This reaction is really bad. What made you "question" the RVS self-vote here?
BooneyToonz X: Boonin’ It In The Slums [TOWN WIN]
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I can't speak for the RVS behavior comment since I'm unfamiliar with large games, however, the RVS self-vote gave me town vibes. I saw it as a way to fish out reactions from players, and an attempt to get us out of the RVS as soon as possible. The reason why I got town vibes from it is that I thought it would give us better reactions than your typical random vote. There's no other reason that I can see why she would self-vote in that situation. Her vote in Post 49 only reinforces what I said regarding fishing out a reaction.In post 53, ceejayvinoya wrote:
What's fucking with my head right now is why no one is questioning it.In post 50, RAS wrote:This reaction is really bad. What made you "question" the RVS self-vote here?
Is this normal rvs behavior for a large theme game?
It doesn't strike me as scummy, hence I didn't vote, but it's very anti town.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
This seems like a weird response to me considering you never questioned it yourself, nor did you ever point out how it wasn't okay until just now. I never said I was okay with someone self-voting, but this is way different than your regular self-vote considering it's a self-vote on Page 1 and is very clearly a vote to gather reactions.In post 58, Sheldon Cooper PhD wrote:
more like why wouldn't you question a self voteIn post 50, RAS wrote:This reaction is really bad. What made you "question" the RVS self-vote here?
why would you be ok with someone self voting
You're almost treating this as a late-day/game self-vote as opposed to what it is with the way you worded things. The vote isn't as important as some of you are making it out to be.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I can't speak as to why she voted ceejay, but my guess is because of she believed that the reaction was poor (as I did). I'm sure awestfie will respond to this soon enough considering just how much discussion there is around her actions, however, I believe that the action of self-voting was done because of either:In post 60, Sheldon Cooper PhD wrote:I generally don't really read RVS naked votes because what's the point
I only noticed that self vote happened because someone quoted it later
Gotta talk about something to get out of RVS - I think given awestfie went directly onto ceejay with her vote, it was kinda planned...Do you think awestfie believes the reaction test is a good scum catching mechanism or do you think awestfie just wanted a reason to lay down any old vote, ie manufacturing a reason, or maybe it's just some way to get the first wagon of the day going
thoughts?
– She wanted to get reactions, and to get out of the RVS as soon as possible. If this was her goal, I would say this was a success considering how much discussion has been done around that one post alone.
– She wanted to get reactions, and to pressure whoever reacted badly to her vote. It's possible she uses it as a way to catch scum, however it seems like a really weak way to do so.
One could argue the self-vote itself was just a joke, and it might be a possibility, however, given awestfie's vote in Post 49, I don't think this is the case.
awestfie hasn't played in years, but I went back and read through some of her games to see her actions during the RVS to see if I could notice any type of pattern, and she seems like the type of player who nearly never participates in RVS.
Here's what I collected from her previous games:
Spoiler: awestfie's RVS Analysis
TL;DR: She has 6 games with no RVS, 1 game with RVS and 1 game that could be argued either or. I think it's fair to assume that the self-vote here was to draw a reaction, and I also think it's very fair to assume that she wanted to get out of the RVS as soon as possible given her previous comments in games.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I didn't expect this game to start off so slow.
I've a decent read on someone, but I'll be keeping it to myself for now in the hopes that this individual keeps on solidifying my read with their posts. Regardless, there's not much of a reason for me to out it at this stage anyways.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I've gotten next-to-nothing from reading this Vork/NC exchange, but at least it got the game rolling, so thanks for that.
To follow-up on post Post 217, I was hoping someone would react to it since the post itself wasn't all that great and very vague.
At the time of my initial post, TLK was looking like someone who was trying to blend into the crowd with the majority of his posts. As opposed to everyone's filler at the time, his filler just didn't look natural to me. It's something that I knew I would have a hard time explaining considering how little I had to go off of. I was withholding my read hoping that he would keep on giving me this vibe going forward, but I don't think this will be the case considering his recent posts.
I've got a couple of comments regarding this:The Last Knight wrote:Also, CJ is literally claiming to be opportunistic. So he's actually pinging me a decent amount. He is also the one who tried to start shit on Awestfie for self-voting, which is pretty weird.
A) Unless I'm reading things awfully wrong, Ceejay didn't claim to be opportunistic and was instead responding for someone else to a question that wasn't targeted at him. Read the exchange from Post 307 to Post 314.
