Elemental Mafia- Game Over!
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I'm a bit leery of starting quicklynches already. Unless we get a little more to go on than we have now, I think we're as likely to devastate the town to no good purpose as to actually get the cults. Two weeks would still be plenty of time to quicklynch a good half a dozen people if we used normal scumhunting for a week or so first to get a better idea of who to target.
Assuming that all cults were successful is a bad idea, I think. Assuming 4 cops, just from the roles presented there are at least 9/24 targets that will fail for each recruiter. Since BM hints at the possibility of other power roles, I'd guess 12/24 as being perhaps a more likely figure. We should still have ~1/3 anti-town currently, but I'd consider that a high end rather than low end estimate. It should also make our projections for Day 2 a little less dire. There's also no way they could move us directly to night Day 2 - they won't know they have half the town if they even do, and they can't coordinate with each other.
Given the possibility of other power roles, I'm against a massclaim - it won't simplify things nearly as much as if there were only cops, and it will point out the vanillas to any cult recruiters that survive today, making their job easier.
Unvote; Vote: TheSweatPantsNinja
Wishy-washy about quicklynching and massclaiming, and seems way too eager to run up both elvis and taff for rather specious reasons."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I think that was the most horrible vigging I've ever seen. :/ At least my judgement that Adel was probably town was on target.
I checked Adel's posts for any possible breadcrumbs, but I really didn't find anything. Random vote was mneme, but from later play that would be an innocent if anything. It's probably nothing.
I'm reconsidering my stance on quicklynching somewhat - I haven't been in a large game before now, so I didn't really realize quite how fast we'd be getting content earlier. We really do need to be accurate now with 2 power roles knocked out, though.
I am skeptical of Elvis Knits' claim.
Elvis, ooba, and TSPN seem like the scummiest candidates to me at the moment. Vote staying on TSPN for the moment, but I'm pretty willing to move it if I see more that I don't like at this point.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Since it seems I'm the main wagon, could anyone explain why? I would like the opportunity to defend myself, or if that's not an option, at least offer the town the service of trying to figure out who the scum on my wagon are, but right now I really can't do either because I don't understand why I'm the wagon and no one has given a reason for voting me. Are we just following Adel's list?"By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Since I'm up to 7 now and won't be able to post again for ~5-6 hours, I claim unrecruitable jailkeeper. I locked up DGB N0 based on reputation - figured her a likely target for at least 1 cult or SK. Hope the food was OK DGB. So assuming I wasn't also blocked, she's neither Wayne nor a cult recruit. Could still be a recruiter.
I've started an analysis of who I think is scummy on my wagon despite not having much to go on, but I don't have time to finish or post it now as I'm getting ready for work.
I'd just like to quickly point out though that TSPN's last couple posts strike me that he doesn't really care who is lynched as long as lynches get done - which doesn't seem to be a town attitude to me, regardless of the fact that we need to go fast. I'm happy with my vote there.
I tend to believe Mizzy that she's a townie confused about the way this game works. Since I also haven't played in a cult heavy game like this before, I'm not sure if that means we should lynch her as a confirmed recruitable or not. Going with no for the time being, on the assumption that it's better to hit people we think could be actual recruiters.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Damn, I was afraid of that. I'm a lousy cook. Sorry.DrippingGoofball wrote:Trust me I noticed. The food was terrible. The mashed potatoes were gray, the meat loaf was gray, and the peas were gray. There had to be an explanation as to why I'm still alive. Feel free to keep me safe as long as Wayne is alive or beyond.
Does anyone have catering skills they'd be willing to offer my guest tonight? I'd like the experience to at least be tolerable.
I'm not liking jediknight either, although for slightly different reasons than DGB.
Seems wishy washy about my claim while also trying to set up his own semi-claim here...jediknight wrote:So I think that unrecruitables are very valuable. Not saying I necessarily believe the current roleclaim but wanted to put that statement out there.
jediknight wrote:I am unrecruitable.
"I don't really know if this is scummy, but what the heck, I'll vote anyway."jediknight wrote:vote elvis_knits as well...I feel his bandwagon jumping is the most irresponsible thing I've seen yet. Does that mean scummy? Sure why not...its alot more than the reasoning anybodies given for anything thus far up to this point.
