Because my son is cuter then hers
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
This caught my eye.FC wrote:Well for the reason to unvote, see the post itself. My only reason to vote Dana was to get him posting, which he did although his post didn't add much. About not voting, I didn't see the point. I believe twoheadedcyclops had no votes at that time (might have been wrong here, didn't count) so a FOS would seem to have the equal effect as a simple vote.
Also, I don't think its time to "vote" yet. (As in trying to seriously getting people lynched or to L-1/L-2) There are plenty of votes already (mostly on K 7 and Wreckstar) and those guys started talking. At first I thought it was scummy not to take part in the RVS stage, but apparantly, also according to you, its very normal for K-7. Since we got that cleared out, I was surprised to see twoheadedcyclops join the K-7 bandwagon right after, which I described as "late". About Wreckstar's bandwagon, I also commented that it seems mostly random or based on disliking him.
I could simply vote for him now, since he'd be a considerable alternative now. (3 votes if I include mine? Sorry, its late so I fail at counting) However, I obviously wouldn't call for a lynch yet. Or will it be scummy now that I vote after being pressured into voting? Guess I'll find out soon enough.
If you didn't expect a well based vote why bother voting him at all?FC wrote:1 He voted and there were no serious/well based bandwagons so far so I didn't expect a well based vote. His activity is lacking compared to other's but he did post. If you want more of him, feel free to pressure him yourself.
So you voted because if you didn't it would seem scummy? I find scum are more worried about what people think about their actions. Why would THC have to be the best alternative? Because he had votes against himself? You could have looked at the other players and found someone else2 Yes, my vote had other reasons. 1, I was asked to vote because it seemed scummy to withhold a vote, so I picked the best alternative there was according to myself. 2, I did and do not expect that this vote will lead to a lynch, but if Wreckstar or K-7 would get on 7 or 8, the odds might go up.
You are new to this site, but not mafia if i remember correctly from your posts in the Queue, and when semi-old guy voted you and started asking you questions you "believed him" about K7 and now have gone towards THC.3 Yep, I'm new to this site so I don't know any of you or how you all play. Since no one bothered to argue against semioldguy, I assume he was right. Also considering no one voted for K-7 afterwards except twoheaded, I think he was right as well.
as far as i see this is the only real time you mention anything against THC:4 I'm not convinced twoheadedcyclops is scum, but I do consider him more likely to be scum right now. Why? See my earlier post(s) about him and also because I think both alternative bandwagons aren't well founded as I've said a few times before. K-7 for not partaking in discussions apparantly and Wreckstar for personal reasons. I think the bandwagons on these guys will lead to nothing unless some new facts about these guys come up, so I do think it would be wise to change to focus to other people.
Because he joined a bandwagon late. And how can you think that a bandwagon against someone who is not taking part in discussions (which is what you say about K-7) will lead to nothing?FC wrote:<snip>FOS: Twoheadedcyclops for joining the K7 bandwagon this late.
Bolding mine.THC wrote:Maybe I should have announced it earlier that I am a hydra.Although, it's kind of obvious with the name two headed cyclops.Sorry, if it bothers anyone.On the otherhand, I don't really care anyway haha.Now we can proceed on with the quicklynch of the inferior hydra.
I'm sorry i must have missed something/my head not on straight. What are you asking?ooba wrote:This is w.r.t Wolf's role name. Do you agree with the claim for info on additional abilities of THC, Wolf?
I don't really like this post much. Now nothing against farside, but I don't know why CMAR just straight calls her a townie. Farside's not pining my scumdar but i wouldn't just call her a townie just yet. This post feels more like CMAR trying to appear too townie (if that makes sense).CMAR wrote:Something is telling me that this is a ploy to get us to kill a townie. This is ridiculous, let's try to ignore this for now since I doubt 8 people would vote farside without getting anything out of it.
ok. point being?CryMeARiver wrote:I hardcore LOL at this due to your most recent post in a different game that I'm not in and I just wondered upon.wolframnhart wrote:Well first:I don't really like this post much. Now nothing against farside, but I don't know why CMAR just straight calls her a townie. Farside's not pining my scumdar but i wouldn't just call her a townie just yet. This post feels more like CMAR trying to appear too townie (if that makes sense).CMAR wrote:Something is telling me that this is a ploy to get us to kill a townie. This is ridiculous, let's try to ignore this for now since I doubt 8 people would vote farside without getting anything out of it.
