Mafiascum.net

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:53 am**

No boon, not fonzie.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:55 am**

Great I just read 30 of nero's posts and I want him to die already.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:55 am**

In post 4298, Boonskiies wrote:Look at Nero actively avoiding everything anyone is putting against him. He's the lynch for today, people. It is NOT a random lynch. Fonz is probably his buddy trying to save Nero by going after me instead of drawing focus on Nero.

So, seriously, who's up for putting up with this kind of 'analysis' every day until deadline? Lynch him now, or forever hold your peace!

(If Boon survives today, I will not be voting for him later on barring the aforementioned awesome case).

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:55 am**

In post 4294, Shiro wrote:
In post 4265, Nero Cain wrote:I don't think I ever said anything about him being read as a VI

Shiro wrote:
In post 2620, Nero Cain wrote:Well,
Boon is a claimed VI
. He softclaimed yesterday. He said he'd talk about it today. I think its obvious that his softclaim was going to be and will be for the remainder of the game until he flips (or full claims), a major point of discussion. As I said, he's a claimed Vi (and maybe I'm giving him too much credit here) I don't actually think he's dumb enough to go "hey ya'll are going to talk about me!" and then when you ask him why he thinks that (which was a super dumb questions anways) he talks about the hoods?

In post 4145, Nero Cain wrote:Whats wrong with it? I'm not getting it?
He's a derpy VI
-or he atleast pretends like he is-and in this game in a claimed bulletproof townie and thus tried to (though a rather horrible job) draw the nk. Then in a bout of self awareness claims he wasn't going to get nked 'cause he was mislynch bait. Well, scum usually don't nk someone they think they can get lynched and or hedge against so exactly why is that bullshit?

@Nero I am pretty sure you did

So any comments on that ?

The difference is that neither 4145 or 2620 or me claiming that he's not scum 'cause he's a vi...wich is what you are claiming that I said.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:57 am**

vote: nero cain

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:57 am**

In post 4282, TierShift wrote:Also nero is very high on my scum list but I have never taken the effort to ISO him. Everything he says feels wrong though.

OMGUS much.

HAVE YOU VOTED ME YOU COCKROACH?

no but I also only have 1 vote and I've been calling you scummy since d1, have you been ignoring that?

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:58 am**

In post 4304, T S O wrote:
vote: nero cain

stop playing against your wincon.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:58 am**

You've voted Flubber

and

Thor.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 11:58 am**

In post 4306, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 4304, T S O wrote:
vote: nero cain

stop playing against your wincon.

This is his defense.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:00 pm**

In post 4290, T S O wrote:I would be up for a Nero Cain lynch on policy basis alone.

Not sure about Boon though.

What changed from earlier?

In post 2979, T S O wrote:It's disturbing how much I like Nero this game.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:00 pm**

In post 4309, Izariael wrote:
In post 4290, T S O wrote:I would be up for a Nero Cain lynch on policy basis alone.

Not sure about Boon though.

What changed from earlier?

In post 2979, T S O wrote:It's disturbing how much I like Nero this game.

He probably looked at his ISO.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:02 pm**

In post 4302, The Fonz wrote:
In post 4298, Boonskiies wrote:Look at Nero actively avoiding everything anyone is putting against him. He's the lynch for today, people. It is NOT a random lynch. Fonz is probably his buddy trying to save Nero by going after me instead of drawing focus on Nero.

So, seriously, who's up for putting up with this kind of 'analysis' every day until deadline? Lynch him now, or forever hold your peace!

(If Boon survives today, I will not be voting for him later on barring the aforementioned awesome case).

Omg Fonz for town mayor. I support this message.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:02 pm**

@Nero wasn't it kinda your bases on your defence of him against Axl ? At least that is the idea I got

@Axl What up with the naked vote ?

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:03 pm**

Fonz what is your nero read?

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:04 pm**

In post 4310, Boonskiies wrote:
In post 4309, Izariael wrote:
In post 4290, T S O wrote:I would be up for a Nero Cain lynch on policy basis alone.

Not sure about Boon though.

What changed from earlier?

In post 2979, T S O wrote:It's disturbing how much I like Nero this game.

He probably looked at his ISO.

naw, he's pissed off that I said I'd pl him earlier.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:06 pm**

In post 4302, The Fonz wrote:
In post 4298, Boonskiies wrote:Look at Nero actively avoiding everything anyone is putting against him. He's the lynch for today, people. It is NOT a random lynch. Fonz is probably his buddy trying to save Nero by going after me instead of drawing focus on Nero.

So, seriously, who's up for putting up with this kind of 'analysis' every day until deadline? Lynch him now, or forever hold your peace!

(If Boon survives today, I will not be voting for him later on barring the aforementioned awesome case).

When Nero flips scum, I think that's enough proof that I'm probably town. Unless you think I would bus my partner from out of nowhere like that. When he flips scum, you'll have no reason to vote me after today, anyways.
@Flubber - I bussed my scum partner in my last scum game, but that was after he was going down, and he had told me to do it in our PT where we had daytalk.

@Nero - You'd policy lynch nearly anyone. You bring it up enough in your ISO.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:07 pm**

In post 4298, Boonskiies wrote:
Look at Nero actively avoiding everything anyone is putting against him.
He's the lynch for today, people. It is NOT a random lynch.

Boon is really putting on a show about scumhunting himself. Because I don't see Nero doing this, I see Boon doing this.

4148

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:08 pm**

Yes, but I'm not keeping caught up on the thread. ^

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:09 pm**

In post 4267, Boonskiies wrote: You aren't really voting anyone this game. You've voted Thor and Flubber...(not going to count TobyLoby from early game). Thor...and Flubber...come on. Two always easily mislynched people.

This is my first game with Flubber. Him being easily mislynchable doesn't mean he's town here. I also don't think that Thor is an easy mislynch.

Also, you aren't giving much information really. You are flat out sprouting fluff, repeating things that's already been said, and you are asking easy to ask questions that make it
seem
like you are doing something.

Just 'cause I'm not a fluff monkey like TSO, Thor or Axle doesn't mean there's not content.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:10 pm**

In post 4317, Boonskiies wrote:Yes, but I'm not keeping caught up on the thread. ^

What exactly am I avoiding?

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:10 pm**

I've already commented on my read on you Iz, a few pages back.

You have more fluff than all of them, Nero.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:11 pm**

Boon... my question wasn't about your read on me. It was a question of how you intend to scumhunt without relying on reading reactions to your claim.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:12 pm**

You still have yet to answer.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:12 pm**

This is how I plan to go forward, Iz. My gut read on Iz isn't strong enough to pursue Iz. Nero isn't a gut read. I've given plenty of reasons, and it's all supported by looking at his ISO as a whole. I'm actually playing the game now.

Posted: **Sun Nov 16, 2014 12:13 pm**

This has nothing to do with my claim, nor does it necessarily have to do with any interactions between Nero and I.

Mafiascum.net

NY 178: MASQUERADE -- GAME OVER