Mafia 58: Ready Salted - Game over!
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
If nobody looks scummier than anyone else then the town has done a lousy job, or the deadline is too soon.Amb wrote:No Lynch is not never good. Its actually a very good play on day 1 when a deadline is looming and no particular player appears scummier than others. There is no point in risking outing town roles or lynching poorly in that situation. Of course it has to be a last ditch thing, not the first point of call.
You won't find many takers for the idea that a D1 no lynch is better than a random lynch. When deadline comes around the town should scramble to reach a decision. It forces people to take positions.
No lynch is good e.g. when there's just one scum group, it's lynch or lose, and there's an even number of players alive.
unvote yellowbounder, I think he is awol.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
What post led you to believe this?phita23 wrote:VOTE: DragonsofSummer
Because everything is based on a lot of speculation, I'll vote for DragonsofSummer because he suggested a nolynch.
Just a hunch but I think this guy might be scum too, delurking in order to save his scumbuddy (whose posts are the only ones he's read)-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Not only did we get a GF, they killed someone I had no read on and who was late on the bandwagon. Lucky us.
I find it rather suspicious that this is your first contribution, having stayed completely out of the spotlight while the LG wagon went down. You didn't even vote.theopor_COD wrote:Good night on the whole only one down, no serial.
First of all I'm amazed Livingod was a Godfather, complete shambles from his point of view, I'd also be inclined to think a few of his buddies gave him up and jumped on the lynch, just to make themselves look slightly more innocent. However I also think some of those not voting him look pretty sus aswell.
Having looked at the previous day's voting Rand Althor, Scotmany, Phita and Battle Mage worry me the most.
However, even if you're scum, I'm pretty sure you put some fellow scum on your list. And it's not a bad list.
I do not really think Battle Mage or Scotmany are scum. They both seem too obvious (if you interpret them as defending LG, which in Scotmany's case seems pretty iffy to me).
There's a lot of reason to think a number of people are town imho, so our position should be pretty good.
vote: phita23for voting DoS for seemingly false reasons. Explain yourself pls.
Comment on Battle Mage:
Here he's unvoting DoS, not LG. So not even obvious defense here. A little weird I suppose.BM 146 wrote:Well i gotta agree that Livingod has been acting a bit scummy in this game, but im equally wary of the fact that such a large majority is already wagonning him. Really, there is such little challenge there, im wondering-if he is Mafia-WTF are the rest of em!?
Unvote-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
It's true that Twito was late on LG, but reading his posts I am inclined to believe that Twito was just being a good townie. Notice that he didn't just hop onto LG, there was clear reason that made him confident about it.
There should be more votes on theopor_COD.Let me do a post by post recap...
Jan 29:
Feb 1:Hello everyone.
Interesting start.
Note lack of content. Note several days' separation.
Just seems to have provoked plenty of reaction early. Looking at other games this one seems to be lively.Kelly Chen wrote:Question for: theopor_COD
What did you find interesting about this game's start?
Feb 8:
Note 1. noting town's good luck, 2. setup speculation (no SK), 3. wishy washy paragraph of suspicions before getting down to it (these are basic scumtells related to looking for stuff to post without actually helping the town or making commitments).Good night on the whole only one down, no serial.
First of all I'm amazed Livingod was a Godfather, complete shambles from his point of view, I'd also be inclined to think a few of his buddies gave him up and jumped on the lynch, just to make themselves look slightly more innocent. However I also think some of those not voting him look pretty sus aswell.
Having looked at the previous day's voting Rand Althor, Scotmany, Phita and Battle Mage worry me the most.
This post from Scot one reason why
Just seems like he knows Livingod is scum and votes Twito (due to his gut feeling) but also uses the old willing to switch line if it appears Living appears doomed. As such Vote Scotmany12Right now, the only vote that I am even considering is the one that my gut is telling me. Even though I know that you will all most likely attack me for this vote simply because I have a gut feeling, I feel it is the right thing to do.
Vote: Twito
I guess I just don't trust you.
However, if more information comes of on livingod being scum, then I am willing to switch.
I admit I did #1 myself.
In my humble opinion this case against Scotmany sucks, although it doesn't necessarily mean theopor_COD is scummy. "I'm willing to switch" strikes me more as something that would be said by scum looking to moveto a townie, not fellow scum. I'd expect scum looking to switch to scum to say "I do think LG is fairly scummy" not "I need to see the case," since this latter just invites more discussion on LG.
Also, there's nothing wrong with voting on gut; his Twito vote certainly wasn't out of nowhere (look at his earlier posts); and so it seems to me unnecessary to look at this Twito vote as a move to save LG or whatever might supposedly help scum.
Feb 8 (response to me saying he was suspicious for not posting day 1):
making excusesApologies for not being much help for the first few days, one I can't get on every day, two the speed of the lynch was quicker than lightning, the guy didn't even have the chance to offer a claim.
Feb 8:
WTF is this???? This is why I first voted theopor_COD, what is this stuff here --^^^ ??Unvote, Vote Battle Mage
If he's not mafia then I think Cheesefan and Kaleidoscope most definately are.
He was also asked about this by Cheesefan, and he hasn't answered.
As before, I find the above scummy because Battle Mage was one of theopor_COD's suspects. And if Cheesefan and Kaleidoscope's pursuit seems scummy to theopor_COD, why in the hell would he want to go along with them?
My theory is that theopor_COD wanted to gently hop from Scotmany to (the more popular) Battle Mage and felt he needed to say something while doing so. What a sneaky guy eh!
Feb 8:
Possible scumminess in seeming to undermine his own suggestion that RA was scummy (e.g. "You just worry me because of something that sounds lame now that I say it out loud, and hey I worry myself LOL").
Just the vote for Riverwind on page five, sometime after the no lynch discussion had expired.Rand Althor wrote:Well BM deffently deserves a fos:BM, theopor_COD can you give a reason why I worry you?
Mind I worry myself most of the time.
As for Scott I think your half hearted vote for Twito same page and then the I'll vote for Livingod if it becomes evident he's for the lynch quote.