Second:
@BV310
Specific posts please to back up your vote.
Not off the top of my head, yet that doesn't mean a possible scum wouldn't do it, one can never say exactly what someone else will/won't do as scum. Like I said I am not completely sure of him being scum, I only think it be a slight possibility to watch out for, hence my questions.farside22 wrote:I know myself to be town so I don't see a scum modivation for making a claim that early. Do you?
Same.farside22 wrote:No, but I'm terrible at looking for things like that.CryMeARiver wrote:Farside or Wolf: Did you notice my breadcrumbing?
Probably because you weren't posting at all, it's due to that that makes me have a hard time believing you, though on the flip side I don't know if you would do this as scum and out yourself so early.bv310 wrote:Posting in response to prod. And since you brought it up Farside, the "read" on Wreck is more of the "Guilty investigation" variety. Not sure why I didn't say it before.
Yea it wasn't meant to be a true vote, and i probable used the wrong wording anyways.Kdub wrote:wolframnhart wrote:pre-emptive vote on WreckStarNot completely sure about your intention here, so I'm going to take the conservative route and say this vote doesn't count.
I cannot find anywhere in this: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Chewbacca Saying that chewbacca was a former freighter pilot that reluctantly joined the alliance. I see that Chewbacca and Han were smugglers, which i believe is different, and that they helped the rebellion, heck chewbacca even helped out in the clone wars with the jedi (though i realize the clone wars has no bearing on this game). Also see nothing about wanting to work independently, nor do i buy that chewbacca has a "homing beacon" because I see nothing that states the Millenium Falcon (which Chewbacca was crew or co-pilot of) having one. I see here: http://starwars.wikia.com/wiki/Homing_beacon that the empire has one, but nothing stating chewbacca or the Millenium has one.Wreck Star wrote:Holy shit, what the fuck is this nonsense? I take a few days off and bv310 conveniently pops back in with a guilty on me. Jesus H. Christ.
I guess we're being forced to claim since people are blindly believing this with no reason for flavor. I'm not sure what the fuck bv310 is smoking, but I'm certainly not evil.
I'm. Flavor talks about me being a former freighter pilot who was reluctantly convinced to join the rebel alliance, despite my desire to work independently from them, and I reluctantly joined. My ability is called "Homing Beacon", and it allows me to track one person each night.Chewbacca, Alliance Tracker
Last night, I tracked SOG to THC. No bullshit. See my post here where I randomly target SOG after not mentioning him previously after D2 starts. Then here, when we place an FoS on SOG. I wasn't sure if he was a town PR who happened to visit the NK victim or not, and I thought by applying soft pressure he might slip up and reveal some connections, which I could use to town's advantage. But here we go with me being forced to claim.
Vote: SOGunless he has a mighty convenient claim to explain why he visited THC last night.
@Town: seriously, just fucking trust me on this. I have no fucking clue why bv310 would get a guilty on me unless there's a redirect or some weird flavor shit going on, but let us lynch SOG today and you'll see how fucking right I am.
You gotta claim, SOG?
Oh did you now? Cuz I did an Iso and see no where you suspecting either of the lynch victims.Toon Fighter wrote:I suspected the lynch victims in days 1 and two, but wasn't online in time to vote.
And here you basically admit to lurking:Toon Fighter wrote:Hi, just read the game so far, and I don't really know what bandwagon to support right now.
K7 - seems very inactive, even with all the votes on him, and isn't really answering any question.
Wreck Star - seems to have nothing but RV and opportunity votes in his bandwagon. He responded against the people who voted him, and they crucified him. I don't see him as suspicious
THC - Here it smells a bit more scummy. He voted for Wreck Star claiming to get rid of the opposite hydra (that was WS' 3rd vote)(post 31), and they attacked each other in page 4. He unvoted WS when we felt pressured, and changed to the easiest target, K7 (post 95). I find that to be suspicious.
You wanted to lynch CMAR to confirm farside.Toon Fighter wrote:I haven't posted much, but I have been following the game.
You haven't contributed to anything, have lurked, lied about suspecting the lynches for the Day 1 and 2 (hell you even defended SOG), all in all are just plain scummy.Toon Fighter wrote:Well, looking at CMaR's claim, I think the best move as town would be to lynch him. If he turns up innocent, then we just lynched a (now vanilla) townie and confirmed farside as innocent. If he turns up guilty, then we have just lynched scum. What do you think?