I see that many of you are well trained in the words of Mao.
I will vote
Only the first half of that is my posting restriction (everything up to the exclamation mark; the rest is just me adding flavor). I figure I should mention this in case people start trying to google these phrases to see if they give any useful information about our roles.Yosarian2 wrote:The Chairman wrote:"The enemy will not perish of himself!" And indeed, we must find and crush those who would bring disaster to our dream.
While I have some theories on possible scum groups, I'd prefer to know how many night kills we have before we try to figure out the type and size of scum groups. There is also the possibility of a Mao influenced cult (the term cult of personality comes up a lot in Wikipedia's articles about the Cultural Revolution). And our glorious moderators might have thrown in an SK just for fun.Y wrote:I think we should start doing stuff that will get us closer to finding scum. The restrictions won't help until we have some deaths to guide ourselves by.
Figuring out how many mafiosos we have (7 or 8 would be my guess) could be a good start.
Huh? I'm pretty sure I've said no such thing; I've suggested that there could be 3 possible types of groups, but I don't claim to know anything about their exact makeup.Vaughn wrote:So Thok is stating that we have possibly 3 groups here? It's probable, with a game this large.
Posting restriction, which should be obvious to anybody's who has read Married to the Mob (Normal 43). Fritzler, I don't know who sent it, but there are obvious suspects.Twomz wrote:Thok, you do know that a SK was lynched yesterday, correct? Or was that a posting restriction?
The Unwritten wrote:Mafia can see the town saying 5 mafiates, when there are in fact 6.
But what ploy could they make of it? I've never seen the town fail because they thought of a different number of roles.
You shouldn't worry about it too much.
And for the vote count (posting merely for the sake of appearing to do something) and for flopping on his opinion of The Unwritten (he distinctly gave him advice before he claimed, then proceeded to vote him after he claimed).Glork wrote:For voting TU after his ability was confirmed, mayhaps?
I'm starting to get the feeling that Tamuz is being stupid rather than scummy, and that Glork, while a mason, has mislead us a little about the recruitables (or possibly has been mislead about them). I'm also trying to decide if we should just start lynching the recruitables as a safety measure.Hop Shui wrote:Then Mao blamed the sparrows for eating the rice, so that everyone was busy chasing and killing sparrows. Without the sparrows to eat them, the insects multiplied to eat every grain and seed.
Do you have other results to compare this to? This is the sort of theme where I wouldn't trust cop results this early unless you were specifically told your sanity.chamber wrote:ok w/e I probably shouldn't be doing this cause I don't know my sanity yet but : I have a guilty of fritz, this game has slowed and I don't see it going anywhere else today.
Hi igota! You hadn't posted for over 10 days before this last post. Want to tell us what you've been up to?igota75 wrote:I don't think that the BJ wagon is helpful in any way to the town. Twomz, you've been calling him out for his childish behavior, but examine the behavior of everyone on his wagon. Someone says, 'Hey, let's lynch BJ!" and 7 or 8 people just fall directly into line, INCLUDING the cop. In all probability, chamber got an innocent result. I just don't forsee him holding back a scum result, since, well, he hasn't once we 'confirmed' his sanity. These are the people we should be looking at for detrimental behavior.
Because it will force the recruiter to attempt to recruit people that areY wrote:Suggesting that two people that appear cleared for now would kill each other just to check something isn't such a good idea...
How will it slow down the recruiting?
1. chamber didn't give us mlaker; we caught him as a deadline lynch before on day 1 before any night actions occured.Of course he's a recruiter... He recruited Fritzler, Shamrock, Bacde andboth SKs. That's a good one.
FoS Thok.
I voted for you yesterday for being overaggressive in attacking BJ and mistating his claims in a way that seemd scummy to me. (That's the comments I made about you claiming that BJ was "implying he was a townie"). I am keeping my vote on you since you've also straw-manned my thoughts on chamber in what seems like an attempt to make me look bad.Y wrote:Actually, we didn't.
Accusations were thrown at me because of a random reason and before I had the chance to answer, chamber revealed his guilty and everybody changed their votes.
I have no problem with you saying that my theory is wrong. I would consider the above statement reasonable.Y wrote:Straw-manned? You were saying we shouldn't trust the cop after two guiltys, saying he might be a recruiter accusing his recruits after he identified a SK.I am keeping my vote on you since you've also straw-manned my thoughts on chamber in what seems like an attempt to make me look bad.
And in two sentences, you've given essentially the definition of what a strawman is. But keep arguing that you're not doing that.Y wrote:I reread the post and I know what you're talking about. That's calledcynicism. Not only that, I never said that you said it. I posted it as a cynic theory to prove what you're saying, thus proving the opposite.
I'm trying to decide if this means anything, now that it seems like the remaining scum is in fact a Mao influenced group (the Red Guards) with cultlike properties.Y wrote:What do you mean by that? I really think a Mao influenced cult would represent the mafia. That's the flavor of this game. What you're saying is pretty obvious...Thok wrote:There is also the possibility of a Mao influenced cult (the term cult of personality comes up a lot in Wikipedia's articles about the Cultural Revolution).
1. Feel free to explain what you think is the difference between "cynical" and "strawmanning"; otherwise we will be stuck arguing all day.Y wrote:I'm a cynical person. Being cynical and straw-manning are two different things.
The sentence you quoted was before I knew the difference between "Cult" and "Mafia", IIRC. I thought you were talking about the game's flavour.
I was speculating about the size of the scum group. So what? It's my fist non-newb game and I didn't know how we can proceed.
As a recruited player, I submit names. It's possible that it will do nothing depending on who has recruited me.Coron wrote:huh? townies submit names? huh?
So it's impossible that BJ could have been recruited you think? Why? I mean if it's voting patterns I've already covered that issue, and my voting patterns are as good if not better.