Feb 10:
Feb 10:
Just a gut instinct I guess, your post reeks of wanting to vote Livingod but not because he's your Godfather.Scotmany wrote:Um, I honestly had no idea whether or not Livingod was scum or not. I would really like to here why you think I knew that livingod was scum.
I find this response awfully scummy, as Scotmany didn't say anything remotely similar to being happy to jump to LG if it looked like he'd be lynched.
I wasn't the one who made out I was voting someone on a gut instinct, but would happily jump to another if he looked like being lynched.Scotmany wrote:So as i see it theoper. You are voting for me because of my gut instinct on twito. However, you are voting off of a gut instinct too. Hypocritical, are we?
confirm vote theopor_COD-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Twito is this your case against DoS?
Looking back I really don't see what DoS wasn't commenting on that he could've been.
I'm inclined to vote Amb for his case against Twito.
I agree with Twito's suspicion of OverTheUnder for this post, which I could definitely see as scum trying to look like they're joining a wagon for a good reason. But I could see it as lazy/busy town piggybacking also. And hey, I think the case against theopor_COD is so obvious it barely needs to be laid out.
phita23 doesn't look any better, but he's probably awol.
I want Rand Althor to comment on the theopor_COD wagon darn it!
And I want theopor_COD himself to pick out some scum suspects from it.
Chibo's vote for theopor_COD ("Need to get on with the game") is a little fishy. Though that's such an overtly bad reason...-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
It'll help if we use our votes to create some pressure. I'm not really frustrated with anyone currently voting an oddball though.Panzerjager wrote:I agree completely with COD here. I don't see how Kelly says he got townie points and this page when he basically told everyone voting on someone who only has 1 or 2 votes to wagon COD or OverTheUnder. I don't see why we should stop voting for who we feel is scummy. But hey I feel my vote should be switched.Vote:Riverwind
I don't think COD is acting extremely protown at all. His last three posts poked at three different people (and rather uselessly I thought), all harder targets than Chibo, where his vote still is.Ok, my suspicsion of Twito has decreased due to COD acting exetremely protown. Twito I still have my eye on you. My eyes are also on BM and Chibo. At this point Chibo should be vigged for their is no reason to keep a lurker in the game.
Your mileage may vary, but Scotmany's Amb vote is one of the most not-scummy posts I've seen. It's beyond me what COD disliked about that post.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Maybe he didn't change his mind about Chibo...theopor_COD wrote:In response to Kelly Chen -
I found Scot's vote scummy because firstly he was voting Chibo, his post 325 was pretty emphatic
Then next time he posts he quickly changes votes to Amb, what made him change his mind about Chibo so much? Is that too difficult to understand why I found it slightly scummy, Kelly?scotmany12 wrote:Vote: Chibo
Think about it. Why else would you not want to post unless you are scum?
You also said that there were more "obvious" people to vote than Amb. It's not clear to me that this is the same issue you describe here. Is it?
We'll get less information from lynching him, since he probably won't fight back, and he probably won't be defended.Chibo mind needs to put in an appearance it's been a week, instead of Vigging him can't we just lynch him. And yep my vote is still on him, mainly because I think he's the scummiest out there, appearing or not.
I have the impression that you're doing the safe thing in continuing to vote for Chibo, but if one of your jabs at another player takes hold, you will gleefully move your vote.
This post sucks though. How can every single one of his suspicions be based on the thought that scum bussed each other.As for the case against Amb, I don't see it so much, Amb has pointed out why he found Twito and OtH scummy in this postAmb wrote:FOS Riverfor being Livingod's first vote (and for saying "My heart scares me. It has evil ideas" :p)
Minor FOS OverTheUnderfor being the hammering vote (A reluctant scum perhaps?)
Vote Twitofor "The wagon on livingod lacking speed just proves that it's on scum."
1. Potentially sounds like inside knowledge
2. He was late on the bandwagon himself. Does his statement apply equally to him?
3. Besideswhich there wasn't evidence of any description. Someone had to be lynched and we got lucky. The lack of speed on any bandwagon can be attributed to 'Town' players who don't honestly know if the target is scum.
This reasoning is awful too, other than the "uncalled-for hammer" charge.It's not as if he's just started to suspect him, there's also a case for voting UndertheOver for hammering the Godfather as ~n9v~ points out here, although again I'm not convinced on an OtH vote.
~N9V~ wrote:Actually,Vote: OverTheUnderfor the uncalled-for hammer on livingod. I beleive he is scum, hammering the Godfather, because he knew that he was already screwed. So he decided to make it look like he was town.
I'm not saying Amb is scummy for saying he's willing to move to Twito. I didn't find that post of Amb's scummy. I just don't find anything scummy about Scotmany's vote; I think it was quite positive especially considering that the Chibo wagon is proving useless.Anyway I just don't really like Scot's quick change based on Amb's post, especially as Amb has already pointed out his feelings on UtO and Twito. You Kelly seem to be defending Scot a fair bit aswell, anything in it?
I'm defending Scotmany because I think the case against him is dumb.
Not really. Lowell is the one who wants to go after Scotmany again.Another thing worth pointing out to Kelly, you seemed to be convinced on Phita, has anything changed since Lowell replaced?
I don't think that post reeks. I feel like I know where he's coming from with that.Elsewhere I can't for the life of me see how Riverwind has gained any townie points, all he seems to have done is posted irrelevant drivel and this post just reeks.Riverwind23 wrote:ok, all the people on the little one votes should switch to a meaningful bandwagon or at least a possible one.
His posts have a lot of drivel, but I don't think it's scummy. It's not like he's flying under the radar, or trying to look more useful than he is.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
I think both Cheesefan and BM are probably town. So I've kind of ignored that argument.theopor_COD wrote:Anyway if we're looking back at the previous lynch, what do you make of the Cheesefan/Battle Mage argument?
I'll have to look back and see what the case against Kaleidoscope is supposed to be.
A brand new theopor wagon would be exciting however.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
I find this kind of talk extremely scummy.~N9V~ wrote:Also, one more thing. If I was in the mafia, I would've killed OverTheUnder Night1, for hammering their GodFather. But no, they hammered spectrumvoid who did what? Put him at -1 to lynch, which I guess is a pretty good reason. Heh, guess I should've looked all the way back on that one, before I started typing this one.
