WutFlareonage wrote:I'd rather lynch less obvious scum
You really meant that???
OMG
We do need to kill ace9475, but Flareonage is next. Remember DeathNote.
WutFlareonage wrote:I'd rather lynch less obvious scum
Why do you think the two factions have uneven numbers of members?Flareonage wrote:I think there's 2 scum left. 1 nobody scum and 1 heartless scum. Even if we lynch one there probably won't be a scumbuddy left. That's why
In practice, you are defending ace5743 - if only by voting someone else. Scum does that all the time.Flareonage wrote:Now it sounds like I'm defending Ace. In the end lynching a scum is better then not lynching a scum and that's why I'm willing to switch to Ace if the town decides that is the better choice
Seeing the scum power roles, I was at first inclined to believe that they would be 3 per team, so I'm disappointed to see that I underestimated their numbers.Flareonage wrote:If I'm not mistaken that would make 4 nobodies and 3 heartless. That's just what I think. The usually mafia ratio I have seen is 2.5 townies for everyone 1 scum. That means a 26 player game would have 7 scum.
Nice, but you are going to have to explain why and show all your calculations.Shotty to the Body wrote:I'm down to kill Ace, I think DGB should go next tomorrow.
What lieStarbuck wrote:Now for my reads,
I rather feel that DGB is going out of her way to frame ace. I have caught her in a lie
Oh no my dear it isn't.Starbuck wrote:Inconsistency IS a scumtell, my dear.
Clearly you haven't been in as many scum teams as I. If scum worries about something, it's to appear CONSISTENT.UncertainKitten wrote:No. Actually, inconsistency tends to be anti town, but not necessarily scummy. Once again, it is the INTENT behind the inconsistency that matters, not the act of it. But it is really easy to point out inconsistency and claim it's scummy. Half the time someone believes you.
Just checked, and as a matter of fact, there is. It's called "Is it really Ansem?"Sajin wrote:@DGB- no miller ability?
Which one of these claimed vanilla? What about ace? What about my result that UK didn't do anything on Night 2? What is UK's role?Sajin wrote:Thanks DGB.
I think scum is of Hayker, Shotty, and UK
Btw, I just want to point out that we have 6 full claims on the table. (snow, DTM, Iec, Flare, DGB, Me) If we do not MC today, I think we should do so tomorrow.
Starbuck is innocent btw.....or at least does not show up as heartless/nobody to cop investigation. Discuss.
Stop tunnelling.Starbuck wrote:This is what you said her actions were. When did she claim them?
OMGFlareonage wrote:If anything, I would think Namine is a roleblocker. She wipes memories
FlaVR PLZStarbuck wrote:Town Bulletproof.
That's serialkilleriffic.Starbuck wrote:Town Bulletproof.
I was wrong about ace437829, but I do believe the above post is my roleblocker taunting me.Shotty to the Body wrote:DGB what was your result for last night?
I still think DGB is red scum. She claimed miller and she's been 'roleblocked' every night except one unless she has a result for today in which case I withdraw this argument. Also the 'I wonder why I haven't been killed *wink*' post puts me off significantly.
Vote DGB
Don't you recall how I posted in big orange letters demanding that SSK be lynched ASAP, then Cobalt, because I believed them to be buddies?UncertainKitten wrote:The SSK lynch was foolish NOT to push, regardless of alignment. the ace lynch was fenceish and you did get it in the long run, so it's worth looking at
Shotty had some fake details about his fake claim that didn't make sense so since I know it's all a lie already, who cares about the flavor? Do we need more fakery to be sure it's a lie?Starbuck wrote:@DGB - Why did you ask for my flavor and not Shotty's or UK's?
Not at all; I owe someone a lift in a few minutes, but I will melt your Swiss Cheese upon my return.Shotty to the Body wrote:DGB's 4103 is hilarious. Translation: 'I don't know how to dig myself out of this hole I hope someone else will for me!'
Yeah, it's not like my search for my roleblocker got us to lynch a townie, we hit the freakin' godfather.Shotty to the Body wrote:Nice try, you can only play that card so many times DGB. When I flip town who will be your roleblocker next?
OK, so it's an acceptable lynch, but it's pure policy, and yet fuzzy scummy? You claim to be a lyncher, and you decide to shy away from the world's most easily-gotten-away-with wagon to what, save zwet's miserable, worthless life???? Like your being off the wagon was going to hold off the lynch of a totally useless player? And for that, you were willing to let your WIN CON escape you? A 1/27 chance of losing the game even though zwet was going to be lynched no matter what???Shotty to the Body wrote:I unvoted Zwet because I his lynch, though acceptable, was pure policy and I actually felt fuzzy was scummy.
You haven't exactly been a paragon of scum hunting, so I call BS. If you're a lyncher, you're not scum hunting, what do care about scum hunting? You're on the right guy's lynch and you win the game.Shotty to the Body wrote:Scum-hunting was more important to me than a 1/27 (less than 4%!) chance Zwet might be the person I was looking for.
I did just look. Maybe it's a breadcrumb, maybe it isn't. It's possible that you're a third-party, or that you are the remaining red scum, if your wincon is truly to be on the blue GF lynch. I don't buy it either way.Shotty to the Body wrote:Also if you need a breadcrumb you can look at my ISO 63 I hinted that I was annoyed that Xemnas was NK'd.
Oh really. You think I'd want to end this game alone after bus'ing two buddies, including the Godfather, while I'm a roleblocked miller??? Ace wasn't the lynch yesterday, there were a lot of distractions, but I wasn't going to let him get away with it. Plus, he's one of the mafiates that's on the team that had two remaining members left. If he wasn't my roleblocker, he knew who was. Which reminds me. I have to go and fish who his buddy may be.Shotty to the Body wrote:DGB offered Ace up (who everyone thought was scummy before she really started pushing the wagon)
Sounds to me like to BELIEVE it - and you believe it because you are scum. You just said that I proved myself when I said that UKitten was action-less, and got it correct. It's too late in the game for you to lie that UKitten and myself are scums in cahoots, because there are two ISOLATED scums left.Shotty to the Body wrote:She threw us the bone that UK was action-less to prove herself
Yeah well you just changed your story from "I get a special power when I'm on Gorrad's lynch" to "I'm aShotty to the Body wrote:Now she's presenting these ridiculous theories about how it's 'balancing' for scum to have a greater incentive to go after other scum. None of theN apparently had such an ability, look at the role-names. If that was the case why wouldn't it be mirrored if it was for balance?
Makes no sense. Also, one scum was a claim killer so I expect more weird stuff.Shotty to the Body wrote:On top of that why would mafia power be based on voting? Mafia powers are based around KILLING because that's what mafia have control over.
Maybe it is, I certainly don't know.Shotty to the Body wrote:The only Heartless left (exploded flavor) is the one that killed Gorrad so s/he would already have gained from such a power if s/he had to kill Gorrad. It makes little sense for mafia to have to get a lynch on someone and it makes less sense such an ability would be used and not mirrored on both scum teams if the mod was trying to balance the Godfathers.
You're sounding exactly like ace54839, it must be the latest scum fashion.Shotty to the Body wrote:TL;DR:: DGB is bullshitting theories that don't even make sense out of her ass without providing much in way of actual content.
Please do...UncertainKitten wrote:I really don't feel like ISOing him, but if I must I will.