Large Normal 204: BooneyToonz III - Calling All Cryptids!END
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
Well, this is certainly a welcome sight to see as I start my first day phase on this site. My #1 suspect got vigkilled and turned out to be a Traitor. I'll look at the... ISOs, I think your site's term is? to see if I can determine who the one partner they knew about is, then look at the context. Expect further analysis from this Night 1 Vigilante in a few hours.-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
I have Lore's slot, and I'm inclined to believe you.In post 4196, Tchill13 wrote:So I'm conftown right? What about Lore's slot and Whymafias Titus?
Still digging into the context for Theta/Waffles, will have analysis tomorrow.-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
Relevant quotes from the ISOs of Theta and Waffles:
"Scumread" on PP back before they'd have any proof who was scum and who wasn't. I'd say Theta didn't really believe PP was scum and wanted someone to throw shade on.In post 1476, Theta Alpine wrote:Spoiler: my reads
this is as far as i got
p-edit
nothing further until post-game
i will still be watching this game and i would not be opposed to replacing back into this slot at a later time if that becomes an option
I'll have to look at pisskop's ISO myself later.
Joining Vedith's wagon on WhyMafia. Not sure why.In post 2005, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
VOTE: WhyMC accept it.In post 2002, WhyMafia wrote:
Say what nowIn post 1964, Vedith wrote:
WhyMafia is the favoured lynch of today if you wish to vote there.In post 1961, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Hey guys. I'm going to skim read (because that's a lot of posts), but is there something extremely important?
Claims not to suspect Why but doesn't take vote off.In post 2044, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
Your avatar.In post 2043, Vedith wrote:Okay, do you want anything else from us in the meantime?
I don't understand what a prof pic is?
And I'm just going to vote Why until I find an actual lynch candidate.In post 2072, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Uhh... I should probably vote someone that'll actually get lynched today.
More looks at Why's ISO will be necessary, and also a change in mind. Again, a confirmed scum saying they scumread Why probably means they didn't unless they knew there was a multiball.In post 2392, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
Well I wouldn't know seeing as I didn't read really anything from before my replacement.In post 2381, Transcend wrote:Like the stuff you "read" is probably the pique of suspense for today.
But from that I find Lore scummy and Trans townie.
Also @Why I ISO'd you and I'm getting scummy vibes from you too.
Claims to back off on my predecessor...In post 2398, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
How is asking if they were hammered shading?In post 2394, Gamma Emerald wrote:
You're shading Lore + Lore claimed PR.In post 2373, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
What is this?In post 2369, Gamma Emerald wrote:
I wanna vote this.In post 2358, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
It's confusing.In post 2356, Vedith wrote:Trans, lay it on the table... What your personal problem with me, Gamma and Mutton?!
Also was Lore hammered?
VOTE: SlingshitWaffles
Uhh...why?
I find them scummy, but if they claimed a PR then I'm (probably) not lynching them D1.
(Definitely to look into in the future though)
More justification for backing off...In post 2409, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
It depends on the claim, and how the player was acting.In post 2406, Vedith wrote:
But for the only reason that it was a PR claim.In post 2402, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
With Lore's claim, I don't know.In post 2401, Vedith wrote:So Sling will only lynch VT claims day 1?
But I didn't even say that, I said probably wouldn't vote them.
That's fucking stupid.
So if any other Scum claim a PR you'll sit there twiddling thumbs waiting for a VT claim?
But votes for them anyway.In post 2431, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
Yes I will.In post 2430, Vedith wrote:
So I'm confused. Will you vote Lore or No?In post 2429, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
Still then I said probably wouldn't.In post 2425, Vedith wrote:
No I am focused on what you originally said, not what you changed it to when I called you out.In post 2423, SlingshotWaffles wrote:I don't know.
You seem to be ignoring many parts of what I said though.
Lore's claim makes me kinda eh, but they've been acting scummy enough imo.In post 2477, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
I would.In post 2476, Vedith wrote:I thought you would vote Lore, Sling?
Are you saying I should?In post 2479, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
Well if I should, then I will.In post 2478, Vedith wrote:Well im just wondering why you're not. You said they are scummy enough to vote.
VOTE: Lore
L-2 right?
As with piss and Why, so with me. Scum giving a scum read means either multiball or probable town.In post 2495, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
You didn't read then.In post 2494, Gamma Emerald wrote:Alrighty
After saying he wouldn't lynch the PR, he voted, guess who? THE PR!
I said I probably wouldn't vote a PR but I Lore feels very scummy to me. But the claim is eh.
Strange justification.In post 2498, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
After people started flipping out at me I reread.In post 2496, Gamma Emerald wrote:Then what changed?
The claim.In post 2808, SlingshotWaffles wrote:I am a Neapolitan Vanilla-Only Doctor.
I target someone and find if they're a VT or not, and if they are I heal them.
Note that this was from before platinum scumclaimed.In post 2835, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
Sounds good to me.In post 2834, Ginngie wrote:Alrighty
Well how's this for a plan?
Lore shoots JJD
Waffles cops TChill
We lynch, PM?
People might not be on board with the lynch though.
I'll also need to reread PM because I don't remember them.
Day 2:I suspect he was at least telling the truth about this.