Although I can hardly imagine that the scum group is collectively so stupid as to NK someone for this reason...
This is not helpfulBut if thats not enough, I strongly beleive that he is scum, that if we lynch him and I am wrong, then you can lynch me the next day.
Please do not direct the doctor. That is also not helpful.Or if I'm right, I pray the doctor in this game will save me!-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Does Lowell not realize theo already got up to 8 votes?Lowell wrote:Okay I guess no one's buying the theo thing... yet.
unvote, vote Kaleidoscopefor the sheer thrill of aggression.
Yeah this after a vote for Kaleidoscope. Looking for the more viable wagon.Yeah okay, that sounds better.
unvote, vote AMB
I have my eye on Lowell but the vote stays on Amb.
Much happier with OTU right now.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Quick question
I'm not sure what you're getting at or commenting on here.IH wrote:
This is clearly a counterwagon. Livingod was at three. DoS was at 4.Kscope wrote:Livingod clearly needs to die. He posted after DoS made the semi-scummy post without saying anything about it, then after Sham notices he votes along.
SCUM
SCUM = VOTE
UNVOTE VOTE: livingod-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
I find myself remembering Switch Mafia from about here, the only other game I've played with Lowell. He was kinda scummy town.
Looking over Lowell's posts here though, nothing even strikes me as that scummy. phita's post was kinda scummy, but not enough to stop me from betting that Lowell is town. The vote hopping doesn't strike me as very suspicious I must say; someone needs to make the argument that he tried to make it look like it wasn't vote hopping or something. The argument that he didn't explain his votes (I believe I read that charge somewhere) actually makes vote-hopping looklessscummy I believe. I hope I'm not attacking a strawman here.
Let's see. IH also asks what I think of BM thinking that scum are after him. That seems pretty ludicrous iirc. Glancing back at the vote counts there are only a few people voting for BM, like Cheesefan a couple weeks ago, Riverwind, Kaleidoscope, Rand Althor. I think there is scum in this foursome, I doubt somewhat that BM is scum, but I think if scum are voting BM they merely hope he's an easy lynch. He might be.
Lowell asks who's the scummiest on his wagon. This will require another post I think as I'm running out of time to write this. Let me just paste:
Lowell- 7 (Twito, Rand Althor, panzerjager, ~N9V~, Amb, Cheesefan, DragonsofSummer)
Relying just on my memory I believe the most likely to be scum are RA, ~N9V~, Amb, possibly panzerjager. Really can't remember much about panzerjager. I had the impression that Cheesefan is town. Twito seems town to me, but circumstances also suggest he is town (I'd say the same about DoS; I seem to recall some sentiment that he might be scum anyway, but I'm not familiar with the cause of this atm).
Another post will have to do better justice to this question.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Posting to say I'm here, don't need replacement, and should participate better in the future.
The thing is that I frequently glance at this game, view all posts by the people being run up today, and feel really ambivalent about lynching any of them.
I'm keeping my vote on Amb right now, as I feel he's a better lynch than Lowell. I'm not sure about say N9V or Panzerjager.
I hope to read all this stuff tomorrow and make a better post.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
I concur with IH
Fos: Jalyn
Fos: Panzerjager
People behaving oddly wrt Lowell is more a reason to vote them, not him.
I will probably be switching to N9V.
EWP: actuallyunvote vote N9V.
I still say Chibo/mole/Jalyn is a decent vig choice. maybe theopor_COD. I got to remember to look and see who contributed to letting all the air out of his wagon.
wtf?Panzerjager wrote:can we lynch Chibo? He really isn't playing at all so would it be wise to lynch him if he isn't really playing? He is like a silent vanilla townie.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
I do not like theopor_COD's weak criticism of me and IH (people he fairly rarely comments on), citing a general principle that vigs shouldn't be directed, when in my mind it isn't clear why in this game the vig shouldn't be directed, especially by "experienced" players.
Unless of course theopor_COD would like to say explicitly that he suspects one or both of us as being scum. But I have a feeling he won't be doing that unless there's already a wagon going.
It also occurred to me just now that yellowbounder/alko is pretty likely to be scum. (Had to check who alko replaced.)
What do you guys think? al_ko + theopor_COD scum? Who are the rest?-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
That you still view the game in this light makes me feel you are mostly uninterested in committing to an opinion that someone is probably town. I.e. you want to keep all your lynch options open.theopor_COD wrote:And why wouldn't you be scum, eh? You seem to have convinced a lot of ppl that your townie, I'm not convinced, mind I'd have to re-read it all to get a better opinion and being as we're one day away from a deadline I'd be happier lynching Lowell or ~n9v~. Although it's noticable that Amb has gone silent.
Also I don't think anyone should be directing the vig unless they havehard solid evidence of which you have none! Your last post to me indicates experienced players have a right to direct a vig, well thoseexperienced players have as much chance of being scum as town, let the vig make his own mind up, especially being as it's only day 2.
I will consider you less dangerous if you say who you think is town. And not something like "he's either scum or scummy newbie town but I lean towards town"*. Tell us a couple of bandwagons that you wouldn't be joining any time soon.
Anyway, my point isn't that I think experienced players have a right to direct a vig, it's that I feel you want to throw dirt at me and IH without actually claiming to suspect us.
*references:Okay well Cheesefan has offered a reasonable defence still suspect him, I'm pretty happy with a lynch of Lowell, I've already expressed my opinions on him.
unvote, vote Lowell
Good reasoning. As such unvote. You seem to have cleared a few things up for me.Lowell wrote:Lowell, although I thought he acted scummy at first has brought up some decent reasons for his actions so I'm happier about him.Anyway ~n9v~ is either scum or a scummy townie, I'd lean more to a scummy newbie townie.
By the way, I believe we learn jack from lynching town.We will probably learn more from lynching Lowell, yeh I know it's bandwagon hop-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Due to the lack of time and unusual lack of interest in consolidating votes, I guess we should lynch N9V and think about nabbing theopor_COD tomorrow.
