Looking forward to play a game with such a fantastic theme tho
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Nope, It's my first on the site, but I've been playing mafia for quite some time on a Danish site.raider8169 wrote:Is this your first mafia game? Not meaning that as an insult just wondering.AK wrote:I'm going to excuse myself from posting anything valuable in the first day or two untill I've read the thread properly through.
Looking forward to play a game with such a fantastic theme tho
This is one of my main reasons of suspecting him, his way of behaving day 1, first his FoS, then adding a vote for active lurking and finally trying to drag Santos out of focus when he got in serious trouble.DrippingGoofball wrote:Something funny I noticed with Setanta. It's nothing major, but look at THIS POST. It was glaringly obvious that Santos had revealed that he had a safeclaim. Setanta's reaction is odd, given that he was one of the first on the Santos wagon. He may have had second thoughts about bus'ing his partner - that's the thought that comes to mind.
Again, the quote from DGB is one of my main reasons, another reason would be(after farkshinsoup takes over) that he in the thread almost clearly states that OGML isn't mafia, a nice cheap trick to score some townie credit when you are sure about his role.DrippingGoofball wrote:And what about Septia???
Check out THIS POST. He says he's not lurking, though he clearly is. His comments on the Santos wagon are gems.
ON JANUARY 22:He never did catch up.Septia wrote:Sorry for inactivity, I've been pretty busy. Will get into it tomorrow and catch up.
ON JANUARY 26:He suggests that mafia would be too careful to make such a slip? That's interesting, because that was hardly a slip, but rather, a huge unintentional scumtell. Septia claims that he needs to read back, but never does. He never even commented on the competing M_K wagon.Septia wrote:The bandwaggon on Santos has been too fast for my liking, and I understand the case on him, but mafia would be more careful to not make a slip up like that. I'm basing this off page 10 alone though,still need to read back.
I'm going to hold back from lynching Santos right now until I see more from him. Will read back now and give my thoughts/ suspicions.
So this lurker has the nerve to show up and express his displeasure at the speed of a SCUMWAGON. He makes excuses for said scum, wants to hear more from him, and never read back or gave thoughts or suspicions.
I will, when i get time to do so.. I just wanted to show you all that i wasn't lurking or anything, but actually reading.. I haven't made it past page 16 yet, had a heck of a long dag at school so..DrippingGoofball wrote:No, I'm trying to give you more chances to gauge your alignment. I suggested that you you your impression of every currently living player for starters.AK wrote:DGB I don't really get your point.. Are you accusing me of acting scummy, and at the same time doing pro-town actions?
One of her first posts with some actual content. I know this is a bit WIFOM, but it is possible that she is going out hard against a scumbuddy and gets him lynched.DrippingGoofball wrote:WHOA!!!! Hey guys we caught more scum!Santos wrote:Yes, I am semi-lurking, but I am not hesitating to post; I just don't have much to add at the moment as most of the discussion usually works itself out. I'm in no hurry to lynch anyone: If a decision needs to be made, then I don't mind being the deciding vote...
Would be kind of impossible to describe her D1 play better than that..DrippingGoofball wrote:Flameaxe made an appearance late in the wagon but declined to vote. He paid no attention to Santos' earlier scummy posts, and even mildly defended Santos. I'm a bit divided on that one given my belief that if Flameaxe had been Santos' buddy, he would have bus'ed him so hard our heads would spin.
Not long after comes this post:DrippingGoofball wrote:OGML was resisting the Santos wagon by continuing to be very aggressive on the M_K wagon. It's like he was screaming to us, "No!!! Look HERE!!! Lynch M_K! What are you guys doing! M_K! M_K!" OK that's a bit of hyperbole for humor's sake. But then he switched to Santos anyway, when it looked like Santos' lynch was inevitable.
After this point her focus is almost only on OGML, seeing he should be an easy lynch if she just pushes hard enough.DrippingGoofball wrote:Is OGML keeping a low profile in the hope that we'll forget about him and build cases against players that are currently more active?
Next post is Sirdanilot voting for Flameaxe too..DrippingGoofball wrote:I was just looking at Flameaxe's posts, in isolation. He's lurking massively. The two players that tried to draw attention to Flameaxe weren't bus'ing, which was in the back of my mind, they were both townies.