In post 3129, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
So they're scum because they believed my claim?In post 3128, Albert B. Rampage wrote:
When texcat said that waffles claim sounded real, it became apparent to me she was scum too.In post 3123, WhyMafia wrote:Let's all be friends instead.
And why is everyone suddenly SR'ing Tex? I mean ...I think he's scum, but yesterday nobody supported me. What changed?
Wtf?In post 3199, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
So there's a doc/rber or they targeted tchill?In post 3198, Transcend wrote:i think lore shot and i think mafia's kill might have been uhhh a failureIn post 3282, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
I think it'd be best if I didn't claim who I was targeting so I could still potentially have a chance to stop the NK.In post 3281, Vedith wrote:Waffle. Thoughts on letting you live another day and you check, say me?
Obviously you have no knowledge if I'm VT or PR, and although the odds are in your favour as me VT, I'll take the chance.
Once again, either they suspected multiball, they lied about their reads, or both.In post 3291, SlingshotWaffles wrote:Why- tone feels off, trying to blend in
ABR- he's ignoring all my questions and such with a "don't care you're scum"
Tex- don't like the PM stuff and (some) talk with 4T
Sorry I'm not good with reasoning. I generally use mainly gut reads.In post 3418, SlingshotWaffles wrote:In post 3405, Lore wrote: I think that accounts for everyone, let me know if i missed someone
and
Waffles4tare still up as far as i can seeLapsa, Tchill
Transcend, Ginngie, Lore, Mutton
Egg, Lexa, Crush, 4T, Massive, JJH
PP, Vedith, Pisskop
ABR, WM, Tex
I used the players that Lore had in theirs, so I might've missed someone/gotten a replacement wrong.
Serial Killer was not part of Waffles's original claim, interestingly enough. Advice from a scumbuddy?In post 3422, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
Ya. He's conf SK.In post 3419, PenguinPower wrote:Waffles is probably scum.
He'd be in a position to know, wouldn't he?In post 3572, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
(joke)In post 3571, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
Is slap a Daykill?In post 3570, jjh927 wrote:Consider yourself slapped, Waffles
Slap: jjh
But I actually don't think that Maf hit Tchill.
I have, though not on this site.In post 4123, SlingshotWaffles wrote:
Whereas that would make sense, I have rarely seen that happen.In post 4120, Srceenplay wrote:I have been following along but haven't had time to reread everything I wanted.
Crush claimed VT. Wouldn't it be more likely for scum to claim a power role to get out of a lynch?-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
For WhyMafia, given his ISO, there are several possibilities:
1. There is multiball and Why is on a different team than Waffles.
2. Why is on the scum team that contacted Waffles N1.
3. Why is on the team that Waffles was a Traitor for, but Waffles never contacted the team.
4. Why is town.
Scenario 2 is, frankly, virtually impossible. WhyMafia was pushing hard for the Waffles wagon D2, which makes no sense if by this time they knew they were scumbuddies.
If Scenario 1 is true, why was Why one of the D2 people who said there was multiball? Actually, do scum in multiball games even know there's another scum team?
And Why's general habits don't seem to me like town, which would rule out Scenario 4.
The only scenarios left are 1 and 3, either of which would cause me to VOTE: WhyMafia.
Why, I would like to see a claim and more pro-town play from you since you're now at L-2.-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
Plus me as N1 Vig.In post 4743, Vedith wrote:Don't be lazy!
But the only 3 that I know of (?)
Chilly is VT
Lapsa is IC
Trans is something to do with VT's-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
Egg has, I noticed, changed his mind on the matter of whether or not Vedith was bussing Transcend.In post 4801, Egg wrote:
I dunno. Vedith doesn't seem the type to hard bus, get his way, and then back off. If he was going to bus, I'd think he'd stick with it the whole way to actually get the town cred for it. What do you think of fykus as a whymafia buddy?In post 4789, texcat wrote:
I agree that he seemed to. My problem is the next day when Why was actually lynched, he voted for Titus. It's a case of not putting your vote where your mouth is when it counts.Egg wrote:
I just went back and ISO'd them side by side and remembered vedith kept offering up whymafia as his preferred alternative to waffles. They might be scum together, but not for your reasons because I'm pretty sure that would have to have been a hard bus from vedith when waffles was getting lynched. He seemed to genuinely want whymafia lynched instead.In post 4756, texcat wrote:
WhyMafia was at the bottom of all of his read lists. He kept saying that WhyMafia was scum. And yet his vote was on Titus.In post 4732, Egg wrote:Texcat and screenplay, why is vedith scum?-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
-
-
Assemblerotws
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
In post 5165, Lapsa wrote:cut the crap. there was no hammer
there's more interesting stuff to talk aboutIn post 5137, Boonskiies wrote:In post 5149, pisskop wrote:humpty dumpty sat on a wall
humpty dumpty had a great fall
VOTE: egg
do you mind full claiming nowYou were saying?
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
-
-
Assemblerotws Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 965
- Joined: June 24, 2017
/pre-in largeShowCheck my wiki for my meta.
"Yeah, when I see an intelligent paragraph, I'll know it's Assemble" -Jay
"I thought Assembler was quite good. I was surprised he was the NK because he's often in the lynch pool, but tunnelling scum will do that to your life expectancy!" -ffery
"assemble GOAT mod" -Mulch
"Anyone who plays with assemble knows silence is NAI" -Maki
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-