She deserves it.
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
Yes, I do realise that. However, I like to jump from person to person during the RVS as I see reactions and relative scumminess change. DTM's post activated my gut, so I voted him.volkan wrote:I hope you realise that simply using the phrase "Lynch all X" doesn't actually justify a vote.
1) What is your basis for saying he is pushy?
2) What is your basis for saying he is usually not pushy?
3) Why is being more pushy a scumtell?
Oh, sorry. I made an error in my last post. I should have said that I like vote-hoppingSpyreX wrote:Do you see anything that would be not-RVS worthy so far in this game?
It's just that I would expect DTM to say, 'Explain yourself, please,' rather than, 'Explain yourself, now.'volkan wrote:Pushy? Not really. "Explain yourself" is hardly a pushy statement given that seeking explanations is a pretty big part of Mafia, and something like "Explain yourself when you are comfortable doing so" or "Explain yourself, when it suits you" just sounds stupid. If you see something which warrants explanation, that usually means you think it is scummy, which itself would justify "Explain yourself, now"
I have acknowledged both the possibility of it being a scumtell and of it being a playstyle change. If it is a scumtell, my vote will help to put pressure on DTM and prove this. If it is simply a playstyle change, my vote will eventually move to someone of more relative scumminess.As for the discrepancies thing, the problem I have is that it rests on an assumption that the change in conduct is caused by a change alignment. I know it's early days, but that doesn't really justify downplaying the fact that discrepancies have a vast array potential of causes (who the other people are in the game, mood, level of interest in the game, etc. all operate all the time)
Good for you.BC wrote:I disagree with your theory.Nikanor wrote:Ehhhh, something is off here. He seems a lot pushier in this game than in his others.
Unvote. Vote: DTMaster.
Lynch all Discrepancies.
Yeah, I acknowledged it was weak when vollkan questioned me about it. Good job ignoring that portion of my posts:BC wrote:wow. this is weak. FoS Nikanor.Nikanor wrote:It's just that I would expect DTM to say, 'Explain yourself, please,' rather than, 'Explain yourself, now.'
-------Nikanor wrote:3) I said it was a discrepancy, which is a type of scumtell. It may just be a playstyle change, but it's the best I have going right now.
You don't want to answer for tubby, but you do anyway. Nice.DTM wrote:1. I don't want to answer for tubby but when you read the exchange he and BM (the almighty mod) had it'll be all clearer. The unvote was a product of trying to save you, and wording issues that BM wanted.
None. In any case, he only has one game in which he is confirmed (as far as his wiki goes, anyway). He wasn't as pushy in that one as he was in the phrase I quoted. That's why I voted him.tajo wrote:So in which games is DTMconfirmedtown and pushy?
Not at all. Pushiness is playstyle-based. Again, the reason I voted DTM is becuase I saw a discrepancy in playstyle. It's called a meta-attack. Are you going anywhere with this? I feel like I'm repeating myself over and over.tajo wrote:Do you think being pushy is a scumtell?
Other than DTM, I find BC's short one-liner posts to be scummy. In a bunch of them, he calls people scummy without giving reasons.Who else do you think is scummy?
...Okay. So you predict that tubby might flip town, say that you are getting town vibes from him, and say that scum would dogpile onto tubby.DTM wrote:If tubby flips town (for what ever reason since that possibility might exist) scum would dogpile onto him. With 14 people to sift through it'll be hard to sift through but it gives us a direction to begin. Just something to keep in mind if this goes through lynch.
<snip>
Unvote
Vote: Tubby216
I'm getting tingly bad vibes though just through meta (partial gut feeling).. but that was pretty much a scum confession.
Seems like rolefishing to me, now that we know tubby was a pro-town neighbor and did have partners.289:@Tubby Did you just claim scum searching for your partners? It reads like that with the whole "my partners thing" o-o.
I thought I had proposed something a while back.Mariyta wrote:And I can't think of a single reason I'd have picked IH at that time, if I could poison people.
A lyncher is the only explaination for your question.Crazy wrote:Why the heck would charter say he knew Mariyta was scum if he was lying?
