DrippingGoofball wrote:ortolan wrote:No, I think he is not really town because he is giving a cliched in the extreme "townie" response
How do you distinguish a genuine townie response from a cliché townie response?
How do you distinguish a cliché townie response from an extreme cliché townie response?
How do you distinguish an extreme cliché response made by a townie, from one made by a scumbag?
mask man wrote:How do you tell the difference DGB?
When a response is TOO town,
how town is too town? When the player clearly is making an effort to seem town, which jebus was doing.
He wasn't just having a normal townie reaction, he was making that statement for the sole purpose of looking town(which a towns member wouldn't do) and if he is scum, to redirect attention at the God claimer(which wasn't really needed because obv attention will be shifted like that, as it was, because we got scum reactions and later looked back at it.). If he toned the "WTF DUN U CLAIM GAWDZ0R" down to a "dude, wtf?" or something, it wouldn't be like this.
Question: Why does this matter? Why are we looking at people acting "too town" and not scummy? Focus people.
FoS: mask man
Looking back at Jebus' posts, I don't find as much wrong with them as before. Most of them are just clairification posts like "Care to share?", "Please explain this to me." etc. etc. What I don't get that as the starter of the Zakeri wagon, he said it was mostly OMGUS.
So I have to ask the people on the Zakeri wagon: did you have legitimate reasons to vote Zakeri aside from just joining the wagon?
ortolan wrote:
Obvscum of what variety? We only want to lynch one out of the seven scum.
Prob cult recruit IMO.
BM wrote:mykonian stop digging your grave and trying to derail the town.
Hrm.....need to look at myko's posts then.
...I'll get back to you about that one. I wouldn't say he's derailing the town, but other than that, I'm not 100% on his reasoning. Nevertheless, your statement is pretty strong without much evidence.
BloodMoney wrote:I never withdrew my attack on zach.
His initial laziness is still bugging me, because a vote like that might, in better places, be interpreted as opportunistic. And if a connection is implicated from one side why are you implying that I should only suspect one half of the implied pair?
In response, I only have to say that you did.
BloodMoney wrote:
Deflecting off Zakeri. Zakeri is a possible God; hell, she's the top nominee for that.
Wait, wait, I'm cult leader, right? Then it makes sense to deflect off God, right? (/endsarcasm) WIFOM arguments are not really arguments, but are "what if..." games that don't help the finding of Godscum.
While throwing around suspicion in normal games makes sense to see reactions, there wasn't only one scum in those games that we are trying to find out of
twenty
. Why the excessive finger-pointing, BloodMoney?
Vote: BloodMoney
(purely as pressure and to unvote Jebus for the time-being)
[i]Currently lurking about...
[/i]