B) I don't believe that he really tried to start anything, and instead was more so just "confused" about the self-vote. I still believe his reaction was bad, however saying he tried to start shit is just flat out wrong.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I'm not a new player or an alt. I used to play on a different forum.In post 355, UnaBombaH wrote:@RAS - are you a new player, or perhaps an alt? I find your first post somewhat familiar..-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
For what it's worth, I've got to agree with awestfie here. Post 394 looked like such a weak thing to push on.
As a matter of fact, a lot of Sheldon's post bother me upon a quick ISO.
– Post 50 (isolation #2) is something I've already commented on in Post 59.
– Post 60 (isolation #3) is something I've already commented on in Post 61. However, something I didn't point out initially is just all over the place Sheldon's post is here. There's a lot of assumptions based on a self-vote made on Page 1. He treated it as something greater than what it really was.
– His vote on Vork in Post 368 (isolation #7) is a self-announced sheep vote. One could argue that he showed some suspicions regarding Vork prior to this in Post 108 (isolation #4) and Post 151 (isolation #5), however, neither of those reads are all that great or have all that much backing them up.
– As I previously mentioned, Post 394 looks like a very weak nit-picky push. This is referring to Vork's Post 379, and it's very obvious that Vork knew he wasn't at L-1 with the very first line of that post.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
"Push" was probably the wrong word to use, but my point still stands.In post 409, Sheldon Cooper PhD wrote:@RAS - if it was a “push” I’d have gone all out and cased/voted
I just thought it was unusual, at no point did I say oh that makes them scum
You also put a lot of stock in the self vote thing
Your whole post comes over as “I know I don’t have a real case on sheldon but I need to force one so when I put my vote there it flys”
And I’m sure you know what that means
I didn't put a lot of stock in the self-vote thing at all, I responded to posts regarding it, yes, but I've said several times that I viewed it as a simple reaction test and nothing more.
And to correct you, my whole posts come over as "a lot of Sheldon's post bother me" so that other people can look at it and potentially comment on it. If you got the impression that I need to force a case from that post, then I don't really know what to tell you other than that's very narrow-minded.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I only have a couple reads that I'm happy with.
– awestfie's my strongest town-read, she's had very similar thoughts to mine. Her thoughts and actions have felt very natural, despite being very undescriptive.
– I think Sheldon is scum, his latest response to me makes very little sense. There's a lot of things I disagree with in Post 411, and I don't understand where most of it is coming from*.
Spoiler: *
It's not a good sign that I've something to say about every line of that post, and none of it is positive.
VOTE: Sheldon.-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
You're an idiot if you think I'm trying to discredit you. I'm trying to understand your fucking read on awestfie, and you're giving me your typical BS answer because "I'm a lazy player! \o/".Vedith wrote:The difference is RAS wants to try and discredit me here but isn't willing to make a stance yet or even try to allocate one.
Which I think is smart of him if scum while I'm pushing else where.
But it looks bad for him.
Fuck off.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
To clarify on my initial post, this is only frustrating because I spent a ton of time trying to meta read you prior to this game because I knew you would be the type of player I'd struggle to read, but you do this type of shit every game. You either use your laziness as a way to not explain your reads, or you just simply don't effort much, but you do it as both alignments. You've been asked to explain his read by both awestfie and I, and you failed to do so both times.In post 492, Vedith wrote:
For a start, less with that. I'm not making it personal to you, don't do it to me.In post 488, RAS wrote:I'm trying to understand your fucking read on awestfie
I asked what you wanted to know about it. And no point was my reason because I'm a lazy player. I'm going to take that as you attempting AtE (NAI, always) rather than trying to shade my posts though.
I'm here to lynch scum, Awe has a good chance of being scum here and I'm actually interested in seeing others views around lynching Awe over lynching Awe. But I'm still lynching Awe so don't think the worry can bounce out of scum here.
Tell me, am I wrong with Awe scum... or?
Take a side on this fence.
It's infuriating to question a player like you, and for me to just get called scum out of the blue because I disagree with one read on one slot. In no way shape or form was I trying to discredit your read with any of my posts. I was very obviously trying to understand your thought process. I don't care if we disagree on a slot, but at least explain to me why that slot is being scum-read by you.
I can't tell you if you're wrong when I straight up don't understand your read, that's the issue. It's not my job to prove you wrong or right, but I need to know your thought process since I've a completely different read on that slot.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
EBWOP.In post 494, RAS wrote:
...In post 492, Vedith wrote:
For a start, less with that. I'm not making it personal to you, don't do it to me.In post 488, RAS wrote:I'm trying to understand your fucking read on awestfie
I asked what you wanted to know about it. And no point was my reason because I'm a lazy player. I'm going to take that as you attempting AtE (NAI, always) rather than trying to shade my posts though.
