I know where you've been! Scumbag!
C'moon guys we can do it let's lynch him by the end of page 1!
Ok so you admit being scum with IH?Fircoal wrote:No, you have failed. Not me.Twito wrote:WE HAVE FAILED! WE ARE ON SECOUND PAGE AND IH IS ALIVE!!
*weeps miserable*
Trust me.Fircoal wrote:What is your proof that IH is scum?Twito wrote:IH is scum. You said your goal is to get rid of all scum. IH is scum so he is part of all scum.
It's everyones goal to lynch IH page one who is protown.
OkFircoal wrote:How do I know your pro-town?Twito wrote:Trust me.Fircoal wrote:What is your proof that IH is scum?Twito wrote:IH is scum. You said your goal is to get rid of all scum. IH is scum so he is part of all scum.
It's everyones goal to lynch IH page one who is protown.
Defending scumbuddy IH are we?Zarvok wrote:Twito wrote:I will add it to my sig and ask him to add it to his aswell. "IH is scum!" will do? Then we can lynch him?FoS: Twito
I mean, I gather that "IH is scum" is something of an in joke around here, but this seems to be getting to be a little much. Just a friendly warning.
You are absolutely right there is no way I would be spamming the thread if I were to be town.Raging Rabbit wrote:I don't like the "IH is scum!!1" thing one bit, and find you more suspicious than Twito for jumping on it.pevergreen wrote:Vote: IH
Why? Cause he is scum
The Kangaroo is always right.
You're also a newb, and therefore not part of that in-joke.
FOS: Twito, mostly for spamming the thread.
Unvote, vote: pevergreen.
Yes we passed first couple of pages so it has stopped. Thanks to you of course for spamming us through those couple of pages.Raging Rabbit wrote:You seem to have stopped the "IH is scum!!1" thing, so my main objective is achieved.Twito wrote:The FOS doesn't really make any difference to me. There is nuttin you can do to change the way I'm sorry to disappoint you. It will only encourage me.
For the win.Raging Rabbit wrote:Thanks.
What's ftw?
I don't accept your explanation for the FOS. FOS means Finger of Suspicion and I don't see how me spamming is suspicious meaning that you ain't really hunting scum.Raging Rabbit wrote:Btw, Twito - DP seems to find you scummier than I do, why address my FOS but not his vote?
Also, if you accept my explanation for the FOS, why are you still voting me?
I dislike with logic behind that vote aswell. But your wagon is idd growing so nice and fast that I'm getting suspicious about it.Raging Rabbit wrote:Lots of peole seem to dislike my vote on pevergreen (I'm on 6 votes atm), none of them has yet to explain exactly why that is. What's wrong with my logic?
I'm not referring to any game in particular.Raging Rabbit wrote:I'd explain the difference since I think it's very distinct, but don't feel too much like quoting other games either. Until we know each other's alignment there it's also not too useful to draw information from that game, IMO.Twito wrote:We are not starting fresh from 0 info. I have played with plenty of people here before and I'm not ignoring the information that provides me with. It's not unfair information coz everyone here is able to read past games if they wish.
I'm however not going to quote ongoing games or something stupid like that, don't worry.
I'm not referring to only you in particular. You taking this so personally is rising my scumwibes about you again.Raging Rabbit wrote:Generally speaking, nothing wrong with that. We don't have any completed games with each other, though.
I'm actually just playing mafia which doesn't really have anything to do with personal feelings. I'm not pissed off at you, don't worry. I will only lynch you if I think you are scummy.Raging Rabbit wrote:I'm pretty sure you're just pissed off at me for reasons that have nothing to do with this game. Do you honestly want BM as your bodyguard? You hate the guy...Twito wrote:I actually feel bullied, have a real weak character and want a bodyguard.
We have seen those lead to lynching scum.IH wrote:Yep. Not trying to stop a mindless bandwagoning lynch at all from people not explaining their logic.
nope.
Not at all.
= )
I read that like 10 times decided that I don't understand it as to me it looked like unvote at the same post you quoted and decided not to ask about it.Raging Rabbit wrote:Only you did unvote, and I'm an idiot. Sorry.Raging Rabbit wrote:I really don't get why you'd make such a post without unvoting me yourself.IH wrote:unvote, vote:BM
Quit wagoning you shameless wagoner!
Also you others, FOS:Pever, Keysmath
Stop it! You shouldn't jump on a wagon that far advanced when we're barely out of the random stage!
mole wrote:Hooray! Let's all take a stand against uselessness!
Why is this? Nobody's playing style is sacred, you say you've been lynched before because of yours. If you'd like to make an argument that those people hating on die-roll votes are just looking for an easy lynch or something, then make it. Otherwise, why should anyone's behaviour be above reproach just because they do it every game? It's a good a starting point for discussion as any, I say.Twito wrote:I find people jumping on MoS for his dice roll scummy. Especially if they keep pushing after explanation.
