Krazy's Anime Upick (Game Over)

Titus · Post Post #235 (isolation #0) » Sat May 25, 2019 2:58 pm

Hiiiii

Lagunitas is good.

Shoot baby shoot.

Goons pose for my camera.

Titus · Post Post #247 (isolation #1) » Sat May 25, 2019 3:03 pm

In post 236, Alisae wrote:OMG ITS A TITUS!

OMG IT'S AN ALISAE!

Titus · Post Post #250 (isolation #2) » Sat May 25, 2019 3:05 pm

Finals. God I feel old.

Get off my lawn you rowdy goons.

Titus · Post Post #258 (isolation #3) » Sat May 25, 2019 3:09 pm

In post 257, Chaos Wind wrote:
In post 256, Alisae wrote:
In post 252, mastina wrote:
In post 247, Titus wrote:
In post 236, Alisae wrote:OMG ITS A TITUS!
OMG IT'S AN ALISAE!
OMG IT'S A SCUMTEAM
we already went over this mastina I'm an IC, we went over this.
Scum IC

:blobtea:

-chaos

We so bastard.

Grab my lantern, grab my gun

Some scum itching to get brains done

Titus · Post Post #266 (isolation #4) » Sat May 25, 2019 3:12 pm

In post 262, Chaos Wind wrote:Titus scares me

all I can imagine is a horde of pasty-white penguins with glowing red eyes, swords, and shotguns aiming at me

-chaos

Just wait till I VCA. Muahahaha.

Titus · Post Post #273 (isolation #5) » Sat May 25, 2019 3:17 pm

Ali, I has sads.

You gluten intolerant?

Titus · Post Post #274 (isolation #6) » Sat May 25, 2019 3:17 pm

In post 272, Chaos Wind wrote:btw if anyone else plays Xenoblade 2 I'll find some way of making a mason chat so we can talk

-chaos

Nah, Gundam Wing's more my style.

Titus · Post Post #292 (isolation #7) » Sat May 25, 2019 4:08 pm

In post 289, CheekyTeeky wrote:Why so cold Elsa?

Let it go.

Titus · Post Post #443 (isolation #8) » Sun May 26, 2019 3:06 am

In post 442, Chaos Wind wrote:Good morning all

My hydra partner is still asleep so I decided to actually read the thread

I think Alisae posting a lot was villagery, it didn't seem like they were worried about getting called out at all. I also found PJ's claim somewhat villagery too.

-Wind

Wind are you newer?

Titus · Post Post #445 (isolation #9) » Sun May 26, 2019 3:12 am

Then why are you equating post volume with villageryness?

Titus · Post Post #447 (isolation #10) » Sun May 26, 2019 3:30 am

In post 446, Chaos Wind wrote:
In post 445, Titus wrote:Then why are you equating post volume with villageryness?
sorry had to eat breakfast

I don't think it's villagery on its own, but the lack of awareness for how they could be perceived by doing that is, if that makes sense

-Wind

By now, you should know that's only a personality and life tell. If not, when I roll scum someday, you'll learn.

Titus · Post Post #526 (isolation #11) » Sun May 26, 2019 9:12 am

In post 521, Elsa Jay wrote:
In post 519, Emperor flippyNips wrote:Jeeze y’all. We just started yesterday.
Get gud then and come faster.

This is going in the quotes no context thread.

Titus · Post Post #544 (isolation #12) » Sun May 26, 2019 9:28 am

In post 542, CheekyTeeky wrote:I thought you'd know better than to try for my mislynch mastina. When I obvtown I look forward to the reasons for your retracted scumread. You might want to start planning that.

I want to see you obvtown if you're town.

So I'm voting you.

Win/win

VOTE: CheekyTeeky

Titus · Post Post #572 (isolation #13) » Sun May 26, 2019 9:43 am

In post 558, mastina wrote:
In post 531, CheekyTeeky wrote:Excellent thank you for confirming my suspicions mastina. I predicted you would omgus me as scum.
Yeah no.
You don't get to fucking say it's OMGUS.
When your fucking reason for voting me.

Is something that you personally know is fucking wrong.
So when I call you out on it.
Damn fucking straight I have good reason to.

Well it's still literal omgus but not within the spirit

Titus · Post Post #592 (isolation #14) » Sun May 26, 2019 10:22 am

How is Alisae so low on your list mastina?

I should let you know, hyper posting Titus is also likely dead while I try to make a baby Titus.

Titus · Post Post #611 (isolation #15) » Sun May 26, 2019 10:30 am

In post 608, CheekyTeeky wrote:Mastina wouldve claimed already if she was town but she's being vague to scare you all off.

She'd only claim as an anti-town role?

Titus · Post Post #621 (isolation #16) » Sun May 26, 2019 10:37 am

In post 620, mastina wrote:
In post 612, mastina wrote:
I am a mason with Elsa Jay.
Pretty blatant breadcrumbs at literally every stage of the way for this.

Want me to compile the full list or do you wanna spend time guessing them all?

CheekyTeeky had every reason to back off of me especially when I softed via the link to Scummers In This Game because that was a 'crumb aimed specifically at her--she did not.

Because she already knew.

Explain the crumb thing. I've been sick and never paid attention to that.

Titus · Post Post #654 (isolation #17) » Sun May 26, 2019 10:55 am

In post 634, mastina wrote:
In post 621, Titus wrote:Explain the crumb thing. I've been sick and never paid attention to that.
I am assuming you mean specifically the 'crumb which was aimed at CheekyTeeky.

Well.

In that case, it's these two posts especially in tandem:
In post 528, mastina wrote:Check out this game.
Specifically, notice something about my entrance there?
Where I went town town? scum? scum.?
And made an early readslist? When all the players in the game had not posted yet?
You know what my role that game was?
Mason.
Kinda literally the fucking opposite of being scum.
That game was the
most pertinent/relevant
game for me to link to.
But it's not the only game we've played together.
It was the most pertinent/relevant game because it is my fucking role this game too.

In post 562, mastina wrote:
In post 532, CheekyTeeky wrote:Coz I do know you well and that's watch do gurrrr.
Uh huh.
Sure you do.

You sure know me well enough to have called me fucking scum when
I am a mason
, yep.
And to, having seen that past mistake.
Then reuse your same fucking shade throwing as last time.
I used present tense here, 'am', not past tense, 'was'.

If you want to see every 'crumb and not just the ones in relationship to CheekyTeeky and that past mason game? That? That'll take me a little longer to compile as I've got over 70 posts and well over half of them contain a 'crumb in some form or another. But I'm assuming this is what you were asking for.

It was. Ty.

Sorry been to busy cooking to eat crumbs effectively.

Titus · Post Post #655 (isolation #18) » Sun May 26, 2019 10:55 am

In post 652, PJ. wrote:Whatever. Mastina is Def a mason. Fuck this game. Now we're gonna be driven to a massive L by an insane person.

I'd lynch you for this, but I want mastina alive to debate VCA with.

Titus · Post Post #657 (isolation #19) » Sun May 26, 2019 10:59 am

In post 656, PJ. wrote:If you lynch me, I'll just vengekill mastina. So go ahead. Lynch me.

You'd vengeful a Mason with no evidence they are lying?

Perhaps you and mastina shouldn't play together in the future.

Titus · Post Post #668 (isolation #20) » Sun May 26, 2019 11:18 am

In post 658, PJ. wrote:I'd 100% vengeful a mason to get hard confirm elsa and put someone who actually knows how to play effective mafia in a position of power. I'd argue that it's literally the most pro-town thing that I could do. So please, help me help town.

