And so it starts.Starbuck wrote:Vote: ABR
Because it's been too long since we played
I have a bias against you, the reason why escapes me
First time I ever heard of not RV'ing later biting you in the ass. Griddle, how experienced at mafia would you say you are?McGriddle wrote:Lol yes, I am already in hot water, having 5 pages to read and not posting in one of them lol, I don't want not RVing to bite me in the ass later.ODDin wrote:Way to go being a nice obedient puppy and doing whatever you're told. "You didn't want to get into trouble"? Seriously?
Scummy. If you're going to vote for someone, you shoud never admit to it being just for "pressure". This is the reason I like ODDin, iLord, Diamondilium, etc.; you don't know whether they are just getting warmed up or they are genuinely ready for a lynch. That's what real pressure looks like. Announcing to the world that you are voting "for pressure" hardly even counts as a BW vote because you will unvote just as fast and with just as little reason as you came on with. If you're going to accuse someone of being scum, you better put your balls on the motherfucking table.wolframnhart wrote:Ya know, let's get a little pressure going here, get some more people to post.
vote tate
Tate you had 3 votes (now 4) on you and haven't posted much. Thoughts so far?
I agree. There is absolutely no reason to give your town reads on Day 1 unless you are trying to make people feel safe...and why would you want that?McGriddle wrote:Finding town is never scummy, telling us who you found town IS scummy. You aren't explaining your vote on him, just saying he is scummy.
Unvote, Vote: kmd4390
Remind me.ZazieR wrote:@ABR
We've discussed that before.
Hahaha?xRECKONERx wrote:Suave needs to post and his only posts in this game are godawful.
I don't think his vote n ODDin is scummy in itself.iLord wrote:The first one is a decent length complete sentence with normal punctuation. Then, when I call him out on his post, he magically decides that he was "changing his posting style." He starts chopping up his sentences and abandoning his original wordiness. The style between these two posts is markedly different - the difference even extends as far as to quotes - he uses quotes in the first post, but in the second opts to use the "@" format.
This changing playstyle thing is BS to cover up for ODDin wagon.
Unvote, Vote Diamonddillium
This defense of kmd reeks of scum.animorpherv1 wrote:WHAT ARE YOU ON???? There's something called towntells, ya know.McGriddle wrote:Finding town is never scummy, telling us who you found town IS scummy. You aren't explaining your vote on him, just saying he is scummy.
Unvote, Vote: kmd4390
vote:McGriddle
For someone so intent on complaining about other players lurking, you don't seem to come up with much of a case except pointing at random lurkers, reckoner...and as if that wasn't enough, I don't understand any of the posts you make.xRECKONERx wrote:MrSuave in iso:
0: "zomg forgot about this game i'll reread brb"
1: "blah blah blah fluff contentless post blah blah blah"
2: "i promise i'll post content"
3: questions/disagrees with manho on his FoS on McGriddle
4: reiterates iso 3 all over again
THAT'S IT.
He's floating by. Under the radar. Like scum do.
And are you even going to explain this?xRECKONERx wrote:This McGriddle wagon is godawful. Please, join me on the Suave wagon ladies and gents.
This ^^^wolframnhart wrote:Actually now that I think about it, why do you believe MrSuave is the best wagon? As far as I can find the only thing(s) you have against him are his posts and inactivity. As it stands you have already apologized for being inactive yourself.
Get with the program Starbuck, you're on THE INTERNET. Where every troll is posting vulgarity from the safety of their mother's basements. This isn't the first time I see you tripping because of a little verbosity; if you're not happy ask for replacement, don't waste our time.Starbuck wrote:Btw, it's not circumstantial ad hom, it's abusive ad hom imho.
Where did this come from?Kmd4390 wrote:ODDin, I very rarely FoS. If I have a second suspect, I'll state that I'm willing to vote them. You can probably only find about 5 times I have EVER FoS'd anyone and some of those were in the RVS.FoS ODDin
Ya. DON'T LYNCH POWER ROLES.ODDin wrote:2) The way I understand it, if the zombies target a vanilla, he becomes a zombie, but if the zombies target a PR, the PR simply dies. So, it's not clear whether we want the zombies to target VTs or PRs - on one hand, we lose a PR, on the other, we don't gain another zombie. I guess it depends on the strength of the PR. I'm not really sure what this means, strategically. Should this change the circumstances under which PRs claim and such?