And no one else brought up Flameaxe. Maybe as it turns out, his buddies don't mind Flameaxe's lurking.
Let's rattle the scum's cage:
vote: Flameaxe
And surely enough, after some people have voiced their suspicion of M_K she joins the wagon:DrippingGoofball wrote:What I find most surprising is that list of players that did NOT vote for a player that refused to claim AND self-voted.
WHY DIDN'T THESE PLAYERS VOTE?
Microphone_Kirby - I'm not liking his condemnation of a very justified wagon, coming in on a high horse. Like Flameaxe gave any clues about being a townie. Were you around, M_K???
zwet - seriously, I think zwet was around to vote. Why didn't he?
PLAYERS THAT DIDN'T SEEM TO BE AROUND:
hp [leaves] - didn't seem to be around. Not posting a lot, but I'm getting an honest town vibe from his posts. Should post more.
raider8169
Narsis
Pear Bear
Jebus - Jebus has flaked out of another game.
serenity2 - where is that replacement player???
minineko - looks like he wasn't even reading.
DrippingGoofball wrote:That sentence is a gem. This was NOT a lurker lynch. Flameaxe was literally posting every five minutes to remind us that he was refusing to claim.ortolan wrote:Pro-town platitude.MK (652) wrote:To me, the entire lynch was simply a lurker lynch... and a very unnecessarily speedy one.
NOT a lurker lynch. Sorry.
And surely enough she is one of the first to be on the lynching wagon of the day:DrippingGoofball wrote:You should read OGML's case on M_K, actually. Knowing that OGML's was town, and after seeing M_K's post today, it's difficult to imagine M_K being town at all.raider8169 wrote:On other news, during the first night Green Crayons killed. If I am not mistaken GC didnt draw any attention to himself the first day. I forgot about this until now but looking at GC is isolation the only person who threatened him was MK. Other then that he seemed really townie.
I'd like to hear opinions from our replacements and lurkers.
Not wanting to change the name of the game she surely joins in on the wagon as one of the first, but nevertheless again she is not first:DrippingGoofball wrote:M_K lynch sequence: LAUNCHEDMicrophone_Kirby wrote:Why I didn't give my opinions before Flameaxe's lynch:none of your business.
vote: Microphone_Kirby
Funny thing she aint killed yet?MafiaWiki wrote:Terrifically and irritatingly funny player,which inevitably gets her lynched or nightkilled early in the game.A lynchalicious player and easy target for the scum to wagon, while at the same a dangerous wildcard to eliminate at night if she contrives to survive the Day 1 lynch. A choice target for Night 0 actions of every kind.
Been for quite a while.. You're here = you're lurking..? Atleast you're not posting any comments on the DGB case..raider8169 wrote:Im still here. Are you fully caught up and everything?AK wrote:Long live inactivity.. Where has everybody gone?
My only guess would be that he's new to mafia. I don't understand any of his acts either..Narsis wrote:although i do have one question AK: in light of your knowledge of what role PB had, what's the best reasons you can think of for why he would act in the way he did?
I'll just quote myself, still looking for an answer..AK wrote:@hp
No comments on my case against DGB? Does it sound like DGB is scum, I'm scum, or do you just think the whole case is pure BS?Comments please, activity is the way to victory for the town.
It's @hpraider8169 wrote:@AK, I did comment on your case or are you just looking for more?
Go back and look at my suspect list, I put Jebus as possible scum and when DGB had only my vote and zwet's close to deadline there was no reason to keep my vote on her. And how should I be pressuring more than I did? I made a long case against her and it has now been proven right. I don't believe it to be my fault that you guys couldn't see my point...raider8169 wrote:What made you think DGB was scum? I got the impression you were setting up a bus using Meta to back it up thinking DGB was going to be killed anyways. Once your review was done you voted fro DGB but that was it, you did not press anything and it seemed like you were resting your vote there until you could jump to another lynch. With DGB flipping scum it seems you had inside information and that is what I think you have been hiding.AK wrote:@Raider
What more can I say? What is it that you want from me?
Couldn't have explained it better myselfXenaroth wrote:Personally I thinkAKhas resided to the fact that he is going to get lynched today and believes his lynching would prove something because his alignment would be revealed (hence it most likely being town) so he just wants it over and done with to make his point.