I have a better idea for this. Give mastina a couple days.

Titus · Post Post #679 (isolation #21) » Sun May 26, 2019 12:06 pm

In post 678, Shiro wrote:
In post 664, Alisae wrote:detective furret says the best slots to look at atm are shiro, TTTT, and Titus
I second that notion. Titus hasn't even asked me forr cookies yet D:

I haven't. I was having you as a pocket scumread because you didn't give me cookies.

Titus · Post Post #680 (isolation #22) » Sun May 26, 2019 12:06 pm

I don't know how many times I could say gluten too.

Titus · Post Post #682 (isolation #23) » Sun May 26, 2019 12:10 pm

In post 681, Shiro wrote:WOAH RUDE

But we can still become friends cause friendship prevails. I will bake you some. ^~^

Yippie.

Pocketed. Now, just make sure tanks don't smash my cookies ok.

Titus · Post Post #688 (isolation #24) » Sun May 26, 2019 12:41 pm

Alisae, only the cookie bakers distribute cookies.

Titus · Post Post #697 (isolation #25) » Sun May 26, 2019 1:54 pm

In post 696, Elsa Jay wrote:You don't give a heroin addict their heroin back or a drunk a bottle. It's OUR definition of your own good.

Ok Elsa, you're annoying me now. Shiro and I control the cookies. You and mastina have cookies.

Titus · Post Post #699 (isolation #26) » Sun May 26, 2019 1:59 pm

In post 698, Elsa Jay wrote:Yeah but the Masonry fund the creation of the cookies. Therefore we have a say of a particular group of people no longer allowed the cookies.

*glares* Try to freeze my reads. I am a hothead.

Titus · Post Post #701 (isolation #27) » Sun May 26, 2019 2:02 pm

In post 700, Elsa Jay wrote:
In post 699, Titus wrote:
In post 698, Elsa Jay wrote:Yeah but the Masonry fund the creation of the cookies. Therefore we have a say of a particular group of people no longer allowed the cookies.
*glares* Try to freeze my reads. I am a hothead.
You are a penguin. Penguins live in the cold. Therefore you can't be hot.

Humans can't freeze ice either.

Titus · Post Post #702 (isolation #28) » Sun May 26, 2019 2:03 pm

Trust me. You want me as a hothead. It's how we handle tanks.

Titus · Post Post #711 (isolation #29) » Sun May 26, 2019 2:58 pm

In post 707, Elsa Jay wrote:Sure thing Emp, you can have some.

Nope but I will watch for it.

Titus · Post Post #824 (isolation #30) » Mon May 27, 2019 3:05 am

In post 817, Shiro wrote:
In post 814, PJ. wrote:Mmm. I like this assessment of reassessment.

vote: TTTT
YUS my cookies worked.

Dude, we need to talk. He's getting the dark cookies tonight or tomorrow.

Titus · Post Post #830 (isolation #31) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:31 am

In post 827, Shiro wrote:@Titus huh?

If Panzer will hurt the masons, he can't have good cookies.

Titus · Post Post #832 (isolation #32) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:44 am

In post 831, PJ. wrote:mason. I will hurt mason. singular.

Indifferent. The Mason can be dumb as crap, you don't hurt Mason's or I hurt you. Got it?

Titus · Post Post #845 (isolation #33) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:56 am

In post 838, Shiro wrote:
In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.

Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..

On Day 1 in a large, if they live forever, I'll handle the problem. If they drop me, then worry. It's a Mason claim, worry about it later.

Endgame Mason claims are more to worry about.

Titus · Post Post #848 (isolation #34) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:57 am

In post 844, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 838, Shiro wrote:
In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.

Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..
I believe Mastina would do that but not Elsa. Scum Elsa is more interested in making false associations with people who aren’t partners and WIFOMing the game.

True but Elsa could be mastina's beta. Unlikely and not worth pursuing but possible.

Titus · Post Post #849 (isolation #35) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:58 am

In post 847, Brock and Onyx wrote:I suppose it's pretty obvious who's posting rn, so I guess I don't need to sign, right?

Sign once

Titus · Post Post #853 (isolation #36) » Mon May 27, 2019 5:02 am

In post 850, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 848, Titus wrote:
In post 844, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 838, Shiro wrote:
In post 834, Alchemist21 wrote:Why don’t you believe the claim?
I am happy you understood that before I corrected it.

Because this is mastina, she has done that in the past before. She really isnt above claiming mason with her scum partner. It kinda bothers me that Titus defended it like that cause she would know that as well..
I believe Mastina would do that but not Elsa. Scum Elsa is more interested in making false associations with people who aren’t partners and WIFOMing the game.
True but Elsa could be mastina's beta. Unlikely and not worth pursuing but possible.
Beta?

Alpha = leader
Beta = follower

Titus · Post Post #855 (isolation #37) » Mon May 27, 2019 5:03 am

In post 854, PJ. wrote:well..i'll keep the milk cool.

Good luck with that. I'm the hot penguin.

Titus · Post Post #870 (isolation #38) » Mon May 27, 2019 5:11 am

In post 859, jjh927 wrote:843 introduces more information to the lie that makes it considerably more implausible in that;

a. it suggests Mastina claiming mason d1 was something she was always planning on doing
b. this plan was discussed and strongly dissented against by Elsa

This can be scum.

Titus · Post Post #882 (isolation #39) » Mon May 27, 2019 5:44 am

In post 876, jjh927 wrote:
In post 870, Titus wrote:
In post 859, jjh927 wrote:843 introduces more information to the lie that makes it considerably more implausible in that;

a. it suggests Mastina claiming mason d1 was something she was always planning on doing
b. this plan was discussed and strongly dissented against by Elsa
This can be scum.
You ought to be able to tell it isn't and know that I'm usually right on these things

You ought to know that I rarely lead on day 1. If you are, time will tell.

@Creature ty

Titus · Post Post #890 (isolation #40) » Mon May 27, 2019 5:52 am

In post 884, jjh927 wrote:
In post 882, Titus wrote:
In post 876, jjh927 wrote:
In post 870, Titus wrote:
In post 859, jjh927 wrote:843 introduces more information to the lie that makes it considerably more implausible in that;

a. it suggests Mastina claiming mason d1 was something she was always planning on doing
b. this plan was discussed and strongly dissented against by Elsa
This can be scum.
You ought to be able to tell it isn't and know that I'm usually right on these things
You ought to know that I rarely lead on day 1. If you are, time will tell.

@Creature ty
Idgaf what you're gonna do with your stated opinions

It's more that they're wrong and if you remember who I am you probably should be able to read me

Don't put extreme stock in a weak day 1 observation in a late game player. I stand by it could be scummy but that doesn't lock scum you. I'll sort you with time. If you know me, that's my process.

Titus · Post Post #894 (isolation #41) » Mon May 27, 2019 6:01 am

In post 893, jjh927 wrote:I'm most interested in whether or not you actually believe it and you downplaying it in response to me pointing that out doesn't help

And the fact is I said "could be" because I honestly do not know. I strongly believe it is possible. I am fences hitting. Deal with it.

