DP12 JeepFest Mafia GAME OVER
-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
I do get feeling Axelrod is making way to a safe-claim, even though he ends his speculation with disclaimer:
[quote="Axelrod]
And I'm not making this speculation based on my own role either, just what has been presented. [/quote][size=75]Music makes the world go 'round,
there's no life without a sound.[/size]-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
Vesuvan's sudden appearance after being called out seems scummy to me too. Even though I agree with his theory about early speculation, it also strikes me as an attempt to divert attention from himself.
unvote: PeaceBringer
vote: Vesuvan[size=75]Music makes the world go 'round,
there's no life without a sound.[/size]-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
I found SaberKitty's reasoning for her vote confusing. Can you please explain it a bit? Do you vote Vesuvan because he hasn't participated and is close to lynch even though you don't think there's a good reasoning behind that bandwagon?
Also your behaviour feels to me like somebody trying to act "just coming along and voting".
FOS: SaberKitty[size=75]Music makes the world go 'round,
there's no life without a sound.[/size]-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
I'm waiting for some sort of explanation from SaberKitty before considering switching. I still think that popping up right after being called out for lurking AND having participated on the site otherwise while the thread has been open is scummiest tell at this point. SaberKitty is close though.[size=75]Music makes the world go 'round,
there's no life without a sound.[/size]-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
Either you were lurking on purpose (scummy) or not paying attention to this game (poor play).Vesuvan wrote: Not noticing a thread is open when the other threads I've posted in are in a different forum is a scum tell now?
In my opinion this is a threat, with a purpose to keep yourself from claiming. Vesuvan, do you think your role is the sole one winning the game for the town? So precious a role, that when out on open, the game is lost for the town?Vesuvan wrote:If someone puts the lethal vote on, then they are running a very big risk of being lynched in turn the following day and there is a very good chance of them being scum.
I'm really torn between SaberKat and Vesuvan, when it comes to voting. I still feel Vesuvan is scummy, but SaberKat just passed him. I'm ready to put that lethal vote on Vesuvan though.
unvote: Vesuvan
vote: SaberKat[size=75]Music makes the world go 'round,
there's no life without a sound.[/size]-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
It isn't? The thread is open for three days, you're participating in other games and post in the thread only when it's noticed you're missing. Maybe it's just me, but for the first day vote I think that's a good reason enough.Vesuvan wrote:
Or logging onto the site quickly to post in two games that I was actively participating in and was able to reply to quickly, and not checking other forums since I didn't have time to.olio wrote: Either you were lurking on purpose (scummy) or not paying attention to this game (poor play).
Really, the point you're bringing up isn't much of a point at all.
So, when playing with you that "statement" is a sure way to keep you throwing in the last vote ever, right? What you're saying is that anyone putting a last vote on a un-claimed person is probably scum and the blame is always on them, not in the person who didn't feel like claiming. How it does fit for scum to get in that spotlight you also mentioned the last votegiver should in your opinion receive?Vesuvan wrote: It's not a threat; it's a statement of how I would expect players react when someone puts a lethal vote onto someone who has just explained themselves. That's a large part of why I am generally unwilling to claim without a good reason to do so.
My take in this situation is following and it differs from yours and Meme's I see:Vesuvan wrote: As to how important my role is, that should have no relevance whatsoever on my decision. If I'm a vanilla townie, then I'm better off unclaimed in that situation to keep our power roles hidden from the scum, who I don't doubt were on that bandwagon to either get a quick lynch or fish for information.
If you're vanilla townie being bandwagoned on day one, sacrificing yourself will keep power-roles that much longer in play and uncovered. In my opinion if the next person bandwagoned claims a real power-role, you've played poorly if you're townie.
I'm still of opinion that I have decent reason for myVesuvan wrote: wtf? You're ready to lynch someone for refusing to claim with no real reason? Added to the BS "logic" I've quoted above...day onevote and I still view your "statement" as a threat I'm not going to be afraid of.[size=75]Music makes the world go 'round,
there's no life without a sound.[/size]-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
-
-
olio Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1062
- Joined: August 6, 2004
- Location: Oulu, Finland
Vesuvan wrote: It it's a lethal lynching vote you're talking about, then I disagree entirely. You do that when you're reasonably sure that the person is scum, not for fairly weak reasoning - unless you're scum, that is.
Ok. In my opinion we've discussed about two different things here which are not related.Vesuvan wrote:
Yes, for yourolio wrote: I'm still of opinion that I have decent reason for myday onevote and I still view your "statement" as a threat I'm not going to be afraid of.day 1 voteyou have answered me. For yourwillingness to lynch based on a player not claiming under a weak bandwagonyou have convinced me that you are scum.
1) my reasoning behind my vote on you
2) putting in the lethal vote
I had a reason for my vote on you and I've moved forward when I found something more solid.
When it comes to number two, there's something in your playing style I think is selfish which in my opinion doesn't fit with pro-town play = scummy.
You said:
So, you'll be the sole person deciding if you'll claim or not, doing it only if you see reasons real enough in your opinion - no matter how many votes on you, no matter how powerful your role is, with statement "Whoever puts in the lynching vote should be considered scum". Maybe my logic is way off, but if everyone'd play like that we'd never get further than day one. No townies would be throwing in the lynching vote, as those nearing the lynch could just spam that statement.Vesuvan wrote: If I don't see a reason to claim, I state why and ask for a reason why I should do so from those calling for my claim. If someone puts the lethal vote on, then they are running a very big risk of being lynched in turn the following day and there is a very good chance of them being scum.
Of course, if I do see a "real reason" for the bandwagon, then I'll claim in that sort of situation.
What I was trying to say, is that I'll be willing to throw in that lynching vote if other pro-town players aren't.[size=75]Music makes the world go 'round,
there's no life without a sound.[/size]
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.