I've been busy all week so I'm going to speed read through this ASAP to make sure I have everything down.
I'll post content as soon as I do that
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
Îdher wrote:
Zepher: Why are you saving your reads? What possible benefit is there for that?
Knight of Cydonia wrote:Uh, yeah. I have 30 posts in this thread. You picked out a whole 1 in your ISO. Really?Reeeally?
Yosarian2 wrote:
Um, he was town. He's dead, we know his alignment. Also, I was saying he was town all game, it was pretty clear from his posting.
Yosarian2 wrote:
Anyway, it's bizzare that you would do an ISO on me and then not mention all the actual important stuff I did, like how when I replaced in I was at lynch -2, and I defended the other main suspect (Ethos, town), the #3 suspect (Hiraki, town), and instead went after Quilford (scum) who only had one vote on him at a time. You know, the stuff that townies actually look at when they're trying to figure out someone's alignment, like how did they intearact with known scum, how did they react under pressure, did their actions seem to be pro-town or anti-town, ect.
Yosarian2 wrote:
It wouldn't be so bad if you looked at all that and then created a case that I was distancing or something, but it seems like you just skimmed through my posts, ignored everything that actually mattered, picked out a few things you could attack me on, and then called me scum.
Yosarian2 wrote:
The rest of your post is pretty terrible, too. The day 1 scum wagon on Empking that forced him into a bad claim was pushed by Îdher, me, Saporovirus, and kunkstar7, and you just called ALL of us scum, which is just beyond absurd. You didn't even mention the day 1 quilford/ empking wagon in ANY of your ISO analysis. What kind of townie tries to read and analyze the whole game but ignores the sucessfull wagon-to-a-claim made against a scum?
Magister Ludi wrote:Why are we still arguing about whether or not to lynch empking yesterday which seems to have no value in finding scum today.
MrZepher is scum. Ask if you want cool cat reasons.
SpyreX wrote:....
All those good Zeph feelings? Gone.
SpyreX wrote:The fact that you're still a fresh enough young buck that literally going you're voting for me thus scum is, in fact, scummy as all getout.
Magister Ludi wrote:
Swag wrote:Para, you've made a lot of unbiased posts, and not very smart moves. You're trying to cover yourself up too hard. Obvious scum is obvious. VOTE: Parabollocks
This was Swag, looking like a scum trying to hop onto the crappy and easy lynch of parabollocks.
Magister Ludi wrote:
Hiraki and KKC are okay [vigging targets]
Vote: Untrod Tripod
Dramonic - Null leaning scum
You want two town vigged here (assuming KKC is Knight of Cydnoia). While this doesn't immediatly make you scum, not finding or voting scum for extended periods of time makes me think YOU are scum looking to gun down poor innocent townies. And you seem to be all over the townies this game! You can't really argue this, its an outside irrefutable observation!
Magister Ludi wrote:
I find Yos' slip damning, and Idher's potential chainsaw damning.
This is crap, since both are probably town.
Magister Ludi wrote:
I'mtoo lazy to look for questions directed at me.almost
Laziness is more likely to come from scum than town in my experience.
Magister Ludi wrote:
NOT BEFORE I GET MY WALL UP. FOOL.
Usually people who want to stall to get a nice 'awesome' wall up are scum. They want to hide any sembalance of scumhunting in a mountain of text.
Magister Ludi wrote:
ISO 16 wrote:Townier than null: KoC,
ISO 20 21 22 wrote:tl;dr Ludi is scum.
Hmmm, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, I think you're scum for this flipflop.
Magister Ludi wrote:Idher wrote: You're flailing SO hard right now.
No, i'm not. I think you are voting me for completely made up reasons. You are not clear at all. I would like you to bullet point, or number, in a single post, the reasons you think I am scum and the actions you think I have taken that are more likely to come from scum than town. I haven't seen anything from you, and I want it.
kanyeknowsbest wrote:what?MrZepher wrote:And basically confirming night kills and vig shots looks bad.
in SpyreX's 1526 wrote:
...
Idher is dead tonight. However, there's NOTHING that can prevent that shot. So, I say one of LLD, Zeph, Kunk get lynched and the other shot. Personal preference is LLD lynch and Zeph shot by a small margin over kunk.
...
Lady Lambdadelta wrote:MrZepher wrote:It's either or, I just don't want to take part in Mastin's gambit at the moment, not until I get a better sense of what's going on here.
So wait.
You believe that one of Mastin and Ludi is scum. Just one.
And you want to lynch OUTSIDE the 50/50 (from your perspective) in favor of another lynch?
Magister Ludi wrote:Read for yourself. Why do you want me to hold your hand? I've already given you multitudes of reasons why each of these players are scummy and should be lynched one and then two.
I helped speed lynch LLD, who flipped mafia, and I didn't push on chair, who flipped town.I'm not sure what mastin has done to give you a town read, but so be it. If you don't want to decide between then, lynch them both we me.