Titus · Post Post #952 (isolation #42) » Mon May 27, 2019 9:54 am

In post 930, mastina wrote:
In post 658, PJ. wrote:I'd 100% vengeful a mason to get hard confirm elsa and put someone who actually knows how to play effective mafia in a position of power. I'd argue that it's literally the most pro-town thing that I could do. So please, help me help town.
Yeah the problem with that is multiple-fold.
1: Vengekills are a shot at hitting scum. By deliberately aiming at town, you're deliberately avoiding playing to your wincon.
2: Vengekills resolve before the night phase. Guess what happens once one mason is vengekilled? You go into night. Guess what the mafia have? A nightkill. End result? Both masons dead before the end of the night. Don't fucking think this game wouldn't have a fucking strongman, because Krazy absolutely gives scum a role like that every single game, pretty much.
3: The mason claim is self-resolving. Scum literally
can't
let us live forever, so what will they do?
Oh yeah.
On their fucking own.
Without a vengekill.
Kill us.

Panzer's not a fucking moron.
He knows all of these.
So he fucking knows better than this.

Ergo.
His threat to vengekill a mason?
Empty at best, gamethrowing at worst. Unless of course he were a scum vengeful, in which case absolutely yeah vengekilling us is the correct play.

It's about as blatant a scumclaim as you can get.

Give me 2 nights. If the power of Dark Cookies cannot resolve it, then we react.

Titus · Post Post #960 (isolation #43) » Mon May 27, 2019 9:58 am

In post 954, Alisae wrote:TITUS
vote TTTT with me D;

Not opposed. I want to wait and see though.

Titus · Post Post #974 (isolation #44) » Mon May 27, 2019 10:07 am

In post 969, mastina wrote:
In post 722, Chaos Wind wrote:so
why do you think scum!cheeky does this?
Because it was a push that was win-win regardless.
I don't claim, Cheeky gets away with pushing me and has an excuse to not push anyone else.
I do claim, then my claim's out in the open and exposed.
CheekyTeeky had every reason to push me as scum and no reason NOT to.

Also.
CheekyTeeky might not have even seen a way to back out as scum.
As town who picked up on my hints, CheekyTeeky would immediately have a way to get out of it; as scum who picked up on my hints, CheekyTeeky likely wouldn't know how she should respond.

Also.
The way CheekyTeeky did respond once the claim was out was a scum reaction, so.

What would town!Cheeky have done?

Titus · Post Post #978 (isolation #45) » Mon May 27, 2019 10:08 am

In post 973, mastina wrote:
In post 726, PJ. wrote:1) cause she's probably a real mason
3) Cause I've only seen garbage play so far
As a vig.
Would you fucking vig an innocent child because you thought their play was garbage?

Fuck no, you'd be fucking banned for gamethrowing for that.

This is literally no fucking different than that, and yet it's Panzer's logic for justifying his threat.

I have a plan. Chill.

Titus · Post Post #987 (isolation #46) » Mon May 27, 2019 10:14 am

In post 982, mastina wrote:
In post 766, Xtoxm wrote:you werent losing this debate
Doesn't mean it wasn't a not-wrong call. A lack of losing the debate doesn't in of itself mean that claiming was bad, because there was a notable lack of winning it in a sense. Good reasons to make it, more or less. I'm kinda getting tired (good god my eyes are shaking I need a nap) so I'm kinda losing coherency here so I kinda can't explain it properly to lay out my thought process but again, I will defend the call. Maybe it wasn't necessary, sure, but it was still I think something overall advantageous. Even if not optimal, still USEFUL, if that makes sense.

Stop defending yourself and focus on catching scum.

Titus · Mon May 27, 2019 10:58 am

In post 995, mastina wrote:
In post 952, Titus wrote:Give me 2 nights. If the power of Dark Cookies cannot resolve it, then we react.
That requires trust in you that I utterly lack.

Well, what's your other option? Lynch him and die?

Titus · Mon May 27, 2019 11:01 am

In post 1021, Alisae wrote:
In post 1020, Titus wrote:
In post 995, mastina wrote:
In post 952, Titus wrote:Give me 2 nights. If the power of Dark Cookies cannot resolve it, then we react.
That requires trust in you that I utterly lack.
Well, what's your other option? Lynch him and die?
I have an idea

If it's ignore Panzer and let baby penguin handle it, that's good.

Titus · Mon May 27, 2019 11:56 am

Ali Alch is a thought that had crossed my mind

Titus · Post Post #1040 (isolation #50) » Mon May 27, 2019 1:01 pm

In post 1036, Cafe Stile wrote:I'm literally just going off how Ali kept bussing teammates in turbos a year back

I'm curious tho what made you think of Ali/Alch team

- Hideri

It was something one said near the other but I can't find it.

Titus · Post Post #1108 (isolation #51) » Mon May 27, 2019 4:24 pm

In post 1107, Alisae wrote:
In post 1105, Cafe Stile wrote:I actually kinda like that answer
He wasn't in the last weeb upick you know

possibly he just said it because of tmi but i'll brew the read for a night

- Hideri
what do you mean you liked it, its bullshit mastina was literally saying that me and titus were her top scumreads the whole game up to that point

What are we referencing here?

My God this VC says lynch Cheeky regardless of Alch alignment.

Titus · Post Post #1116 (isolation #52) » Mon May 27, 2019 7:57 pm

In post 1110, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1108, Titus wrote:My God this VC says lynch Cheeky regardless of Alch alignment.
How does it say that? Can I borrow your glasses?

A wagon lead by two masons gets a counter and Mr. OMG the Mason is a Shithhead is not leading or on the counter? That is a neon sign in wagonomics that you're important for scum to keep alive.

Titus · Post Post #1132 (isolation #53) » Tue May 28, 2019 1:56 am

In post 1118, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1116, Titus wrote:A wagon lead by two masons gets a counter and Mr. OMG the Mason is a Shithhead is not leading or on the counter? That is a neon sign in wagonomics that you're important for scum to keep alive.
I still don't get it. :/ I understand that I'm a counter but I don't know who the mr is why he's important and why Alch and I can be svs.

Panzer is the Mr.

S v S is a thing if one of you has an extremely valuable PR.

Titus · Post Post #1136 (isolation #54) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:04 am

Oh hi Tet, how do Panzer's red intestines look?

Titus · Post Post #1138 (isolation #55) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:06 am

In post 1135, Tet wrote:Titus is going to need a smoking gun.

*giggles*

Good luck with that.

Titus · Post Post #1140 (isolation #56) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:09 am

In post 1139, Tet wrote:
In post 1136, Titus wrote:Oh hi Tet, how do Panzer's red intestines look?
Super townie response, this will in no way cause me to tunnel.

Well, at least you'd be doing something.

Titus · Post Post #1145 (isolation #57) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:27 am

In post 1144, Tet wrote:Titus doesn't get lynched today for a couple of reasons. Make your case and then hunt elsewhere.

Interesting. If mastina wasn't in the game, I'd swear you'd be an alt of yours for this attitude if you're town.

Doubt it but posts like this give me pause.

Titus · Post Post #1147 (isolation #58) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:52 am

Well roll me in mud and try to put a case on me...

Oh wait I am a penguin not a pig.

You know, I'm totally bussing Cheeky. You should join.

Titus · Post Post #1153 (isolation #59) » Tue May 28, 2019 6:58 am

My dark cookies shall prevail.

What's head cannon?

Titus · Tue May 28, 2019 12:02 pm

Out of curiosity, why Tet and not Cheeky?

Titus · Tue May 28, 2019 12:15 pm

In post 1204, Alchemist21 wrote:Because that’s the slot that has my attention right now and the one I want to push.

What's your read on Cheeky? Why doesn't your counter wagon have your attention?