No. I'm not sure what this is a response to. When I said I think we learn jack by lynching town, this was a reference to you suggesting we lynch Lowell because it would be informative.theo wrote:Your absolutely certain Lowell's town then?
If this is a reference to me asking you to name some people you think are town, then I think you are twisting my meaning.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Hint: There is a clue on this page.
Also, I went ahead and read through all his posts. He could be scum. We'll see.
FOS Rand Althorfor the theory that scum attempted to discredit {Twito, ~N9V~, Cheesefan, Jalyn, theopor_COD, Amb, Rand Althor, Battle Mage} by killing Lowell. That's not a very intuitive theory to me. I think it's much more likely that scum just decided it wasn't worth it to keep trying to get Lowell lynched.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
It's allowed, but I consider it evidence in this case that he only has them to wreak havoc.theopor_COD wrote:
Ah so now a ranger is also kardkraizee? Or was should I say.Kelly Chen wrote:I'm guessing now a ranger is a kardkraizee alt, since I'm pretty sure now a ranger has done similar crap.
Search is disabled atm so I can't grab evidence for this.
Is that allowed having two usernames?-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
A few comments as I read. I might be repeating myself.
[quote="scotmany12"]Maybe it was the mafia, and they killed lowell knowing that scope might possibly be the prime suspect. They could be setting him up.[/quote]
How does this work? And how does this work more than, say, killing an innocent N9V would?
I have searched my heart and come to a reasonably positive opinion of refusing to vote Lowell even at the expense of NL.
[quote="Panzerjager"]I screwed up my vote in my second to last post. I posted "Unvote:Lowell" and I meant to Unvote and vote Lowell. Still there is no excuse for Kaleidoscope to push for the no lynch. Vote:Kaleidoscope[/quote]
FOS: Panzerjageryou opportunistic liar (possibly)
Perhaps it would be useful to look over every post that has voted Kaleidoscope and see who looked like they were trying to come up with some BS justification in their own words or something. For example, I don't like Panzerjager's vote much, but Battle Mage's seems better:
[quote="BM"]what K-scope did yesterday was completely idiotic. As it turns out, we had a lucky escape, and it turns out your mistake hasnt been costly. In fact, i dont believe that this act yesterday was especially scummy. However, throughout the whole of yesterday i had my vote on you, and if i remember correctly, for very good reason.
Vote Kaleidoscope
-2 lynch if Rand was correct. Time to claim?[/quote]
[quote="theopor_COD"]Two things.
One Kscope's vote was scummy but it wouldn't have affected the lynch either way as he has pointed out, Lowell still wouldn't have had a majority.
Two If he's scum it's a pretty stupid move to kill Lowell thus drawing this kind of attention on himself.
Now I'm not clearing him, but this wagon seems to have developed without much thought. I don't think we should clear ~n9v~ either.[/quote]
Thinking theopor_COD is not scum with Kaleidoscope. I do not understand point two.
Town points for scotmany and OTU, maybe Rand Althor. Can't remember precisely why atm, but felt I should mention it.
[quote="theopor_COD"][quote="Rand Althor"][quote="kardkraizee"]because everyone else is[/quote]FoS:The hell out of you for this.[/quote]Maybe I'm looking in the wrong place but this a bit of pot calling the kettle black. Yeh Kard's vote is scummy but not much more than yours.Whatever Scope voted it would be a no lynch at that time.
[quote="Rand Althor"]Forgot to Vote: K-Scope no reason for going for a no lynch.[/quote]
And then you want an alternative wagon setup aswell, why not bring up some targets of your own.
[quote="Rand Althor"]Agreed please don't hammer K-Scope. I'd also like to hear other targets for the lynch today.[/quote][/quote]
Hmm, interesting. My mind tends to see theopor_COD throwing some harmless dirt at scumpal Rand Althor, in defense of townies Kaleidoscope and kardkraizee/Cheesefan.
[quote="theopor_COD"]Rand - not a good one, it would have been no lynch whatever.[/quote]
Okay. This (with underlined section above) starts to look like some unnatural degree of defense to me. It is factually true that Kaleidoscope couldn't single-handedly make the difference. That should hardly clear him entirely.
[quote="theopor_COD"]Erm what are we going to do about Kard? Is he any help alive.[/quote]
dude wtf.
[quote="theopor_COD"]Therefore to summarise I don't really like a few of the early votes on this wagon seems they're trying to set ppl up for an easy lynch, me included due to my wishy washy voting re - lowell yesterday. And I don't like the last few votes on the Scope wagon because they appear to be easy wagon votes,mind like Kardkraizee you can't tell if their newbies or scum.[/quote]
This looks like total bs to me. Is that what newb scum does, is throw together a townie PM?
[quote]Anyway -Vote Twitoas I see him as the main mover in setting up Scope.[/quote]
Twito was the first vote. How does this work?
[quote="DragonsofSummer"]That the scum would have killed Lowell to throw suspicion onto K-scope isn't something I had thought of (obviously since I didn't understand Lowell's death) and and with that to foil against the case against him I will unvote.[/quote]
How does this theory work?
[quote="Kaleidoscope"]I've also said Twito and Cheesefan are likely scum in my eyes as well.[/quote]
to which:
[quote="theopor_COD"]Cheesefan is now Kardkraizee so that rules that one out.[/quote]
So theopor_COD has come around. Kardkraizee is definitely town. But we still get:
[quote="theopor_COD"]kard - you mafia? playing us for fools posting that PM.
now a ranger - you playing? No don't think so, so leave.[/quote]
Pretty sure theopor_COD would've loved a kardkraizee lynch. (Why then say Cheesefan is ruled out as scum? Maybe this makes sense in the context of the small tiff with Kaleidoscope (theopor_COD had thrown some dirt at Kaleidoscope asking him to provide some other suspicions beyond BM).)
[quote="Panzerjager"]Well, that was stupid and pisses me off. I will withdraw from explanation at the moment. Thank you CDB for modkill though. Very appreciated. I understand COD, agruement and my vote was based on me thinking he could have lynched if my vote had counted. I will Unvote. I also agree that we should keep eyes on Twito if he ever comes back with good internet.[/quote]
This blips slightly for me.