I'm here to lynch scum, Awe has a good chance of being scum here and I'm actually interested in seeing others views around lynching Awe over lynching Awe. But I'm still lynching Awe so don't think the worry can bounce out of scum here.
Tell me, am I wrong with Awe scum... or?
Take a side on this fence.You've been asked to explain your* read by...
I found it incredibly odd how you left out her confusion in your quoting of that post, and I don't think I'm asking for much when I'm asking you to explain.-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
Why would I argue? Your read on that slot is irrelevant to me, what I cared about is why you read that slot that way. My job isn't to convince you about who town or scum is. I think that slot is town as it had very similar thoughts to mine, and even though she hasn't been very descriptive of her reads in general, I don't see that as AI.
I'm not backing off, I just don't want to have a back-and-forth with you since it'll be a useless clog on the thread. We both play the game very differently which is why I don't want to comment on your meta read statement, but I think your view on that is really flawed.
One thing I forgot to mention is that my comments weren't made to discredit your "possible scum" comments, but it was definitely out-of-the-blue FMPOV.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
Where did I ask for an over-analyzed post in response? I asked him to explain his read, and he didn't answer me initially. You might want to read back through the exchange, cause I've no idea how you came to this conclusion at all.In post 504, Dr Easy Bake wrote:That being said, I don't disagree that asking for an explanation is a simple request. I think you just expect some over-analyzed post in response, not everyone is going to build massive posts as you do. I'm tired of your "I don't have the patience" for this or for that RAS. You expect people to have the patience to read your long and tiresome posts but you're too high and mighty to have a conversation with another player in this game?
And no, I don't expect anyone to do anything, but I also don't want to argue with another player for the sake of arguing. Is it wrong for me to not have the patience to argue with another player when I think it'll be completely useless?-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I've explained my read regarding my awestfie before in Post 414, but I guess I didn't go much into details.In post 510, Vedith wrote:
Well, it wasn't. It was after you avoided in a scummy way.In post 506, RAS wrote:but it was definitely out-of-the-blue FMPOV
But great, you have taken a stance with Awe is town so that's more or less what I wanted from this.
On a side note, which thoughts in particular do you and Awe agree on?
In order:
Spoiler:
I haven't had the greatest of days, so I probably shouldn't read into things as negative as I did, but yeah, I assumed you meant arguing initially. That's on me.Vedith wrote:Also when I said back and forth, I didn't mean as arguing back and forth I meant to discuss.
Just encase you mis understood my intention with that comment.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I think Sheldon is a good vote.In post 516, Vedith wrote:
Okay this makes good sense. I was more concerned to you stating opinions that you haven't said in game.In post 515, RAS wrote:While she hasn't posted in a while, I often found myself coming back to the thread and disliking the same posts as awestfie. While I don't particularly agree with everything she's said (I don't quite understand her townread on DEB), she seems to be having very similar thoughts to mine, and I can't help but see that as town.
And I actually missed where you had Awe as town already, so that affected my thoughts on your response.
If I were to change my vote right now, with a solid lock where exactly would I be putting it to hit scum? I don't want reasons I just want to see where I should be looking if my Awe vote is wrong.
I'm in the process of writing some thoughts on the ceejay slot right now, and I think that vote would be a good one too.
Also, I want to apologize for my comments earlier. I shouldn't have made it personal, and while I haven't been having a great day, there's no excuse for that shit. Sorry.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
In post 517, RAS wrote:I'm in the process of writing some thoughts on the ceejay slot right now, and I think that vote would be a good one too.Spoiler: ceejayvinoya ISO Analysis
TL;DR: I don't think he's a good vote anymore. His recent posts feel very townie and very natural to me. He's null for me, and I could see this slot go either way. Gun to my head, I would say he's town now purely based on his recent posts.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
Sorry. It's because I had half of it written in my notes prior. It should be fixed here:In post 521, Vedith wrote:Why can't I view the topic you're linking RAS?
RAS wrote:In post 517, RAS wrote:Spoiler: ceejayvinoya ISO Analysis
TL;DR: I don't think he's a good vote anymore. His recent posts feel very townie and very natural to me. He's null for me, and I could see this slot go either way. Gun to my head, I would say he's town now purely based on his recent posts.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I agree with basically all of this.In post 520, Vedith wrote:So I'm not sure about Ceej here.
If Awe is town, I'm not sure what scum Ceej gets out of calling me town and Awe town lean.