Titus · Post Post #1212 (isolation #62) » Tue May 28, 2019 1:03 pm

In post 1207, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1205, Titus wrote:
In post 1204, Alchemist21 wrote:Because that’s the slot that has my attention right now and the one I want to push.
What's your read on Cheeky? Why doesn't your counter wagon have your attention?
It’s still a scumread but the Tet read is one I want to push right now. I feel stronger about my Tet read.

Why is Cheeky a scumread? Why is Tet a higher priority over a push by Masons?

Titus · Post Post #1215 (isolation #63) » Tue May 28, 2019 1:14 pm

In post 1214, Alisae wrote:why would you want to follow masons that are gamethrowing????????
Asking for a friend

Alchemist doesn't think they are and nor do I.

Titus · Post Post #1218 (isolation #64) » Tue May 28, 2019 1:28 pm

In post 1216, Alisae wrote:
In post 1215, Titus wrote:
In post 1214, Alisae wrote:why would you want to follow masons that are gamethrowing????????
Asking for a friend
Alchemist doesn't think they are and nor do I.
Here are the things mastina did this game
- get into a fight that is probably a TvT with Cheeky
- claimed mason and outed their buddy because Cheeky reasonably thought mastina could be scum for some reason
- continued to push that one read and nothing else because their ego demanded it.

I'm sorry, how is that not gamethrowing?

This is pinging hard. We are not continuing this discussion until after alchemist answers. Whether or not mastina was game throwing is irrelevant to my line of questioning.
Alch believes Cheeky is scum supposedly but wants to push Tet now. I want to get at why.

Titus · Post Post #1224 (isolation #65) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:16 pm

@Alchemist, I was saying you didn't perceive them as gamethrowing.

Titus · Post Post #1227 (isolation #66) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:18 pm

In post 1220, Alchemist21 wrote:Cheeky’s been a scumread since I saw Mastina call them out on lying about meta. And tet is higher on my priority list because it’s pushed by me.

This is circular. I asked why are you pushing Tet over Cheeky when both are scumreads? You respond with Tet is a higher priority because it's pushed by you.

Why are you pushing it though?

Titus · Post Post #1228 (isolation #67) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:19 pm

I seriously feel this conversation might have three scum and 1 town (me).

Titus · Post Post #1234 (isolation #68) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:24 pm

In post 1229, Alisae wrote:Titus ur town because you realized that the language I'm using is intentionally manipulative.

@Cheeky Engagement is a matter of real life, not alignment.

Titus · Post Post #1235 (isolation #69) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:26 pm

In post 1232, CheekyTeeky wrote:Like she keeps trying to herd people onto me for no reason. The amount of apathy towards both the wagons and the feeling like this is it for the day feel like maybe both are town. I do think alchemist is scummy though so idk.

I was just grilling Alchemist to sort whether he was scum or town bailing on your wagon.

Why did you think I was herding him? If he said he TRed you, that conversation would be different entirely.

Titus · Post Post #1241 (isolation #70) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:30 pm

Why not let it push organically and push your own wagon Alisae? Then attack mine.

This let's you see who kisses ass to the masons for a bad wagon and who follows to a good one. This is part of why I was grilling Alch. If I was wrong and Cheeky is town, some scum would buddy the masons. Let things happen. Loosen the grip. Jumping to defend people and manipulate wagons pings my scumdar.

Titus · Post Post #1242 (isolation #71) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:30 pm

In post 1239, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 1227, Titus wrote:
In post 1220, Alchemist21 wrote:Cheeky’s been a scumread since I saw Mastina call them out on lying about meta. And tet is higher on my priority list because it’s pushed by me.
This is circular. I asked why are you pushing Tet over Cheeky when both are scumreads? You respond with Tet is a higher priority because it's pushed by you.

Why are you pushing it though?
My read on Tet is stronger than my read on cheeky.

Why?

Titus · Post Post #1245 (isolation #72) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:31 pm

In post 1238, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1235, Titus wrote:I was just grilling Alchemist to sort whether he was scum or town bailing on your wagon.

Why did you think I was herding him? If he said he TRed you, that conversation would be different entirely.
Do you think there's only 2 scum in the game?

I just randomly postulated everyone in this conversation but me is scum sooo

Titus · Post Post #1259 (isolation #73) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:47 pm

In post 1251, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1243, Alisae wrote:What do ya mean, I'm just saying she wants you dead so why wouldn't she try to herd people onto you?????????? I'm asking for a friend here.
Because of some moon logic VCA and the masons? Sounds like an opportunistic excuse.

Have we played together before?

Titus · Post Post #1260 (isolation #74) » Tue May 28, 2019 2:48 pm

In post 1255, Elsa Jay wrote:Mastieeeeeeee where are youuuuuuuuu

Grab popcorn, I'm baking cookies.

Titus · Post Post #1261 (isolation #75) » Tue May 28, 2019 3:31 pm

Seriously, does anyone know if cheeky is an alt?

Anyone? I need to know if Cheeky and I have ever played together.

Titus · Post Post #1263 (isolation #76) » Tue May 28, 2019 3:49 pm

In post 1262, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1259, Titus wrote:
In post 1251, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 1243, Alisae wrote:What do ya mean, I'm just saying she wants you dead so why wouldn't she try to herd people onto you?????????? I'm asking for a friend here.
Because of some moon logic VCA and the masons? Sounds like an opportunistic excuse.
Have we played together before?

In post 1261, Titus wrote:Seriously, does anyone know if cheeky is an alt?
Anyone? I need to know if Cheeky and I have ever played together.
We've played in a garbage fire. But under this name only. I can't remember the name but Pine, Ali, LLD, Reck, FB were in it.

Ok. I'll ask you more when I'm sober. If we hadn't played together, your post would be a scumslip.

It does suggest a lack of familiarity with me as day 1 has no VCA barring multiple scum modkills. That's wagonomics. Moonlogic is also sort of associated with me too.

In days past, I push it as a slip but I am an old drunk bitch.

Alch read?

Titus · Post Post #1270 (isolation #77) » Tue May 28, 2019 4:15 pm

In post 1267, Flavor Leaf wrote:I actually think that might be scum indicative rather than a scum slip anyways, Titus. I see that line of reasoning and exactly why you brought that up. I'm not caught up. But I am Hikaru. From Hikaru no Go.

Looking forward to this.

Titus · Post Post #1274 (isolation #78) » Tue May 28, 2019 4:38 pm

Alisae if you hit 600 posts today, I am policy lynching you for onstruction of justice. You have approximately 1/3 of the posts in the entire game.

Titus · Post Post #1276 (isolation #79) » Tue May 28, 2019 4:53 pm

Do you think I blindly follow masons?

Titus · Post Post #1278 (isolation #80) » Tue May 28, 2019 4:55 pm

In post 1277, Flavor Leaf wrote:Who are the masons?

Mastina and Elsa

Titus · Post Post #1286 (isolation #81) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:06 pm

In post 1282, Flavor Leaf wrote:
In post 1281, CheekyTeeky wrote:It was the other way around FL.

Lololololololol.

Either way. They aren’t masons.

I’m masons with Xtoxm.

I am not drunk enough or too drunk for this shit.

Titus · Post Post #1305 (isolation #82) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:20 pm

In post 1302, Tet wrote:Titus is probably town as well. Cheeky, vote BO and I'll help you get that awful wagon off you.

Wait when did I become town

Titus · Post Post #1310 (isolation #83) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:31 pm

In post 1307, Tet wrote:
In post 1305, Titus wrote:
In post 1302, Tet wrote:Titus is probably town as well. Cheeky, vote BO and I'll help you get that awful wagon off you.
Wait when did I become town
I'd be hard pressed to put you and alchemist on a team together and I feel Alchemist is more likely scum out of the two of you. I get the scumreads on cheeky and the wagon can't be all scum... Probably.

