im no king, only first citizenIn post 1462, superbowl9 wrote:Yw king
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
im no king, only first citizenIn post 1462, superbowl9 wrote:Yw king
yes, stop townreading meIn post 1559, petapan wrote:was i premature in my townread?In post 1262, midwaybear wrote:Firebringer too I thinkIn post 1259, Deacon Blues wrote:who actively wants to go over atm? I am aware of superbowl
In post 1820, Dandelion Wine wrote:hm ok. any reasons u feel like offering? does your experience withIn post 1815, Something_Smart wrote:I think LLD, peta, FB, you guys are town. I'll trust FB on sinkhole being town. Superbowl is > rand town.?fb say he often has sheepworthy reads
-ceph
me too but at CephIn post 1826, Deacon Blues wrote:I'm insulted.In post 1815, Something_Smart wrote:I think LLD, peta, FB, you guys are town. I'll trust FB on sinkhole being town. Superbowl is > rand town.
ban this user now modsIn post 1830, Dandelion Wine wrote:Hi Insulted, I'm Dad.In post 1826, Deacon Blues wrote:I'm insulted.In post 1815, Something_Smart wrote:I think LLD, peta, FB, you guys are town. I'll trust FB on sinkhole being town. Superbowl is > rand town.
fair i guess. kind of surprised a bit too. especially since ive stated i this game ive had one game experience with nora, but its definitely not like tht game imo.In post 1835, Dandelion Wine wrote:sry i love you but it's mostly for being cute, i cant speak to your read accuracy i have no idea actually but i feel you're usually more interested in fucking around than explaining themIn post 1828, Firebringer wrote:me too but at CephIn post 1826, Deacon Blues wrote:I'm insulted.In post 1815, Something_Smart wrote:I think LLD, peta, FB, you guys are town. I'll trust FB on sinkhole being town. Superbowl is > rand town.
-ceph
ngl i have skipped alot of deacons posts in this thread even when we are both posting at same time.In post 1843, Something_Smart wrote:ngl your avatar is so nondescript it is hard to read your posts
yeah i dont usually hard defend alliesIn post 1851, Something_Smart wrote:Then he likely wouldn't stick out his neck to hard defend you, because the scumteam would probably consider you a lost cause.In post 1849, upside down sinkhole wrote:What if Firebringer was scum?
he is saying if i am scum i dont defend scumyou.In post 1852, upside down sinkhole wrote:ur saying I'm scum?In post 1851, Something_Smart wrote:Then he likely wouldn't stick out his neck to hard defend you, because the scumteam would probably consider you a lost cause.In post 1849, upside down sinkhole wrote:What if Firebringer was scum?
probablyIn post 1857, upside down sinkhole wrote:my question was would scum!him do this to town!me.In post 1855, Something_Smart wrote:My point is if he's scum then he wouldn't act this way toward you if you were also scum.In post 1852, upside down sinkhole wrote:ur saying I'm scum?
definitely. I like rooting for the underdogsIn post 1863, upside down sinkhole wrote:even ones that are nearly one step away from the rope?In post 1861, Firebringer wrote:i like defending townies as scum.
strangely enough u can get alot of people to trust u by telling them they can't trust u.In post 1866, upside down sinkhole wrote:Noraa: at the edge of a cliff
Firebringer: saves her
Noraa: do you normally save people just to murder them
Firebringer: absolutely
none of us are really special in the grand scheme of things that we call the universeIn post 1870, upside down sinkhole wrote:I don't trust u :OIn post 1868, Firebringer wrote:strangely enough u can get alot of people to trust u by telling them they can't trust u.In post 1866, upside down sinkhole wrote:Noraa: at the edge of a cliff
Firebringer: saves her
Noraa: do you normally save people just to murder them
Firebringer: absolutely
am I special.