Except that she used her ability on CKD and you supposedly got your message TWO DAYS after the poisoning. The mod would have sent you a message directly after he posted the save scene if he was going to send a message at all. How does that fit together 'so perfectly'?charter wrote:It's almost like I got my message at the same time, read it, then made my post in the thread. It all fits together so perfectly!
Uhm, wouldn't it be a good thing for us to let any buddies she may have get dayvigged?charter wrote:Nik you should vote, not wait, I'd wager she might self hammer to prevent more of her buddies being dayvigged.
You bolded the wrong thing. I'll fix it for you:Vi wrote:Nikanor strikes me for saying some suspiciously one-dimensional things inthread, for instance--Nikanor wrote:A lyncher is theonlyexplaination for your question.
His Appeal to Fear also fits this conclusion.
Stop misrepresenting what I said, please.Nikanor wrote:A lyncher is the only explainationCrazy wrote:Why the heck would charter say he knew Mariyta was scum if he was lying?for your question.
His Appeal to Fear also fits this conclusion.
It's day two with eight people dead. It has been proven through Mariyta's flip that charter was (at least) incorrect, unless the distorter has a poisoning ability. DTM has come out at the start of day two with a claim and a self-vote.Vi wrote:In retrospect, the idea of a Town Poisoner who didn't have the sense to claim immediately and didn't have enough sense to wait for a decent target... makes little sense.
Just because everyone else took charter's claim unquestioningly doesn't mean I have to do the same. Just because you disagree with me about something looking scummy doesn't mean you yourself are scummy.Vi wrote:While these are all things that charter did, this ignores that there were a lot of people at the time - myself included - who really had no problem with all of that. Nikanor didn't question any of them.
I meant that I would rather have my vote on charter than on Mariyta, but that I would hammer and end the day if required.Vi wrote:And this is a complete 180 considering 542 was one of charter's posts. If the wagon is inevitable, why wait to vote/hammer? Why express opposition in one sentence and then support in the next?
Craplogic is a correct term for it.Vi wrote:[craplogic]Then there's how Mariyta claimed to have Distorted Nikanor just before charter got his message.
Mariyta said she never lied. Just for kicks, I'm tempted to believe her and suggest that Nikanor did it.[/craplogic]
I have my reasons. I did not think it was very possible that he was town, but I guess I was wrong.Vi wrote:With that said, may I ask why you thought charter was a Lyncher, and not whatever he was?
(shrug) I just thought charter was scum and that Mariyta was not, is all.What's the point of that, pragmatically speaking?
Explain, please.Paranoid wasn't necessarily his sanity, it was a post restriction!
Mariyta's claim (A role that randomly changes or blocks other roles), seems consistent with her role name. Although I don't know why scum would trueclaim.CKD wrote:DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT A DISTORTER DOES?
It imploded when you signed up for this bastard mod game. :/tajo wrote:Based on a guilty result of a paranoid cop? Where did Occam's razor go?
Well, I assume people think things through before doing them; everyone here seems intelligent enough to do that, at least.tajo wrote:And how in hell do you get to the conclusion that the only valid possibility is that Spyrex killed charter?
I have no idea. But then again, the other explaination (different scumteam) doesn't make much sense either.tajo wrote:I dont see Spyrex or Spyrex scumbuddies (if he has them) killing charter, who would flip cop, to painfully prove that Spyrex was indeed scum and accelerate the process. What was the benefit here?
Something more common in these types of games. Roleblocker or Busdriver or something like that.SpyreX wrote:What the hell else would I guess?
Interesting theory. This would require Kairyuu's killer to be the scum who removed DTM's vote (or for said vote-remover to be fairly quick).Vi wrote:If I were to draw a conspiracy here I would say that DTMaster's vote loss came from the same person who poisoned IH; similar M.O.