Also why are you so terrified of the cults if you're unrecruitable? I'm feeling less scared of them knowing I'm unrecruitable - gives me an edge in going out to kill them.
In other news:
In addition to the anti-town attitude of not caring who's lynched, not caring and saying it shouldn't be random is a contradiction.TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:And yes, I might not really seem like I care who gets lynched. . . because I don't. A lot of the players who are protown now may not even be protown tomorrow. We shouldn't lynch at random, but right now, we are being too discerning, and we need to just start stringing people up.
What makes it a good fakeclaim exactly?TheSweatpantsNinja wrote:If DGB does not confirm his role, I still think we should lynch him. Its a good fakeclaim, and not all that valuable that we need to worry too much about lynching it.
So, you knew there was a good chance DGB could't specifically confirm or deny my role based on the night action. Despite that, you want to lynch a claimed power role just because the target doesn't confirm it? As Muerrto pointed out, this is just terrible.
I support TSPN and jediknight being the first 2 lynches at this point. I'm going to stick with my TSPN vote for the moment since I'm more convinced about him, but I'm willing to vote jedi also if his wagon picks up steam faster.
I am uncertain of the case on DoS at this time - need to reread him.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Leaders are unrecruitable according to the role PMs posted on page 1.kabenon007 wrote:I guess I never thought about it, but can cult leaders recruit other cult leaders, thereby nullifying that leaders ability to recruit? And also, if a cult member can be recruited into a different cult, perhaps we aren't as screwed as we think.
Recruits are less clear, and I find that an interesting question.Mod:Can you tell us if cult recruits become unrecruitable, or could their cult membership change by being recruited by a different leader?-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
You're correct. I was originally thinking it would affect cult growth rates, but I was being stupid. Whether they can cross recruit or not, the person is going to be just as anti-town either way. I need to think these things through better.Muerrto wrote:While I'd say the PM's sound like they can still be recruited, Xtoxm is right, it matters not to the town.
FoS: Mac
despite the claim.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
This is actually part of the reason I expressed skepticism of elvis' claim when it first popped up, because at first glance it seemed an unlikely combination with my role.lord_hur wrote:Also, what do you all think about the possibility for BM to include both a roleblocker AND a jailkeeper in the same game ? The two roles seem pretty close to me, the main difference being that one is more powerful than the other... I personally have the feeling that one of them is bullshitting...
I later realized that this is trying to outguess the mod, which is probably a bad idea. Combined with the fact that elvis has been playing more townlike lately, and the main accusations against her were from a VI, I'm no longer much into the idea of lynching her.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
If we're going to kill him Day 1 anyway, is there a good reason not to do it while the wagon is already in place? I don't see keeping a "town" vote that has admitted he doesn't care who is lynched as worthwhile, especially when gambiting seems like a good possibility to me.Muerrto wrote:I'd still say lynch him before night
I basically see trying to disband the wagon and then reform it later as a huge waste of time. I mean, if we're convinced he's town, we shouldn't lynch him... but I'm not, and it doesn't look like Muerrto is either.
FoS: Muerrtofor stalling.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
In the multi-lynch format we have going here, the time of disbanding and later reassembling a wagon is more valuable than a voice that doesn't care who is lynched.Muerrto wrote:I'm not convinced but you're saying the trouble of voting him again is worth killing him now and losing his voice?
Again, if we really think he's town, we shouldn't lynch him. I haven't seen anything that makes me think he's town.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Not sold on armlx. Bandwagoning isn't that serious an accusation in this game, and he hasn't done it nearly as bad as some others. Like lord_hur, for example. He's been on every single main wagon, and never voted for anyone else all day. Combined with that recent WIFOM comment,vote: lord_hur.