What do you think about Reckoner and McGriddle?WRP_Beater wrote:Ok, to answer all of your questions about me:
Iusuallynever place random votes and all of the people Iusuallyplay with find scummy to random vote without information. I do, too. I really haven't understood why you place them like that yet.
Ongoing game where I caught RECK as scum.wolframnhart wrote:OK I have a bit to post during my V/LA so i thought I would try to catch up while I could. I do not really see Reck asking for a mod kill, his reaction was much like mine, however since farside already explained the situation and then he still went on about it, along with his major over reaction and big caps lock frenzy it makes me wonder about Reck. This game has so many "will post later's" I really don't know how many could/are lurking town or lurkign scum, so I will give tate a chance to actually post something before deciding on him. for nowIGMEOY Reck
Can you link to the specific posts in question that brought you to this conclusion?ODDin wrote:Hmm, I followed iLord's example and browsed the game reck linked to. Seems like it supports that that's the way he behaves when being accused, what with the caps and f-words. So, this makes his play look even less like scum-under-pressure to me.
Blatant avoidance of scumhunting by the following means: policy lynching, OMGUS, obsession with lurkerdom, arguing about modkills, posting vulgarity, calling everyone an idiot.animorpherv1 wrote:Someone explain why Reck is a good lynch. I see WIFOM.
So please enumerate the pro-town points you see thenanimorpherv1 wrote:I wouldn't call OMGUS, the modkill bit as part (Seriously, his post had "That's a blatantly modkillable offense." If I said that, does that makesme scummy?).
Posting vulgraity/calling everyone an idiot/frustartion all seem to look like his playstyle, because I don't see anyone else act like that as scum when they ragequit.
So that leaves policy lynching and obsession with lurkers, and I can see both from town.
You must mean RECKONER.farside22 wrote:I looked into cooldog's post. CoolDog this is a warning please calm down and stop with the attacks and constant use of the F word. There in no need to be condescending. This game is for fun see rule 1.
What? What do you mean??ODDin wrote:Seeing that this is a cult game, I'm wondering whether it's more important to hit actual scum as early as possible, rather than removing dead weights. (Not saying I'm certain, but I am wondering.)
Both got lynched Day 1...both were town. May I suggest some scumhunting, kind sir? Maybe this would rally more men to our noble cause.Kmd4390 wrote:In this game, I went after DeathNote Day 1 in a similar way. Day 2, I did the same to Zakeri, even though there was a brief period where I pushed the Mipe lynch. Day 3, I did it to Hulk, who was scum. Day 4, Dramonicscum, who I had a guilty result on.ODDin wrote:kmd: repeating "X is scum, vote for him," over and over and over (and over) again, and more or less implying that everybody doing otherwise is WRONG.
Especially on D1.
Heres one where I'm pushing Haylen all of Day 1.
Players edit their posts during the preview page ani.animorpherv1 wrote:???? You EDITED your post?Kmd4390 wrote:edit: I now see that Animorph has switched to Tate as well. Interesting. Not sure what to make of that yet. I actually see it as a possible towntell I think.
I want it to be in the open. No surprises. No lack of surprises.Diamondilium wrote:I don't like this post at all. The scum hunting does appear to be genuine especially on point #3. If you think he's day cop then why call him out on it? You'd only be exposing a power role. The scenarios you presented also are questionable: one effectively assumes he's town, while the other assumes he's scum. Instead of debating which one's true as I would have expected from a scum hunting townie, you try to construe the former as scummy.
You are saying "I am right" with your certainty and "I am wrong" at the same time. Contradiction.Kmd4390 wrote:ABR,
1) So what if I was wrong in those games? Day 1 is a mislynch more often than not. Doesn't mean I'm not going to continue to try lynching who I think is scummy.
2) This doesn't even make sense as a scumpoint unless you work under the assumption that anyone on a mislynch is scum.
3) Not a daycop. Can't say much about the bussing accusation, but which is it? Am I setting myself up for "*Shrug*, I was wrong" or am I bussing? You can't have both.
I don't want to be crossed by a convenient coincidence.Diamondilium wrote:So it was your goal to have KMD claim or reveal his role?Albert B. Rampage wrote:I want it to be in the open. No surprises. No lack of surprises.