You can still be 3p if you want.

3p helps with my dark cookie delivery system to protect the real masons

Titus · Post Post #1312 (isolation #84) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:34 pm

What about them?

Titus · Post Post #1314 (isolation #85) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:36 pm

Why? This was so simple when I was sober

Titus · Post Post #1319 (isolation #86) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:42 pm

I need more bullets. Lmao

Titus · Post Post #1322 (isolation #87) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:46 pm

In post 1320, Chaos Wind wrote:
In post 1319, Titus wrote:I need more bullets. Lmao
double your revolver capacity

its better that way

-chaos

Lol

Titus · Post Post #1337 (isolation #88) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:56 pm

In post 1330, Chaos Wind wrote:
In post 723, Chaos Wind wrote: [snip]

In post 655, Titus wrote:
In post 652, PJ. wrote:Whatever. Mastina is Def a mason. Fuck this game. Now we're gonna be driven to a massive L by an insane person.
I'd lynch you for this, but I want mastina alive to debate VCA with.

In post 656, PJ. wrote:If you lynch me, I'll just vengekill mastina. So go ahead. Lynch me.
these 2 posts

don't look good together
@titus can you explain your post more

because there was no indication of panzer claiming to kill mastina
until after you said "i'd lynch you, but i want mastina alive"

i just think the timing is hella weird

-chaos

Ok. Timing's wierd. I didn't trust Panzer.

The thing is not the type of thing buddies fake but I could use more mud on my boots

Titus · Post Post #1339 (isolation #89) » Tue May 28, 2019 5:57 pm

In post 1338, Chaos Wind wrote:what the holy fuck

-chaos

The ms bug is back.

Mod, please delete the duplicate posts.

Titus · Post Post #1357 (isolation #90) » Tue May 28, 2019 6:07 pm

In post 1340, Chaos Wind wrote:but uhhh

why would lynching panzer directly mean that mastina dies?

-chaos

I felt there was the implication.

Titus · Post Post #1359 (isolation #91) » Tue May 28, 2019 6:11 pm

In post 1358, Chaos Wind wrote:
In post 652, PJ. wrote:Whatever. Mastina is Def a mason. Fuck this game. Now we're gonna be driven to a massive L by an insane person.
you got an implication here thinking that panzer was going to
kill
Mastina?

if anything to me it feels like the resigned tone of someone who is irritated and can't do anything about it

-chaos

But he could if he avenged her, which is the idea we both had simultaneously

Titus · Wed May 29, 2019 11:56 am

Mastina are you caught up?

Titus · Post Post #1558 (isolation #93) » Wed May 29, 2019 4:33 pm

In post 1554, TTTT wrote:there's more utility in prolonging my reveal
obv I can't prove that
but there it is

This feels townish.

When would it be optimal to reveal?

Titus · Post Post #1561 (isolation #94) » Wed May 29, 2019 4:39 pm

In post 1559, TTTT wrote:depends on claims
and maybe flips

In post 1560, TTTT wrote:maybe something else too

Can you approximate when or say the type of knowledge?

Titus · Post Post #1572 (isolation #95) » Wed May 29, 2019 4:53 pm

In post 1567, Xtoxm wrote:idk where people are getting this idea that im a good player from

People still expect me to be good day 1 lol. Day 1 is about taking out anti town.

Titus · Post Post #1581 (isolation #96) » Wed May 29, 2019 5:05 pm

Tet, I think you're town. I wanna talk. If King Tet had a plan, what would it be?

Titus · Post Post #1583 (isolation #97) » Wed May 29, 2019 5:12 pm

In post 1582, Alisae wrote:Lets
lynch
Pink Ball
?????????????????????????????

Cheeky

Titus · Post Post #1586 (isolation #98) » Wed May 29, 2019 5:13 pm

In post 1584, Alisae wrote:
In post 1583, Titus wrote:
In post 1582, Alisae wrote:Lets
lynch
Pink Ball
?????????????????????????????
Cheeky
Your Cheeky read is shit

Well maybe I'm not obvtown

Titus · Post Post #1588 (isolation #99) » Wed May 29, 2019 5:18 pm

In post 1587, Alisae wrote:
In post 1586, Titus wrote:
In post 1584, Alisae wrote:
In post 1583, Titus wrote:
In post 1582, Alisae wrote:Lets
lynch
Pink Ball
?????????????????????????????
Cheeky
Your Cheeky read is shit
Well maybe I'm not obvtown
you are obvtown you just have a very bad read

Why wouldn't you scumread? I think you're white knighting me?

Titus · Wed May 29, 2019 5:34 pm

In post 1589, Alisae wrote:Because Cheeky bled town like what, all game?

No. He like hasn't but oook.

Titus · Wed May 29, 2019 5:44 pm

Wait who all is here now you scumfuck?

Titus · Wed May 29, 2019 6:04 pm

In post 1600, Tet wrote:
In post 1581, Titus wrote:Tet, I think you're town. I wanna talk. If King Tet had a plan, what would it be?
Lynch alchemist and shoot probably chaos in the night? That's kind of a broad question.

Drunk!Titus asks that stuff.

Why would chaos be shot and how?

Titus · Thu May 30, 2019 2:44 am

In post 1701, Shiro wrote:Because he claims to be something that will be useful later. By itself that, makes one more wary of lynching it.

Actually if I didn't feel how he went about it, I'd vote him for the info.

I'm a greedy bitch and want all the information.

Titus · Thu May 30, 2019 2:48 am

In post 1705, Xtoxm wrote:hey shiro, im something that will be useful later

I'm like that no matter the role. Lol

Titus · Thu May 30, 2019 2:53 am

In post 1714, CheekyTeeky wrote:

Mwahaha you're all going to regret today.

Why?

Titus · Thu May 30, 2019 3:04 am

In post 1725, PJ. wrote:@cheeky, honestly I'm just ready for a flip.

I think a Shiro flip could be interesting. I think an alchemist or cheeky flip would tell us a lot.

Idk, I feel the traction that Shiro is getting is a little too easy?

I feel that the.non-masons on that were on cheeky''s wagon are probably scum.

Idk, I just want more information instead of reading furret go in circles and anything mastina or titus write.

DARK COOKIES!

Titus · Thu May 30, 2019 11:20 am

In post 1765, Shiro wrote:
In post 1763, Furret und Woopers wrote:4Ts join Furret on Shiro!

For someone that thinks he is a good player as you said, you are justifying an awful lot of horrible town play apparently.

Shiro, this post makes me feel you might be an evil baker.

Titus · Fri May 31, 2019 6:26 am

In post 1807, mastina wrote:
In post 1548, TTTT wrote:I'm Informed Town
what I'm informed of I don't wanna reveal until later
While I'm annoyed that you're not claiming this info.

This is 100% not a fakeclaim.
Or even, like.
200% not a fakeclaim.
It is absolutely, 100%, real as real can be, a realclaim.

It is not
inherently
a town claim because Krazy
can
(and in a certain sense to some extent from a specific point of view, has) make an informed scum...

...But it is
disproportionately likely
to be a townclaim.

We're talking, solid 80-95% range, town claim.

Haven't I fake claimed informed townie as scum? I am too confused to remember.

I think TTTT is town but this feels overblown mastina.