Jedi is still on my list of people to look at today."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
DGB, can you explain why you want to go after armlx? I'm more inclined to trust your motivations than most people in this game since I'm nearly certain you're not a recruit or SK, but I'm not seeing what armlx has done that's worth going after."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I'm not seeing town tells specifically - as I noted in the post you quoted, it's a statistics thing based on my protection last night. I'm not getting town or scum vibes from DGB, and statistically she's less likely to be scum than the many other people I don't have a solid read on. It's not like I trust her implicitly. I would believe someone that I'd picked up specific town tells from over DGB. Unfortunately I haven't been getting solid town vibes from anyone, really. Trying to adjust my standards and such to accommodate the speed of this game has been a bit of a head trip. I should probably do a detailed reread in the next couple days.Muerrto wrote:
Actually I see DGB leading most of these lynches. What town tells are you seeing from her?Macavenger wrote:DGB, can you explain why you want to go after armlx? I'm more inclined to trust your motivations than most people in this game since I'm nearly certain you're not a recruit or SK, but I'm not seeing what armlx has done that's worth going after.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I'm sorry, are you talking about Cavebear or yourself here?DragonsofSummer wrote:Response to Kison: After thinking about what makes me uneasy about his posts. I think it is that he is trying to represent himself as having a whole bunch of original thoughts without really saying anything original. But again thats my opinion...Vote: DoS
Also kinda feeling like that bit about normal scumtells could be an effort to encourage feelings of cold feet in anyone who's getting them over all the dead townies so far.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I don't know if that's the case either, just kind of a hunch I had since I'm kinda fighting against cold feet right now.Xtoxm wrote:But seriously, I can see Mac's angle, but i'm not sure that it's the case...I don't think that's the type of argument a scum would come up with.
My vote is actually far more based on my other comment though. Seriously, reread DoS - his comment about appearing to add original content but not fits his own play quite well.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I believe that's a lynch.
Show me where I defended DoS? I remember saying much earlier that I wasn't sold on the case on him at the time, but I can't recall ever defending him.Muerrto wrote:Hm.. I thought it was weird that Jedi never even mentioned the DoS wagon but then Korlash and Farside defended him pretty strongly. Mac did as well but voted him anyway? Strange behavior."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I'm curious what some other more experienced players think of Korlash's logic about finding scum here.Korlash wrote:first off, it is in towns best interest to lynch many, quickly. it is in cults interest to not lynch. The more we lynch, the less likely they will be able to build up. In reality, cult has no reason to want to see 10 town dead, they want to see other cults dead yes, but not so much town. If your wanting scum tells try and find people who are acting like they want as many lynches, but doing things that slow them down. Also late bandwagoning, and a small bit of poor reasoning for votes are also good tells. (keeps up apperances but little to no effort has been made)
Also, I don't think much more needs to be said about jedi.Vote: jediknight. I think he semi-claimed unrecruitable earlier. If you are an unrecruitable power role jedi, you'd better full claim, and hope it's testable."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Mod:Andycyca and DGB haven't posted since Monday. Prods perhaps? Also, can you clarify the number of lynches we have left today? Looking back at that announcement, in one post it looked like the modkill and vigging were counting against our limit, but in another it didn't."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I have to say I'm not inclined to let a claimed SK live, especially when we have at least 2 other claimed pro-town roleblockers. Well, jailkeeper in my case, but that still blocks. I'd rather keep that role to pro-town players, if we can."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I thought this when she first claimed too, but the reveal of the inventor and dayvig and such has modified my opinion somewhat. We have a fairly stacked town - with 4 cults, we have to - and since my role as jailkeeper is theoretically primarily defensive, I can see having a plain RB too.DrippingGoofball wrote:
Overkill in the RB department, maybe?elvis_knits wrote:As for RB and jailkeeper in the game... why is this impossible?-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I agree with xtoxm that Andy has been awfully quiet. We've got 8 or 9 days to do 2 lynches though, so I'm probably going to try to take a detailed reread here before voting anyone again."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I assume by 'it' you're referring to jedi's claim here? Can you explain this a bit better? I may just be being dense, but I'm not seeing where you're going with this.Muerrto wrote:Kabenon had a pretty 'convincing' post about it being a false claim and him really being a CL. Xtomx backed it up pretty quickly without much thought and voted him at the same time. Little weird both of those. Moreso Xtomx who's been under heat earlier as well.
Andy also simply jumped in there at the end. As did Kison.
But then Xtomx jumped on Andy immediately after the lynch...
Vote: Xtomx
FoS: Andy-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Erg0 raises an interesting point about the Lowell wagon here. Inspired by that along with my impression that Andy hadn't been contributing anything to the game, I went back and did a little lurker hunting. Some notes:
Roland hasn't said anything of any substance since April 18, a week and a half ago. He popped in for a "this is fast, I'm reading" post once since then. Even at the beginning when he was posting, there wasn't much substance.Mod:please prod/replace/something rolandofthewhite.