The vote removal was ~ten minutes after Kairyuu's death, so if we are to assume it was scum who removed DTM's vote, it would probably be the same scum who killed Kairyuu. Either way, it could have been SpyreX's team trying to make DTM look like a recruit by removing his vote.Vi wrote:? Explain.Nikanor wrote:Interesting theory. This would require Kairyuu's killer to be the scum who removed DTM's vote (or for said vote-remover to be fairly quick).
...Sajin wrote:How the hell would you kill off that kind of cult?
Would they not auto win?
A) charter was scummy. I thought he was lying, so I tried to get him to elaborate.Yosarian2 wrote:The whole way that he A) tried to fish for charter's role, B) tried to attack charter while he was attacking Mariyta, and C) Then later tried to discredit charter by accusing him of being a lyncher, all make him look bad.
Well, as it turns out, he was lying about his role information, although it wasn't in the way I had expected. This is the reason why I attacked him again on day two after his guilty claim on SpyreX.Yosarian2 wrote:Anyway, if someone suddenly pops up on day 1 and implies they have role information that person X is guilty, the odds of them just lying are generally pretty small
I never attacked charter prior to his information claim; you're getting me confused with other people. randomlunatic comes to mind, but I'm not sure about the others before rereading.Yosarian2 wrote:Your behavior was especally bad, since you attacked Charter when he first attacked Maryita, then followed him and voted Mariyta when he said he had role information, but then later reversed yourself and voted charter again afterwards. Just really scummy.
A lot of people? Who are these people, specifically? All I can think of are charter and Mariyta.Also, re-reading that time period now, I forgot that it was you Mari had claimed to have day-roleblocked, which is kind of interesting. A lot of people in this game seem to have day-actions. How would she have known you woun't contradict her claim, if she isn't your buddy? Granted, she was a little vauge with the details of the timing, but you didn't push her for precise details either, which I would have expected you to if you were town.
Because of the weird role mechanics he had claimed, he would have been 'semi-confirmed' no matter what DTM flipped, unless it was a pro-town power role.How would a DTM lynch "semi-confirm" SpyreX?
His behaviour at the beginning of yesterday fits town-DTM more than scum-DTM, I think.Yosarian2 wrote:Why?Nikanor wrote:I need to reread a bit, but right now I think DTM is town, at least.
Read my posts during that time frame, and I think you'll understand.BC wrote:In regards to the bold, why did you think he was lying?
I assume you are talking about thte /in-vitational 2 Chosen game where I was vanilla town, correct? That's not how I usually act while under pressure as town, I assure you. In that game, I had reason to suspect I was more likely to be VT than Chosen, so I didn't bother defending myself too much. I was excluding the wrong people for the wrong reasons as well, which attributed slghtly to my poor performance that game.Sajin wrote:Nikanor, this is not how I have seen you play as town before. You are trying to convince others far more then I have seen you do in the past and offering explanations to that extent.
Why are you misrepresenting Sajin? That is obviously not what he meant in his post.DTM wrote:Also elaborate on how Nik is scummy? I don't understand how convincing through elaboration (aka explaining your self and defending) is scummy. You aren't discrediting his posts with evidence from the thread. Your point just reads as: defending yourself is scummy.
2. Vollkan is obviously a scum kill.Day One Kills wrote:2. Vollkan - Doctor, Killed Day 1
8. Haylen - Protown Neighbour, Killed Day 1
9. Gieff - Mafia Neighbour, Killed Day 1
20. ElectricBadger - Mafia Doctor, Killed Day 1
6. Shanba - Vanilla Townie, Killed Night 1
This makes sense. charter was SpyreX's mafia kill, Kairyuu was the SK's kill, and there was no night kill because there was no cult recruiter during the night phase.Day Three Kills wrote: 24. Charter - Paranoid Cop, Killed Day 2
19. Kairyuu (Rep. Seraphim) - Cult Recruiter, Killed Day 2
What are you saying here? Who is to say that I have any day powers at all?Yosarian2 wrote:If I was a scum, I'd worry about lying and claiming to day role-block someone who's role I didn't know in a game where a large number of people had already been daykilled day 1. For one thing, if you also had a daykill, I'd expect you to test her claim that she was blocking you by, well, trying to shoot you and see what happened.