Titus · Fri May 31, 2019 6:47 am

In post 1813, mastina wrote:(Generally speaking for a scumteam of four, the most you want is six. You can potentially have UP TO eight, but you don't really WANT to have more than six. Basically, scumteam of 4, 4 scumreads = perfect, 8 scumreads = maximum, 9+ = you're doing it wrong, 6 = most you want to have, 5 = perfectly fine, 7 = not optimal, but acceptable spot. So I have one more than I want, but one less than the maximum acceptable to have.)

I'll just pretend your SR of me is the extra one to shield me from scumkills.

Titus · Fri May 31, 2019 7:45 am

Shiro why haven't you told mastina I'm town then?

Titus · Fri May 31, 2019 8:28 am

In post 1844, Emperor flippyNips wrote:@titus. Do you have any sr?

Yup. Panzer Cherky Alch Shiro Alisae but my reads are stale/,illness induced so I'm probing not pushing

Titus · Fri May 31, 2019 1:14 pm

Occam's Razor, if 4t is scum, it's likely with someone who knows Krazy meta. This is not meant to state a 4t scumread.

Titus · Fri May 31, 2019 1:33 pm

Shiro can you read wall for me?

I'm going into urgent care and need something I can chew on to sort you.

Titus · Fri May 31, 2019 1:35 pm

Maybe if you shut up you could read more

Titus · Fri May 31, 2019 8:03 pm

VC Please

Titus · Sat Jun 01, 2019 4:10 am

Sick moonlogic theory. Would Krazy adopt something from the Werewolves and Masons setup and have a wolf Mason or a mafia monk? Feel free to ignore if delirious. The objection for a lack of foundation and relevancy is sustained but the point this is not a courtroom is noted.

Titus · Sat Jun 01, 2019 4:30 am

In post 2160, Pink Ball wrote:How do you turn this on

My husband would like that answered for sick robot Titus.

#badandinappropriatejoke

Titus · Sat Jun 01, 2019 11:54 am

VOTE: Alchemist

Titus · Sat Jun 01, 2019 1:37 pm

In post 2204, Furret und Woopers wrote:
In post 2175, Krazy wrote:Day 1 deadline is in 3 days, 0 hours, 33 minutes
I'm not sure how many people are paying attention
BUT
we need to lynch something
soon

I'll vote almost anything. I hate d1, my head hurts and I am still sick.

Titus · Sat Jun 01, 2019 2:20 pm

I townread TTT, I don't trust a wagon with you on it and I want higher numbers on wagons. Alch's an SR so it works

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:13 am

Hey I wouldn't mind a nips wagon.

We need large wagons, not trickles atm.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:47 am

In post 2219, CheekyTeeky wrote:VOTE: Pink Ball

We had the largest wagons when pushing obvscum cheeky

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:55 am

In post 2221, CheekyTeeky wrote:Good thing that's gone eh.

Don't tempt me. You're a very lucky woman.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:14 am

In post 2225, Furret und Woopers wrote:
In post 2224, Furret und Woopers wrote:Does anyone want to play league with a Furret?
and by anyone I mean

@Titus

Rain check. I have to leave for Mass soon.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:25 am

In post 2239, jjh927 wrote:I'm not seeing anything convincing on Pink Ball scum tbh

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:33 am

In post 2242, Furret und Woopers wrote:Titus who are your townreads and why?

The Mason claims bc Mason claims
Tttt bc claim

I can't follow much of anything else. I am also not seeing enough pattern in the VCs.

I literally just don't want any wagon you want. I don't trust you that much.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 9:33 am

In post 2243, Flavor Leaf wrote:How is pink ball scum? He is the coordinator of Flavor Leaf Appreciation Page.

Alch has a wagon

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 11:24 am

Ali, your Alch read?

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 1:10 pm

In post 2315, Furret und Woopers wrote:Cheeky its ok ur already my doublevoter for the day

Uck...

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:23 pm

In post 2404, Flavor Leaf wrote:I don’t think alchemist fights like this as scum.

Where was he before?

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 4:55 pm

In post 2423, Skygazer wrote:tangentially related: alch's role sounds like a town role based on my info?? granted scum have fakeclaims but

Uh, really?

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:36 pm

VOTE: Skygazer

I think scum just want tttt info.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:37 pm

In post 2438, Shiro wrote:
In post 2405, Flavor Leaf wrote:Pretty sure a TTTT partner is pushing this
Whenever 4ts started being legit wagon a cw poped up, 3rd time now.. But nothing to. See here folk. Everyone come back to the light with me and flavour.

Tttt has never been a legit wagon? The only wagon we got so far was alch.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:42 pm

In post 2444, Shiro wrote:
In post 2442, Titus wrote:VOTE: Skygazer

I think scum just want tttt info.
No Titus, ffs no.

TTTT has seen 4 cw

Pink ball
Me
Alchemist
Cheeky

And now a 5th is trying to rear its ugly head.

FIVE CW TO THE SLOT TITUS, FIVE!

what does that tell us Titus, wake up.

None of those were viable wagons. Ever. Cheeky came first with mastina. So arguably this applies to Cheeky. Alchemist also had a higher point. I know because I cast the vote that put Alch over tttt.

Shiro you never had above 4 and pretty sure you capped at 3.

In a 19 player game, those aren't wagons. They're sneezes.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 5:55 pm

In post 2447, Shiro wrote:That should make his claim to you even worse, a claim. He said defended wasn't hurtful to town. Titus please Trust me on this one, I know I am right.

??? I scumread you? Why are you reaching out to me so hard? I also don't trust Ali with the amount he's done to make the game unreadable.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:01 pm

In post 2450, Shiro wrote:You do?

Yeah, the only thing you've done since cookies according to my recollection is an unexplained rolefish on tttt. That's what this wagon feels like.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:32 pm

@Nips, Ignore Panzer unless I die. He's whitenoise.

@Shiro, I am inclined to give TTTT the day unless no option presents itself. TTTT has outlined his info will be useful on d1. I feel that scum are piggy backing on this to get useful pr info.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 6:34 pm

In post 2461, Titus wrote:@Nips, Ignore Panzer unless I die. He's whitenoise.

@Shiro, I am inclined to give TTTT the day unless no option presents itself. TTTT has outlined his info will be useful on d1. I feel that scum are piggy backing on this to get useful pr info.

Ebwop d2

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:01 pm

In post 2464, Pink Ball wrote:Be, aggresive, be be, aggresive

Who do you want dead?

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:10 pm

In post 2468, Emperor flippyNips wrote:
In post 2465, Emperor flippyNips wrote:
In post 2463, Titus wrote:
In post 2461, Titus wrote:@Nips, Ignore Panzer unless I die. He's whitenoise.

Spoiler:

Also

Spoiler:

Yeah, I'm not following a guy dumb enough to venge a Mason claim because his ego says he's a better player.

What are you thinking of voting?

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:12 pm

In post 2471, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 2130, CheekyTeeky wrote:Worst ISO I skimmed today. Seems more opportunistic than game solvy. Has given barely any reads or reasons. Wagon hopping with consensus. Overly focussed on the mason claim.
I'll remind you that he just hopped on another wagon and he still hasn't given solid reads.

It's two days until deadline, well almost 1 now...hopping happens.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:15 pm

In post 2475, CheekyTeeky wrote:Your defense is noted Titus.