Andycyca has in fact contributed essentially nothing, just pops in to vote every now and then. Also one "damn why are we lynching town" post. Probably worth wagoning.
Pooky has been extremely quiet since replacing in, only popping in for essentially reasonless votes twice. My confidence in Mizzy's sincerity is dropping quickly.
ooba is an interesting one. He isn't really lurking, at least not on the same level as the others - I just kind of noticed this as I was reading posts by player looking for possible lurkers. However, his contributions have mainly been theory, especially encouraging use of the multiple lynch bit. The lynch limit was unfair, we should never go to night, etc. Very gung ho to get the town to lynch lots. But... his minimal contributions other than spouting off about that theory have been the type to slow down the town's lynching. He voted me back before I claimed (4/18), and hasn't doneanythingwith his vote since then. His only comment of any substance on a wagon was encouraging us not to lynch jedi.
So, talking mostly about theory, appearing to push the town into quick lynches but actually trying to slow them if anything, and not tying himself to any wagons to be looked at later. Probably the most amazingly scummy package I've seen in a while.Vote: ooba
Is there much of a possibility of townies lurking to try to avoid CL attention? I haven't really given much thought to how I would play as a recruitable, since I'm not. The idea just sort of popped into my head as I was studying lurkers, and makes me not want to just start arbitrarily lynching them.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Why is armlx scummy? I've honestly yet to see a good case for that from any of the people voting him or advocating pushing him.
Andy is the main person I'd vote aside from ooba right now. If someone could lay out a case on kabenon I might be willing to go for that also; I don't see him as especially scummy at the moment but I don't appreciate everything he's done, either. I'll try to get a reread in tomorrow and see if I turn up anyone else that looks like a good suspect.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Just noticed:
Cavebear with a toothache, in response to elvis' claim wrote:Elvis, are you recruitable?
Someone seems quite interested in claims and whether people are recruitable.Cavebear with a toothache wrote:I believe it would be a good idea to not have several wagons of 3-4 votes, since that is just a waste of time. If the people on two of the wagons jumped to a third, we could put someone at L-2 or L-1, get a claim, and do the same with the other wagons (and pretty quickly, too); and then, hopefully with time to spare, make a decision on who the two lynches should be.
Of course, that would mean that we would all have to *gasp* cooperate, which can be hard. I think we can do it, though.
We're down to two lynches. We have more than two wagons. Presumably, this means that all or most of us have one person we really want to lynch ahead of all others. Obviously, we can't satisfy everyone.
I assume that people are reluctant to change wagons, since they perceive that this would decrease the chance of their chosen target getting lynched.
What I'm proposing is that we gather more information about, IE get a claim from, some of these targets, so that we all can make a more informed decision on who to lynch.
The way to do this, I believe, is to recklessly abandon your own wagon in favor of the largest one. We then get that wagon up to L-2 or so; enough for the person to claim. We then unvote, and go for the second largest wagon etc. After a certain amount of time (I'm thinking Sunday or Monday, if we have one week until deadline) we stop this, look over our claims, and hopefully will be able to decide on two people to lynch.
What, then, do we do if someone refuses to cooperate? One option is to just lynch them right away. Someone refusing to claim is suspicious. I'd argue that the better option would be to leave them for a maximum of 24 hours, and then unvote anyway; if they didn't claim for the reason of not being around, they bloody well should claim as soon as they get back; and if they don't, well, we'll just have to take that into consideration when we decide who to lynch.FoS: Cavebear
Why did this bit about claims benefiting recruiters not occur to me earlier?-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
It's certainly possible. The rest of Cavebear's actions have been sufficiently pro-town looking that he's about my last choice for lynching of people I find suspicious at the moment. Still, I see no reason to just ignore that he's been looking for information that gives the greatest benefit to cult recruiters.Xtoxm wrote:
Claims of this nature are helpful to CL's, but I get the feeling Cavebear has pro-town intentions with the way he's going about it.Someone seems quite interested in claims and whether people are recruitable. FoS: Cavebear
Why did this bit about claims benefiting recruiters not occur to me earlier?-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
It's possible he's a recruit, self hammering would make sense then; as it prevents the possibility of drawing more links to your recruiter. Hell, even if he's a recruiter that has a recruit, if he knows he's screwed up and is about to be lynched, I guess there's always a faint hope he could win by having his recruit survive into a final 3 and endgame a townie. I agree self-hammering isn't bad for town in this game under certain conditions like it normally would be, but it's far from a town tell.
