Merchant's Daughter [Game Restart!]


User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #852 (isolation #0) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:29 am

Post by Reinhardt »

My my it seems a fair amount of discussion has already occurred! I’ll do my best to become appraised of the situation.
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #855 (isolation #1) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 10:38 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 14, the worst wrote:I've now read posts 3-11 and realise this may have been a Bad Decision
Interesting, Will keep in mind going forward I guess.
Also a few questions for our gracious mod.
@FakeGod: the rules seem to imply each pair has 1 vote at least during First Dance, is this correct?
I also assume majority in the First Dance is based on total coins in the game?
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #877 (isolation #2) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:07 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 34, Firebringer wrote:
In post 28, Ankamius wrote:Read the setup fire
I DIDNT EXPECT FAKEGOD TO CHANGE THE SETUP!


ALSO WOULDNT IT MAKE MORE SENSE FOR THE GENTLEMEN TO HAVE THE COIN!?
I actually think it makes sense historically for it to be the ladies with the coins. Dowries and all that.
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #881 (isolation #3) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:11 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 62, Slaxx wrote:
In post 54, the worst wrote:
In post 51, Slaxx wrote:
In post 49, the worst wrote:Only key difference here vs. the coalition setup is it's distinctly +ev for scum to powerwolf like crazy during predance and infiltrate the power couples vs. coalition where max ev is one off/one on

the little voices in my head are telling me to be careful of finding 6 people to basically prep for the finale when half of them could be scum

I recognise the probability of it is absolutely tiny but still
Yeah but in that scenario it doesn't take three, it just takes one. It also gives people an excuse to chain lynches together. I don't really like it.
Why does it only take 1?
Because 1 scum in the townblock loses the game.
I believe this is inaccurate. 1 scum in the coalition does not lose, the game carries on as a mountainous.
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #883 (isolation #4) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:14 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 84, Jibril wrote: A noble cause. I have no doubts that you are.
May we refrain from making quote stacks of the caliber seen here? It’s unneeded clutter.
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #887 (isolation #5) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:16 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 99, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I have not played this before, but I believe that we should probably come together and decide who is the scummiest gentleman first, that gentleman will be eliminated by not having a dance partner. After that, I am going to be learning whilst doing.

So far, my only read is Slaxx as a townlean.
I do not like how this post feels. It feels like a construct rather than a true belief. I am saying this feels fake.
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #892 (isolation #6) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:20 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 132, the worst wrote:
In post 117, Firebringer wrote:okay but my accusation of tw pocketing me was mostly a joke (even though it was at u), I am scum reading tw for his general disposition and way he is interacting with me and others. My general vibe is a lack of authenticity backed with a lot of playfulness. Which is where my read is.
Firstly
all of this is bullshit

This game started with 3 pages of shitposting and I didn't register how important the whole dancing thing was. how am I being even close to as playful as I normally am? if anything I feel abnormally serious in this game.

and when do you ever scumread playfulness?

the only time I've seen you be this lolconfident about a read was an s/s so you're heavily pinging me with this shit
I do not really see what Firebringer sees either. I see the playfulness and such, yes, but not what makes the a scum-oriented appearance.
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #897 (isolation #7) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:22 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 139, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 135, the worst wrote:
In post 134, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 132, the worst wrote:the only time I've seen you be this lolconfident about a read was an s/s so you're heavily pinging me with this shit
How would this be s/s, though?

Are you claiming scum right now Sir Goose?
what do you think?
I believe that would be playing against your win condition. However, you are also saying that he's lolconfident in a scum/scum situation, so, this would not be analogous unless you are both scum, I believe.
I like this thought a little more from Adelbert, but not by much. It’s a very by-the-numbers questioning.
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #900 (isolation #8) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:26 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 170, Adelbert Steiner wrote:
In post 168, the worst wrote:@Albert are you an outed alt?
No. And I will not be outed.

A man is allowed his secrets.
Three can keep a secret if two of them are dead you know.
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #903 (isolation #9) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:31 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 180, Dunnstral wrote:The gentlemen who pairs with the lady with 8 coins can hammer a wagon by themself as the last vote before intermission
In post 196, Ankamius wrote:I'm kind of surprised it took this long for an Adel scumread to start appearing, the entrance to the game in of itself was scummy
So I don’t seem to have been alone in suspecting Adelbert’s entrance. So it seems interesting people are singling me out in such a manner. Is it because I’m so proper?
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #904 (isolation #10) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:32 am

Post by Reinhardt »

Oh my that wasn’t supposed to happen. I’m merely replying to the second item.
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #905 (isolation #11) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:33 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 206, Firebringer wrote:I want to point out that people are reading Alberts personality as scummy. None of his play has been indicative of anything so far. But I am so curious on who the player is.
I don’t think anyone has said this in fact?
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #906 (isolation #12) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:35 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 217, Allomancer wrote:
In post 215, Slaxx wrote:
In post 213, Allomancer wrote:Ank and Urist are null
Dunn is town
Why is Dunn town?
Good analysis, seems towny. Don't worry yourself, this is early on, reads can and will change.
Why the need for the caveat about reads changing? Did Slaxx seem concerned about your reads?
User avatar
Reinhardt
Reinhardt
Townie
User avatar
User avatar
Reinhardt
Townie
Townie
Posts: 63
Joined: January 25, 2019

Post Post #907 (isolation #13) » Wed Jan 30, 2019 11:37 am

Post by Reinhardt »

In post 218, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 175, the worst wrote:
In post 153, Adelbert Steiner wrote:I am fairly confident that the worst has attempted to throw off a read by firebringer using what is referred to as a chainsaw method. Instead of defending his play, he has attacked his accuser's play. I still do not believe that a scum v. scum can be analogous where a 1v1 is involved with you.
Elements of this are probably fairly reasonable but literally the last time I saw him as scum he came out the gates swinging at a scumbuddy to manipulate the gamestate into a massive annoying 1v1

It was a scum motivated behaviour

he's actually pretending to have reasoning here but I don't think his reasoning is consistent with reality which is not directly analogous but I think it's very worth mentioning


Do you think it's fair to suggest that I've been posting the way he claimed and I'm scum because of it?
If you die he dies too

You're positing that this is scum motivated

IF YOU DIE, HE DIES TOO
If this is trying to imply what I think it is it’s wrong, and Dunnstral should probably be aware of that.

Return to “Completed Large Theme Games”