Ah good. Scum willing to give up yet?IH wrote:Zarvok, I'd say mostly because the post you quoted wasn't craplogic. I believe I already explained it. Kthanks.
So the scum will get fed up with my badgering and nagging and give up. Duh.Twito wrote:Why do you encourage him to talk MORE?
See IH I knew he would just love your nagging!RR wrote:I honestly like your playstyle.
You are so terribly wrong about this.Raging Rabbit wrote:I really don't think anyone would be stupid enough to actually claim mafia.
For 20 bucks I'm willing to claim flying scum pumpkin that shoots lazers of it's ass. No wait I've done that before without being paid..Fircoal wrote:No, but the scum paid me 20 bucks to claim scum.Cheesefan wrote:Would it be an honest claim?
Ok! I'm scum with RR, Cheesefan and blahgo. Now pay me!Cheesefan wrote:If you give me names ill give you 100 bucks.
Raging Rabbit wrote:*Blatant Advertising*There's now a Mafia Strategy Thread discussing my game philosophy. Y'all may be interested in checking it out.*/Blatant Advertising*
Now lets get back to actually playing the game.
Twito wrote:The way RR does it is the wrong way and the way Twito does it is the right way. 'Nuf said.
QFTFircoal wrote:Actually, RR is the most annoying, and they show more to finding scum, then who spams.
:DRR wrote:putting me at the kinda dangerous lynch -4
QFTIH wrote:Errr, so we can try to see if you're scum or not? Town needs all the posts they can get. You might be able to get a read on people, but we can't get a read on you, so we can't trust you.Chibo wrote:What is this stupid rule where i have to always post, even though i have viewed the thread every day. Requires far less effort to get off my back and let me just browse instead of post. Ugh.
So you suspect her of being a townie and that's why you might vote her soon?Dragon Phoenix wrote:I'm tempted to switch votes to spectrumvoid, and I might do so soon. I'm simply not buying this. If you get a prod for a game that you really had forgotten about (in spite of a mesage with your role), you don't post "Am I in this game?" whereas one quick glance in your inbox and in the thread shows that you are. I think you may be trying to set up a defence in advance that your role was boring (i.e. townie).
GETTING annoying?Battle Mage wrote:wow. a prod.
I dont really have anything else to say atm, other than that i think RR's arguments are getting annoying. Im still happy with my vote for now.
BM
No, I got what you meant.Dragon Phoenix wrote:Is this a serious question?Twito wrote:So you suspect her of being a townie and that's why you might vote her soon?Dragon Phoenix wrote:I'm tempted to switch votes to spectrumvoid, and I might do so soon. I'm simply not buying this. If you get a prod for a game that you really had forgotten about (in spite of a mesage with your role), you don't post "Am I in this game?" whereas one quick glance in your inbox and in the thread shows that you are. I think you may be trying to set up a defence in advance that your role was boring (i.e. townie).
Thank god! SHUT UP AND DIE!Raging Rabbit wrote:This is quite possibly my last direct response to you in this game.
No.Raging Rabbit wrote:I want everyone on my wagon to consider the following question - if I get replaced, will you unvote me?
I surely felt like you pushed his lynch for it.Raging Rabbit wrote:It was a pretty dumb and pretty scummy play, and I feel I explained myself enough on it. Never voted you or pushed for your lynch, though.
Back to usual RR are we? Repeating already answered things. I'm pretty sure you giving up is cuz you are scum and are out of ways to defend yourself.Raging Rabbit wrote:SV, just look at the following post:
The fact that no one even bothered to respond to this is my main reason for wanting replacement. I just can't be bothered to deal with personal attacks with no real basis. Sorry.Raging Rabbit wrote:While I know Twito far too well to actually expect anything other than pure ad hominem, can any of the other 6 (!!1) guys corrently voting me back themselves up with anything other than not liking my vote on pevergreen? Anyone even has an opinion on blahgo voting me to get me and Twito to shut up and/or MoS voting me for something 3 other guys are way more guilty of, while completely forgetting to even mention Twito (with both votes putting me at the kinda dangerous lynch -4)? Anyone at all?
Same thing. Always scum asking to be replaced. The one and only time I've been replaced I was scum myself.spectrumvoid wrote:I've also realised that scum are generally the ones who asked for replacement when they're being attacked.
Try this: ignore Twito.
Twito is in all of them but Twito really doesn't have anything personal againts you. Againts your playstyle a little bit as you keep repeating things over and over and over and over.. and over.. and over again.SV wrote:Sorry to hear that RR. Would you be interested in playing an open game to hopefully make mafia fun? Or try a large game, there're a few signups going at the moment.
QFTIH wrote:RR, you're taking things to personally. Most of these things you call "personal attacks" are not personal attacks.