The town read on me is odd overall but I won't be going into that further any time soon.
I don't think I would lynch Ceej today unless over a town read or no lynch.
I don't know if I would completely disregard awestfie!Town+ceejay!Scum, but I think it's very unlikely for this to be the case.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
Unluck.In post 526, Abstract Nonsense wrote:
Because he posted it first in the scum PT.In post 521, Vedith wrote:Why can't I view the topic you're linking RAS?
VOTE: RAS
-smart-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I confirm being Mason with awestfie, and I also confirm fucking up badly.In post 531, awestfie wrote:UNVOTE: RAS
NVM, I was going to reaction this but I think people might believe it. RAS and I are masons and he fucked up big time. I don't think he would be able to talk his way out of this one.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
Explain. I'm also finding all of this to be quite ironic considering your use of the word white knighting earlier in this game.In post 568, Nero Cain wrote:Sheldon is town. Lynch someone else you, imp.
If it's because of Vork, then don't explain cause that's a bad read.-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
I take this back.In post 708, RAS wrote:I don't like AN's latest posts.
I don't like ANY of AN's posts.-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
No. I just think he's being stubborn, and I'm disliking his "I'm sheeping day 1" mentality quite a bit.In post 717, Nero Cain wrote:Do you think tchill is faking ignorance?-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
Me stating that I think you're being stubborn, and disliking a play of yours makes you ashamed? That's unfortunate.In post 724, Tchill13 wrote:
And I gave you a hard TR man... I'm ashamed...In post 720, RAS wrote:
No. I just think he's being stubborn, and I'm disliking his "I'm sheeping day 1" mentality quite a bit.In post 717, Nero Cain wrote:Do you think tchill is faking ignorance?
No I don't blame you for not liking the sheeping. Of course by the tenth day I sheep day 1 it'll be my gimmick. I'll get cleared d1 because "tchill sheep's day one. It's just what he does". Just like NM who lurks. Just like RC who solo gambits. I'm excited to finally have a shitty meta excuse as to why I never get lynched day one. It'll be fun. Sorry yall are the first group that has to experience it.
You can play however you want, I don't really care. I just think you could be doing much better things than just sheeping, and with that said, I don't think you can really critique anyone's play when you're doing this. It's a little bit hypocritical.
I don't disagree with most of this, for what it's worth. The thing is though, if you believe these two to be a second mason team, or neighbors, I don't think voting there today is optimal since it's something that can be solved later.In post 725, Tchill13 wrote:
That's the thing. I can see them being neighbors and nero being town that "knows" Sheldon is town because of some stupid crap in the neighborhood then Sheldon turning out to be scum.In post 723, RAS wrote:Hey, Tchill. Do you think they're masons/neighbors?
Nero just needs to full claim. He's being stubborn on purpose because he got a "cool role".-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
This seems a bit far-fetched.
-
-
RAS
-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
No, but I think it's bad that you're feeling the need to read into that type of stuff considering their claim. Like I said earlier, with or without claim, I don't think voting there (or spending any time reading into it) today is optimal since it's something that can and will be solved later.In post 746, Vorkuta wrote:In post 743, RAS wrote:This seems a bit far-fetched.if you're talking to me
Like that post is basically the entire reason why I got into an argument with NC in the first place.
So now I'm having difficulty going back and reading everything NC said while arguing WITH the new info that NC and sheldon are mason buds.
Is it bad that I'm thinking I was baited into this?
I just don't know what you think you'll accomplish by doing any reading there.-
-
RAS Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 547
- Joined: March 26, 2019
You can do whatever you want, but I think it'll be a huge waste of your time, especially considering the position that you're in. I think anyone would agree with that.Vorkuta wrote:
We have 2x2 =4 Masonbuds, a miller, an ascetic, a few lurkers, and only Boon knows what in this game that will """solve itself later""", and I am very hesitant about letting that slide.In post 747, RAS wrote:that can and will be solved later.
More importantly, do you believe one of the Mason teams are scum?
With that said, the Ascetic claim is meaningless, and one could also argue that the Miller claim is useless, although I do believe it.
Miller is davesaz; Ascetic is AN.Tchill13 wrote:
Who's the Miller and ascetic again?In post 748, Vorkuta wrote:
We have 2x2 =4 Masonbuds, a miller, an ascetic, a few lurkers, and only Boon knows what in this game that will """solve itself later""", and I am very hesitant about letting that slide.In post 747, RAS wrote:that can and will be solved later.-
-
RAS Goon
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-