[quote="Amb"]How did we end up with no lynch? I will be looking carefully at Panzerjager, scotmany12, KaleiÐoscøpe and al_kohaulec to make sure they werent one of the rabid 'never no lynch' people from earlier (or was that the mcdonalds game, apologies if it was).
I do not like this statement by DOS: "I am fairly baffled why Lowell was killed. To me it would make more sense to let him stay alive and keep the suspicion of the town on him. " ... It sounds a bit distancey.[/quote]
Amb.townpoints+=3; for these observations. Need to take another look at him.
[quote="N9V"]Heh, I'm not enjoying this huge wagon jump onto me, andmight i add, that is exactly what my role said... Does that count as quoting the role PM? Because I didn't say it.
Also, for you who put a vote on me now, I would thin kit would be very scummy to do so.[/quote]
What? Why? Because you've claimed townie?
I'm not sure whether I think this N9V post is scummy or not.
[quote="theopor_COD"]I'm with ~n9v~ he acts scummy but he's town I reckon,and being as we've lost one townie today through Kard's stupiditiy and one last night in Lowell we need to avoid the easy scummy newbie lynch.[/quote]
Uh? Not sure what theopor_COD is doing in this post. Underlined section is a lot of unnecessary wordage I think, beefing up what is just a waffly comment of "N9V acts scummy but he's town I reckon!"
Not sure whether I think N9V post 917 is scummy.
I don't find BM post 920 scummy but I have trouble agreeing with it.
So in conclusion
unvote, vote: theopor_COD
I hope to find time to look over the whole game by player.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Is that four people in a row able to believe theopor_COD was on a joking spree?
"Kard - are you for real?"
"Erm what are we going to do about Kard? Is he any help alive."
"mind like Kardkraizee you can't tell if their newbies or scum."
"kard - you mafia? playing us for fools posting that PM."
Definitely committing Amb and Panzerjager's posts here to memory. I get a "yeah he's scummy, def vote him maybe, but-- hey look over there!" potential from both.
Panzerjager, can you clarify why scum Theo would suggest scum Kaleidoscope (or vice versa) and why Kaleidoscope's actions are more damning than theopor_COD's?
Amb, why do you have to wait for a general consensus to decide whether theopor_COD "made a joke"?
I will take a special look at Amb's thoughts on scotmany however.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Some responses.
How come only my position on Lowell might be insider knowledge?theopor_COD wrote:826 KC presses against a Lowell lynch, maybe some insider knowledge. Prefers a ~n9v~ today and one on me tomorrow, which she is avidly pushing.
Well, he basically FOSed you and told Lowell not to waste his vote.827 - riverwind as usual posts nothing of content
Damn. Amb's vote had no commentary.829 - Amb votes Lowell
830 - BM votes Lowell - both these votes seem genuine to me
Underlined seems false. The attack doesn't seem contradictory to me. Scotmany said he preferred to vote Amb, but if the town were choosing between N9V and Lowell, it should be N9V. Jalyn said she was not getting off "the high bandwagon." Scotmany attacked her for suggesting that was the only reason behind her vote choice.833 - Jalyn seems genuine, Scot then attacks her for it, whilst theprevious post he didn't make any difference to the wagons, seems contradictory to me.
You know it's not a scum tell every time someone picks out a protown player without using ESP.836 - Scope unvotes BM, throws pointless vote on ~n9v~ prior to deadline. This vote wouldn't have affected the lynch, which seems to be the main basis for the seven votes thereafter, however when I first viewed the thread I tended to miss Scope's insistence that against a Lowell lynch, thus again meaning a possible insider information tell.FOS Scope
The only reason it was bollocks is that Scope was voting BM, not Lowell. Take a look at the VC in 835. It looks like Lowell is the only one with a prayer of being lynched.837 - Twito calls Scope out for stopping a lynch, my first reaction to this was bollocks as it wouldn't have been a lynch whatever, the previous voters IH and Scot are also applicable here, but Twito seems insistent on painting Scope as scum.
A reasonable question.841 - Twito back on the attack, votes Scope straight away, my thinking here is why on earth would Scope if he's scum have Lowell killed just after pretty much revealing he thought he was town. I can't see Scope or a scum group killing Lowell basically, maybe that's my poor logic and someone else can help.
I think he may have said as much.842 - KC votes Scope no reason. Seems an easy vote she doesn't note that Scope's vote would have led to a lynch then in 847 she elaborates a little more, without this being revealed I assume it's the fact that Scope preferred the no lynch to Lowell lynch. Forgive me if i'm wrong here.
I was alright with voting Scope due to his seemingly useless deadline vote (I had not noticed he hadn't been voting Lowell). The main reason I voted Scope was to give momentum to Twito's vote.
Why do you think this vote ("I am fairly baffled why Lowell was killed. To me it would make more sense to let him stay alive and keep the suspicion of the town on him.") is contradictory?849 - DoS as far as I can tell doesn't see it, but votes Scope anyway, his vote is pretty contradictory aswell with the "I don't see why scum have killed Lowell" - Infact don't like this vote out of the wagon the most so anotherFOS DoS
I think the suggestion is incredibly unlikely.852 - Twito makes reference to maybe a Vig killing Lowell, this I could possibly understand but it's interesting to note, no-one else comments on it.
Man, I don't understand how that can be your first thought.Scot implies it's the mafia trying to set up Scope which was my first thought when I viewed the thread, since I've re-read it I'm not so sure.
It's a possible theory but it shouldn't be the best one. When someone does something that helps town or hurts scum the first thought should be "indicates town" not "omg inside knowledge".855 - Panzer's vote is somewhat scummy again using the no lynch as an argument for a Scope vote, no one brings up the possible insider info on Lowell's death as a possible theory.
And so he keeps talking about it to bring suspicion on himself.863 - Scope pipes up, firstly didn't realise we needed a majority, seems genuine, thing is even if Scope votes Lowell it's no lynch. Not overly keen on his second reason that he didn't like a Lowell lynch period this again tells me he knew something solid about Lowell pre-lynch.