Not really a defense...just a reality of the situation. You're pushing on lies and playstyle and have been since the fight with mastina.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:20 pm

In post 2477, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 2476, Titus wrote:
In post 2475, CheekyTeeky wrote:Your defense is noted Titus.
Not really a defense...just a reality of the situation. You're pushing on lies and playstyle and have been since the fight with mastina.
Right well the times you choose to see reality are revealing.

Where have I lied? Now you're reaching.

Well, mastina was pretty persuasive in that regard. I'm not rehashing that fight again.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:21 pm

Nips, who do you want to lynch? I want to get a non-toxic wagon going.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:34 pm

In post 2483, CheekyTeeky wrote:Clearly Titus is full of shit in this argument. You've been side swiping me but if I was lying and so obv scum why are you pushing people to claim when you've found caught scum?

Emperor I think Alchemist is town.

I'm not pushing people to claim. In fact, that's why I'm against wagoning TTTT. That posting is within the past hour.

Second, I've been vote parked on you most of day one. The wagon deteriorated. Only mastina Elsa and I would stay on you. They gave up. Then when deadline approached I did.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 7:51 pm

Oh this conversation is over Cheeky. Either vote me or move on.

You don't need to feel inspired. You literally just lied about me role fishing in 2483. You claimed that I pushed people just for the claims. You lied in the chat with mastina, yet no one aside from me Alch and the masons voted you.

So I'm sorry that I don't inspire you.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:16 pm

In post 2488, Emperor flippyNips wrote:
In post 2481, Furret und Woopers wrote:VOTE: jjh

What are your reasons? Minus deadline

Started by Alisae and Cheeky. Couldn't pay me enough.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:17 pm

I'd rather vote TTTT.

@Cheeky, I've been sick most of this dayphase.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:18 pm

Also, if jjh flips scum, you're welcome to try. Or if he flips town. I really don't care.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:23 pm

@Cheeky No. What I don't have is time. You gloating in my face about me being sick and incapable of stringing you up earlier does zero for town. So either vote me or shut the fuck up.

@Nips, I'd do it if it's clean.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:24 pm

In post 2496, CheekyTeeky wrote:
In post 2494, Emperor flippyNips wrote:@cheeky what do you think of cafe?
Town.

Actually agree. That wagon has Panzer. Eww.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:30 pm

@Nips, how do you feel about Skygazer. That might be the only decent wagon with a shot.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:32 pm

In post 2504, Furret und Woopers wrote:alright mastina
I'll give it to ya
you were right
Titus might be scum

Let me ask you this Alisae/the worst. What made you think drowning out communication to the point where I felt compelled to tell you to shut up was protown?

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:39 pm

In post 2507, PJ. wrote:
In post 2461, Titus wrote:@Nips, Ignore Panzer unless I die. He's whitenoise.

@Shiro, I am inclined to give TTTT the day unless no option presents itself. TTTT has outlined his info will be useful on d1. I feel that scum are piggy backing on this to get useful pr info.
He literally just responded to my case against him with 5 gifs pushing his content post to actual post percentage under 16%. Regardless of you feel about me and my philosophy on vengekilling an awful player, claimed mason or otherwise; I think it's foolish of you to consider me white noise and to disregard this information. This is a player who has both been around and actively avoided making any opinions about the game at large. No opinions on cheeky. No opinions on alch aside from pretty non-committal one liners. Creature and flavor leaf provided more content than flippy and have been around less.

Also, look at our options: alchemist is a claimed town sounding role with weird wagon conditions, pink ball and TTTT were both started by your scumreads. I'm not asking you to like me or think I'm smart, I'm asking you to look into it.

Look, any player who will vengekill a conftown is playing for ego over team. This means if you're town I cannot trust your judgment. If you're scum, I want nothing to do with you.

The problem is I got to many slots that are anti-town and few to trust.

Titus · Sun Jun 02, 2019 8:40 pm

In post 2509, Furret und Woopers wrote:okay yeah I think I might just enable my mute script and mute Titus this is actually unacceptable.
I'm starting to not get how people who have a townread on Cheeky are not saying "Titus, what you are doing is actually not okay."

Probably because I didn't push Cheeky because sick.

Good night all.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:57 am

In post 2515, Emperor flippyNips wrote:But ya Titus why do you think cheeky’s scum? Cos I’m pretty sure she’s town

I stand with mastina. Plus, there were a couple of things that pinged me.

@Ali, Yup. I can't hear anyone to have my reads change over the same slots. Skygazer's a guess but it's the only one I'm not creeped out by. I have too many people who creep me out and zero way to sort it prelynch.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:59 am

@Ali Hydra has almost 6 times the posts if any other player. You're silencing the game, and a great chunk of these posts aren't game relevant.

What is your skygazer read?

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:01 am

I double counted Alisae, still 3 times.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 3:42 am

Jjh, what's your skygazer read?

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:31 am

In post 2555, PJ. wrote:Yes.

Also chaos is significantly less scummy than flippynips

Flippy's pocketed me.

Panzer, your survivalist nature is starting to show.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 5:33 am

In post 2549, Pink Ball wrote:I have a better take on things, let's look at the context we're in: too close to deadline, a lot of wagons forming and disolving... What do you guys think the scumteam is doing? Like, one vocal scum member trying to get one wagon until the end, another leaving his vote parked forever, another not doing anything...? I don't know, if I were scum in this situation, I would let the town fuck themselves without taking stances.

And guess what

VOTE: Chaos Wind

Follow me, people

VOTE: Chaos Wind

Why not?

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:06 am

In post 2571, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 2568, Titus wrote:
In post 2555, PJ. wrote:Yes.

Also chaos is significantly less scummy than flippynips
Flippy's pocketed me.

Panzer, your survivalist nature is starting to show.
How is he being survivalist?

Read my ISO. I've promised I would handle the Panzer problem by night 2. We can't lynch Panzer atm because he'll venge mastina. Now deadline's coming and Panzer pushes me as a brand new wagon.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:14 am

In post 2573, jjh927 wrote:You know, that whole thing requires you to believe in both the claim and that he'd play suboptimally with it but w/e

In post 2574, jjh927 wrote:Like if you believe all that then it logically follows that he's town

*shakes head* He's either a scum venge, a town venge that will hurt town, or a lying sack of shit.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:26 am

In post 2577, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 2576, Titus wrote:
In post 2573, jjh927 wrote:You know, that whole thing requires you to believe in both the claim and that he'd play suboptimally with it but w/e

In post 2574, jjh927 wrote:Like if you believe all that then it logically follows that he's town
*shakes head* He's either a scum venge, a town venge that will hurt town, or a lying sack of shit.
Sounds like you just want a policy lynch.

Did you not see the part where I said we can't lynch Panzer?

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:42 am

In post 2584, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 2583, Titus wrote:
In post 2577, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 2576, Titus wrote:
In post 2573, jjh927 wrote:You know, that whole thing requires you to believe in both the claim and that he'd play suboptimally with it but w/e

In post 2574, jjh927 wrote:Like if you believe all that then it logically follows that he's town
*shakes head* He's either a scum venge, a town venge that will hurt town, or a lying sack of shit.
Sounds like you just want a policy lynch.
Did you not see the part where I said we can't lynch Panzer?
Then why is this an issue to you? Why keep pushing him or care that he’s pushing you if you could simply deal with him at Night?

I care to document Panzer's scuminess so he can't capture town.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:42 am

In post 2585, jjh927 wrote:
In post 2576, Titus wrote:
In post 2573, jjh927 wrote:You know, that whole thing requires you to believe in both the claim and that he'd play suboptimally with it but w/e

In post 2574, jjh927 wrote:Like if you believe all that then it logically follows that he's town
*shakes head* He's either a scum venge, a town venge that will hurt town, or a lying sack of shit.
If he's a scum vengeful then we still need to kill him eventually, no?

