NabakovNabakov wrote:Surye wrote:
Once we set [some pre-lynch information] up, a lynch would be town benificial as far as I see, and Superfly is as good as anyone at this point.
This is advocating an near-arbitrary lynch after we've filled our information quota. You leave no room for the information we gather to clear Superfly. It has nothing to do with solidification and everything to do with justification.
Ah, I was looking over my statements, and I was thinking this was the one in question. The part that I left implied is: Once we set [some pre-lynch information] up
that incriminates
, a lynch would be town benificial as far as I see, and Superfly is as good as anyone at this point
to try to build that case against
. I didn't think you would assume any information should lead to a lynch, but some scum pointing information.
I will not leave as much to assumption next time, I apologize.
GhostWriter wrote:
You've also stated that you would strongly consider voting him after he talked, or if he took too long to not respond. If you are for the lynch, in any way, shape, or form, then you aren't exactly contesting it, now are you? Because that would be an oxymoron. Like saying something is cold as hell, or boring as fuck, or dumb as GW...
I'm not up for a lynch in "any way, shape, or form", only that I couldn't DECIDE to lynch him without
some
incriminating evidence, which is what Primate is asking for. And if he took too long... I just really don't like or trust lurkers. But you need to stop putting words into my mouth, if I didn't say "any way, shape, or form", don't act like I did without a quote of where I implied that, and same goes for the wording on "strongly consider voting him after he talked".