I don't know what you're referring to here. I don't think I commented on RA FOSing kardkraizee.Bit of chat around Kard's vote, he then replies in 873 because everyone else is, now I'm thinking what the fuck, has this guy not read any of the previous 35 pages before replacing in, yeh i'm pretty pissed of about it. RA FOS's kard for doing so, which seems slightly scummy to me, because he's pretty much doing likewise andalthough KC argues he has a reason in her long post, the reason as I've pointed out is flawed.
I would rather say that if Scope is scum, River looks like he doesn't really want to vote him and so could be scum with him.883 - River seems eager to board the Scope wagon which is still at -2. Votes ~n9v~ seems the easy alternative to me.
I believe this is a lie and you should try explaining again. Your post 884 seems to clearly suggest that Kard should die884 I'm still shocked by Kard and dissapointed, more wondering here if he'll get modkilled which he does eventually.because he's no help alive.
If this is true then Scope would have to be stupid. What could he possibly gain by shouting I TOTALLY KNEW THAT DEAD GUY WAS TOWN! ?886 - Scope seems to have continued insider knowledge
What was the flaw in my plan that had failed?893 - KC another to unvote Scope, votes ~n9v~ doesn't make any other comment. Is it because the flaw in your plan has failed?
It is fascinating that you claim that in post 896 you realized that kardkraizee had posted896 - I'm commenting on Scope's theory that Cheesefan is scum, add that Kard is now Cheesefan and has quoted his PM, so guess Cheese isn't scum, fact that Scope doesn't realise Cheese has been replaced is worrying.role pm and so "guessed" he wasn't scum and then went on to ask him whether he was mafia.your
But no matter how newb and idiot kard is, he has a copy of your role pm.901 - This post is after some interaction between Now a Ranger and Kard, now I was unaware they were alts and the same one, so i'm pretty much even more peeved that Now a Ranger has posted in a game, he's not playing, the Kard are you mafia thing is a jokey throwaway comment, yeh I can see it being taken in the wrong context but ppl have taken it to mean too much KC especially. I don't know how many games Kard has played so although he strikes you as a newbie idiot, I'm just keeping an open mind with the little comment. In hindsight I shouldn't have said it.
Yes it certainly is not much of a defense of N9V, it just looks like it's supposed to sound like it is. You give that post too much credit with that underlined stuff as post 915 was almost totally fluff.915 - My post is not a defence of ~n9v~it's more a look at the people who seem to be using him as an easy place to leave their vote. Which by reckoning is DoS, OtU, KC.
No, I didn't say that. I'm saying I can understand Scope feeling that way.KC first states she would refuse to vote Lowell even at the expense off a no lynch, why may I add, surely a lynch would give us more info than a no lynch?
I mainly attacked Panzer for his vote of Scope. I am not at all sure he was lying about his supposed screw up.Then attacks Panzer for his so called lack of vote on Lowell.
Wth man. I didn't say this. But even so, of course it is "not necessary" to do something as ridiculously scummy as concoct BS reasons to vote Scope.And also argues that it's not neccessary for people to come up with any bullshit reasons for voting for Scope.
I agree with this. This at least was the value of the Scope wagon.The thing to remember the main argument against the Scope wagon was flawed, his lack of vote for Lowell wouldn't have made one iota of difference, therefore I think we should be looking at the people on the Scope wagon. Christ there was seven ppl on it your not telling me all were lynch hungry townies.
Because everyone would accuse Scope of inside knowledge or what?Say's she doesn't understand point two well simply I can't understand if Scope's scum that they'd decide to kill Lowell why is that difficult to understand.
It's just vibes.Say's that Scot,RAand OtU gettown points. Kelly please point these out because so far this page I can't see much from em. OtU has done nothing aside from attack Kard and vote ~n9v~. RA has hopped on the Scope wagon and then jumped off when it was pointed out that Scope's vote was irrelevant. Scot just doesn't appear to be helping with his continued vendetta against Amb. So please point out there town points for me will you.
Scotmany's 851: Aggression towards me (though could be parroting IH), leaves Scope vote possibility open but prefers to put a first vote on Amb. 853 is kind of scummy. In truth not too many town points for these, but I like that he seems to know where he stands. (I do intend to look at him again, though.)
OTU's 871 just gives me good vibes. It's very much not an "under the radar" type post.
Rand Althor's response to me 858 I liked. Struck me as genuine at a first glance.
If I did that you'd say I had inside information. I can't make my mind up because it's two different pieces of information, they tell me different things, I don't have ESP. If you demand my opinion right now, I am certainly not ready to lynch him.The next line say's I'm throwing needless dirt at myscumbuddy Randthis despite the previous line saying Rand got town points, make your mind up!!
Accuses me of a natural defence of Scope, not at all what I'm doing is trying to figure out why Scope has seven votes before many ppl have posted, not a defence more that I'm looking for reasons and keeping an open mind unlike a lot of people.Unnatural defense because you keep pushing that Scope's vote wasn't decisive, as though that totally exempts him from having some responsibility to get us a lynch.
Yes, because you should have realized he was town.Attacks me for attacking Kard, which seems to be her main reason for wanting me lynched now.
What I called total BS was the suggestion that one can't tell whether a newb like Kard is scum or just a newb.Accuses my whole argument of being total bullshit, thing is no one else has even bothered to look for an alternative argument to the Scope must scum, everyone's so damn happy to just go along with it, Kelly included.
Though when I read that section again, I see your point is more about the votes for Scope, not Kard's alignment. So to that extent I take back the "total bs" charge.