It's also possible that he knew he wasn't self hammering according to the rules and was gambiting hoping we'd assume he was dead and move on or something.
If you have knowledge that his result claim is bogus for some reason, I'd be inclined to trust that.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Well, 3 weeks after Day 1 was announced as started would be 3pm PDT on Wednesday the 7th. If we hear from BM tomorrow, that would give us a little over 4 days real time, with part of that a weekend.
I pretty much want to see Andy dead at this point though unless whatever Muerrto is finding out makes him very certain he's a tracker, though."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Ouch, yeah. So answering your question will unquestionably confirm his role, but if it's a gameplay issue that we should know, like you're sort of implying... that's pretty harsh.Muerrto wrote:Either Andy is absolutely not a tracker or absolutely is, that's what I need to know. That's why it's hard to get confirmation because confirming a role is definitely not fair for the game but it will confirm him either way. We'll have to see.
If BM declines to answer, what do you think we should do? I'd be inclined to kill him, since his behavior matches "cult recruiter" far better than "tracker"...-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Hey, be forced away from the game for a couple days and the wagon I tried to start way back when finally takes off. Kinda like that, although I was hoping to see a dead CR when I got back.
I'd hammer ooba, but can't since I'm already voting him. :/
Motivation for anyone else reading the thread:
I still think he's faking pro-town actions while trying to disrupt our activities and not tie himself to wagons, fairly good scumtells in addition to the lurking.I wrote:ooba is an interesting one. He isn't really lurking, at least not on the same level as the others - I just kind of noticed this as I was reading posts by player looking for possible lurkers. However, his contributions have mainly been theory, especially encouraging use of the multiple lynch bit. The lynch limit was unfair, we should never go to night, etc. Very gung ho to get the town to lynch lots. But... his minimal contributions other than spouting off about that theory have been the type to slow down the town's lynching. He voted me back before I claimed (4/18), and hasn't done anything with his vote since then. His only comment of any substance on a wagon was encouraging us not to lynch jedi.
So, talking mostly about theory, appearing to push the town into quick lynches but actually trying to slow them if anything, and not tying himself to any wagons to be looked at later. Probably the most amazingly scummy package I've seen in a while.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
That doesn't work though, since my lockup of DGB N0 prevented her from either getting a recruit or being recruited, regardless of her alignment.armlx wrote:Actually, this is making a lot more sense now. DGB and Korlash teaming up on the crusade vs. me, I can see one recruiting the other easily. Its just an issue of who is the puppet and who is the master.
And yes, I'm not planning on revealing my target last night unless a good reason appears. We do need to see a result claim from Andy, though.
I want to get some rereading in before voting today. Should have time tomorrow, I think.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
DGB confirming that I jailed her makes her a bad lynch, IMO. Not willing to say more than that right now.
Korlash I plan on rereading, amongst others."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I'm having a really hard time figuring out scum in this game.
For now,Vote: Pooky. It's occurred to me that Mizzy's bit about townies wanting to join the winning cult could have been fishing for recruitables. Pooky not contributing anything after replacing her doesn't help much.
Also not terribly fond of Andy, Lowell, Korlash, or Farside right now. Waiting for a result claim from Andy before deciding what to do there. Pretty unsure about the rest.
More rereading as I get time. Hopefully it'll be more enlightening than this last batch I did.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Yeah, that makes me like Lowell a lot less.Muerrto wrote:
Um.. he called for your lynch and told you to stop WIFOM'ing and claim so he's a 'breath of fresh air' and you bandwagon his vote?Lowell wrote:unvote, vote pooky. DR's post is a breath of fresh air.
CONFIRM Vote: Lowell
Unvote; Vote: Lowell
I'm cool with giving Pooky a chance to show up and talk before stringing him up.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Sarnath'd, so you're not claiming jailkeeper, more like doc/alarmist combo. Or just all purpose doc, to make it sound simpler.