And he can be a lying sack of shit regardless of alignment

Exactly.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 11:49 am

What's the VC like? Deadline?

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:38 pm

Ugh the TTTT wagon looks pure but I think lynching TTTT is dumb. :/

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:39 pm

Yes I am changing my Shiro read.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 12:43 pm

In post 2714, Furret und Woopers wrote:
In post 2711, Titus wrote:Ugh the TTTT wagon looks pure but I think lynching TTTT is dumb. :/
talk me through either/both of these things

I believe TTTT when he says that the info is best left for day 2.

I liked Shiro's reach out to me when not sick and reflecting on it.
Flavor Leaf feels town.
Elsa's a Mason.
Sky is a informed and lynch of last resort so semi pure.
PB is town.

So yeah.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:02 pm

In post 2718, PJ. wrote:
In post 2712, Furret und Woopers wrote:I'm hysterical you guys wanna wagon Titus?
please?

I'll start

UNVOTE: VOTE: titus

Panzer what are your tttt and jjh reads

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:20 pm

VOTE: TTTT

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:24 pm

In post 2724, Emperor flippyNips wrote:Why the change Titus?

Deadline, wagon mostly pure and Panzer gates it.

I would rather lynch elsewhere but we lack the time.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:27 pm

Good luck Cheeky.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 1:30 pm

In post 2729, CheekyTeeky wrote:Well JJH isn't a thing so you'll have to do. Can also vote flippy.

Doesn't jjh have more votes? Also both those are town sooo

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 2:12 pm

In post 2735, PJ. wrote:hopefully it won't come to that.

and what a spiteful scummy jerk titus is.

I object to scummy jerk but I protect my masons.

Titus · Mon Jun 03, 2019 6:24 pm

Well, I have a paranoid thought
...but I'll save it for tomorrow

Titus · Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:30 pm

In post 2823, Furret und Woopers wrote:Titus you still are in fact going to do something about Panzer right?

I intend to but I will likely need until night 3. Something delayed me (or maybe I'm wifoming). No point in letting him use his venge.

Titus · Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:32 pm

In post 2845, Skygazer wrote:VOTE: brock and onyx

don't like that vote park yesterday from creature, dont like the low activity levels, don't like that clemency has been 0-posting

Clemency siteflaked.

Titus · Tue Jun 04, 2019 8:34 pm

@mastina why are we playing professor vca instead of scumhunting?

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:48 am

In post 2572, Titus wrote:
In post 2571, Alchemist21 wrote:
In post 2568, Titus wrote:
In post 2555, PJ. wrote:Yes.

Also chaos is significantly less scummy than flippynips
Flippy's pocketed me.

Panzer, your survivalist nature is starting to show.
How is he being survivalist?
Read my ISO. I've promised I would handle the Panzer problem by
night 2
. We can't lynch Panzer atm because he'll venge mastina. Now deadline's coming and Panzer pushes me as a brand new wagon.

Bolded added for emphasis.

Unfortunately, I misread my PM while sick and night 3 is the time, not night 2.

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:48 am

In post 2915, Shiro wrote:Wait wait wait wait, Titus was softing to be a vigged and then claimed to be delayed????

How did I miss that?

What the hell did you think bad cookies were?

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:49 am

In post 2918, Tet wrote:So it still doesn't follow they would claim roleblocked to backtrack from a vig shot they never said they were going to make.

I never did claim roleblocked today?

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:51 am

Yeah I went stupid bad on the softs. I wouldn't be surprised if I was an NK target last night.

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:52 am

In post 2922, Shiro wrote:I was so focused on 4Ts everything elsae was kinda blurring unles specifically asked to search it. xD

Hey I was right so I am happy.

I also left one about the song we sang in Wake's game.

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:53 am

In post 2925, PJ. wrote:can't be an NK target when you're the scum.

Does anyone else realize how this might be a scumslip?

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:54 am

In post 258, Titus wrote:
In post 257, Chaos Wind wrote:
In post 256, Alisae wrote:
In post 252, mastina wrote:
In post 247, Titus wrote:
In post 236, Alisae wrote:OMG ITS A TITUS!
OMG IT'S AN ALISAE!
OMG IT'S A SCUMTEAM
we already went over this mastina I'm an IC, we went over this.
Scum IC

:blobtea:

-chaos
We so bastard.

Grab my lantern, grab my gun

Some scum itching to get brains done

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:55 am

In post 2932, Tet wrote:
In post 2931, Titus wrote:
In post 2925, PJ. wrote:can't be an NK target when you're the scum.
Does anyone else realize how this might be a scumslip?
No? Explain like I'm...me.

Why would Panzer suppose there's only one scumkill in a game with up to 5 deaths per night worst case?

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:58 am

In post 2935, Shiro wrote:I dunno Titus, the sk just died, it is a fair assumption

Not really

My vig (n2/n3 plus [will not explain this])
Scum 1 nightkill
Panzer venge
SK
????

Plus, that doesn't allow for the possibility of Panzer's venge not counting in the 5.

Panzer's scum.

Let's find lynchable scum.

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 1:59 am

In post 2937, Tet wrote:Mmmm I don't buy it. A killing 3p has already been lynched, nothing suggests it's multiball yet, it's implied town has killing power. Town is incentivized to holster early with low information.

It's not really a leap tbh.

I actually could not shoot last night and would come back innocent to gun checkers. I come back guilty to them now.

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:01 am

VOTE: Cafe

I'll sheep you until you're wrong.

Cookie Bakers until the end.

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:02 am

Ok Tet, thoughts on Cafe?

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:07 am

In post 2947, Tet wrote:I dunno, I find them playing politically correct. Meaning most of the reads they have given out have already been debated and they happen to land on the popular side after the fact.

Except on me I feel but even at the time I thought they could be whiteknighting to pocket me.

Let's pressure him then.

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:09 am

In post 2950, Tet wrote:If I'm included with the cookies.

You can get a small good cookie. I think Shiro can agree to that. You don't want the bad ones.

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:10 am

In post 2948, Tet wrote:I could vote there but I'd rather vote in like chaos, Alch, creature, someone I'm forgetting.

I get that in a way, but we can watch what they do too.

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:11 am

Who are the scummier lurkers Panzer?

Why does it bother you that I'm sleeping Shiro when he tunneled the SK yesterday?

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:38 am

Pink Ball, a Cafe vote please?

I think I hear Panzer's answer on who the scummier lurkers are...

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 3:09 am

In post 2959, PJ. wrote:Flippynips, chaos wind..and honestly flavor leaf too at this point.

Man, titus is the worst. Big fan of the scum team all voting cafe for us though. I like it a lot.

Flippy isn't a lurker. He was rather active with me at EoD. Maybe there's a buddying thing going on but lurker nah.

Why are Chaos and Flavor scummier than Cafe?

@Alch, Hi. Why?

Titus · Wed Jun 05, 2019 3:24 am

In post 2962, Alchemist21 wrote:I’ve always based my read on you by whether or not you were making arguments that made sense and I could see where you were coming from. D1 I mostly saw you being more obsessed with wagons and then a bit of pushing Panzer. Today, that whole NK thing where you tried to say there should be more than 1 partly because a vengeful exists didn’t make sense.

Well that's not what I said. I said Panzer putting forth singleball and assuming it repeatedly is a scumslip because of the inability to get to five kpn.