After the part of my post where I questioned your Twito vote, my points against you are that I believe you wanted to suggest a kardkraizee lynch (inexplicably), and that your post 915 looks like fluff.There's some more points she raises but it still the same, just trying to accuse me of basically trying to look for alternative lynches. Hell I don't if Scope's scummy, I just don't like the way he got 7 votes before I posted anything that seemed more scummy to me,
Kelly is town. Underlined synopsis of my points against you is hilarious.As for a vote well I'd prefer that everyone takes a look at Kelly so far this game, instead of viewing her so pro-town which seems to be the general consensus, yeh there's a bit of OMGUS in that but she seems to be overly picking me on.What for finding a wagon on Scope suspicious and then finding a replacement a complete retard and waste of time.If everyone could post an opinion on KC that would be nice, if your all in agreement with her then fine she's a good player, I like her, just think she may well be scum herself.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Vote count for my own sake
~N9V~- 4 (Riverwind23, DragonsofSummer, OverTheUnder, alko)
theopor_COD- 3 (Kelly Chen, Jalyn, panzerjager)
KaleiÐoscøpe- 2 (Twito, Battle Mage)
Amb- 1 (scotmany12)
Battle Mage- 1 (KaleiÐoscøpe)
scotmany12- 1 (Amb)
Panzer - 1 (IH)
RA - 1 (theopor_COD)
Not voting : Rand Althor, ~N9V~
I'm not too persuaded on Scope being scum. theopor_COD's recent posts are at least useful. But the inability of his wagon to gain steam is just astonishing.
I made my first big post against theopor_COD in 220. Riverwind FOSs him, acknowledging this might bite him in the butt. theopor_COD votes me. Twito posts
[quote="Twito"]My suspects for scum, remember this after we lynch t_COD:
Riverwind is scum with theopor_COD.
Kaleidoscope is scummy.
Riverwind is scum with Cheesefan.[/quote]
and votes theo. DoS votes theo 226. scotmany 228.
Here theopor_COD comments that he thinks scum are happily joining the bandwagon. If I'm not mistaken there are just four people. Me, Twito, DoS, scotmany. Riverwind declined.
Battle Mage joins 234. Twito tells Riverwind this is his chance to bus his scumbuddy. Chibo/mole/Jalyn joins 240. Scope points out that he pushed LG (in response to Twito's suspicions) and joins theo 245. Townie Cheesefan joins 246.
Battle Mage unvotes 247 because Scope and Cheesefan are on the wagon.
Riverwind calls Twito a jerk but gives in to the pressure to vote theo 251. Says theopor is scummier than BM. Battle Mage remarks on this saying the third musketeer joined the wagon.
Seriously, Battle Mage is probably town! What can he gain from agitating Riverwind over this.
OTU joins the wagon 257. I must say that if OTU were scum, this is the post I would expect from him.
Ah, Twito didn't like that vote either 258.
DoS tells Riverwind he needs to unvote first if he wants to vote theopor. Weird. Enough to convince me that there is at least one townie between DoS and Riverwind to be sure.
Rand Althor votes BM 277 because of his reasoning for getting off of theopor.
theopor_COD posts a defense and unvotes me 281. Without waiting for commentary, Riverwind corrects his mistake of not unvoting, and votes theopor correctly. This suggests to me that Riverwind isn't scum with theopor_COD.
N9V says he wants a claim before he hammers. Riverwind agrees a claim would be nice. Of course he's already claimed. Hrm. Not sure what to think of this.
Twito gets off 287 because the wagon is "too happy." Good point though that N9V and Riverwind look a bit scummy here.
N9V casts random vote for OTU instead. Because of the LG hammer.
Amb moves from Twito to OTU.
Amb says theopor case is not particularly strong 296.
OTU explains 298 why he voted theo, and also points out that N9V could be scum with him.
299 yellowbounder posts this bullshit out of nowhere in response to N9V's vote for OTU
[quote="yb"]This is one of those really annoying WIFOM arugments, not to mention it fails to take into the possibility that OverTheUnder could have just been a townie hammering a godfather.
A Finger of Suspision maybe, but as I've been told, you can't second guess a WIFOM arugment.[/quote]
Ok, actually that's not bullshit but pretty reasonable. But I notice a total failure to comment on other recent events.
Scotmany unvotes with no other direction in 304, apparently satisfied with theopor's defense.
308 theopor_COD answers my request to pick out some scum from his wagon, listing Chibo and Scope as the worst, followed by Riverwind, OTU, and N9V. Votes Chibo.
ah 315 RA says theopor_COD is the wrong lynch, BM better.
N9V 321 is scummy. Asks theopor "why you think I am scum" when he was the last name theopor listed in 308.
hm, I'm the next one to get off of theopor in favor of OTU.
Scotmany moves to Chibo.
Panzerjager's first post is 328. Damn, that is kind of a scummy post. He expresses some suspicion of theopor, Twito, Chibo (vote goes here), Riverwind, BM. Calls me, Amb, and DoS town although says my townness is limited by my interactions with Twito.
Lowell comes in 333 with a scotmany vote, and let me guess, everything went to hell from here.
Trying to decide where to end this post, but maybe I'll keep going awhile. Battle Mage continues being misguided town on this page (14). IH repl water_foul.
Panzerjager agrees 350 with Lowell that Scotmany was let off the mat too easily. That's interesting since he didn't list Scotmany earlier. Says he prefers to keep voting Chibo, though. Two possible scenarios suggested here: 1. Panzerjager is scum happy to consider voting townie Scotmany with townie Lowell, and 2. Panzerjager is scum with Scotmany and wants to say he's suspicious but instead keeps his vote on Chibo. I think #1 would be more likely.
351 is Amb's "I'll join Twito wagon if it appears" that Scotmany (and also OTU) thought was scummy 358 and which fact theopor found scummy 364. Of these three posts I only found theopor's scummy (maybe OTU's too though), although I did not agree with the suspicion of Amb either.
I should say that e.g. Amb and Panzer's idea to vote Twito strikes me as extremely dumb. I was not going to mention it at all for this reason, but I may as well.
theopor 353 is useless dirt thrown at Panzer ("Seems a lot of scum to me, you got some insider information").
367 is vote count listing theopor still as leader with 6 votes. Riverwind (who is voting theopor) asks people to move to wagons that might actually work. I really don't see Riverwind making this comment if he's scum voting a townie.
Panzer 371 is interesting. Strongly agrees with theopor, and disagrees with my opinion that Scotmany and Riverwind got town points on this page. Moves from Chibo to Riverwind. I really don't find this post scummy. Says his suspicion of Twito declines due to theopor_COD acting "extremely protown." Says his eyes are still on BM and Chibo.
375 theopor reminds me that I really wasn't pro-Lowell this whole game.