i dont like scripts. i prefer to improvise.In post 1872, upside down sinkhole wrote:Fire follow ur script where u tell me I'm special
then I ask if u murder special people
and then u say hell yes :O
why r u scared of sending a scum over to them?In post 1952, Flavor Leaf wrote:I’m not sold on sending FB, I’m just paranoid of Annie now at this point. Bell could be a decent person to send over. Cabd-FL-Bell has been a trio in a few games recently, so I think that could be a decent move.
why? this thread is easier for scum to hide in.In post 1959, Flavor Leaf wrote:If I were scum, I’d want to be sent over here.In post 1955, Firebringer wrote:why r u scared of sending a scum over to them?In post 1952, Flavor Leaf wrote:I’m not sold on sending FB, I’m just paranoid of Annie now at this point. Bell could be a decent person to send over. Cabd-FL-Bell has been a trio in a few games recently, so I think that could be a decent move.
okay i guess fair enough.In post 1966, Flavor Leaf wrote:I don’t really have a preference of sending anyone over or what not, but i specifically think AnnieScum wants to get sent over because she can lead more actively over there.In post 1963, Firebringer wrote:wait if u want scum to be sent over here. Then us sending a scum over to them should be goood?
if u omgus everyone of ur reads im gonna stop defending u. This is fucking annoying.In post 1968, upside down sinkhole wrote:Ok so the scum team is Flavor/Annie/___ from our side ?
i dont think this is how scum are thinking tbhIn post 1976, Flavor Leaf wrote:Here’s the thing, scum already can be in a game with 4 scum based on throes draft lists, so if scum can get one of their 2 over, that game can hard be manipulated by scum, and the other game can have 1 scum sitting pretty like a lone wolf, which creates hard associations.
That would be the idea for me if I were scum, get sent over. Even if it’s 3-3 now, getting sent over creates that 4-2.
this game is a good example of thisIn post 1979, Dandelion Wine wrote:firebringer is always town, he just gets a red pm sometimes
no i am saying i don't think the scum thing "lets stack one game full of scum and other with no scum because that way game with no scum has no associations and we can control the scum stacked game". for one the no associations is ruined by having one game full of associations. Secondly i think scum play more passive influence than more actual pushing so i think we see scum playing differentlyIn post 1981, Flavor Leaf wrote:You think a 6 man scum team wouldn’t discuss the best ways of being sent over or not, or if they even should?In post 1978, Firebringer wrote:i dont think this is how scum are thinking tbhIn post 1976, Flavor Leaf wrote:Here’s the thing, scum already can be in a game with 4 scum based on throes draft lists, so if scum can get one of their 2 over, that game can hard be manipulated by scum, and the other game can have 1 scum sitting pretty like a lone wolf, which creates hard associations.
That would be the idea for me if I were scum, get sent over. Even if it’s 3-3 now, getting sent over creates that 4-2.
They might not be thinking of the exactness of all of that, but they definitely would think about it.
welcome to the clubIn post 1982, skitter30 wrote:Aside i forgot to say this, but spiffeh is most likely town
ur now beating ceph for my favorite user in this threadIn post 1991, Flavor Leaf wrote:To be fair, i wanted to send you over to the other thread, and I scum read Skitter.In post 1988, Firebringer wrote:also skitter how do u think my buss of u is going? I think we are fooling them really well.
my mouth cant keep anything secret friendoIn post 1992, skitter30 wrote:I'll give u 8/10, keep it more secret next timeIn post 1988, Firebringer wrote:also skitter how do u think my buss of u is going? I think we are fooling them really well.
WHAT A GOOD POINT FROM MY SCUMFRIEND BRIAN SKIES.In post 1082, Brian Skies wrote:Flavor Leaf is missing the rule where if one thread loses all their scum by Night 2 or before, then that entire thread becomes modconfirmed town.