I can buy that claim. Role name of bodyguard fits with what limited flavor I have in my role PM, more or less.Unvote; Vote: Pooky"By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
I wouldn't count the mucking up what a bodyguard is against him. I see that as a logical name for the role he's describing. Technically, my role name is Prison Warden - I just said jailkeeper because that's the common name for what the ability is. But the minor difference in role name makes what he's claiming relatively believable, at least to me.
That's not to say I think the way he's gone about claiming is flawless, or that the case against him has no merit. I find it believable enough that I don't want to vote him myself. On the other hand, the way he's gone about it makes me not want to try very hard to stop the lynch, beyond explaining my thought process here.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Yes, this has occurred to me, and would also call into serious question Andycyca's claim of just tracker.Dead Rikimaru wrote:That makes me think about EK's claim of roleblocker.
In a game of Suicidal Dayvigs, Density Cops and Prison Wardens a simple "roleblocker" sounds out of place, doesn't it?
Such could help explain why we're hitting so many power roles and no scum. There are other possibilities, though. Before I spell out exactly what I'm thinking here, I'd like Lowell and elvis to claim whether you are recruitable. It would help me evaluate the claims. I'll explain exactly why once they've both responded - obviously if one or both are lying scum and know what I'm looking for, they'll tailor their answers.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Kison, this isn't a good question. We have no proof he was recruited N0, it could have happened N1.Kison wrote:Mnemennenmenem, who recruited you N0?
Seriously though, the way mneme is clearly not paying attention and just hostily spouting town platitudes does say cult recruit to me. I'm thinking recruit specifically because a recruiter would probably be more interested in paying attention to the thread looking for information than he is.FoS: mneme
Recruitable is not the answer I was expecting from Lowell.Unvote; Big FoS: Lowell
I would prefer to see elvis claim recruitability before voting to help really nail down my theory, but given how wonky the Lowell claim has been from the start, I might be willing to vote on it soon anyway.-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Possibly, Kison. I random voted DGB as a sort of crumb that I protected her, so I could see a cop with innocent doing the same thing. More importantly, Adel's play does not at all look like "cop with guilty" to me.
Of course, cop having an innocent is virtually meaningless this game."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Pretty sure that's not a hammer. Since Erg0 unvoted that makes 8 by my count.
Debating whether I should just hammer or wait to hear what I wanted from elvis."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Okay screw it, I just reread Lowell in isolation and it was painful.Vote: Lowell
mneme should be next, IMO, unless he very quickly gives some indictaion he's actually paying attention or cares what's happening."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
First order of business:Mod:request one day deadline extension due to the fact that the thread was locked for most of yesterday.
Second: elvis, don't claim recruitability now, with Lowell's death I already know my theory is bunk, and it no longer serves any purpose.
Now, mneme, let's deconstruct a couple of your recent posts to see where I get that you aren't paying attention and don't care.
Let's see what's wrong with this. For the first line, I just explained prior to this post that I had a theory that could help evaluate the claims. Obviously I couldn't spell it out while waiting for answers, since then any lying scum would just give me the answer that sounded right. (For the record, the theory was that we had some "vanilla" power roles - tracker, roleblocker - that were recruitable, and some complex/flavored ones - prison warden, the weird cops, bodyguard - that weren't.) In general I would agree that finding out who's recruitable helps scum, but I had a specific reason here.mneme wrote:How does it help for -anyone- for people to claim recruitable/nonrecruitable?
Doesn't this just help the scum make recruits that aren't going to bounce? The first few may make the scum more likely to collide -- but the more recruitables we reveal, the -more- likely the scum are to successfully recruit.
DR - he's not playing like this in Mature Mafia, at least; that may or may not mean anything.
Macavenger hasn't claimed, right?
Still not convinced on the Lowell BW -- though it seems like we have a -lot- of protective roles.
Second line is the useless platitude thing I was talking about. Yeah, we get it. See first bit about why I hoped this case was a useful exception. I think you're just shoving this out there to sound pro town.
Third line is the one that really demonstrates you aren't paying attention at all. I was one of the first people in the game to claim, and it's been discussedmanytimes since then. It was brought up a couple times later D1, confirmed by DGB, etc. Today there was discussion of me not claiming my N2 target without reason. And if all that weren't enough to let you know I'd claimed, I hadjust referenced my claim again 12 posts before yoursin the context of discussing Lowell's claim.
And finally, you're not sold on the Lowell wagon. Ok.
But wait, let's see what happens next!
