Open 86 - Lovers Multiball (Game Over)

[Crazy]

[quote="Crazy"]I hope the other townies in this game will pick up on what

she's

saying and not reveal this secret scumtell.

[charter]

Crazy,
First you're for the massclaim, and now it "certainly wouldn't help" this scumtell, so why would you want it?

[Crazy]

I didn't fully realize the potential of this scum-tell until Adel mentioned it. Now I

don't

want the massclaim for a couple days, as Adel said.

[Cephrir]

Works for me.

[sekinj]

Charter just missed all my points, but oh well, because I just saw what Adel said:

because it would invalidate the secret scumtell I have that I won't announce until we have three days on the books without a lover-pair massclaim.

I believe I know what she's talking about. I don't believe that claiming would completely invalidate it, but it certainly wouldn't help...

I hope the other townies in this game will pick up on what he's saying and not reveal this secret scumtell.

(If any of you inquire about this, I will assume you are scum.)

too bad you put the warning at the bottom...

[pacman281292]

Sorry for late arrival...

I'm not with mass claim. It might not be useful to us, because the lover dies after a lynch, so nothing happens.

[Firestarter]

I think the main thing is the size of this particular game... in relation to massclaiming.
Im in favour of a latter day to do this.

[Adel]

Hello peeps

Would having a mass claim really benefit the town or harm them? Personally though I think it really wouldn't make a difference but thats why i'm asking.

pros: simplifies relationships, and reduces the game to a 2:2:8 mountainous setup populated by hydras. Makes lynch-all-lurkers more of a viable tactic.

cons: may prevent certain sumtells from being made.

[OpposedForce]

Hello peeps

Would having a mass claim really benefit the town or harm them? Personally though I think it really wouldn't make a difference but thats why i'm asking.

Sorry spacecase you were replaced in this game.

I think that we should claim lovers as early as possible because A)With a lynch of one person we could potentially lead a generally useful and townie person to their death who was the partner of the lynched person B)With the connection between two people we can evaluate both of them seeing how the had played the game and could help with deciding a lynch.

Also I'm not sure about Adel's scumtell thing. I don't understand it generally so elaboration would be helpful to why people would change their minds of a early lover mass claim.

[Adel]

unvote: firestarter, vote:OpposedForce

[sekinj]

The safest play is to wait on the mass claim. Day 4 or 5 might be the ideal time, but depending on how things go, we can always mass claim later today or on Day 2. But once we've claimed, we can't take it back. So I agree on the waiting strategy.

[OpposedForce]

unvote: firestarter, vote:OpposedForce

Cause and reason?

[sekinj]

Also I'm not sure about Adel's scumtell thing. I don't understand it generally so elaboration would be helpful to why people would change their minds of a early lover mass claim.

Not a good move...

[Adel]

your rather obvious mistake, and my superior scum-detection ability.

[OpposedForce]

Also I'm not sure about Adel's scumtell thing. I don't understand it generally so elaboration would be helpful to why people would change their minds of a early lover mass claim.

Not a good move...

Okay I understand where this is coming from. Revealing the scumtell will only benefit the scum in general. Okay I see it now. I only asked because I was confused on it and only wondered why it would change people's opinions on a early mass claim. My mistake.

[Firestarter]

your rather obvious mistake, and my superior scum-detection ability.

If you were chocolate, you'd lick yourself to death!!

[ThAdmiral]

vote: alabaska j

- you were scum in the last game i was in!

[Crazy]

Vote: OpposedForce

If this was AITP, you just asked who the king was.

[Crazy]

Unvote
Vote OpposedForce

[SleepyPanda]

Waiting until later on to massclaim sounds good to me.

OpposedForce, curiosity killed the cat. Why still ask when told not to?

Unvote, Vote: OpposedForce

[icemanE]

Yes to what adel implied. I would have preferred to keep it less obvious by sort of dancing around it a bit more, but it should work regardless.

unvote - vote: OpposedForce

[Alabaska J]

DO NOT LIKE OP WAGON (NOTE: I UNDERSTAND WHY IT HAS FORMED). GUARANTEE THERE IS SCUJM ON IT.

THAT IS ALL.

[Alabaska J]

AND, IN ADDITION TO THERE BEING SCUJM ON IT, THERE IS SCUM ON IT TOO.

[icemanE]

GUARANTEE THERE IS SCUJM ON IT.

1. Why the caps?
2. What is scujm?
3. How do you know scjum is on the wagon?

[icemanE]

EBWOP: 3. How do you know

scujm

is on the wagon.

Yes, I misspelled a misspelling.