proper to want to lynch 4 players that you feel share a scum QT. As opposed to, you know, your 14 player lynch-list.
So it was the "if one's innocent the other is guilty" deal that that bothered you? And...um...the sheer numbers of mine?
What do you mean "one's innocent the other's guilty?" I does not compute, but if this is an attempt to confuse/frustrate me, it's not working. I've expressed numerous times how I don't like your and Reck's ignorance to no NKs, and I also didn't like Esp's call for real discussion when he was providing nothing himself (IIOA). He got a fire lit under him after that point, but of course he would after I called him out for it.
Purple Orange wrote:Kise wrote:If the majority of players are inactive, then the majority are obviously town. I have fallen into the inactive category so my
current
line of thinking is that townies are somewhere in the 90's% range of those other inactives... if not 100%.
So...minority action = mafia? "I'm doing this and I'm town, therefore everyone who acts like me is town?" What kind of reasoning is THAT?
Mine.
Rather than dispel me from my line of thought, why not ask how I'd reevaluate things if my suspects flipped town? 'Course you wouldn't ask such a thing.
Purple Orange wrote:I mean, mine might not be much better, but it's more along the lines of: The mafia will be trying to blend in with the town. They try to do what the majority of the town is doing, or they'll stand out and get noticed and die. When town's active, they need to be active, even though lurking is usually more in their interests. When the town is coasting along doing nothing...golly, guess what? They can go coast along doing nothing, draw no attention to themselves, and blend right in, and survive.
There's no cops, so mafia can draw as much attention to themselves as they want. And if this is how mafia is playing according to you, then who are the scum that are blending in?
Purple Orange wrote:Kise wrote: Purp, I'm not sure how long you've consistently played mafia, but I know better that lurkers and people who barely contribute (or fail to contribute completely: werewolf) are NOT always scum. It's a matter of you actually attempting to figure out why each player would do certain actions as both town and scum, then take note of it, then weigh which of the two viewpoints reads stronger compared with interactions of other players - This, instead of lynching minimal players in lazy fashion.
Of course I know that. You guys are the ones putting words in my mouth saying that I'm going after people
because they're lurking
. PP is the only person I said I'd be willing to lynch for his lurking
K.. gotcha.
Purple Orange wrote:When someone posts fewer posts, it often makes it harder for me to read them, though I've tried my best. And again, I'm also currently of the "scum are probably lazy and going with the flow" school of thought, not the "scum are acting as an organized force of doom" school of thought. Any correlation between lurkiness and people I'm ok lynching will be based on those factors. If it looks like conscious and deliberate lurker hunting, fine, it looks like conscious and deliberate lurker hunting. There's not much I can do about that.
What led you to think scum are lazy, again?
*
*
*
*
*
EmpTyger wrote:Llama’s the one insisting otherwise.
Llama, your rebuttal? This makes me want to undo my minimalism.
werewolf555 wrote:The problem is that this game will go on for at least two more months because of the no-night policy.
Not if there's a town sweep from here on out. This sounds like a complaint that there's no night kills.. hey, that's good.
No town deaths at night, kno'm saying? You shouldn't want night kills right now. All that town can do in general (any game) is vote to lynch, so if you're town, use your vote and don't worry about night kills. Sorry, dram, but wolf's gotta go.
Kcdaspot wrote:it go boom.
Hehe... I see Reck's point now. You go off to get BS' approval for some case, then don't present it or even reveal the contents, so now I have to
unvote;
wagon
vote: kcdaspot
They have escaped into the mansion where they thought it was safe.
Yet…