Your next post you vote Lowell. What new information has come out since then? Well, he claimed recruitable, I decided I was more suspicious of his claim than previously, and... two more people had voted him. That's pretty much all the new content relating to Lowell. You also thought you were hammering, but actually hadn't paid enough attention to count the votes right and realize you weren't. So, this changing your mind with little new information (and no indication you'd reread) makes me think you don't really care, you just want to lynch people.
Vote: mneme
Kison, I agree with you that Pooky has been highly useless. At this point though, I'd recommend only lynching him if you think Mizzy was lying about being a recruitable townie yesterday. I can certainly see an argument for how her bit about townies wanting to get recruited was a CL trying to get a reaction from nervous townies, but I don't really know. At this point I'm kinda regarding Pooky as a "default lynch" to use armlx's term, and I think mneme is better right now."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Just to make sure I understand what's going on, are we wagoning Korlash for anything other than the directing scum thing?"By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
Unvote; Vote: Korlash
I wasn't convinced on Korlash, but this refusing to full claim and pointing fingers nearly at random while being run up is not confidence inducing.
Also note that I don't really like any part of Cavebear's 1161 - includes the "I told you so" that I got run up for earlier, advocates looking harder at claimed power roles for little reason, still interested in elvis' recruitability for I don't know why, and seems quite focused on keeping recruitables alive. Cavebear is now competing with mneme for the coveted "next after Korlash" position on my list."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
QFT. This is pretty depressing.armlx wrote:I'm honestly unsure where to go from here.
My enthusiasm for killing mneme is waning, since everyone else we've killed for similar stuff has come up town.
I dunno, lurker hunt? Seriously, I'm pretty lost.
Pooky might still be a good lynch. I'm having trouble reconciling his "I am the most powerful town power role, don't question me" bit with Mizzy's "So being town sucks and you want to get recruited into the winning cult right?""By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon
So, basically here you have a lot of text about nothing. Yeah, our aim sucks. So does the rest of the town, as you admit. Three people does not make a lynch. Basically you're singling us out here because we're very active players site-wide. Kinda makes sense we're going to be on more wagons in this game because we're all the type of players to check our games multiple times a day, every day.cavebear wrote:The following three people can be said to have played a very big part of the game thus far, being on every large wagon since the one leading the TSPN's lynch:
- Muerrto (who semi-claimed some unmentioned, powerful town role and who's been directing wagons all day).
- Armlx (who managed to not claim yesterday and who's been following Muerrto around like a lost puppy).
- Macavenger (who claimed unrecruitable jailkeeper; we since then have found out that another (albeit weaker) protection role was very much recruitable. He is also, however, apparently confirmed by DGB.)
Does this mean anything, other than that their aim is horrible? Maybe not. Still: they're not doing a good job at finding scum, let alone recruiters. (Note: No, of course they're not alone in shouldering this responsibility. We all, as a town, suck at finding cultists.)
:goodposting:xtoxm wrote:List of possible frie/ice recruiters:
DR
mneme
DGB
Kison
Cavebear
EK - claim RB
Andy - claim tracker
armlx - semi clear
Mac looks basically cleared to me. If we believe Mizzy's townie claim, and Muertto's semi claim.
What logic are we using to semi-clear armlx? Not saying I disagree - he looks pretty pro-town to me, but it's more of a feeling. I could see him being a recruit, but I don't think he's a recruiter, and that makes him a less desirable lynch for the moment, certainly.
I still think DGB is a bad lynch. I realize cult recruiter is possible for her, but honestly confirming me makes me think we should keep her alive. This is not just for the WIFOM reason of "why would a CL do that," but I don't want to get into my other reasoning unless I really have to. I would rather lynch Farside than DGB, since she could still be earth/wind.
Aside from that, looking at the way Xtoxm presented that player list, I agree the other 4 look like potential good lynches. Let's start with cavebear.Vote: Cavebear
Oh and actually, I just remembered we only have 4 lynches for the rest of the day. Cavebear, mneme, Kison, DR doesn't sound like a terrible plan to me at this stage."By far the towniest player in the game. Very good scum hunting, doesn't let anyone off the hook. All in all I find Mac's posts insightful and thought-provoking. " - Vel-Rahn Koon-
-
Macavenger Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 768
- Joined: March 10, 2008
- Location: Oregon