I want to see him say WHY he thinks people are scum. He's just tunnelling all day on 3-4 players for absolutely zero reason that I can see. It's unsettling. It's been unsettling all day.
I'm 99% sure he wasn't, but if he were scum he might have jumped on the opportunity and said that he was. Ergo, it was a trap admiral ackbar!ODDin wrote:Also, abr: Diamond has already said it, but you suggesting that kmd was a daycop was pretty damn bad.
Between what you did in this game and what you did in last game...yeah.McGriddle wrote:It was an honest mistake. Get over it. There is a VERY big difference between a lie and a mistake. Lynch. I obviously don't give a crap
If I may correct you, I asked if he was a Daycop. He wasn't.Diamondilium wrote:Vote: Albert B. Rampage, for blatant role fishing yesterday, that *ahem* specifically speculated on KMD's role as cop, who oddly enough JUST DIED LAST NIGHT.
I can think of at least one reason: you have a gut feeling that he's lying, but youiLord wrote:How is the fact that townies lying being uncommon make it scummy for me to recognize it when it occurred?evil wrote:Yes, I am voting you for correctly pegging McGriddle as lying town, because lying townies are rare, when lying scum is common. It's a weird conclusion to draw.
Absolutely not. If you disagree with my statement then you must prove it.Starbuck wrote:I would definitely feel that ABR is more likely to do it as scum. He's trying to shift focus off himself.
My whole point in this is that what he said may or may not be fact. We don't know. Therefore, it is WIFOM and ABR stating it like it is fact is scummy.
D explained why he's voting me. I don't reach the same conclusion as him by facts alone, and I find him scummy. Reckoner is just bandwagonning someone that suspected him on Day 1. I think that's scummier. And I don't think Reckoner is smart enough to do anything different than what he's been instructed to do.iLord wrote:You lost me.ABR wrote:Unvote, vote Reckoner
Scummier than Diamondilium, yet not smart enough to know which string to pull to close the red curtains. But scummier nonetheless.
Reckoner has been doing much of the same thing, why not vote for him instead?elvis_knits wrote:It does not seem like you are really scum hunting becuase you're picking ALL easy targets.
Cooldog is voting for reckoner.farside22 wrote:Pie_is_good (2) Wolframnhart
Albert R (1) xRECKONERx
bv310 (1) ODDin
iLord (2) evilsnail, manho
evilsnail (1) iLord, Starbuck
Reckoner (2) Albert B. Rampage, CooLDoG
Wolf (1) elvis_knits
not voting:
animorpherv1
MrSuave
Nobody Special
Pie_is_good
Yosarian2
CryMeARiver
bv310
Diamondilium
With 18 players it takes 10 to lynch
Deadline is Sunday March 21st, 10:00am PST
xRECKONERx wrote:This is not pressure:McGriddle wrote:It's called pressure, and you obviously can't take it. ie. freaking out, and personal attacks
It's a completely BLATANT misrep of what actually happened and what I said. Either CooLDoG is town and you're scum trying to actually give this awful awful post some validity (lol pressure), or you're both scum. How the fuck did I miss that before? In either scenario, you're scum.CooLDoG wrote:Is this anything other then an omgus?
And lets see where my vote is? NOT ON YOU. Wooops looks like theirs some tyupe of hole in your plan. anyway I don't feel like your vote can be anything other then an omgus. And why did you want a mod kill soooo bad? "because it was modkillable , plz kill him " next we say "KILL THE MOTHERFUCKER> HE SHOULD BE MODKILLED!! !!!! IT WAS DESERVED!!!! " Why did you want a mod kill so bad? And is their anything that I must answer to other then an omgus. And look up how many other people said that you seemed over zelous for a mod kill. Again I'm not voteing you. I want my vote on the scummy/lurking tate for the moment.
Unvote; Vote: McGriddle
xRECKONERx wrote:-_-CooLDoG wrote:Just settle down and post content, and scum hunt (sorry that this sounds bad comeing from me).
Yes. Yes, it does.
Unvote; Vote: CooLDoG
Posts like this = reckoner is scum. I already made at least two posts explaining in more detail if anyone (starbuck) cared to check.xRECKONERx wrote:Vote: ABR
Hellll yeahhhhh boooyyyyyy.