Scope shows up, still wants BM lynch. Riverwind agrees, says the BM argument has been made at least by others, votes BM. Riverwind here is getting off of the big theopor wagon if I'm not mistaken.
theopor 384 seems ambivalent about BM being scum. Interested to see if theopor ever waffled on this later. He does conclude "I'm not sure he's either scum or he's a townie trying to defend what he thinks is another townie."
385 is Panzer's highly scummy "can we please lynch Chibo because he's like a silent vanilla townie" comment. Other suspects are BM and Riverwind.
Twito 386 is good, I note in particular underscoring theopor's observation that Scope was happy for a BM lynch but not voting him. Missed that. Twito also didn't like Panzer 385.
yellowbounder votes Scope 393, Amb tosses vote on 394 (no commentary), theopor in 396. Hm.
397 N9V says he'll reread but he's not moving his vote (from OTU I believe).
Riverwind 398 is interesting. His thoughts on the game after a reread. Notably, says there was no real case against theopor_COD. And that scotmany was not livingod's cheerleader. Scope is not worth a vote. FOSs Panzer and BM.
399 OTU asks Amb for reasoning. Pretty easy thing for OTU to do. I must say I am not liking OTU as much during this reread.
400 DoS joins Scope wagon "in light of all the information at hand." Alarm bells there.
403 Panzer dislikes wagon on Scope due to speed, but agrees he's scummy. So heunvotesand FOSs him. Panzer wasn't voting Scope was he? I'm pretty sure he was voting Chibo. Did Panzer ever suspect Scope? Is the purpose of Panzer's unvote that he might be considering voting for Scope? SeriousFOS: Panzerjagerfor this post.
EDIT AFTER WRITING EVERYTHING: It must be noted that Panzer relentlessly did not want to vote Scope after this.
404 Amb is highly defensive in response to OTU's question. Other than that it is a reasonable response.
406 OTU pushes back. Clear suspicion of Amb. Not finding this suspicious of OTU.
Scope 410 is a response to yellowbounder's pbpa and vote for him. This post (Scope's) seems to be pure bullcrap, saying there was no reasoning given, FOSing yellowbounder, and reiterating his lame ass opinion that BM needs to die for protecting LG.
Lowell 413 takes on theopor and (still) scotmany. His case against theopor seems to be totally independent of prior events. Interesting that.
theopor's response is ok.
Chibo/mole 416 votes yellowbounder due to not knowing "where he stands on anything"! This seems quite strange considering yb's vote.
Scotmany's defense 418 against Lowell is fine.
theopor 419 responds that Lowell is full of shit and is just trying to save Scope. Huh.
421 another bullshit post from Scope, saying just that he likes how those suspecting him "miserably fail in explaining why. Doesn't seem like the townie way to me." This is how scum talk. And his vote is still on BM.
Amb 424 asks mole for more explanation of the yb vote. Because Amb likes his Scope stance. Notes that he even likes Twito more due to Scope.
hmm, 430 I (me) do not think Scope is scummy. I guess the difference is that I'm meticulously reading through things right now and I feel like Scope is more useless than average.
Scope 446, responding to attacks from Twito, is ok. This goes into the next page and is still ok.
Panzer shows up 464. Says he agrees with scotmany that it was just luck that livingod was scum. Doesn't see anything scummy about Scope except recent discussion, interesting. Says "He is using craplogic to defend crap logic and doing a bad job at trying to make BM seem scummy. I don't believe stupid is a voteable offense."
And once again Panzer unvotes and FOSs Twito. I don't think Panzer was voting at all here?
465 Riverwind wants to know what Twito would do if Scope came up town, and what Twito thinks about scotmany's failure to vote livingod. Neutral feeling here.
Panzer 468 tells Riverwind that Scotmany is def town, he wouldn't have voted LG either. Won't vote scope either. I will give Panzer town points for this post.
Panzer 475, after a reread of Scope I guess, ends up voting Twito. Scope doesn't vote on evidence. His vote for BM is reasonable. Makes the argument that Scope had no reason to bus LG.
479 Twito clarifies a lynch order of Lowell > Panzer > Scope > Riverwind.
Panzer says he's willing to call a truce in order to lynch Riverwind. Not happy with Lowell either. I think Panzer has some consistency to his opinions which suggests some protownness.
485 theopor says Lowell is scum, that much is obvious. 486 Panzer thanks him for that one line of OMGUS.
Amb 497 notes that Twito and Panzer have quickly changed to a cooperative stance with each other. In 499 it is fascinating that Panzer says that Twito is "presumably town."
500 OTU attacked Amb for 497! I guess. And votes Amb. Honestly scummy.
501 N9V posts long nonsense post. His case against OTU is ridiculous.
502 Panzer is already done with Lowell push and goes to OTU.
I'm stopping here at post 506 (OTU) because I'm feeling tired and am finding it hard to decide what I think of this post. Esp e.g. "I'm pretty sure that the only reason SpectrumVoid was lynched was to frame me."
Conclusions are going to have to wait. I'll say I think a little better of theopor and also Panzer. I think worse of OTU. Possibly Scope. I don't know what I think of Amb. I don't like Chibo/mole. From this section, I don't know what I think of N9V. BM, scotmany, and DoS I don't think are scum. Riverwind could be scum. yellowbounder/alko could be scum. Rand Althor I suppose.
I suspect I will end up advocating the lynch of someone who relatively hasn't said that much.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Well, I regret that I didn't take notes first and then write an essay. But I tried to put my thoughts into those notes so that it isn't just a summary of what happened. You could go through those posts, looking at mine, and decide if you agree/disagree with me for instance.Battle Mage wrote:Kelly's pbpa is very informative, but doesnt reach a strong conclusion.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party
Eh, I guess I'll look to contribute sthg tomorrow or Saturday. It's getting late.
I'm interested to take a look at everything posted so far by e.g. scotmany, Amb, Scope, N9V, Panzerjager, Rand Althor, Riverwind. Maybe OTU. There's obviously got to be scum in this group, and I want to be precise about who I think it might be and who it probably isn't.
At this point in time I am not thinking Panzerjager is scum. Though I am scratching my head at that last post.-
-
Kelly Chen Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Open-Minded
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: November 25, 2005
- Location: in the party