So while yes scum can stack one side, that lone wolf side is at heavy risk of blowing it for their team.
yes, as brian pointed out if no scum exist in one thread by night 2 we get a whole thread confirmed town.In post 2002, upside down sinkhole wrote:does it even matter how many scum are where?In post 2001, Flavor Leaf wrote:@Brian Skies - why do you not want town to be sent over? With little information like this, scum can completely abuse getting switched over.
i thought u said they were 4-2 going or 5-1In post 2004, Flavor Leaf wrote:Nah, if there’s a scum in the thread, it doesn’t matter. Scum would have 5 others in the other thread, so they’d be able to control stuff.In post 1998, Firebringer wrote:WHAT A GOOD POINT FROM MY SCUMFRIEND BRIAN SKIES.In post 1082, Brian Skies wrote:Flavor Leaf is missing the rule where if one thread loses all their scum by Night 2 or before, then that entire thread becomes modconfirmed town.
So while yes scum can stack one side, that lone wolf side is at heavy risk of blowing it for their team.
this is why you are friends with ur enemies people. They have good insights and are very smart.
Also, you missed the part I said they could be 3-3 trying to get to the 4-2.
I don’t think they’re anywhere near in danger of having that happen.
This.In post 2013, skitter30 wrote:And honestly i think you're overvaluing how much scum wants to create scum-heavy threads to begin with
unlikely yes, but i still think its important to scum thinking.In post 2017, Something_Smart wrote:I disagree. That possibility seems super remote.In post 2003, Firebringer wrote:yes, as brian pointed out if no scum exist in one thread by night 2 we get a whole thread confirmed town.
That is important.
lol ur encouraging me to troll uIn post 2243, Deacon Blues wrote:LET THE OTHER THREAD FINISH THEIR TURNSTILE SHIT BEFORE WE ELIM.In post 2241, Flavor Leaf wrote:Oh, yeah, that’s what I meant to do.In post 2237, Deacon Blues wrote:Yeah you put him at E-1 with your unvote.
Please familiarize yourself with how the damn votes work here on the dark side.
I do know the votes, you posted and made me second guess.
UNVOTE: GFITC
I specifically stated the real reason to you, that’s somewhat a weak response by you then.
Once we elim their clock goes to 48 hours.
okay but ceph is town.In post 2255, Flavor Leaf wrote:I specifically don’t want Cabd and Imperium in the purple room, actually.
I don’t have a strong enough town read on Cabd to be comfortable on that
FLAVOR LEAF LOOK AT THIS POST AND TELL ME ITS MADE BY SCUM!!!!In post 1283, Imperium wrote:We are the pinnacle of town.In post 1274, Bell wrote:hi.In post 1254, Annie Edison wrote:Bell I see you and I’m very excited to be on your side please come say hi
Is imperium scum.
damn thats a fresh wound.In post 2258, Flavor Leaf wrote:Like Sircakez was town in Xenoblade, right?
i need better than mightIn post 1311, unwnd wrote:I think Gamma is town in the other thread
noIn post 1312, Annie Edison wrote:Other thread lim noraa
u and flavors communication styles dont go togetherIn post 2270, Deacon Blues wrote:ok so you're unable to be communicated withIn post 2267, Flavor Leaf wrote:For what? Imperium scum? Why would there be any actual reasons for them to be scum right now if they're scum?
-b
okayIn post 1316, unwnd wrote:In post 2266, GFITAC wrote:superb I wanna ask how you read me in donner party real quick
because I know you were correct in mbos10 but I obvscummed by pushing your mason buddy
so I find it RIDICULOUSLY strange you have this confidence level when I've done nothing of the sort to incur that sort of opinion of me
Like, you say your read on me is all this game, but I have not done SHIT this game. So your confidence seems SUPER FORCED.
This is a gamma town post
How could u do this to me.In post 2283, Flavor Leaf wrote:well, Noraa is scum, sorry.In post 2280, Firebringer wrote:i feel like i might stop reading other thread. they keep screaming nora is scum and i just don't feel like listening to it.
like a recorder on repeat.
In post 1324, Hench Princesses wrote:skitter is scum
i think u very well know my appreciation of u that no words need be uttered
silence this non believer.In post 2292, superbowl9 wrote:Skittler is town
lallallaalalllllalalalala not listening. Can't hear u UNWND